JoPar_v2 Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 First Poyer gets thrown under the bus, then this. Starting to think dating an Instagram model isn’t that great an idea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LikeIGiveADarn Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, Saint Doug said: No doubt she’s irrational. Even burn-the-house-down crazy. But a model doesn’t destroy her face. When the phrase beauty runs skin deep was coined, they had her in mind. No way she would destroy her only asset. Problem with that is is that her only asset isn't going to pay the bills, or provide her with ANYWHERE NEAR the lifestyle she has been living. Getting a nice big settlement from McCoy, along with the mansion, would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 @Hapless Bills Fan Will you please force the OP to change the name of this thread to "Real Estate Law"? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 29 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He is an amazing rb. And that doesn’t mean he did anything wrong in this case. But just like RI, he seems to always be around the smoke. http://m.tmz.com/#!celeb/feed/lesean-mccoy/ My point exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, dollars 2 donuts said: @Hapless Bills Fan Will you please force the OP to change the name of this thread to "Real Estate Law"? How about "When have Tenants Rights laws gone too far?" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, KD in CA said: If that happens, what kind of cap relief are the Bills looking at? Ya know, damn, KD, didn't think of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, dezertbill said: To me, I see this as once the June 1st incident occurred where he saw him moving stuff out of the house, he changed out the cameras to where she doesn't have access to them. Only he does. So he can still keep an eye on her, but she can't keep an eye on the place when she isn't there. Her attorney says as much in that letter. Righton dezerbill! That makes sense! That is my point - and therefore, not having control anymore SHE ripped them out, not him. That is where the logic takes you, but the facts, I admit, could be different. If she ripped them out, this is almost certainly BS, IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cornette's Commentary said: Ah, gotcha. Tom, is there any possibility that this whole thing could be an elaborate setup on the ex-girlfriend's part? Any possibility? Sure. A realistic possibility? How the !@#$ should I know? Seriously...there's a paucity of real information in this case, masked - as usual - by everyone's rampant speculation based on whatever context is foremost in their heads. I simply take the position that I do not know what I do not know, but I know that I don't know what I don't know, which puts me in a position to know what the rest of you think you know but don't know that you don't know...y'know? Basically, I play devil's advocate and point out to people the assumptions they make. And ignore the shitbiscuits that think "I don't know what happened" means "I think she's lying, and he's innocent." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornette's Commentary Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, fansince88 said: My point exactly. If these accusations were made against Kyle Williams or Harrison Phillips, would they be immediately dismissed as false? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: How about "When have Tenants Rights laws gone too far?" Honestly, KD, this is when these long threads get down right awesome! well done, Sir. Well done, indeed. Edited July 11, 2018 by dollars 2 donuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Even if McCoy had nothing to do with it, she's almost certainly a victim of assault. Yes, she might have done that to herself, or gotten someone to do it. But I highly doubt it at this point. Maybe she’ll sue him for not providing a safe place for her to squat. More press releases! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 Somebody involved in this is telling one heckuva lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, dollars 2 donuts said: Honestly, KD, this is when these long threads get down right awesome! It really is....you always have to let them marinate through the first 50 pages or so before you get to the choice cuts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, Cornette's Commentary said: If these accusations were made against Kyle Williams or Harrison Phillips, would they be immediately dismissed as false? My thoughts would be no way with Kyle. Dont know Horrible Harry well enough yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, KD in CA said: It really is....you always have to let them marinate through the first 50 pages or so before you get to the choice cuts. Usually takes that long before the REAL numbskulls show up and I get to have my fun... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, dezertbill said: To me, I see this as once the June 1st incident occurred where she saw him moving stuff out of the house, he changed out the cameras to where she doesn't have access to them. Only he does. So he can still keep an eye on her, but she can't keep an eye on the place when she isn't there. Her attorney says as much in that letter. Yep. There’s no way she would allow those cameras running, watching her 24/7. This is actually one of the simpler things to explain at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornette's Commentary Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, fansince88 said: My thoughts would be no way with Kyle. Dont know Horrible Harry well enough yet. Why is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Read the attorney press release. Sounds like Meathead McCoy hired thugs to break into his house and take property from the woman that he felt was rightly his own. If this story is not made up, there are some crimes being committed here, and they should extend to Meathead McCoy. Will be interested to see how the Bills handle this with regard to McCoy. He may be done as as Bill, regardless of any criminal proceedings that may or may not be brought against him long term. It certainly sounds that way. But the attorneys work for the victim and are not objective. For example, the press release mentions the assailant asked for jewelry that McCoy has requested for in the past. The assailant asked for cash, too. What we don't know is if the intruder asked for a numbers of things, including a couple of jewelry items McCoy wanted returned. Maybe those jewelry items were obvious because they were being worn and the intruder demanded them because they looked valuable. He might have demanded 10 different items - only a couple of which were items McCoy wanted returned. Did McCoy want cash, too? While I'm troubled and worried, we certainly don't know all the facts and the press release is bound to be one-sided. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPT Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 Okay I obviously condemn what's been done to this woman, but here's a legal question for the non-Cuddy's out there. If she is found to have been living in the home illegally, and the person who entered the home did so with McCoy's permission, and the ex attempted to physically prevent him from removing McCoy's possessions, would he be able to make the case that he was defending McCoy's property? Sort of a convoluted "stand your ground" defense? Again, I absolutely do not condone the actions, I'm just wondering about the legal implications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted July 11, 2018 Share Posted July 11, 2018 9 minutes ago, Augie said: I bet Chris Carter has some advice for Shady, either way.... Get a fall guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts