Jump to content

Tyler Kroft positive COVID result reported Sat am [EDIT: now said to be false pos and he's active again]


RiotAct

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

Sucks for them for sure but this really good news team-wise


 

really sucks when you consider the likelyhood of him playing and getting some positive tape before likely facing FA next year. 
 

Mistakes cause career issues is not a good look.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

Sucks for them for sure but this really good news team-wise

Quite literally the best possible outcome for the team after he tested positive yesterday.

13 minutes ago, whatdrought said:


 

really sucks when you consider the likelyhood of him playing and getting some positive tape before likely facing FA next year. 
 

Mistakes cause career issues is not a good look.

I was going to say he'll get time in the playoffs but if Gilliam comes back that might not be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Quite literally the best possible outcome for the team after he tested positive yesterday.

I was going to say he'll get time in the playoffs but if Gilliam comes back that might not be true.

 

I mean, he was a healthy scratch all the weeks our offense was playing best... Doubt he plays much, if any, in the playoffs. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:


if this is true, this is a problem. He had 5 negative tests after the arguably false positive test. Imagine if this had been a key player in a playoff game. 
 

I would be interested to hear the NFL’s side of the story. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hapless Bills Fan changed the title to Tyler Kroft positive COVID result reported Sat am [EDIT: now said to be false pos and he's active again]

Pufnstuf just can't catch a break.  For some reason, he's in McD's doghouse, while Featherstone continues to drop room service each week.  On top of that, he's got the NFL doing him dry.  The last thing the NFL should be doing is sidelining guys with false positives.

Edited by Freddie's Dead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2021 at 1:02 PM, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Better safe than sorry. He still gets paid. I'd rather err on the side of keeping the rest of the team un-infected (?lol) going into the playoffs.

That was the only question I wasn't sure of.  Though he could have possibly reach incentives if he wasn't ruled out for those games.   Not sure if he has any or not but it could be possible.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


if this is true, this is a problem. He had 5 negative tests after the arguably false positive test. Imagine if this had been a key player in a playoff game. 
 

I would be interested to hear the NFL’s side of the story. 

 

It's going to happen, and they absolutely err on the side of safety. Just the way it is this year.

 

NFL's side of the story: We're doing the best we can to prevent the spread of a pandemic while still having a season.

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2021 at 6:05 PM, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I understand your point and appreciate your service....but one difference you may be overlooking is that you signed on, knowing TDY you would not see your family.

 

The NFL and NFLPA negotiated how the season would work and explicitly excluded a bubble or lockdown.  So saying to them "lockdown now" would be changing the terms of their employment.  Maybe they'd agree, but the NFL isn't the military, and they can't just dictate or change the terms unilaterally.  The players have got to buy in.

 

It's also not likely for a lockdown or bubble to be effective unless you also lockdown all the staff who have player contact - trainers, medical, coaches, I'm not sure who all.  You gotta know this, you're only as strong as your weakest link.

Extraordinary times deserve Extraordinary measures. 

 

I agree with your points. 

 

My point is of course a hypothetical. I would like to think that most,  if not all players would buy in to sequestration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

NFL's side of the story: We're doing the best we can to prevent the spread of a pandemic while still having a season.

 

 

NFL isn't.  For playoffs they should use two tests with 2 different companies (that might interfere with $ponsor$) and only prohibit players from player if both say negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...