Ya Digg? Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 minute ago, mannc said: He’s not talking about moving up. I think he’s talking about keeping 54 and buying one of the first 5 picks this afternoon. That’s a fair trade. But it’s not even close to a fair trade. You are trading a first round pick for a second round pick. Even if you just take a look at a couple of the lists that have been posted on here, these lists are 20 guys long-that tells me there isn’t that ONE guy who the bills have to have. Plus it keeps getting mentioned that the Bills really don’t have a NEED anywhere. So again I have to disagree, not a fair deal at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny33 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 hour ago, jkx2 said: If you feel the Bills will be a playoff team next year and therefore will draft again in the bottom part of the draft again next year. Would you give up next years 1st to be in the top 5 of today's 2nd round. It would give us one more piece this year and is there really a big difference in the bottom of the 1st and beginning of the 2nd? No, but I would give up this year’s 2nd for a 1st next year depending on who falls to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Most likely not. One variable to look at is the quality of next year's draft. That was one positive of giving up a #1 for Watkins, the 2015 draft was not very good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. 1 hour ago, jkx2 said: If you feel the Bills will be a playoff team next year and therefore will draft again in the bottom part of the draft again next year. Would you give up next years 1st to be in the top 5 of today's 2nd round. It would give us one more piece this year and is there really a big difference in the bottom of the 1st and beginning of the 2nd? Fix the thread title and don’t start another nondescript thread. It be da rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 35 minutes ago, mannc said: OK. But what's wrong with adding an another starter this year? Who's to say that they won't at #54. and then you still have your 2021 first rounder. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cage Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 hour ago, Buddo said: No. Apart from anything else, we don't know if there will be a season yet. I think that's a serious consideration that has to be factored in. Its not hard to imagine the season being lost in which case I guess they would draft #22 again with the players being underclassmen who's video is all from this past season. Maybe it would be worth making a trade like that if you have a high enough grade on someone who will go in the top 5 tonight??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 17 minutes ago, mannc said: He’s not talking about moving up. I think he’s talking about keeping 54 and buying one of the first 5 picks this afternoon. That’s a fair trade. ahhh, ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: Who's to say that they won't at #54. and then you still have your 2021 first rounder. . But under the scenario posed by the OP, they are keeping 54 and trading next year's first for an early second this year. So theoretically, they are adding two starters this year. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMaster Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Too much risk if season goes south due to injuries/unforeseen circumstances for me to pull the trigger on such a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 minute ago, freddyjj said: This is ludicrous. To move to # 38 pick would only cost us 54 and 86 in this years draft. Why offer 54 and next year's 1 (which would be worth mid 2nd rd this year) - serious overpay. IMHO some great players will fall to us at 54. I don't think he's talking about trading 54 and next year's first for #38. He's talking about next years first for 38, and keeping 54 this year. That's a fair trade. I'm just not sure any teams picking early second this year would do it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, mannc said: But under the scenario posed by the OP, they are keeping 54 and trading next year's first for an early second this year. So theoretically, they are adding two starters this year. And as my original post stated, very unlikely to add one next year. No picks in first 60. (likely) . Edited April 24, 2020 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Just now, B-Man said: And as my original post stated, very unlikely to add one next year. No picks in first 60. likely) . You're not making sense. Why is it better to add one new starter this year and one next year, than two new starters this year? And why is it likely they will add a starter this year with pick 54, but not one with their second round pick next year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Otreply Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Only if there are two and no older than 19, a gallon of Kama sutra oil, and the residents is the castle anthrax... then, and only then would I be willing to face my peril... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkx2 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 59 minutes ago, Don Otreply said: Only if there are two and no older than 19, a gallon of Kama sutra oil, and the residents is the castle anthrax... then, and only then would I be willing to face my peril... Alright... good luck in rehab and kicking that meth problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Otreply Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 20 minutes ago, jkx2 said: Alright... good luck in rehab and kicking that meth problem. It’s a Monty Python reference for those who don’t know... a movie called the Holy Grail... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 NO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 No because our roster is deep enough that we can compete for a Super Bowl now without jeopardizing our future. There's too many unknowns. Injury problems, drop off in QB play, and/or a tougher schedule may land us a top 15 pick next year. Plus, we may have to let Dawkins or Millano leave if they're overvalued on the free agent market. I also wouldn't include Dalton in the trade as giving up a 4th rounder and 17 million plus is too much to pay a backup QB who may not be thrilled to be Josh Allen's backup. The Bengals may just release him if they can't find a trading partner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 OP...you revise your proposal and all it does is make all the responses even more confusing. ...and it’s still a NO for me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) Absolutely 100% not!!! Keep in mind, if for some reason there is no season this year, which we all obviously pray is not the case, draft seeding next year will likely be a lottery. (Meaning a 1 in 32 chance to have the #1 pick) Edited April 24, 2020 by buffaloboyinATL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts