Jump to content

Biden's Foreign Policy Already GettING Results


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

On 10/5/2022 at 4:16 PM, Doc said:

 

They might not have been in the past, but there's an election to be won...

You know the fed chairman is a republican right? 

On 10/13/2022 at 5:31 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Did Joe Biden Try to Blackmail the Saudis To Interfere With the Midterms?

 

Didn’t the Democrats impeach Trump over something like this?

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/10/13/did-joe-biden-try-to-blackmail-the-saudis-to-interfere-with-the-midterms-n1636725

 

 

.


impeachment #1 to pass through the house, now that the new standard is set

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Biden Licks Beijing’s Boots

 

 

The Biden Administration is headed now to the halfway point of its execrable term. Having managed to survive what was supposed to be a blowout midterm for their Republican rivals, Joe Biden and his team arefeeling their oats. They defied history: with record levels of disaster and misery surrounding his tenure, in a midterm election year in which incumbent parties almost always lose control of Congress, Biden is walking away with minimal damage. 
 

Yet a far greater spectacle of national disaster awaits the American people in the coming weeks: Biden’s meeting with China’s President Xi Jinping in Indonesia. And with the Democratic Party’s improbable survival in the midterms, Biden undoubtedly will confuse his blind luck with actual skill and attempt to finesse his way into better relations with Beijing—which of course will do lasting damage to U.S. national interests. 

 

https://amgreatness.com/2022/11/13/biden-licks-beijings-boots/

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Biden's new Saudi policy: Immunity for "pariahs"?

 

8643d475-bf95-4b75-96b4-3305218cca21-450

 

Remember when Joe Biden promised to treat the Saudis, and especially Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, like “pariahs” over the murder of Jamal Khashoggi? Good times, good times … 

 

At the time two years ago, Biden even made clear that the target of his ire would be the crown prince, and that he would make the entire Saudi nation “the pariah that they are”:

 

What a difference a lot of oil makes, eh? Biden famously went to Riyadh this summer to fist-bump the man he publicly accused of ordering Khashoggi’s murder to get MBS to pump more oil on our behalf. Instead, the Saudis cut production after Biden blew up the attempted diplomacy in his defense of the meeting, which everyone recognized as a giant FU to Biden.

 

So what does Biden do now? Hold the pariahs accountable, or suck up even more to the leader of a key strategic ally who Biden alienated for cheap political points in the campaign? If you picked Door Number 2, collect your prize:

 

The Biden administration has declared that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia should be granted immunity in a U.S. legal case over his role in the murder of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi, effectively blocking yet another effort to hold the kingdom’s leader accountable for the grisly crime. …

 

The action by the Biden administration angered human rights activists, who say that failing to punish Prince Mohammed, widely known as M.B.S., for the killing of a high-profile journalist could encourage other autocrats to do the same.

 

 

https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2022/11/18/bidens-new-saudi-policy-immunity-for-pariahs-n511972

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Don’t worry gun nuts - Gen Z will F you over on this issue in due time just like they did a couple weeks ago.


 

I believe I’ve mentioned it many times. I’m not a gun guy. It’ll be interesting to see if you’re right on this issue. Time will tell. 
 

By the way, in case you missed it….the House is now controlled by Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Don’t worry gun nuts - Gen Z will F you over on this issue in due time just like they did a couple weeks ago.


 

 

You've yet to give any meaningful ideas on how to reduce the number of gun deaths other than your utopian and impossible idea of taking away ALL guns.  Any other adult ideas?  Time to start adulting Billy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Why wouldn't he, with this administration.

 

Putin: Hey, I'll do more prisoner swaps like Griner-for-Bout, sure

NY POST 2:20 PM on December 09, 2022

 

Shortly after Brittney Griner landed in Texas early Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said more prisoner exchanges are possible between the two countries.

Putin said “everything is possible” when asked about future swaps, noting that “compromises have been found” to clear the exchange of the WNBA star for notorious arms dealer Viktor Bout.

 

“We aren’t refusing to continue this work in the future,” the Russian strongman added after a summit in Kyrgyzstan.

“Whether this could set stage for a dialogue with the U.S. is a separate issue,” the leader said. “We didn’t set the task to move from those talks to something else, but they do create a certain atmosphere.”

 

“A certain atmosphere” is putting it mildly. Having suckered this administration into handing back their best arms trafficker and terrorist supplier, why wouldn’t Putin want to see what else he can get out of Biden? 

 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/09/putin-says-more-us-prisoner-exchanges-are-possible/

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

 

 

 

The US and UK have stoked the fires to generate this conflict, the Russians obliged. Obviously that doesn't remove the Putin's responsibility - it just prevents our leadership from facing accountability.

 

That's why the narrative engineers have worked so hard to paint any questioning of our role in the war as being such a sin - they are providing cover for the bad actors inside our walls. The ones we, as citizens of the republic, are duty bound to keep in check.

 

So, to keep us from doing that they program people to "push back" when confronted with things that stray from the narrative, to proclaim that any variation from the narrative shows that you are "Pro-Putin" !

 

(see simpletons here)

 

 

.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

LOL

 

 

Trump launches a drone that kills a key architect of state sponsored terrorism, and he is derided.

 

Biden launches an F22 against a spy balloon that has already completed its mission, and is a war hero

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Joe Biden has poured out a ton of the time and treasure of the United States into the defense of Ukraine in its war with Russia.

 

Indeed, it seems like it’s the one thing that “shall not be questioned” in the Biden Administration in terms of funding: money for Ukraine. Not the defense of our border, mind you. Just Ukraine, with no clear end in sight.

 

However, despite all that, it appears that Joe Biden might have been willing to play appeasement games with Vladimir Putin, according to a report from the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ). NZZ said CIA director William Burns went to Moscow on a secret trip and offered Russia 20 percent of Ukraine to end the war. 20 percent of Ukraine would be about the size of the Donbas region that Russia claims. The Washington Post reported that last month, Burns had met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv. Supposedly the deal was submitted in January.

 

The offer didn’t go over well with either Ukraine or Russia. One would imagine that Ukraine was not too happy with being sideswiped by the deal.

 

Kyiv reportedly shut down the proposal “because they are not willing to have their territory divided” while Russian officials said they “will win the war in the long run anyway,” reported NZZ, which has been described as the Swiss newspaper of record.

 

Sean Savett, the deputy spokesperson for the National Security Council said the report was “not accurate.” That’s an interesting remark because they didn’t say “completely untrue” — not accurate can mean there’s one part of the report that isn’t true but the rest is substantially true. If the WaPo report is to be believed, why then did Burns go to meet with Zelensky if there wasn’t something afoot?

 

{snip}

 

Let’s remember how (and maybe why) this all started and the signals that seemingly being cool with “minor incursions” can give.

 

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/02/05/report-did-biden-offer-putin-a-secret-deal-on-ukraine-n699030

 

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-vladimir-putin-ukraine-territory-end-war-nzz-report-1778526

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

AND NOW, THE AWARENESS GAP

 

President Biden sat down for an interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff yesterday. Students of ancient history may recall the “credibility gap” whose power was deemed to have brought down a president or two. I would like to seize on Pentagon bureaucratese to declare that we have an “awareness gap” in the Biden administration from the top down. In one of the video clips of Woodruff’s interview with Biden below, the president shows no awareness of a proper response to the exposure of the Chinese spy balloon last week.

 

Biden thinks that the relationship between China and the United States should remain a thing of beauty. The CCP regime paid good money for it and Biden means to deliver good value.

 

Biden’s first response is to state falsely that he spoke with Xi himself to support the proposition that everything is beautiful. But why? Someone must wake the president up.

Biden was obviously misleading about his alleged chat with Xi last week, as becomes evident within a few seconds. He does not seem to be aware that some more compelling response than his own somnolence is called for. What we have coming into plain view here is the credibility gap superimposed on the awareness gap. It should be a lethal combination.

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/02/and-now-the-awareness-gap.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

US foreign policy reduced to an afterthought

Joe Biden’s State of the Union speech skipped foreign policy for a reason.

By Marwan Bishara

 

US President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night was quite upbeat. It was long on domestic affairs and short on foreign policy. It skimmed through the challenges posed by Russia and China and skipped the rest of the world altogether.

 

It is a first for a US president to reduce the United States’ global role to an afterthought, no less a president who considers himself an authority on foreign policy, or for a commander-in-chief, who has spent so much time, effort and political capital confronting Russia in Ukraine and containing China in Asia. This, therefore, begs the question: Why has Biden chosen to ignore entire continents and countless hot spots where America is directly involved?

 

According to one theory, Americans are not terribly interested in the rest of the world and foreign policy is an unaffordable luxury at a time of economic hardships and culture wars. Even the elites with greater overseas interests realise that costly investment in foreign policy is becoming a hard sell for the public in the absence of direct national security threats.

 

Biden understands that, which is why when he first took office, he vowed to end the “forever wars” and promised a “foreign policy for the middle class” – one that serves Americans at large.

 

But that has proven easier said than done, as Washington has channelled billions of dollars to Ukraine to fight a war that may last years amid warnings from populist Republicans about high inflation, the high cost of living, and high national debt.

 

Hence the president, who seems keen on pursuing a second term, dialed down the costly global bravado in his speech and instead focused on “made in America” growth and prosperity. His call on Congress to tax billionaires and big corporations and lower the costs of drugs – aligning him with the “progressive left” led by Senator Bernie Sanders – may prove more popular among working and middle-class families than, say, restoring Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

 

According to another theory, however, there is not much to celebrate in US foreign policy, which is why the president decided to skip the subject altogether. 

 

The two theories are not mutually exclusive.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/2/8/us-foreign-policy-reduced-to-an-afterthought

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Getting results.

 

 

 

Biden Diplomats Trying to Block U.K. Plan to Designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as Terror Group

by Jeff Zymeri

 

Biden administration diplomats are trying to block a U.K. plan that would see Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) designated as a terror group, despite the fact that the U.S. took similar steps during the Trump administration.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/biden-diplomats-trying-to-block-u-k-plan-to-designate-iran-militia-as-terror-group/

 

 

.

  • Shocked 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken pledges another $444 million to Yemen

money-furnace-burn.jpg

 

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2023/02/27/secretary-of-state-antony-blinken-pledges-another-444-million-to-yemen/

A humanitarian crisis brought to you by major US arms purchaser Saudi Arabia.  Blinken's announcement is in keeping with the State Department's primary mission to help blow things up and then fix them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

 

More "results"

 

 

MAYBE IT WAS A BAD IDEA FOR BIDEN TO CALL THEM A PARIAH STATE: 

 

Saudi Arabia joins the new Axis of Evil.

 

The biggest story breaking on Friday was clearly the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the existential threat that may pose to America’s economy and possibly the global marketplace as well. But as the New York Post pointed out yesterday, the downfall of SVB may not carry the same long-term impact as another story that received far less attention. Friday was also the day that Saudi Arabia announced that it has restored its diplomatic ties with Iran. Making the announcement even more worrying is the fact that the deal was brokered by China. The possible upside to the story is that such an agreement may mark an end to (or at least a significant decrease in) the ongoing proxy war that the two nations have been fighting in Yemen. The obvious downside is that the Saudis will be pulled more closely into the Axis of Evil that has grown around China and Russia.

 

 

https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2023/03/12/saudi-arabia-joins-the-new-axis-of-evil-n536497

 

 

 

I was told that the Biden Administration would return us to smooth diplomacy and happy allies.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
16 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

America is back!

SAUDI ARABIA TO CUT OIL OUTPUT BY 500,000 BARRELS/DAY FROM MAY

KUWAIT TO CUT OIL PRODUCTION BY 128,000 BARRELS/DAY

UAE TO REDUCE OIL PRODUCTION BY 144,000 BARRELS/DAY FROM MAY

KAZAKHSTAN TO CUT 78K B/D TO OPEC+ OUTPUT CUT

IRAQ TO CUT 211,000 B/D OF OIL OUTPUT FROM MAY

ALGERIA TO CUT 48K B/D OF OIL OUTPUT FROM MAY TO END 2023

OMAN TO CONTRIBUTE 40K B/D TO OPEC+ PRODUCTION CUT

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...