Jump to content

Black Lives Matter Messaging at "The Stadium"


SectionC3

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Who does? Who's a "leftist elite"?

Absolutely.  There are 6 major news outlets in the US that control 90% of the media.  All owned by leftist elites.  Fox news is also moving in that direction over the last year.  Campuses around the country have been censoring conservative viewpoints routinely while liberal platforms are not challenged.  What happened to the debate between two sides, where actual solutions are created?  Hollywood?  Constantly promoting liberal view points.  How much conservatism have you heard in Hollywood over the last decade?  

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said:

Sure. America ranks 27th when it comes to a poor person's ability to improve their economic standing:
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-social-mobility-of-82-countries/

Right behind Lithuania.

Why, because that left wing page says so?

 

Btw, how many screen names do you have on this board?

Edited by Bill from NYC
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, StHustle said:

I'm DONE with this team. With The Stadium. With the NFL. How dare they post messaging that says black lives matter. What about the other entitled races who hate anything they dont feel included in? Its boils my blood anytime I hear the phrase "Black Lives Matter" HOW DARE THEY LEAVE US OUT ?

 

-The overtly covert racist

 

 

 

Adios.  Arrividerci.   Auf weidersehen.  Aurevoir.    Don't let the door hit ya where you keep your brain   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Why, because that left wing page says so?

 

Btw, how many screen names do you have on this board?

What about the page tells you that it's left wing?
Did you read that the data is a visualization of the annual report from the World Economic Forum?
Are you suggesting their data is incorrect and intentionally politically biased?
If so, do you have data to support your claims?
Do you have data to support an improved social mobility score for the USA?
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

man, the millions of immigrants and refugees coming here every year have it all wrong then!

 You can be from the 54th country on the list and 27 is still an improvement. Why people immigrate and where from is a whole separate discussion.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, swimtoga said:

Link?

Go to "black lives matter" 

17 hours ago, Logic said:

Since my good friends @dwight in philly and @Buffalo716 decided to somehow rope Antifa into this thread, I thought I'd share this article with them:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/27/us-rightwing-extremists-attacks-deaths-database-leftwing-antifa

Deaths cased by anti-fascist violence since 1994: 0
Deaths cased by far-right violence since 1994: 329

But please...do go on about how dangerous anti-fascists are. 

Nothing like parroting the breathless, fact-free pearl clutching of such visionaries as Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity! 

If you find the leader of Antifa or can locate any of their weekly meetings or official creeds, please let me know.

As to the subject that this thread is about: Good for the Bills organization.

I can't imagine actually being upset that a sports team feels that the lives of the players that make up the majority of its roster actually MATTER. The Gall!

 

All due respect , i think you are full of sh @#t its not about antifa.. its about what "black lives matter" actually is . 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mango said:


That park was admittedly snarky. 
 

I was refuting you’re claim that you had a better chance of socioeconomic mobility in America than “any other place on earth.” Taken quite the step back, eh? 
 

Most resources qualify 25-30 countries as first world. Your claim of 20th isn’t so great amongst isn’t so great amongst its peers, is it? 
 

Since this is a football board, let’s make it anecdotal to football. 
 

You: K’Lavon Chaisson was the first pick in the NFL draft. 
Me: Actually he wasn’t, here are the order of draft picks. 
You: There were what, 255 draft picks in the 2020 draft? 20 is still really good. 
Me: Sure, but that’s not what you said, nor what the conversation was about. 
 

Or maybe you should just call Auburn National Champs. I get they weren’t number 1, but they were top 10% and that’s pretty good! 
 

 

I don't think there's probably a huge difference between number 1 and number 15 or 20. Both have tons of economic freedom

 

Also look at the size differences of those countries. America is massive compared to Denmark and most of those top countries population wise

 

We have a lot more people to worry about economically. 

 

and historically first world second world and third world has nothing to do with economic status. It was a labeling system during the Cold war

 

First world countries were countries that supported the allies. Second world countries were communist Bloc, and third world countries were neutral.. 

 

The terms were not economic. All Western European nations are first world countries by grouping.

 

Whatever people have done with the term over the last 30 years I'm indifferent towards, But First world countries were specifically the allied Bloc during the Cold war. That was the original use

 

And America's GDP ls still #1

 

 

 

 

Edited by Buffalo716
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

I don't think there's probably a huge difference between number 1 and number 15 or 20. Both have tons of economic freedom

 

Also look at the size differences of those countries. America is massive compared to Denmark and most of those top countries population wise

 

We have a lot more people to worry about economically. 

 

and historically first world second world and third world has nothing to do with economic status. It was a labeling system during the Cold war

 

First world countries were countries that supported the allies. Second world countries were communist Bloc, and third world countries were neutral

 

The terms were not economic. All Western European nations are first world countries by grouping

The difference between Denmark(85.2) and the USA(70.4) is roughly the same as the USA and Thailand(55.4).

In other words, The USA is Denmark's Thailand.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

How do you know the bills don’t simply support the point that the lives of blacks matter?  It’s an important discussion piece.  African -American players are more likely to want to play in an area in which they are accepted and respected not just for what the accomplish on the field, but for who they are as human beings.  The Pegulas made a good move here.  It was a solid football and human decision to post that message.

Sorry. It’s fine to support helping the black community but NOT supporting an organization who has anti-social goals in their mission statement. Whatever pandering the Bills are trying to gain is going to be counter-balanced by the backlash of people who have researched the BLM platform and deplore it. Just look at this thread. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DE Bills Fan said:

Sorry. It’s fine to support helping the black community but NOT supporting an organization who has anti-social goals in their mission statement. Whatever pandering the Bills are trying to gain is going to be counter-balanced by the backlash of people who have researched the BLM platform and deplore it. Just look at this thread. 

How come you assume that saying "Black Lives Matter" is equivalent to support for a website that (to my knowledge) was started after the phrase became part of modern lexicon?  In other words, what if the Bills simply support the point that the lives of black people matter?  And what if that "pandering" is good for the football and business sides of the organization?  Would your principles be compromised by supporting that position?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DE Bills Fan said:

Sorry. It’s fine to support helping the black community but NOT supporting an organization who has anti-social goals in their mission statement. Whatever pandering the Bills are trying to gain is going to be counter-balanced by the backlash of people who have researched the BLM platform and deplore it. Just look at this thread. 

You made it clear that it's actually you with the anti-social goals since you believe certain groups of people don't qualify as "family". How does denying their idea of a family make yours stronger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

The only people who are in Robert Stack's level is Alex Trebek and Steve Harvey.

 

?

 

Welp, I can see this conversation is definitely not going to be as congenial as the rest of this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...