Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees

[RochesterRob]

21 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Not having Hillary on the ticket will help Dems though, right? 

  At some point you have to have a candidate that appeals to people other than leftist university types.  I don't see one in the current field that strongly appeals to middle America.  The Democrats have made themselves the party of identity politics.  Now they have to live with it.  At least until they can get a state control media which is the course that the MSM is on now.  Just waiting for the next Obama to come along to get the deal done.  I'm afraid when the next Obama does come along dissenting opinion will be made illegal.  Then the end will be in sight for the US.

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  At some point you have to have a candidate that appeals to people other than leftist university types.  I don't see one in the current field that strongly appeals to middle America.  The Democrats have made themselves the party of identity politics.  Now they have to live with it.  At least until they can get a state control media which is the course that the MSM is on now.  Just waiting for the next Obama to come along to get the deal done.  I'm afraid when the next Obama does come along dissenting opinion will be made illegal.  Then the end will be in sight for the US.

So you are saying Hillary is just another Democrat? So many posters on here excused support for Trump on the grounds that murderous Hillary was just the worst human ever. Now it's all a Dems are worst humans ever? All worse than Trump 

[Wacka]

54 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you are saying Hillary is just another Democrat? ... murderous Hillary was just the worst human ever. Now it's all a Dems are worst humans ever? 

You finally said something right for once.

[RochesterRob]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

So you are saying Hillary is just another Democrat? So many posters on here excused support for Trump on the grounds that murderous Hillary was just the worst human ever. Now it's all a Dems are worst humans ever? All worse than Trump 

  Being overconfident is one matter while Hillary's character is another.  That aside you just don't get it.  Believe it or not a lot of Americans are not for things such as full term abortions or full abolishment of religion.  I hope you are not paid based on incentives to convert people here to being leftists as you would not be able to afford a stick of gum per day.

[3rdnlng]

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So you are saying Hillary is just another Democrat? So many posters on here excused support for Trump on the grounds that murderous Hillary was just the worst human ever. Now it's all a Dems are worst humans ever? All worse than Trump 

Yes, yes, yes and yes.

[reddogblitz]

On 5/31/2019 at 8:24 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That makes it worse, not better. The "hacks" (which we'll agree to disagree on their reality for now) happened in the spring. By the summer the administration was aware of Russian attempts to penetrate voting systems and rolls -- and yet they ordered the stand down anyway? Even after they "knew" the Russians had stolen information and were planning to distribute them? 

 

 

Did you read your own article Deranged?

 

Quote

Daniel added that “it’s not accurate to say that all activity ceased at that point.” He and his staff “shifted our focus” to assisting state governments to protect against Russian cyberattacks against state and local election systems.

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

10 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

Did you read your own article Deranged?

 

I did. And listened/read his full testimony. He's describing a readjustment of mission -- away from active defensive measures and towards "information sharing" between state actors like Britain and Australia -- the same two nations who were, at that time, actively working with the USIC to inflate the hype of Russian hacking misdeeds. 

 

It was a stand down order without rationale behind it. Especially in light of the words and actions taken just several months later by 44 after they lost the election. 

 

Obama wanted the Russian hacking story to take root. He did not want to deter them or stop them in anyway because he knew, very early on, that his Lts were building a collusion/conspiracy narrative to deflect away from the revelations that Obama had been running an illegal spy ring out of the DOJ for at least 4 years.

 

*********************

 

 

 

If the Russia situation were as real as they want us to believe, why did they need to invent evidence in order to justify FISAs? 

[DC Tom]

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I did. And listened/read his full testimony. He's describing a readjustment of mission -- away from active defensive measures and towards "information sharing" between state actors like Britain and Australia -- the same two nations who were, at that time, actively working with the USIC to inflate the hype of Russian hacking misdeeds. 

 

It was a stand down order without rationale behind it. Especially in light of the words and actions taken just several months later by 44 after they lost the election. 

 

That is a real stretch, considering that "state governments" in that context never in my memory refers to "foreign states."

14 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

not Campaigning in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania (like Trump did) was a contributing factor don't you think?

 

10,000 votes in states she ignored because her and Steve Kornacki thought they were in the bag.  Comey's fault?

 

She didn't ignore them.  She called them "deplorables."

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

That is a real stretch, considering that "state governments" in that context never in my memory refers to "foreign states."

 

It's discussed in later portions of his testimony re UK/Aus information sharing. 

[DC Tom]

12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's discussed in later portions of his testimony re UK/Aus information sharing. 

 

Then that should have been your counter-argument to @reddogblitz, because the quote he cherry-picked certainly doesn't say that.

[Deranged Rhino]

18 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Then that should have been your counter-argument to @reddogblitz, because the quote he cherry-picked certainly doesn't say that.

 

Posting on the move today. I'll dig it up. I forget the technical terms, but there's offensive cyberwarfare teams and counter/defensive teams (rock/entock I think?). The order took those teams off the table (the claim being they wanted less people involved rather than risking an escalation) while they focused on gathering more information to better gauge the threat. This included gathering information from both the states and from the continent/5 Eye partners (Brexit had just happened/was in the process of happening) to form a better plan. The said goal was to avoid an escalation into a full on cyberwar with Russia. 

 

Which, in reality, was just BS to start with.

[B-Man]

I’LL TAKE “HEADLINES I WASN’T EXPECTING IN THE NATION” FOR $500, ALEX: 

 

How Did Russiagate Begin? Why Barr’s investigation is important and should be encouraged.

 

 

 

.

Edited June 3, 2019 by B-Man

[B-Man]

William Barr Is Washington’s Worst Nightmare

by David Catron

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Edited June 3, 2019 by B-Man

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Tiberius]

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

No release of Flynn transcripts. See that? 

[Deranged Rhino]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No release of Flynn transcripts. See that? 

 

I did. "Harm to ongoing investigations."

 

See: Durham/Huber.

 

Flynn will be freed. It's just down to timing now.

[McGee Return TD]

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No release of Flynn transcripts. See that? 

 

You know the Q-munity is flailing in the wind when they resort to posting Breitbart again.

[B-Man]

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No release of Flynn transcripts. See that? 

 

 

?️  ?️  ?️............Barr thread.

 

 

 

It’s a bird....it’s a plane, it’s the United States Attorney General!

 

[Foxx]

5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No release of Flynn transcripts. See that? 

look, Squirrel!!

 

5 hours ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

You know the Q-munity is flailing in the wind when they resort to posting Breitbart again.

you're an idiot.

Edited June 3, 2019 by Foxx

[Foxx]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1135497146776428544

 

[B-Man]

Top 28 Moments From Bombshell Barr Interview

by Mollie Hemingway

 

Original Article

[Tiberius]

Steele to be questioned 

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/christopher-steele-the-trump-dossier-author-to-be-questioned-by-us-officials

[Deranged Rhino]

I know this was covered this morning -- but some more details: 

 

That Steele agreed to this after Trump met with May is just a coincidence, totally. 

[Deranged Rhino]

Posting for the video -- another one from this guy.  

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

After two and a half years of Mudd assuring us collusion/conspiracy were real, he's now changing directions. 

 

Asshats gonna asshat. And it's going to be great watching this particular asshat drift away into obscurity.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

Mudd isn't the only one talking out both sides of his mouth. Former FBI (cabal) turned CNN analyst dropped this gem yesterday: 

 

 

Funny how now that we know the FISA details will be declassed, the same former intelligence officials in the media are WILDLY changing their stories on how the FISA process is run. Compare her comments above to the ones in the Mudd article linked above as well. 

 

We were told for two and a half years by smug #######s on every cable news outlet that the FISC and FISA process is intense and heavily scrutinized, that they'd NEVER approve a FISA without double checking each and every source and fact... 

 

And now, they're finally admitting the truth. 

 

 

 

Pain's coming. And they know it.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

Whole article is worth the time. A snippet:

 

The media is now openly entwined with the national security establishment in a manner that would have been unimaginable before the advent of the age of the Dossier—the literary forgery the FBI used as evidence to spy on the Trump team.  In coordinating to perpetrate the Russiagate hoax on the American public, the media and intelligence officials have forged a relationship in which the two partners look out for the other’s professional and political interests.

 

 

 

 

 

**NOTE/Point of contention: this connection between the media and the IC began long before the dossier and this scandal. It's just now out in the open and bragged about rather than hidden. 

[Hedge]

36 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Whole article is worth the time. A snippet:

 

The media is now openly entwined with the national security establishment in a manner that would have been unimaginable before the advent of the age of the Dossier—the literary forgery the FBI used as evidence to spy on the Trump team.  In coordinating to perpetrate the Russiagate hoax on the American public, the media and intelligence officials have forged a relationship in which the two partners look out for the other’s professional and political interests.

 

 

 

 

 

**NOTE/Point of contention: this connection between the media and the IC began long before the dossier and this scandal. It's just now out in the open and bragged about rather than hidden. 

 

At least former IC members haven't been attempting to run for Congress in record numbers. That would truly terrifying for them to control most of the news AND be able to legislate!   

[Koko78]

5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Mudd isn't the only one talking out both sides of his mouth. Former FBI (cabal) turned CNN analyst dropped this gem yesterday: 

 

 

Funny how now that we know the FISA details will be declassed, the same former intelligence officials in the media are WILDLY changing their stories on how the FISA process is run. Compare her comments above to the ones in the Mudd article linked above as well. 

 

We were told for two and a half years by smug #######s on every cable news outlet that the FISC and FISA process is intense and heavily scrutinized, that they'd NEVER approve a FISA without double checking each and every source and fact... 

 

And now, they're finally admitting the truth. 

 

 

 

Pain's coming. And they know it.

 

Her attempt at defending herself in the comments was funny.

[B-Man]

 

 

 AG Barr amused by media freaking out over him asking questions they don’t want asked

 

 

.

[Albwan]

On 6/5/2019 at 11:09 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Mudd isn't the only one talking out both sides of his mouth. Former FBI (cabal) turned CNN analyst dropped this gem yesterday: 

 

 

Funny how now that we know the FISA details will be declassed, the same former intelligence officials in the media are WILDLY changing their stories on how the FISA process is run. Compare her comments above to the ones in the Mudd article linked above as well. 

 

We were told for two and a half years by smug #######s on every cable news outlet that the FISC and FISA process is intense and heavily scrutinized, that they'd NEVER approve a FISA without double checking each and every source and fact... 

 

And now, they're finally admitting the truth. 

 

 

 

Pain's coming. And they know it.

       At best I see the outcome of this being they grudgingly admit making  a mistake

this time with fisa and how the American people need politicians to talk about how to fix this this for years.

I can hear the blah blah now...the fisa system isn't perfect guys, we did our best, but it's a necessary thing 

to protect the American people.

[Deranged Rhino]

22 minutes ago, Albwan said:

       At best I see the outcome of this being they grudgingly admit making  a mistake

this time with fisa and how the American people need politicians to talk about how to fix this this for years.

I can hear the blah blah now...the fisa system isn't perfect guys, we did our best, but it's a necessary thing 

to protect the American people.

 

It's likely/possible this is the outcome -- though I'd add if this is the route they go it would 1) ruin Trump's chances in 2020 and 2) better be accompanied by actual reforms to the FISC and FISA process. 

 

Personally I'm still (very much/even more now based on what I'm hearing) in the camp that heads are going to roll. Big names in the DOJ/FBI will be charged and prosecuted for these abuses which will speed along the follow-on reform package to the FISC/FISA system(s). 

 

But the rats are clearly trying to open up an escape route along the lines of your post above. The only question is will the administration and DOJ let them flee. 

[Albwan]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's likely/possible this is the outcome -- though I'd add if this is the route they go it would 1) ruin Trump's chances in 2020 and 2) better be accompanied by actual reforms to the FISC and FISA process. 

 

Personally I'm still (very much/even more now based on what I'm hearing) in the camp that heads are going to roll. Big names in the DOJ/FBI will be charged and prosecuted for these abuses which will speed along the follow-on reform package to the FISC/FISA system(s). 

 

But the rats are clearly trying to open up an escape route along the lines of your post above. The only question is will the administration and DOJ let them flee. 

Imho, he has no chance 2020. the democrat s h i t show is plowing over this this country gaining momentum

every day. Clearly, the rats and the liars are in charge. I see only one way out, most people don't have the guts for it.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-russia-barr-sources

[Nanker]

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-russia-barr-sources

From your link:

"During the CBS interview, Barr revealed Durham picked up the FISA and surveillance components from Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber, whose work was put on hold pending DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's findings from his ongoing review. Huber, Barr said, “was essentially on standby” in case Horowitz “referred a matter to him to be handled criminally.”

Horowitz's investigation is expected to be completed shortly."

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, Nanker said:

From your link:

"During the CBS interview, Barr revealed Durham picked up the FISA and surveillance components from Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber, whose work was put on hold pending DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's findings from his ongoing review. Huber, Barr said, “was essentially on standby” in case Horowitz “referred a matter to him to be handled criminally.”

Horowitz's investigation is expected to be completed shortly."

 

Yup -- in that same interview Barr referenced Huber's office as working on matters relating to the Clinton investigation/Foundation which he expects to be able to report on soon. 

 

Funny how that bit always slips under the national media's radar.

[Nanker]

Wonder how the media will couch it when it does get revealed.

 

[Gavin in Va Beach]

3 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Wonder how the media will couch it when it does get revealed.

 

 

What they usually do..."HEY, WHAT'S THAT OVER THERE!?!?!"

[Buffalo_Gal]

26 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-russia-barr-sources

That is the whole reason we were told it was handed over to him... he's the only prosecutor in the country with top clearance. He can look into anything (up to and including classified presidential material), and prosecute from there.  

[B-Man]

 

 

 

.