Jump to content

Coonman says it wasn’t him, after yesterday’s apology ???


Recommended Posts

Never forget:

 

none of this would be happening in Virginia right now if Kathy Tran hadn't introduced a bill to legalize abortion all the way up until birth.

 

A bill that was going nowhere in the statehouse. That's what made Northam's med-school classmate drop the dime on him.

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I've been hearing this one too. It's a way to prevent the GOP from taking over the governor's mansion. 

 

Not sure it's legal? Expecting it'll be down to a new election in the fall.

 

Have to believe that would be blocked in some manner or another... 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, whatdrought said:

 

Have to believe that would be blocked in some manner or another... 

 

I am in no way an expert or even amateur at Virginia state law, so I really don't know. But it seems like a weird loop hole that shouldn't be legal... perhaps one of the attorneys on the board can speak more to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I am in no way an expert or even amateur at Virginia state law, so I really don't know. But it seems like a weird loop hole that shouldn't be legal... perhaps one of the attorneys on the board can speak more to it.

 

Legally speaking the ascending Governor nominates his successor to Lt. Gov. But I imagine any move like this would cause a giant amount of hoopla and probably some form of suit in the SC. Not sure the legality either, but I think this might compel me to pick up the phone and call my district rep to voice my displeasure in the bastardization of the government of the state by the democrat ass holes. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, /dev/null said:

 

Does a replacement LG have to be approved by either house of the Virginia legislature.  Both of which are controlled by Republicans

 

No, at this point I think they just want someone who isn't afraid to show their high school yearbook to anyone.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

No, at this point I think they just want someone who isn't afraid to show their high school yearbook to anyone.

 

So was it taboo to have that in your yearbook in Virginia in the 1990s?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a rundown on how succession would go:

 

If the governor were to resign, the lieutenant governor — Justin Fairfax — would assume the office of governor for the duration of the governor’s term. That is what people thought would happen … 
 

</snip>
 

If the lieutenant governor were elevated to the governorship or if the lieutenant governor resigned — now a genuine possibility — then the current president pro tempore of the State Senate “assumes the duties” of the lieutenant governor. Note that the president pro tempore does not assume the office of lieutenant governor. It is a subtle difference, but the office of lieutenant governor would be left open until the next statewide election in 2021.
 

The current president pro tempore of the Virginia Senate is Sen. Steve Newman of the Lynchburg area. Newman is a Republican — a mild-mannered conservative who is well-liked on both sides of the aisle.
 

Interestingly, he would not have to give up his Senate seat as he assumed the duties of the lieutenant governor. That means that he would get his vote as a state senator, and he would also get to vote to break any ties that arise in the chamber.
 

</snip>
 

There is more, and it is worth reading if you are interested in the Clown Show in Virginia

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 


Welllllllllllll this opp took an unexpected turn. There have been whispers that Fairfax is a "creep" and his past was "polished" as he was to be pushed on to higher offices after the LT Gov gig was up. "People" expected him to be the next VA Governor, and then on to the White House. That appears most unlikely now. The question I have is... what else is going to come out about him? His handlers are said to be "most unhappy".  

:lol:

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

There's literally not enough popcorn

 

 

 

Oh wow. 

 

Christmas came early... Or late... 

 

 

 

this is the greatest screenplay that nobody could ever think up... 

 

 

36 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Here is a rundown on how succession would go:

 

If the governor were to resign, the lieutenant governor — Justin Fairfax — would assume the office of governor for the duration of the governor’s term. That is what people thought would happen … 
 

</snip>
 

If the lieutenant governor were elevated to the governorship or if the lieutenant governor resigned — now a genuine possibility — then the current president pro tempore of the State Senate “assumes the duties” of the lieutenant governor. Note that the president pro tempore does not assume the office of lieutenant governor. It is a subtle difference, but the office of lieutenant governor would be left open until the next statewide election in 2021.
 

The current president pro tempore of the Virginia Senate is Sen. Steve Newman of the Lynchburg area. Newman is a Republican — a mild-mannered conservative who is well-liked on both sides of the aisle.
 

Interestingly, he would not have to give up his Senate seat as he assumed the duties of the lieutenant governor. That means that he would get his vote as a state senator, and he would also get to vote to break any ties that arise in the chamber.
 

</snip>
 

There is more, and it is worth reading if you are interested in the Clown Show in Virginia

 

 

This is a good run down... On that note, maybe we can just make Cuccinelli governor. 

Edited by whatdrought
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

the local news here in Richmond is just pure comedy gold right now...station I am watching (CBS affiliate)seems overwhelmed ... too many stories for a little local station to cover i guess

 

Southern Democrats have a large portion of social conservatives and they had enough with this crew.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, there is no way in the world I believing a prep boy at the  preppiest of prep boy schools in UVA,  in 1980 , was listening to Kurtiss Blow....not a freaking chance. I will die on that hill.

 

I mean damn, some UVA bars still had a " no thug" dress code as of last year...get out with " we were listening to Kurtiss Blow" in 1980

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said:

BTW, there is no way in the world I believing a prep boy at the  preppiest of prep boy schools in UVA,  in 1980 , was listening to Kurtiss Blow....not a freaking chance. I will die on that hill.

 

I mean damn, some UVA bars still had a " no thug" dress code as of last year...get out with " we were listening to Kurtiss Blow" in 1980

 

That was my thought as well :lol: 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

BTW, there is no way in the world I believing a prep boy at the  preppiest of prep boy schools in UVA,  in 1980 , was listening to Kurtiss Blow....not a freaking chance. I will die on that hill.

 

Hell, I thought he meant Curtis Loew. Black man with curley white hair.

 

Shows you how much I know about rap music.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

 

They can get that Abrams lady for the job!  She's dying to be Governor of someplace.

Can she move up from Georgia real quick?

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by snafu
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL: Ralph Northam Must Resign. “His shifting and credulity-shredding explanations for the racist photograph on his medical school yearbook page, and the silence into which he then succumbed for days — after initially promising to do ‘the hard work’ of atonement and apology to restore his standing with Virginians — is simply too much.”

 

Hey, WaPo editorial board — remember how you pushed Northam as some sort of racial healer, while gleefully spreading the bull#### claims that longtime milquetoast GOP pol Ed Gillespie was some sort of Stormfront stalking horse? Maybe you should resign, too. Hacks. Don’t try to pretend this is just about the rottenness of Virginia’s Democratic Party. You’re part of the rot yourselves.

 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baby Killing Is Fine. Yearbook Photos Are The Problem.

By Ben Shapiro

 

Last week, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam was hit with a shocking blast from the past: a photo on his medical school yearbook page of a man in blackface and another man in a Ku Klux Klan outfit. Northam quickly apologized for the photo, then said he wasn't in the photo and then admitted he had once worn blackface and dressed up as Michael Jackson for a dance contest. He nearly moonwalked at a press conference before his wife gave him a look that could curdle milk.

 

For this sin — the sin of an old, disgusting, racially insensitive photo — Northam now finds his political career on the skids. As of this writing, he's hanging on by his fingernails, even as his lieutenant governor struggles with dicey sexual assault allegations.

 

The same week that Northam found himself in hot water, he endorsed a Virginia bill that would have broadened the ability of women to obtain an abortion up to the point of birth. Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran, a sponsor of the bill, stated in defense of her legislation that women would be able to obtain an abortion during labor. Northam then defended the bill, adding that if a baby were born alive during such an abortion — he assumed that the abortion would be due to "severe deformities" or "a fetus that's not viable" — then the baby could be "kept comfortable" while the family and the doctor decide its fate.

 

Even in the least appalling reading of his comments, Northam clearly endorsed infanticide. 

 

Yet these comments did not merit his ouster. In fact, they didn't even merit an argument inside the Democratic Party about the extremism of the pro-choice position. Last month, Democrats in the state of New York cheered wildly for a law that opened the floodgates to third-trimester abortion, with Gov. Andrew Cuomo ordering state sites to be illuminated in pink in celebration of the potential murder of the unborn. The Democratic governor of Rhode Island endorsed a similar bill; Democrats in Vermont attempted to pass an even more extreme bill that would enshrine abortion as a "fundamental right" for the entirety of the pregnancy period.

 

More at the link: https://www.dailywire.com/news/43159/baby-killing-fine-yearbook-photos-are-problem-ben-shapiro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, snafu said:

 

They can get that Abrams lady for the job!  She's dying to be Governor of someplace.

Can she move up from Georgia real quick?

 

 

 

 

 

Why would you make her move?  All she should have to do is self-identify as a legal resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia

6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

As a citizen of Scott's district, I can say without a doubt that he is a douche canoe

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gary M said:

Why has the college not drawn any fire for publishing these disturbing photos?

 

Most yearbook staffs have professors that counsel them, no repercussions for them?

They were tracking down the editor but it turned out he was aborted in his 133rd trimester after his mom had a discussion with a medical professional.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gary M said:

Why has the college not drawn any fire for publishing these disturbing photos?

 

Most yearbook staffs have professors that counsel them, no repercussions for them?

 

Because the college isn't governor.

 

And because back in 1985 this wasn't that big a deal.  The Democrats, ignorant #######s they are, are retrofitting 2019 social taboos to 1985.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gary M said:

Why has the college not drawn any fire for publishing these disturbing photos?

 

Most yearbook staffs have professors that counsel them, no repercussions for them?

  It's probably too late for this year but you can bet that any accredited college in the US will be setting guidelines for next year's yearbook.  Gone will be the SNL-esque manner of personal expression.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Because the college isn't governor.

 

And because back in 1985 this wasn't that big a deal.  The Democrats, ignorant #######s they are, are retrofitting 2019 social taboos to 1985.

 

yearbooks always try to be hip or rebellious or excel in "shocking the boor-jwa-zeeee"

 

i had to burn a few of mine for the comments people wrote in them

 

the 80s were kind of placid for college antics, South Africa divestment was the only thing on campus for my 7 years in University in 80s

 

2 decades earlier it was common form to write "kill this pig" next to the picture of a prof

 

 

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...