GG Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 57 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: like I said. I really appreciate someone who just sits all day and posts tweets of biased sources. It’s the most 2019 thing you could do. Cheers buddy Which sources are unbiased? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 They're scared as hell of what Pompeo and Barr have found. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They're scared as hell of what Pompeo and Barr have found. No, they're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 14 minutes ago, DC Tom said: 46 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They're scared as hell of what Pompeo and Barr have found. No, they're not. I have to agree with Tom here... The Dems have gotten out in front on this and since they also control the media, for now at least, they also control the narrative... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 Trump told US diplomats at the UN that CNN built a beautiful studio, costing maybe $2 million, for the NC 9th election, and it was going to "stay up for weeks" if the Democrat had won, but instead CNN hastily took it down that night. CNN did not build any set there at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 48 minutes ago, Cinga said: I have to agree with Tom here... The Dems have gotten out in front on this and since they also control the media, for now at least, they also control the narrative... If they weren't scared of it, they wouldn't be trying this hard to get in front of it. Remember, the OIG report has been read by (some)many already on the Hill -- that's what's driving this strategy. It's not about 2020. It's about staying out of jail. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 34 minutes ago, Kemp said: Trump told US diplomats at the UN that CNN built a beautiful studio, costing maybe $2 million, for the NC 9th election, and it was going to "stay up for weeks" if the Democrat had won, but instead CNN hastily took it down that night. CNN did not build any set there at all. Just call it parody... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: No, they're not. They will be on the 12th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 7 hours ago, John Adams said: Ukraine also says Biden is clean. Either way, Trump brought the pressure, just like I'm sure he's done many times in business. Remind them who has the checkbook. Then ask for the "favor." Again, Velensky stated otherwise. Sorry but you can't on one hand say that Ukraine said Biden is clean and then OTOH ignore them when they say there was no pressure. And in the end, it's all about what you can prove. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 it shouldn't be too hard to understand the reasons for the hypocrisy. https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1179188498575659008 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 17 minutes ago, Foxx said: it shouldn't be too hard to understand the reasons for the hypocrisy. https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1179188498575659008 The uranium one stuff was such a witch hunt fake news joke only a few actually believed it. Turn off the fake news! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 What about this other thing What about that other thing What about some other guy The current POTUS used US aid leverage to ask for the "favor" of investigating his leading political rival. This is the story that everyone can see from (thankfully) the notes. Impeachable, probably not. But even many on the right are not comfortable with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, John Adams said: What about this other thing What about that other thing What about some other guy The current POTUS used US aid leverage to ask for the "favor" of investigating his leading political rival. This is the story that everyone can see from (thankfully) the notes. Impeachable, probably not. But even many on the right are not comfortable with it. John, I still have to disagree. Have you actually read the phone call transcript? The President is doing everything through proper channels, and the main theme of the conversation is letting the incoming Ukrainian leader understand that it’s not going to ‘business as usual’ with his country where we gift them a bunch of money that they turn around and use to purchase US made weapons with a side dish of graft and corruption thrown in for good measure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 Extortion is proper because he loves Trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, John Adams said: What about this other thing What about that other thing What about some other guy The current POTUS used US aid leverage to ask for the "favor" of investigating his leading political rival. This is the story that everyone can see from (thankfully) the notes. Impeachable, probably not. But even many on the right are not comfortable with it. No, that's the delusion of the left trying to create something that's not borne out by the facts. Forget about his thing or that thing, the aid was withheld for 5 months before the call, Velensky said he didn't feel pressured (and that's proven by the fact that he didn't bother doing what Trump allegedly pressured him into doing), and the call was placed on a higher level server because of leaks, like what happened here. And he asked Zelensky to work with Barr, not "make ***** up" about Biden. Again (and again), there's no there, there. But the left thinks it's a winner for them politically. What's actually corrupt is Joe getting Hunter on the board of Burisma and withholding funds until they fired a prosecutor looking into the company. At least there we have the prosecutor under oath saying he was fired for that reason. Edited October 2, 2019 by Doc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: John, I still have to disagree. Have you actually read the phone call transcript? The President is doing everything through proper channels, and the main theme of the conversation is letting the incoming Ukrainian leader understand that it’s not going to ‘business as usual’ with his country where we gift them a bunch of money that they turn around and use to purchase US made weapons with a side dish of graft and corruption thrown in for good measure. He named Biden, his #1 leading opponent, and asked for the "favor" of investigating him. How many times do you think Trump has used that move before: 1-remind contractor about who has all the money 2-ask for "favor" to his benefit It's not befitting a sitting president to strong-arm other presidents into investigating his leading political rival. And that's why this story has traction with some Rs. He named Biden, no one else, and I'm sure there is more corruption in the Ukraine than Hunter. 6 minutes ago, Doc said: No, that's the delusion of the left trying to create something that's not borne out by the facts. Forget about his thing or that thing, the aid was withheld for 5 months before the call, Velensky said he didn't feel pressured (and that's proven by the fact that he didn't bother doing what Trump allegedly pressured him into doing), and the call was placed on a higher level server because of leaks, like what happened here. And he asked Velensky to work with Barr, not "make ***** up" about Biden. Again (and again), there's no there, there. But the left thinks it's a winner for them politically. Not being a grammar dick, but noting his name is Zelensky. I've seen it at PPP with a V and also two Ys. Now I'll be a dick: When the media that takes PPP's posts and runs with them comes here, we want to look our best. Edited October 2, 2019 by John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: Not being a grammar dick, but noting his name is Zelensky. I've seen it at PPP with a V and also two Ys. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 Just now, Doc said: My bad. No worries. It doesn't undermine your lack of credibility. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: He named Biden, his #1 leading opponent, and asked for the "favor" of investigating him. How many times do you think Trump has used that move before: 1-remind contractor about who has all the money 2-ask for "favor" to his benefit He named Biden, no one else, and I'm sure there is more corruption in the Ukraine than Hunter. John? I’ll ask again if you’ve actually read the phone call? His main point is that once again the US is giving this country the lion’s share of financial aid. Get off the political rival stuff. Neither Trump nor anyone else believes Biden is going to be the candidate by next summer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: John? I’ll ask again if you’ve actually read the phone call? His main point is that once again the US is giving this country the lion’s share of financial aid. Get off the political rival stuff. Neither Trump nor anyone else believes Biden is going to be the candidate by next summer. So Biden was just a passing thought, even though he was by far the leading Dem candidate at that time and had just splashed onto the scene? Do you REALLY think Trump turned off his brain to the fact that Biden is the guy who plays well to PA and the middle states? I'm not saying this is impeachable, but let's be real. Trump LIVES on TV news and at that point right after Biden announced, the airwaves were filled with Biden. (And I've had to quote the call twice to prove DR embarassingly wrong on things, so yes, I've read it.) Edited October 2, 2019 by John Adams 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 15 hours ago, GG said: Which sources are unbiased? 3rd Chair always errs on the side of ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, John Adams said: He named Biden, his #1 leading opponent, and asked for the "favor" of investigating him. How many times do you think Trump has used that move before: 1-remind contractor about who has all the money 2-ask for "favor" to his benefit It's not befitting a sitting president to strong-arm other presidents into investigating his leading political rival. And that's why this story has traction with some Rs. He named Biden, no one else, and I'm sure there is more corruption in the Ukraine than Hunter. Not being a grammar dick, but noting his name is Zelensky. I've seen it at PPP with a V and also two Ys. Now I'll be a dick: When the media that takes PPP's posts and runs with them comes here, we want to look our best. Have you read the transcript? 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: 3rd Chair always errs on the side of ignorance. Great, another 3rd.. to keep track of 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 13 minutes ago, John Adams said: No worries. It doesn't undermine your lack of credibility. LOL! Says the guy whose only rebuttal to what I posted is "you spelled the name wrong." I accept your defeat. Now go get your shine box. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, John Adams said: So Biden was just a passing thought, even though he was by far the leading Dem candidate at that time and had just splashed onto the scene? Do you REALLY think Trump turned off his brain to the fact that Biden is the guy who plays well to PA and the middle states? I'm not saying this is impeachable, but let's be real. Trump LIVES on TV news and at that point right after Biden announced, the airwaves were filled with Biden. (And I've had to quote the call twice to prove DR embarassingly wrong on things, so yes, I've read it.) John, you and I’ll just live to disagree on the question of intent. But we both agree this is not grounds for impeachment. This sort of thing cannot possibly be what the Constitution would categorize as high crimes and misdemeanors. It’s not even close! Our main difference is that I’ve never considered Trump to be a typical politician. In fact I’ve always seen him acting just like I would; as a typical citizen trying desperately against all odds to clean up a huge mess of insider trading, graft and corruption. Again, we’ll live to disagree. It doesn’t make you a bad person just like it doesn’t make me one either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 This whistleblower stuff is perfect. When was the last time we heard anything about the New Green Deal, Reparations, Medicare for all, AOC and The Cheerleaders or whatever they call themselves? Oh wait I take that back. We need to bring those things back up. Those things are spotlights on how effed up the left is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, GG said: Have you read the transcript? I have quoted the notes several times back when DR was saying that Zelensky brought up aid first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, John Adams said: I have quoted the notes several times back when DR was saying that Zelensky brought up aid first. That was a yes or no question counselor. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 9 hours ago, Doc said: Again, Velensky stated otherwise. Sorry but you can't on one hand say that Ukraine said Biden is clean and then OTOH ignore them when they say there was no pressure. And in the end, it's all about what you can prove. No, in the end it's all about what you can sell. Much of what's being passed off as "fact" here is merely interpretation (and fallacious interpretation at that). Democrats and the media are doing the far better sales job, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: No, in the end it's all about what you can sell. Much of what's being passed off as "fact" here is merely interpretation (and fallacious interpretation at that). Democrats and the media are doing the far better sales job, though. Trumps criminal behavior sure makes it an easy sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, John Adams said: I have quoted the notes several times back when DR was saying that Zelensky brought up aid first. So you haven’t read the entire transcript? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 16 minutes ago, John Adams said: I have quoted the notes several times back when DR was saying that Zelensky brought up aid first. I'll take that as a no. What was the favor that Trump referred to? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Trumps criminal behavior sure makes it an easy sell Which criminal behavior is that again? I must’ve missed it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 13 minutes ago, meazza said: So you haven’t read the entire transcript? The instructions for the talking points clearly said to NOT read the transcript. It wasn’t sanction by the Ministry of Truth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, dubs said: The instructions for the talking points clearly said to NOT read the transcript. It wasn’t sanction by the Ministry of Truth. The Dems were counting on people not reading the phone call, assuming it would be classified by the White House and assuming that most would think it’d be hundreds of pages. It almost worked! I hadn’t read it myself until just a couple of days ago. If you haven’t, it’ll take you less than five minutes. There’s literally NOTHING there at all. It’s certainly not the storyline the Left is trying to push. What a colossal waste of time. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 14 minutes ago, GG said: I'll take that as a no. Do your best not to be a douche. 14 minutes ago, GG said: What was the favor that Trump referred to? We really need to spell this out like 2nd graders? Crowdstrike server and investigate Bidens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Which criminal behavior is that again? I must’ve missed it. If I told you again, why would you bother remembering? You will just ask again. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, John Adams said: Do your best not to be a douche. We really need to spell this out like 2nd graders? Crowdstrike server and investigate Bidens. A douche is the person who conflates things to make a point. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 Didn't Bill Clinton sign a treaty with the Ukraine to help each other fight against corruption? This was back when he was president. If he did sign the treaty, there is no case. He is allowed, under the treaty to ask for help in fighting corruption. Case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 33 minutes ago, westside2 said: Didn't Bill Clinton sign a treaty with the Ukraine to help each other fight against corruption? This was back when he was president. If he did sign the treaty, there is no case. He is allowed, under the treaty to ask for help in fighting corruption. Case closed. Fake news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts