Jump to content

Impeachment Hearings Open In House Of Representatives


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

 

Don't you get tired of falling for this stuff? It always starts with a "WOW" and is followed with "Someone you don't specifically know is looking into something that MAY have happened!"

 

A few days later, it's revealed that no one is really looking at anything other than another fake story to pile on top of the other fake stories.

 

We know you guys aren't that smart, but are you really this stupid for fall for this again?

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

1) Two year old news.

2) So what?  :lol:  No one cared two years ago.

 

But he started the tweet with WOW! Right way you know this MUST be the one blow to take out Trump!:lol:

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Was she close to her Brother?  This would be a good time Nancy for some personal reflection on how you are spending your weeks and months at nearly 80 years old.  Yes, the witch is almost 80. 

 

I read the article and thought, "What did Pelosi do to piss off the Clintons THIS TIME?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/17/2019 at 10:26 AM, B-Man said:

 

Rep. Schiff (D-CA) Tried To Get Kurt Volker To Lie About Trump/Ukraine.

 

 

 

 

WITNESS INTIMIDATION? Schiff pressed Volker to say Ukraine felt pressure from Trump.

 

In a secret interview, Rep. Adam Schiff, leader of the House Democratic effort to impeach President Trump, pressed former U.S. special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker to testify that Ukrainian officials felt pressured to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as a result of Trump withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

 

Volker denied that was the case, noting that Ukrainian leaders did not even know the aid was being withheld, and that they believed their relationship with the United States was moving along satisfactorily, without them having done anything Trump mentioned in his notorious July 25 phone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

 

When Volker repeatedly declined to agree to Schiff’s characterization of events, Schiff said, “Ambassador, you’re making this much more complicated than it has to be.”

 

Pathetic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3dk53p-1200x630.jpg

 

 

 

 

.

 
 
 
 
 
.

 

...what's even MORE pathetic is that I'd bet he wins re-election in a 2020 landslide......got 78% of the vote in 2018......Cali-Fun-Ya strikes AGAIN.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

0B2B0B68-11D3-409A-B223-9DEC93A06A5D.thumb.png.0e8a4ea76e7bc6af7b15cec296e97c95.png

 

 

.

 

See, I'd be fine with being "supervised" by a Democrat while reading the material.

 

Well, with the proviso that if the Democrat got in my way, prevented me from taking notes, became annoying, or tried to s.natch something away from me, they would leave the room with one or more broken limbs.

 

***** this dumbshit ***** ####### piece of ***** ***** filter.

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...what's even MORE pathetic is that I'd bet he wins re-election in a 2020 landslide......got 78% of the vote in 2018......Cali-Fun-Ya strikes AGAIN.............

Maybe not.. LA County just removed 1 1/2 million from the voter rolls. Heck, Schiff and Waters may not get a single vote next year!
giphy.gif

Edited by Cinga
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tenor.gif

Triggered!  Deplorable Snowflakes storm the proceedings to "protest" the ill treatment their corrupt leader is receiving.  Time to check your moral compass RepubliCrooks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-storm-closed-door-impeachment-hearing-as-escalating-ukraine-scandal-threatens-trump/2019/10/23/29877c06-f5a5-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html?outputType=amp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cinga said:

Maybe not.. LA County just removed 1 1/2 million from the voter rolls. Heck, Schiff and Waters may not get a single vote next year!
giphy.gif

 

Eh, people die every day....

 

 

Then they start voting solidly Democrat.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

tenor.gif

Triggered!  Deplorable Snowflakes storm the proceedings to "protest" the ill treatment their corrupt leader is receiving.  Time to check your moral compass RepubliCrooks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-storm-closed-door-impeachment-hearing-as-escalating-ukraine-scandal-threatens-trump/2019/10/23/29877c06-f5a5-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html?outputType=amp

tell me again just who exactly is abusing their power in this ***** show?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

tenor.gif

Triggered!  Deplorable Snowflakes storm the proceedings to "protest" the ill treatment their corrupt leader is receiving.  Time to check your moral compass RepubliCrooks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-storm-closed-door-impeachment-hearing-as-escalating-ukraine-scandal-threatens-trump/2019/10/23/29877c06-f5a5-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html?outputType=amp

I love how you come across as the expert on morality. Lol?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 10, 2019, Oleksandr Danylyuk, the Secretary of the National Security and
Defense Council for Ukraine, visited Washington, D.C. for a meeting with National
Security Advisor Bolton. Ambassadors Volker and Sondland also attended, along
with Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
The meeting proceeded well until the Ukrainians broached the subject of a meeting
between the two presidents. The Ukrainians saw this meeting as critically
important in order to solidify the support of their most important international
partner. Amb. Sondland started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific
investigations in order to secure the meeting with the President, at which time
Ambassador Bolton cut the meeting short.
Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb.
Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into
the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Amb. Sondland that his
statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son
had nothing to do with national security, and that such investigations were not
something the NSC was going to get involved in or push. Dr. Hill then entered the
room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate.
Following the debriefing meeting, I reported my concerns to the NSC’s lead
counsel. Dr. Hill also reported the incident to the NSC’s lead counsel.

 

 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/10/28/breaking-top-ukraine-expert-on-national-security-council-plans-to-testify-about-trumpzelensky-call-n2555490

Edited by daz28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/army-officer-reported-concerns-over-trumps-ukraine-call-023300613--abc-news-topstories.html

 

Does anyone else have a feeling of deja vu, like we're revisiting the Kavanaugh joke?

 

How many times can they go to the well when the first "witness" for a Democrat smear fell apart, so they had to keep finding more "witnesses" hoping one of them were credible?

 

On a side note, I love how the article contains an extensive quote from the "witness", then state that the quote is what the person may say.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/army-officer-reported-concerns-over-trumps-ukraine-call-023300613--abc-news-topstories.html

 

Does anyone else have a feeling of deja vu, like we're revisiting the Kavanaugh joke?

 

How many times can they go to the well when the first "witness" for a Democrat smear fell apart, so they had to keep finding more "witnesses" hoping one of them were credible?

 

On a side note, I love how the article contains an extensive quote from the "witness", then state that the quote is what the person may say.


Yeah, Alexandra Chalupa was all over twitter with it last night. <_< That tells you all you need to know.
 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don’t see why these people all assume the President was/is trying to find dirt on Biden. The rumor of Joe’s improper conduct is worse than the proof. I believe Trump was/is trying to root out corruption from the Ukrainian side...in other words...doing his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

I still don’t see why these people all assume the President was/is trying to find dirt on Biden. The rumor of Joe’s improper conduct is worse than the proof. I believe Trump was/is trying to root out corruption from the Ukrainian side...in other words...doing his job.


This is manufactured. What will be coming out from the Durham investigation is gonna be bad, very bad, for the Democrats.  This is simply the Ds and MSM (BIRM) trying to get ahead of a story with a distraction. When Trump released the transcript of the truly terrible bad bad Ukraine call, it was an "oh *****" moment for the impeachment innuendo crowd.  Gotta give 'em credit though, they are still tryin'. "Who needs the truth? We have the media to help us with our lies!!" is the the Democratic Party mantra. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I still don’t see why these people all assume the President was/is trying to find dirt on Biden. The rumor of Joe’s improper conduct is worse than the proof. I believe Trump was/is trying to root out corruption from the Ukrainian side...in other words...doing his job.

 

his useless son was handed a plum contract with a suspect government in the Ukraine

 

what's to wonder about?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/army-officer-reported-concerns-over-trumps-ukraine-call-023300613--abc-news-topstories.html

 

Does anyone else have a feeling of deja vu, like we're revisiting the Kavanaugh joke?

 

How many times can they go to the well when the first "witness" for a Democrat smear fell apart, so they had to keep finding more "witnesses" hoping one of them were credible?

 

On a side note, I love how the article contains an extensive quote from the "witness", then state that the quote is what the person may say.

Daz28 has posted this same thing in several threads. The wording is very, very careful. I'm going to dox him though. His real name is Dumbazz28, the clever little bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Adam Schiff Empowerment Act

Washington Examiner, by Byron York

Original Article

 

House Democrats plan to pass their Trump impeachment inquiry resolution Thursday. Its full description is "Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes.

 

" A better, and much shorter, title would be The Adam Schiff Empowerment Act. The resolution gives Rep. Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, far-reaching power over the Trump impeachment.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...