DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, The Red King said: I hate to be the one to tell you this, but at this point I think you're being actively trolled. They're seeing how far they can wind you up, and you're taking the bait. It's okay...it's what I do. I consider it an opportunity to work on new and creative ways to insult idiots. (My cereal box comment, for example...that was pretty good.) Some people juggle geese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 He's been trying to evict her from a house that he owns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornette's Commentary Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Has McCoy been released yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, CuddyDark said: They have a rental contract. McCoy and this woman made a home. If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her. Okay...that's three statements that contradict each other. So which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 He wants her out. She won't leave. I think she is lying. Here is her public filing. Reveals no excuse for her being there. An alleged beating would delay her eviction. However, as said, if he did it he should (and probably will), be prosecuted. I don't believe it. Here https://deadspin.com/police-lesean-mccoys-ex-girlfriend-was-the-victim-of-a-1827490589 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, The Red King said: I hate to be the one to tell you this, but at this point I think you're being actively trolled. They're seeing how far they can wind you up, and you're taking the bait. Shhhhh! It's fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuddyDark Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Okay...that's three statements that contradict each other. So which is it? I have made zero contradictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: He's been trying to evict her from a house that he owns. But he doesn't own it, because it's a family home, not a shared home, because she said they were married, and you can't evict a spouse unless you have a rental agreement with the spouse! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, CuddyDark said: They have a rental contract. McCoy and this woman made a home. If he had a contract with her the Sharif would have removed her. Now you've gone and done it. First--tenet, then--Sharif? I can see why we should listen to you on legal matters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: Yeah I'm gonna say you don't know what you're talking about. Then post some citations. I've been Googling and I find nothing in U.S. state law that supports your claim. I'll keep searching but don't expect to find anything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Okay...that's three statements that contradict each other. So which is it? Its a rental family. She is a rental wife and house maid thingy. Its not that hard to follow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonCents Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, MarlinTheMagician said: He wants her out. She won't leave. I think she is lying. Here is her public filing. Reveals no excuse for her being there. An alleged beating would delay her eviction. However, as said, if he did it he should (and probably will), be prosecuted. I don't believe it. Here https://deadspin.com/police-lesean-mccoys-ex-girlfriend-was-the-victim-of-a-1827490589 More crap. She just got the court date pushed back 30 days. Why would she beat herself up when she is clearly doing a fine job of delaying the eviction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuddyDark Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: But he doesn't own it, because it's a family home, not a shared home, because she said they were married, and you can't evict a spouse unless you have a rental agreement with the spouse! The eviction was the other poster talking about Threes Company. He said in my world they would never get evicted. I told him they have a rental agreement so they have a contract that can lead to eviction. Keep up. Get your lawyer wife to read it to you. LMAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 This is awful story but it’s funny the way some fans defend let’s just say questionable guys like McCoy or Incognito. I’m sure if they were on NE it would be the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 LeSean McCoy apparently went to court a year ago to try to get his ex-girlfriend out of the $800k house he owns. For @CuddyDark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, CuddyDark said: I have made zero contradictions. 1: "They have a rental contract." 2: "McCoy and this woman made a home. 3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her." 1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3). The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract. But they had a rental contract (1). 1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2). They had a rental contract. (1) But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home. Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, Commonsense said: More crap. She just got the court date pushed back 30 days. Why would she beat herself up when she is clearly doing a fine job of delaying the eviction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, C.Biscuit97 said: This is awful story but it’s funny the way some fans defend let’s just say questionable guys like McCoy or Incognito. I’m sure if they were on NE it would be the same. EXACTLY. He seems to be a dirtbag. Great RB but not so great a person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuddyDark Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: 1: "They have a rental contract." 2: "McCoy and this woman made a home. 3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her." 1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3). The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract. But they had a rental contract (1). 1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2). They had a rental contract. (1) But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home. Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction. Threes Company have a rental contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskibreth Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: 1: "They have a rental contract." 2: "McCoy and this woman made a home. 3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her." 1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3). The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract. But they had a rental contract (1). 1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2). They had a rental contract. (1) But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home. Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction. not sure if this complicates things further for you guys, but.... "The home is owned by LKM Trust Agreement — LKM are McCoy’s initials — which is listed with a Buffalo, NY, address.:" https://www.sbnation.com/2018/7/10/17553550/lesean-mccoy-abuse-accusations-home-invasion-georgia-ex-girlfriend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts