Jay_Fixit Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: You are calling out a guy whose 16 game numbers are 1100 yards and 9 TDs. You clearly googled “Martavis Bryant stats” and thought you were bringing something to the table. Try again Big Guy!! Are those projections or are they what he had? Because they’re two different things. Answer the question hot shot. I mean, this is easy stuff. Hold on. 765. Hahaha Edited September 2, 2018 by Jay_Fixit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Hooks Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 “Big guy”, “hot shot”, ish is getting cray in here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Fixit Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Bobby Hooks said: “Big guy”, “hot shot”, ish is getting cray in here! This post projects to be hilarious over 16 games. Projections. LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Hooks Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said: This post projects to be hilarious over 16 games. Projections. LOL I know you’re just snarkily trying to prove a fun point, but you do really think this post will still be funny 16 games from now, right? Right?! Edited September 2, 2018 by Bobby Hooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Fixit Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bobby Hooks said: I know you’re just snarkily trying to prove a fun point, but you do really think this post will still be funny 16 games from now, right? Right?! I just want projection guy to post again so I can laugh at his projections. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Fan in LA Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 hours ago, The Bills Blog said: It's MARTAVIS. I will never comprehend why people add the "ou" before the S. It's like Tasker constantly saying Peterson instead of Peterman, ostensibly because Peterson is more common? I don't get it. It's not that hard. What happened to the good old days when people with weird names got a nickname ? How about "Marty"..............................what's wrong with that ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenorthremembers Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 .My favorite part of this post is someone giving Bryant credit for projected games he never played and then giving someone else crap for quoting his actual real life stats. I would love to try that at my job. "Granted I didn't show up half the year but given my high performance the first half of the year you have to assume every other day I would have shown up but didnt, would have been exactly the same regardless of circumstances" You get credit for the things you do, not the things someone thinks you will do. The guy is a tall wideout who ran the 9 route well for a bit of success. He is also 27 years old, never played a full NFL season and appears to like weed more than football. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 3 hours ago, The Bills Blog said: It's MARTAVIS. I will never comprehend why people add the "ou" before the S. It's like Tasker constantly saying Peterson instead of Peterman, ostensibly because Peterson is more common? I don't get it. It's not that hard. Don't blame us if this kid can't even spell his own name right... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Martavius was good on the Steelers. The only way he is ever going to be good is if we ever get a 6'4" or 6'5" big strong doofy first round QB from a small school with a big arm. Otherwise, why bother? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 42 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: .My favorite part of this post is someone giving Bryant credit for projected games he never played and then giving someone else crap for quoting his actual real life stats. I would love to try that at my job. "Granted I didn't show up half the year but given my high performance the first half of the year you have to assume every other day I would have shown up but didnt, would have been exactly the same regardless of circumstances" You get credit for the things you do, not the things someone thinks you will do. The guy is a tall wideout who ran the 9 route well for a bit of success. He is also 27 years old, never played a full NFL season and appears to like weed more than football. 1900 yards in 36 career games.......17 TD's.......15+ yards per reception. Yeah.......he's a big suspension risk but if he were producing at that 850 yards and 6-7 TD's per 16 games clip he'd be earning north of $10M per right now and the Bills would have virtually no shot at signing him. So as a dirt cheap waiver wire pickup he'd be worth the risk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 The fact that this thread exists and has serious replies saying we should sign him, just shows how little knowledge a lot of poster actually have. I mean, just Google Bryant's name and you'll see why no one is going to pick him up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavy Kevi Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Man he is so talented... but definiyely NOT a process guy. We are desperate at WR though so I wonder at what point McD starts to think he can handle a diva or two. I hope it's not now, but I could justify it if it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 People always want to think that a quick, cheap easy fix is just around the corner... Must be human nature I guess.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 I personally WOULD pick him up while understanding that it could end the same as Corey Colemen Except Bryant has actually produced when he is on the field 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 How long is he going to be suspended for though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Don’t see it happening but I’d grab him. Wouldn’t cost much. If he doesn’t clean up his act, cut him. Our WRs are bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 minute ago, NewEra said: Don’t see it happening but I’d grab him. Wouldn’t cost much. If he doesn’t clean up his act, cut him. Our WRs are bad. Agreed. I totally understand that McBeane only want Boy Scouts. But it seems to me that they can take a flyer on some of these guys, like they did with Coleman, and if it doesn't work they just get rid of him, and if it does work, they're heroes for the reclamation project. It worked for three years with Ritchie Incognito. There was also a somewhat reliable rumor IiRC that the Bills were interested in Bryant last year. I thought no way would McBeane do it but then I saw that they actually did look into it. So who knows. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 9 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said: Agreed. I totally understand that McBeane only want Boy Scouts. But it seems to me that they can take a flyer on some of these guys, like they did with Coleman, and if it doesn't work they just get rid of him, and if it does work, they're heroes for the reclamation project. It worked for three years with Ritchie Incognito. There was also a somewhat reliable rumor IiRC that the Bills were interested in Bryant last year. I thought no way would McBeane do it but then I saw that they actually did look into it. So who knows. Bryant is a "process guy" compared to Coleman. Just can't stay off the wacky tobacky and has developed a bit of a chip on his shoulder about being hyper-prosecuted for it and denied his free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said: Are those projections or are they what he had? Because they’re two different things. Answer the question hot shot. I mean, this is easy stuff. Hold on. 765. Hahaha He played 11 games!! You can’t possibly think people here are stupid enough to not look at a per game or per target average. Aaron Rodgers threw for 1,675 yards last year and only 16 TDs!! He fell off a cliff. If you want to push gross stats for a season in which he played 11 games people will see right through it. That is a TERRIBLE argument. Distorting the truth around here never works. If you want to say, “he’s an idiot” you have a point. That’s reasonable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 25 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said: Agreed. I totally understand that McBeane only want Boy Scouts. But it seems to me that they can take a flyer on some of these guys, like they did with Coleman, and if it doesn't work they just get rid of him, and if it does work, they're heroes for the reclamation project. It worked for three years with Ritchie Incognito. There was also a somewhat reliable rumor IiRC that the Bills were interested in Bryant last year. I thought no way would McBeane do it but then I saw that they actually did look into it. So who knows. We prefer the term “McBoy Scouts” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts