Jump to content

Jerry Jones starting to melt down


CorkScrewHill

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Success said:

In the '90's, I dreamed of this day.

 

Now, if the Pats could just have a similar 25+ years of disappointing play and heartbreaking playoff near-misses or 1st round exits.

 


The Patriot demise begun a week ago. 😁

58 minutes ago, FireChans said:

My dude, if we lose tomorrow on a QB draw with 14 seconds left, I guarantee Sean, not Beane, will be the guy talked about.


Maybe.

 

Though I think in this scenario, it’ll be Daboll who’d get the brunt of the blame thereby making his departure more palatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FireChans said:

My dude, if we lose tomorrow on a QB draw with 14 seconds left, I guarantee Sean, not Beane, will be the guy talked about.

If we call a QB draw with 14 seconds left in the game tomorrow, Josh will score on his own and win it. He is, after all, Josh @#%!ing Allen.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FireChans said:

For a guy who followed a team who missed the playoffs for 17 years, you seem to have quite a high bar now, huh

 

That makes long-time Bills fans experts in recognizing how incompetence in the FO/ownership results in incompetence on the football field. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoTier said:

 

That makes long-time Bills fans experts in recognizing how incompetence in the FO/ownership results in incompetence on the football field. 

It really doesn’t if they are calling 12-5 and a playoff berth less than average. Just shows that they are no different than Pats fans once they taste a little success.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FireChans said:

That's simply NOT true lol. I can list at least half a dozen teams that you couldn't list 9 players that would start on Buffalo.

 

More importantly, the names I listed aren't just upgrades to current Bills players, they are stars. Some of them are superstars.

 

More to the point, we can't have it both ways. We can't laugh at Dallas for underperforming and choking when they have a great roster, AND say their GM sucks at team-building.  It makes us look petty and stupid, instead of brilliant and right.

I'm not laughing at Dallas. They're a good team. But there is no way I can agree that Dallas has some sort of monopoly on league leading talent. There is great talent on EVERY team in the league at one position or another. That's the point. 

3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Cool!  Do it for the Jets, Lions, Giants and Jags.

What constitutes "nearly?" By your standards, that's 28 or 32 teams. How about I amend my comment to say "most" teams? How many is that and does it still include the four worst teams in the league to bolster your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, K-9 said:

I'm not laughing at Dallas. They're a good team. But there is no way I can agree that Dallas has some sort of monopoly on league leading talent. There is great talent on EVERY team in the league at one position or another. That's the point. 

What constitutes "nearly?" By your standards, that's 28 or 32 teams. How about I amend my comment to say "most" teams? How many is that and does it still include the four worst teams in the league to bolster your point?


not my standards—FireChan laid it out for you. Clearly I’m challenging you to do what you said you could do..for every team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, K-9 said:

I'm not laughing at Dallas. They're a good team. But there is no way I can agree that Dallas has some sort of monopoly on league leading talent. There is great talent on EVERY team in the league at one position or another. That's the point. 

What constitutes "nearly?" By your standards, that's 28 or 32 teams. How about I amend my comment to say "most" teams? How many is that and does it still include the four worst teams in the league to bolster your point?

Okay so tell me how many rosters top to bottom are more talented than Dallas?  6? 10?

 

They are a good team that underperformed. Unclear why you tried to challenge my overarching point to someone who doesn't agree with you that they are a talented team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

Okay so tell me how many rosters top to bottom are more talented than Dallas?  6? 10?

 

They are a good team that underperformed. Unclear why you tried to challenge my overarching point to someone who doesn't agree with you that they are a talented team.

They need a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...