B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Democrats’ ugly Christmas present to the nation New York Post, by Editorial Original Article House Democrats’ impeachment show moves to Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee this week — but don’t expect the proceedings to get any more serious. Sometime before Nadler starts things off at 10 a.m. Wednesday, Intelligence Committee chief Adam Schiff is supposed to send along his final report — which is apparently to be all the evidence the House will consider on the Ukraine matter, despite the near-complete lack of first-hand testimony. Judiciary is simply going to “consider” whether the wrongdoings that Schiff alleges actually constitute “constitutional grounds for impeachment,” with experts brought in to opine on whether President Trump’s actions warrant such a grave step. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 It was so much easier before the internet, Schiff back then would have been writing all the news cue cards for ABC/NBC/CBS to parrot and nobody would be able to begin to challenge them 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, row_33 said: It was so much easier before the internet, Schiff back then would have been writing all the news cue cards for ABC/NBC/CBS to parrot and nobody would be able to begin to challenge them True, but without the internet/social media Trump or someone like him isn't elected in the first place and there is no need for the coup and all this nonsense that has followed from it. Edited December 2, 2019 by BillsFanNC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 This impeachment drive is a huge political bust for Democrats. ........................ . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: True, but without the internet/social media Trump or someone like him isn't elected in the first place and there is no need for the coup and all this nonsense that has followed from it. Nixon won and faced the toady media’s wrath i will sadly believe he was guilty but after watching this garbage pile up, there are grounds to maybe doubt it was nothing but a media/Dem crock of crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: This impeachment drive is a huge political bust for Democrats. ........................ . Funny part is they are STILL loudly declaring it's a slam dunk on cnn, yahoo, huff etc. However, The Democratic National Committee has a money problem. And that could hurt its nominee’s chances of beating President Donald Trump in 2020. In the first four months of 2019, the party spent more than it raised and added $3 million in new debt. In the same period, its Republican counterpart was stockpiling cash. Shocking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: Nixon won and faced the toady media’s wrath i will sadly believe he was guilty Do you pity criminals often or only when they identify with your politics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 The headlines today on the local news were the report is coming out to seal off the very convincing testimony against Trump so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, row_33 said: The headlines today on the local news were the report is coming out to seal off the very convincing testimony against Trump so far My god then....finally, its here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Trump lawyers to Jerry Nadler: We won’t participate in your sham Wednesday law professor hearing The impeachment torch is about to be passed from Adam Schiff (House Intelligence Committee) to Jerry Nadler (House Judiciary Committee). Nadler scheduled a “hearing” for Wednesday, but it’s not an evidentiary hearing and the witnesses (as of this writing) are unknown. What is known it that there will be three pro-impeachment law professors called by Democrats to opine on what constitutes an impeachable offense. (Spoiler — if Democrats are calling the law professors, they will opine that anything and everything Trump did is an impeachable offense). Republicans will be allowed one legal expert to say the opposite. In other words, it’s a show hearing, meant to give the pro-impeachment mainstream media a news cycle dominated (by numbers) by pro-impeachment opinions. Trump’s lawyers sent a letter tonight to Nadler rejecting the premise and procedure of the hearing, and refusing to participate. Politico reports: . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Gary Busey said: Do you pity criminals often or only when they identify with your politics? What are my politics, according to you.... Red Tory is the closest thing I can see on paper It has ruled Canada a few times over the last 50 years 1 hour ago, Albwan said: My god then....finally, its here! Hey whatever this is how a story works in our society a key witness is asked what evidence there is, says his speculations, this is totally ignored by the press good enough for the media and those who believe it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 Because the DNC is not interested in what's best for the country. They're not interested in due process or actual justice. They want their power back. Nothing more. Enemies of the people. 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Because the DNC is not interested in what's best for the country. They're not interested in due process or actual justice. They want their power back. Nothing more. Enemies of the people. They've got a funny way of going about it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Gosh, golly and gee, this little tidbit from Catherine Herridge about the whistleblower seems kinda sorta important, yeah? Especially since they are moving into a new ‘phase’ of the impeachment circus. The wording was confusing? Huh? Alrighty then. From CBS: CBS News has reviewed documents that show the anonymous whistleblower reached out to the intelligence community watchdog on October 8 to clarify the nature of his or her contact with Democratic majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee before the complaint was filed. The whistleblower acknowledged reaching out to the committee, but claimed that nothing substantial was discussed and that the staff member directed them to go through official channels, according to the “Memorandum of Investigative Activity,” provided to House and Senate Intelligence Committee leadership by intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) Michael Atkinson. The form is dated October 18 and documents the October 8 outreach by the whistleblower. Republicans have seized on the contact with Democratic committee staff to question the credibility of the whistleblower, while Democrats have downplayed the significance. Of course Democrats are downplaying this, they need the leaker … sorry, the whistleblower … to be credible. Pretty tricking wording there. "Congress or congressional committee(s)." Easy to see how someone smart enough to work for the CIA would get confused. . 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 LOTS OF CAPS LOCK - GOOD CASE, DR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Back to 2016? That is hilarious. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Hoho heehee haha its a liberal Dem family move along, they are totally above the law... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm going to guess the release is either going to be Wednesday morning, or whatever the second day is going to be, just to crap on Nadler's show trial... 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: They've got a funny way of going about it. Reverse psychology/pity votes. If they act stupidly and self-destructive enough, people will feel badly for them and elect them! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. Changing lawyers buys you some time from facing justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1201566849827311622 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 So if the Senate was Dem majority then Trump would be kicked out without a shred of credible evidence presented? careful what you wish for liberals.... you won’t last two seconds in a real crisis, you never have before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 A political mag up here offers bounties of thousands for useful info as to why someone’s lawyer fired the client Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, Doc said: I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn... At this point, Joe may be wishing he did as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, IDBillzFan said: I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 So what was this magic about Hillary that they have totally freaked out over her losing? seriously, where is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 hours ago, row_33 said: Hoho heehee haha its a liberal Dem family move along, they are totally above the law... ...he needs to have the case moved to Delaware where he can get a fair trial............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said: I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. he stopped their graft. Fixed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Hedge said: Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats? A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. No one will watch this. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats? A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. No one will watch this. I will. ? Edited December 2, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I will. ? But that's for the good of others, and it's appreciated 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hedge said: Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed! This should make for some great theater. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed! This should make for some great theater. PishPosh! Enough with your "normal" standards of jurisprudence, peasant! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts