TakeYouToTasker Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: It's this type of arrogance over here that's the reason I don't bother engaging. There's arrogance on the football board... but it's football and even there it's a watered down version of the bravado over here. I lurk here enough to see that much of the "sourcing" you guys over here is utter crap. But they fit with your own biases... so you roll with them. You think you’re unique in that you’re presented with the opportunity to learn? It’s an opportunity every one of us was, and is, presented with. Most here were anti-Trump. Most are not/were not Republicans. Speaking for myself I was a vocally anti-Trump, free banking, classical liberal (possibly closer to a minarchist). I’ve never cast a ballot for a Republican for the office of President. The information Greg has presented over the past three years don’t mesh with any narrative I support. I believe non-voluntary taxation to be theft, and that the Federal government as it exists today should be abolished, and a new framework established similar to the Articles. But even more strongly I believe that the consent of the governed, and self determination, are the only things that legitimize governments; and that failed states observably don’t produce libertarian utopias. As such the peaceful transition of power is paramount. Greg’s argument, which we have heavily scrutinized over the last three years, has turned out to be much more plausible than what you hear from the MSM. Our government is not “the things we decide to do together”. Our government is a control mechanism and a tool used to hold a certain class of people above the laws they create for the rest of us. Read Greg’s argument. Edited October 3, 2019 by TakeYouToTasker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 14 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Sanders's fundraising numbers are impressive given the people continuing to shell it out saw so little return on their investment in 2016. It's known as the lottery syndrome. Fall in love with a nearly out of reach scenario and people will throw a lot of cash at it if done a little at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Julián Castro says that ‘time and again’ the idea of a good guy with a gun has been debunked Kamala Harris again promises executive action on gun control if Congress doesn’t act Buttigieg: No, I Wouldn’t Execute 9/11 Plotter KSM https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/10/03/buttigieg-no-wouldnt-execute-9-11-plotter-ksm/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Kamala Harris again promises executive action on gun control if Congress doesn’t act Again. YOU ARE ALREADY IN CONGRESS AND CAN DO SOMETHING NOW. WHY ARE YOU WAITING? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, KRC said: Again. YOU ARE ALREADY IN CONGRESS AND CAN DO SOMETHING NOW. WHY ARE YOU WAITING? Because she's a worthless pole smoker who's only in the position because of her pole smoking. But that's only stating the obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Because she's a worthless pole smoker who's only in the position because of her pole smoking. Always classy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, John Adams said: Always classy. Always truthful, you mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 24 minutes ago, B-Man said: My vote for even more irrelevance: You posting some guy's tweet mocking Time's cover of Kamala Harris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 36 minutes ago, John Adams said: My vote for even more irrelevance: You posting some guy's tweet mocking Time's cover of Kamala Harris. .... My God, how can I go on ? ? The Smoke Signals Say It’ll Be Trump Vs. Warren https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/09/26/the-smoke-signals-say-itll-be-trump-vs-warren-n2553567 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 15 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: That is what I assumed he meant, even though he basically said the opposite... maybe he should have paid more attention in school to those dishonorable educators he believes are just below tax collectors Well, that flew right over your head. You don't even recognize an insult when given one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Yup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Biden lead by 15 points on August 1st. Now he's down to a 2 point lead. (Bye, Joe!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I can't believe he RT'd this. I mean... I can, but savage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Biden lead by 15 points on August 1st. Now he's down to a 2 point lead. (Bye, Joe!) Can you imagine how badly he would look in a real debate?? I can't see how he'd begin to hold up against Warren once the Dems finish clearing out the noise, much less Trump. The Dems can't be that dumb, they know they've got to get rid of him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Just now, KD in CA said: Can you imagine how badly he would look in a real debate?? I can't see how he'd begin to hold up against Warren once the Dems finish clearing out the noise, much less Trump. The Dems can't be that dumb, they know they've got to get rid of him. I'm still of the opinion that part of the motivation behind pushing this Ukraine story so hard and fast was to kill two birds with one stone: get ahead of the OIG report/Durham investigation, and to force Trump and the media to slay Biden rather than have Warren do it and risk alienating the black support Joe has which she desperately needs to steal to have a prayer. It was a two-fer. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm still of the opinion that part of the motivation behind pushing this Ukraine story so hard and fast was to kill two birds with one stone: get ahead of the OIG report/Durham investigation, and to force Trump and the media to slay Biden rather than have Warren do it and risk alienating the black support Joe has which she desperately needs to steal to have a prayer. It was a two-fer. Booker or Harris in the VP slot is going to have to be the key for them to get black turnout. I can't see how Warren gets viewed much differently than Hillary otherwise. I could see Warren/Booker winning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: Booker or Harris in the VP slot is going to have to be the key for them to get black turnout. I can't see how Warren gets viewed much differently than Hillary otherwise. I could see Warren/Booker winning. A few staffers on the Hill whom I've come to know say the office pools have shifted a bit, the Warren/Booker ticket is still the most likely (per them) but the dark horse emerging is Warren/Clinton. The logic being Clinton would allow her a centrist counterpoint and draw her own black base to Warren. No one I talk to thinks that will actually be the ticket, but its gone from a joke to a thing that Warren might consider (again, per DC gossip). They're basing it on Clinton's re-emergence in the media as of late, coming right on the heels of a weekend sit down with Warren last month she had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: A few staffers on the Hill whom I've come to know say the office pools have shifted a bit, the Warren/Booker ticket is still the most likely (per them) but the dark horse emerging is Warren/Clinton. The logic being Clinton would allow her a centrist counterpoint and draw her own black base to Warren. No one I talk to thinks that will actually be the ticket, but its gone from a joke to a thing that Warren might consider (again, per DC gossip). They're basing it on Clinton's re-emergence in the media as of late, coming right on the heels of a weekend sit down with Warren last month she had. I'd be pretty surprised if Warren agreed to that and risked being upstaged by her VP. Also, will the London bookies be taking six figure bets on Warren not surviving her term? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 19 hours ago, Rob's House said: For the leftists out there, I know it upsets you that the establishment lost, and I know how desperately you want it to regain power, but you shouldn't fret. Time is on your side. As we continue to move toward Idiocracy, the masses will increasingly empower the federal bureaucracy. A friend of min recommended the movie Idiocracy to me a month or so ago. I did watch it and it is a great science fiction futuristic movie. And, scary because it looks like it is already starting to happen. I would recommend this to anyone who has not seen it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: I'd be pretty surprised if Warren agreed to that and risked being upstaged by her VP. Also, will the London bookies be taking six figure bets on Warren not surviving her term? That was my thought too. I think the most dangerous position in the world would be any one which involves having a Clinton one breath away from taking your job. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 24 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That was my thought too. I think the most dangerous position in the world would be any one which involves having a Clinton one breath away from taking your job. That and I can't see Hillary accepting 2nd chair with her ego. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: A few staffers on the Hill whom I've come to know say the office pools have shifted a bit, the Warren/Booker ticket is still the most likely (per them) but the dark horse emerging is Warren/Clinton. The logic being Clinton would allow her a centrist counterpoint and draw her own black base to Warren. No one I talk to thinks that will actually be the ticket, but its gone from a joke to a thing that Warren might consider (again, per DC gossip). They're basing it on Clinton's re-emergence in the media as of late, coming right on the heels of a weekend sit down with Warren last month she had. yeah... my money would be that it's a Clinton/Warren ticket. no surprise HRC has emerged from her hole. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 47 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I'd be pretty surprised if Warren agreed to that and risked being upstaged by her VP. Also, will the London bookies be taking six figure bets on Warren not surviving her term? She'd be lucky to survive the post-inaugural walk down Pennsylvania Ave. "BREAKING NEWS: Newly-inaugurated President Warren hit by car during Inaugural Parade. Three times. Secret Service mystified, FBI rules it a suicide." 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 53 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I'd be pretty surprised if Warren agreed to that and risked being upstaged by her VP. Also, will the London bookies be taking six figure bets on Warren not surviving her term? The over/under on that is 2 years into a Warren administration. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 31 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: That and I can't see Hillary accepting 2nd chair with her ego. Unless Hillary views Warren as the necessary Trojan Horse to gain entry to the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: A few staffers on the Hill whom I've come to know say the office pools have shifted a bit, the Warren/Booker ticket is still the most likely (per them) but the dark horse emerging is Warren/Clinton. The logic being Clinton would allow her a centrist counterpoint and draw her own black base to Warren. No one I talk to thinks that will actually be the ticket, but its gone from a joke to a thing that Warren might consider (again, per DC gossip). They're basing it on Clinton's re-emergence in the media as of late, coming right on the heels of a weekend sit down with Warren last month she had. Wait...which Clinton? Because Hillary's old, know's she's old, and I don't think she'd be against immortalizing herself by establishing dynastic power. And the minimum age for a VP is 35 - Chelsea is 39. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Wait...which Clinton? Because Hillary's old, know's she's old, and I don't think she'd be against immortalizing herself by establishing dynastic power. And the minimum age for a VP is 35 - Chelsea is 39. I had assumed HRC but I didn't clarify -- so maybe it's the rear admiral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Wait...which Clinton? Because Hillary's old, know's she's old, and I don't think she'd be against immortalizing herself by establishing dynastic power. And the minimum age for a VP is 35 - Chelsea is 39. It sure would show that the Democrats are firmly in a Clinton choke hold if that happens. I still think that Chelsea has to do the podunk congressional seat for two years even though she most likely considers that beneath her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1179759561500028929 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: I had assumed HRC but I didn't clarify -- so maybe it's the rear admiral. Would not surprise me at all. I mean, look at her qualifications: best-selling author, an NBC contributor, a former management consultant, a former hedge fund analyst, on many boards of directors, chaired the Clinton Foundation, through which she has foreign policy experience. She's got the perfect "claim everything but do nothing" political resume. She's the second-most qualified candidate ever, behind mom.* *This statement is, of course, bull####. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1179759561500028929 Planning for this started merely a few days after the Epstein "suicide." 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, KD in CA said: Booker or Harris in the VP slot is going to have to be the key for them to get black turnout. I can't see how Warren gets viewed much differently than Hillary otherwise. I could see Warren/Booker winning. I doubt it. Harris isn't black. Booker is a super duper straight black guy ? (one confirmation of his being gay and blacks will not vote for him), but Lizzie probably wants to be the only minority on the ticket. ? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, KD in CA said: Can you imagine how badly he would look in a real debate?? I can't see how he'd begin to hold up against Warren once the Dems finish clearing out the noise, much less Trump. The Dems can't be that dumb, they know they've got to get rid of him. It'll pry be Warren at this point more Sanders supporters will shift to her than Biden once he drops out. Political betting odds have Warren at 50.8% to take the primary and Biden at 19.2%. That seems about right at this point as Biden is reeling and it's only going to get worse. https://electionbettingodds.com/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 47 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1179759561500028929 The woman couldn't sell her ***** books for 99 cents each at Costco, but she's gonna sell $50K a plate fundraising tickets? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc Brown said: It'll pry be Warren at this point more Sanders supporters will shift to her than Biden once he drops out. Political betting odds have Warren at 50.8% to take the primary and Biden at 19.2%. That seems about right at this point as Biden is reeling and it's only going to get worse. https://electionbettingodds.com/ No doubt. The Dems are morons. Warren cannot win in states where Trump has weakness, which means she cannot win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 No one on that stage has a chance really, but Warren's chances are worse in the general than anyone not named Biden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: No one on that stage has a chance really, but Warren's chances are worse in the general than anyone not named Biden. Not even Beto? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Not even Beto? I forgot he was still running to be honest. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I only know because he instagrammed his flu shot this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts