Jump to content

Helsinki Summit


Recommended Posts

This is one that will be remembered for a long time. That's for sure.

 

Meeting without aids, with no witness that can talk about it, unless the translators talk.

 

Putin who wanted Trump to win and helped him and Trump the guy who accepted this murderous thugs help.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

This is one that will be remembered for a long time. That's for sure.

 

Meeting without aids, with no witness that can talk about it, unless the translators talk.

 

Putin who wanted Trump to win and helped him and Trump the guy who accepted this murderous thugs help.

 

 

 

Just horrible.  The President, conducting foreign policy, without the presence of so much as herpes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Just horrible.  The President, conducting foreign policy, without the presence of so much as herpes...

He conducting foreign policy?  You don't know that

Could be domestic policy,

 

Putin are you listening???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You kids might not believe this, but there was a time when a President could get a Nobel Peace Prize for meeting with foreign leaders.  Or for campaigning on the idea of meeting with foreign leaders.  Or something kinda like that.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KD in CA said:

You kids might not believe this, but there was a time when a President could get a Nobel Peace Prize for meeting with foreign leaders.  Or for campaigning on the idea of meeting with foreign leaders.  Or something kinda like that.

 

Hell, there was a time the Speaker of the House could conduct her own foreign policy and travel to Syria to meet Bashar al-Assad, and was hailed as "courageous" and creating a "breakthrough."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Hell, there was a time the Speaker of the House could conduct her own foreign policy and travel to Syria to meet Bashar al-Assad, and was hailed as "courageous" and creating a "breakthrough."

 

Oh, but it was all so easy back in those days.  All you needed was a SoS who could shatter a glass ceiling and a reset button!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KD in CA said:

 

Oh, but it was all so easy back in those days.  All you needed was a SoS who could shatter a glass ceiling and a reset button!

 

That was a couple years before those days.  You're thinking of the days when a presidential candidate could conduct a foreign policy tour of Europe and not only not get accused of collusion with foreign powers, but win a Nobel Prize for it.

 

How did attitudes in our country get this !@#$ed up, that Democratic presidential candidates can conduct foreign policy, but Republican Presidents shouldn't be permitted to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is our President

“Much of our news media is indeed the enemy of the people and all the Dems know how to do is resist and obstruct! This is why there is such hatred and dissension in our country — but at some point, it will heal" 

 

 

 

 

Clinton tweeted, “Question for President Trump as he meets Putin: Do you know which team you play for?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

This is our President

“Much of our news media is indeed the enemy of the people and all the Dems know how to do is resist and obstruct! This is why there is such hatred and dissension in our country — but at some point, it will heal" 

 

 

 

 

Clinton tweeted: Do you know which team you play for?”

Funny.  That's the same question Hillary asked Huma and it meant something totally different.

Edited by 4merper4mer
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Funny.  That's the same question Hillary asked Huma and it meant something totally different.

I know, nothing about treason, though. 

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


WTH is wrong with these people!?

Who? FDR and Bush? 

 

Oh you mean the people that date criticize Saint Trump for meeting his election fixer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I know, nothing about treason, though. 

Actually it had some because she asked in a email and meant to attach a picture of the Kama sutra but accidentally attached a schematic of a nuclear sub.  

 

Don't worry though.  Although it was negligent and it was also VERY gross, it wasn't gross negligence according to Comey.

Edited by 4merper4mer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Actually it had some because she asked in a email and meant to attach a picture of the Kama sutra but accidentally attached a schematic of a nuclear sub.  

 

Don't worry though.  Although it was negligent and it was also VERY gross, it wasn't gross negligence according to Comey.

Ya it's ok, our president looks like a traitor. Over there begging Putin to fix more elections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:wallbash:

 

 

But FDR did go to Yalta and sacrificed tens of millions of Europeans for 2 generations.

 

Open up a history book, people

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

But FDR did go to Yalta and sacrificed tens of millions of Europeans for 2 generations.

 

Open up a history book, people

That's stupid, So we were suppose to fight the red army to free Poland? Glad to see all you know about history is recycled GOP talking points from 1950 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ya it's ok, our president looks like a traitor. Over there begging Putin to fix more elections. 

 

It will be tougher this time because Zuck won't let him open the all important Facebook pages on which the fate of the free world, and so much  else hangs.  That bandwidth must be reserved for whatever depths of depravity can get him a few extra bucks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walk in, tell Putin he has 24 hours to stop his nonsense or we are at war.  Cyberwar.  Then walk out.  Take 1-2 minutes.  No further talks , no negotiations, nothing until this nonsense stops.  

 

Instruce our intelligence people their sole priority is to destroy Russia's ability to interfere with us.

 

The integrity of our country is at stake

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump and the Russuans share the same point of view, the same talking points and the same lies 

 

"Putin’s allies say that last Friday’s indictments represented the latest effort by the Washington establishment to derail Trump’s effort to improve relations with Russia.

“It seems to us the opponents of the improvement of U.S.-Russia relations should not be allowed to endlessly exploit this harmful topic, which is being kept afloat artificially,” Putin’s foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov said ahead of the summit, according to Interfax."

6 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Walk in, tell Putin he has 24 hours to stop his nonsense or we are at war.  Cyberwar.  Then walk out.  Take 1-2 minutes.  No further talks , no negotiations, nothing until this nonsense stops.  

 

Instruce our intelligence people their sole priority is to destroy Russia's ability to interfere with us.

 

The integrity of our country is at stake

And what's happen is almost completely opposite. Putin is his friend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Walk in, tell Putin he has 24 hours to stop his nonsense or we are at war.  Cyberwar.  Then walk out.  Take 1-2 minutes.  No further talks , no negotiations, nothing until this nonsense stops.  

 

Instruce our intelligence people their sole priority is to destroy Russia's ability to interfere with us.

 

The integrity of our country is at stake

1. Threaten and execute Cyberwar

2. Each country knocks out the others power grid

3. ??????????

4. Profit

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's stupid, So we were suppose to fight the red army to free Poland? Glad to see all you know about history is recycled GOP talking points from 1950 

Those weren't GOP talking points. They were taken directly from FDR's fireside chats that he had on tv in 1932.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

1. Threaten and execute Cyberwar

2. Each country knocks out the others power grid

3. ??????????

4. Profit

DNI Coates has indicated our country is under attack.  Will we fight or capitulate?  We should fight.   This president won't.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

DNI Coates has indicated our country is under attack.  Will we fight or capitulate?  We should fight.   This president won't.  

After that cowboy Obama it's so nice to have such a gentile leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joesixpack said:

 

That's just retarded.

 

This president's done nothing BUT fight since day 1.

 

Fight against foreign interference...fight against domestic coup attempts.

 

 

Fight against foreign interference?  You can't be serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldmanfan said:

Fight against foreign interference?  You can't be serious.

 

I'm serious. He's fighting against interference from our supposed "allies" who've worked hand in hand with the Democrats to try and remove him. Steele was from the UK, and his discredited dossier was the product of foreign intelligence services. Just not the ones you deem fit to demonize.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

After that cowboy Obama it's so nice to have such a gentile leader.

When our DNI says we are under attack, and we do nothing, it is borderline treasonous.  The former president should have stopped it. He didn't.  And now the current president refuses to acknowledge what his own intelligence people tell him.

 

This transcends stupid political bickering.  The integrity of the country is being threatened.

Just now, joesixpack said:

 

I'm serious. He's fighting against interference from our supposed "allies" who've worked hand in hand with the Democrats to try and remove him. Steele was from the UK, and his discredited dossier was the product of foreign intelligence services. Just not the ones you deem fit to demonize.

 

 

An adversary is trying to destroy our electoral system and we meet with him?  We need to destroy him.

 

Dossier- both parties were involved.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joesixpack said:

 

Mainstream republicans are no different than democrats. They serve the same corrupt, pedophilic elite business masters.

 

And in the meantime a foreign adversary interferes with our election.  That is war.  And needs to have a response in kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldmanfan said:

And in the meantime a foreign adversary interferes with our election.  That is war.  And needs to have a response in kind.

 

No, it's not, and no it doesn't.

 

And no, there wasn't. Facebook troll farms and the like don't constitute election interference. Hacking democratic party computers also does not constitute electoral interference.

 

You're nuts, you want to start a war with a nuclear power because some demi-mongoloid democratic party staffers got phished?

 

Gtfo here

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

DNI Coates has indicated our country is under attack.  Will we fight or capitulate?  We should fight.   This president won't.  

 

There are many ways to fight, and our President is fighting.

 

The issue at play is that for the full duration of the prior Administration all foreign policy was weaponized solely for the purpose of domestic political optics.  This Administration does not play fast and lose to those ends; but rather seeks to achieve real results, and does so without the benefit of a fawning media., but rather one that is hostile for the sake of being hostile. 

 

What you're doing is advocating for nuclear war

 

Stop and think about that. 

 

Who does that benefit?  Perhaps you're interested in holding free elections, with no interference from political adds on facebook, in your 30 man colony in a remote fallout shelter?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

And in the meantime a foreign adversary interferes with our election.  That is war.  And needs to have a response in kind.

 

Reminder: " interferes with our election" in this case equals "posts stupid **** on the internet that the average American is too stupid to doubt."

 

If that's a casus belli, I want gatorman tried as a war criminal.

 

Edited by DC Tom
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...