DC Tom Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The picture of Hillary signed with "Ha Ha! Still can't catch me, suckers!" left in the cell was found to be completely unrelated to Epstein's death. We'll never really know what happened... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 Wow, the illuminati really want to wash away all Epstein evidence. Appropriate name for the hurricane, as well. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 28, 2019 Author Share Posted August 28, 2019 Not an endorsement of this connective tissue -- but it is interesting to consider. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not an endorsement of this connective tissue -- but it is interesting to consider. There's never a Lord Protector around when you need one... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not an endorsement of this connective tissue -- but it is interesting to consider. Or it could be that the little she has said about Brexit over the last few years has indicated she is for it? ?♀️ If there is a video, doesn't mean she will not try and protect her son (and the royal family), however. Edited August 28, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: I've always found the argument of "he knows what he did" particularly compelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 16 minutes ago, Koko78 said: I've always found the argument of "he knows what he did" particularly compelling. I don't necessarily believe the conspiracy theories regarding the Royal Family such as Princess Diana's crash actually being a result of people working for the Queen but I don't know that I would want to stand alone against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 22 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: I don't necessarily believe the conspiracy theories regarding the Royal Family such as Princess Diana's crash actually being a result of people working for the Queen but I don't know that I would want to stand alone against them. Hey, the Queen was once a mechanic. She knows what she is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 This is a parody account you should all follow. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted August 31, 2019 Share Posted August 31, 2019 So......? Dead man switches slow to activate, neutralized, or never existed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted August 31, 2019 Share Posted August 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: So......? Dead man switches slow to activate, neutralized, or never existed? Wait until the 12th. Everything will be revealed then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 31, 2019 Author Share Posted August 31, 2019 1 hour ago, RochesterRob said: So......? Dead man switches slow to activate, neutralized, or never existed? Already in the possession of the DOJ is my guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 On 8/31/2019 at 9:23 AM, 4merper4mer said: Wait until the 12th. Everything will be revealed then. I thought it was the 13th? But not that 13th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 On 9/1/2019 at 1:01 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: ... i didn't think they killed him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 2, 2019 Author Share Posted September 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: i didn't think they killed him... Serious question though, because I've never thought to look -- what does his brother look like? And since his brother took control of the trust/island upon his death, what are the odds it's him? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Serious question though, because I've never thought to look -- what does his brother look like? And since his brother took control of the trust/island upon his death, what are the odds it's him? appears to be balding somewhat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 2, 2019 Author Share Posted September 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: appears to be balding somewhat. So not a chance with that hairline. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 If they went through the trouble of springing him from jail why wouldn't they put a disguise on him to make him look like David ***** Letterman? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 40 minutes ago, GG said: If they went through the trouble of springing him from jail why wouldn't they put a disguise on him to make him look like David ***** Letterman? Because there still is a law against cruel and unusual punishment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Foxx said: appears to be balding somewhat. so his brother looks like white Lester Holt 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 If he’s not dead, did Hillary still kill him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 MICKEY KAUS: Jeffrey Epstein, Red Pill: Why This Scandal Should Just Be Getting Started. We’re in the middle of a global populist surge. There’s a sense that elites are not playing by the same rules as everyone else. They might not even be playing the same game. It’s pretty clear that Epstein was running some kind of a sex ring for the rich and well connected. How big a ring? We don’t know until we try to find out. But there are reports out there [click if you dare] that it’s bigger than we might think — bigger than old, familiar Prince Andrew, involving a non-trivial cross-section of business and entertainment leaders, plus some prominent Anglo-American families and maybe a handful of nation states. Do we live in a society where people try to get rich so they can build bigger houses, drive faster cars, wear nice clothes and send their children to the best schools. Or is that really a facade behind which they escape into a secret lawless world where they order up underage girls and boys to rape and abuse? Are we living in Disney movie or a Girl with the Dragon Tattoo movie? Don’t we want to know? If we follow the Epstein case to its conclusion, we might learn which is the reality. Epstein’s the biggest red pill we’ve been handed in decades. A lot of people are eager for us to forget all about it. . 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 5 hours ago, Hedge said: Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary. At least according to Wikipedia: Quote Preska was nominated by President George H. W. Bush on March 31, 1992, to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ... In 2007, it was reported that Judge Preska was on President Bush's short list of potential Supreme Court nominees.[3] On September 9, 2008, Preska was nominated by President George W. Bush to be a United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[4] As Preska was nominated after July 1, 2008, the unofficial start date of the Thurmond Rule during a presidential election year,[clarification needed] no hearings were scheduled on her nomination, and the nomination was returned to Bush at the end of his term.[citation needed] So, by my calculations: ✔️ Double plus bonus points for 2 Deep State ties from the same family ➕ ⚱️ Papa Bush ➕ Unsealed the first batch of documents ➕ ? Possibly believes = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 7 hours ago, Koko78 said: Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary. in an old boys network, what is the expected outcome? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 . 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2019 Author Share Posted September 4, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 33 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Looks like we're also on track for the 12th for the release of these docs. Quote The case files are known to contain claims by Giuffre that she was sexually abused by “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister and other world leaders.” “Did you people not talk about this?” Preska asked the lawyers in federal court in Manhattan when she was told there was no plan in place for reviewing the documents. Preska ended the hearing with a tentative plan to have the attorneys take the next two weeks to hash out a process for categorizing the thousands of pages of sealed documents. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 5, 2019 Author Share Posted September 5, 2019 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Quote Officers at the Metropolitan Correctional Center recently let an accused CIA leaker obtain electronic devices to continue to steal and transmit classified information, according to the documents. They let a fraudster with ties to the Clintons get his hands on a smartphone that he used to falsify evidence. They even let an Islamic terrorist have access to al Qaeda propaganda — including bomb-making instructions — that he distributed to fellow inmates. ... Last year, according to the documents, a former CIA employee allegedly responsible for “the largest unauthorized public disclosure of CIA information in the history of the agency” was able to get two iPhones into his cell at the MCC. The outrageous security breach was aided by correctional officers. “The contraband cellphones were smuggled into the MCC and protected from detection through a network of visitors to the facility, inmates and correctional officers,” FBI agent Jeff Donaldson wrote in an October affidavit for a search warrant that was recently unsealed and obtained by The Post. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Hedge said: This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web. This stuff doesn't really bother me, because the women are willing participants. It can't be a surprise that rich guys are attracting women with their wealth (in some of these countries, prostitution is legal anyway), they are just able to cast a wider net now, with social media, uh..."bringing the world together". Edited September 6, 2019 by OJ Tom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 51 minutes ago, OJ Tom said: This stuff doesn't really bother me, because the women are willing participants. It can't be a surprise that rich guys are attracting women with their wealth (in some of these countries, prostitution is legal anyway), they are just able to cast a wider net now, with social media, uh..."bringing the world together". If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you. But, this is also about more than just one thing. Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein. For example: Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party. Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves). Then from here: Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling. Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 6 hours ago, Hedge said: If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you. But, this is also about more than just one thing. Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein. For example: Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party. Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves). Then from here: Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling. Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling. Sounds very similar to owning a golf course? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 7 hours ago, Hedge said: This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web. Wait... is that actually Victoria's secret? Could they be that blatant with their naming? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 9 hours ago, Hedge said: This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web. Seriously...why else would anyone buy a yacht except to bang high-priced call girls in international waters outside any nation's legal jurisdiction? I thought that was the entire reason rich guys bought boats the size of a WWII troop transport. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 (edited) 19 hours ago, Hedge said: If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you. But, this is also about more than just one thing. Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein. For example: Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party. Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves). Then from here: Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling. Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling. Unless they are women are underage, or somehow being forced to comply, I don't think it would be that effective for blackmail. I mean, I doubt it would take that elaborate of a plan to make deals with these corrupt politicians, and these party favors are probably more along the lines of "celebrations after closing a "deal". The thing that surprises me, is how famous many of these women are. Edited September 7, 2019 by OJ Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 Married men, with videos of them screwing literal playgirls have no danger of being blackmailed. Sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts