Jump to content

LeSean McCoy allegations


Recommended Posts

I dunno, of course there's so much to be revealed, but my "Spidey Sense" tells me this is a setup.  Jilted ex upset that Shady has been trying to get her out of his house for months.  Legal process initiated.  Is it a coincidence that a hearing was scheduled yesterday and this stuff happens?  Lawyer representing ex is an attention seeker -- she trademarked "pitbull in a skirt" -- yet doesn't even spell McCoy's name correctly in her "statement" released to news sources.  Lots of vague information presented as "fact."

 

Shady's kid's mom has come out and said the kid has never been abused.  So there's one lie.  I think we also now know (or are pretty sure) the assailant wasn't Shady himself.  So we're beyond the "heat of the moment" scenario frequently associated with domestic violence.  There are a few keys to this "case" in my opinion:

 

1 - What's on the security cameras?

2 - Is there any evidence that ties Shady to some sort of direct request for a "hit" on the ex?

3 - What would Shady's motivation be for calling out such an order?  The eviction case was going to be heard and he would have won.

 

Look, if Shady ordered someone to break in and beat/rob this chick then he deserves whatever the legal system doles out.  But this is as fishy as hell.

 

We'll all find out soon enough.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eball said:

 

2 - Is there any evidence that ties Shady to some sort of direct request for a "hit" on the ex?

 

We'll all find out soon enough.

 The "intruder" asking for specific items may be damning. How would he know what to demand? I would imagine the two most likely suspects would be Shady or the girl hired someone to beat the snot out of her. One seems more likely than the other to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, slaphappy said:

 The "intruder" asking for specific items may be damning. How would he know what to demand? I would imagine the two most likely suspects would be Shady or the girl hired someone to beat the snot out of her. One seems more likely than the other to me.

Her allegations do sound damning.  Still to me, a lot hinges on finding her assailant.

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

You were expecting something different???

Agreed and I would add that his moralistic post on the thread he is criticizing is hysterical.  "All of you have hit a new low....now let me hop into this and tell you why..."

Edited by N.Y. Orangeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Red King said:

 

Plausible =/= likely.  Plausible = possible.  Do your homework.  From Merriam-Webster themselves...

 

"appearing worthy of belief"

  • the argument was both powerful and plausible"

 

It is entirely possible for a situation to have multiple, plausible outcomes.  I am not defending McCoy.  I am, as I have been, defending the simple fact that there isn't enough evidence to determine what actually happened, and that there are multiple possibilities, all plausible!

 

Also from Merriam-Webster:  "A plausible explanation is one that sounds as if it could be true."  Try actually researching a word next time before critisizing someone else's use of it.

Dear Internet detective keyboard warrior. Merriam webster sucks. HARD. Its a silly American Dictionary, with no etymological context. No one who knows anything about etymology (look that word up too) or semantics gives a crap about what it says. Its used by grade school kids, so I think your quoting a definition meant for 4th graders. Try looking the word up in the Oxford, the 4th (legal) definition might surprise you. Then stop telling people to do research. Because your research is at the level of an elementary school student who just learned how to google, but doesn't have the attention span to read beyond a few sentences.

Edited by MURPHD6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, slaphappy said:

Unless she completely made that part up after the fact. I hadn't thought of that until just now.

I read her lawyers allegations, and it reminded me of my ex wife's allegations against me.  Not that I was accused of pistol-whipping or robbing, but that in an allegation you're free to accuse anything you'd like.  

  That said, without the Instagram pics and accusations, I'd be more likely to believe her.  But once social media is used, you've corrupted the issue to me.  Is it justice or vengace she wants?  The victims lawyer made her dumb ass friend take down the post, so I believe at least her lawyer agreed.

Edited by JaxBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, slaphappy said:

 The "intruder" asking for specific items may be damning. How would he know what to demand? I would imagine the two most likely suspects would be Shady or the girl hired someone to beat the snot out of her. One seems more likely than the other to me.

 

She knew what Shady gave her , might have been a real robbery. No forced entry unless this is a real pro is a question.

 

If they never find the attacker Shady might be in the clear once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, slaphappy said:

 The "intruder" asking for specific items may be damning. How would he know what to demand? I would imagine the two most likely suspects would be Shady or the girl hired someone to beat the snot out of her. One seems more likely than the other to me.

 

Her posting all over Insta the type of jewellery she has or out talking about it at "da club" means someone who doesn't know her personally could ask for specific items, no?

 

Could it also not be probable that this intruder went there, knowing she wasn't home because it was all over social, looking for these things and was surprised to find her there?

39 minutes ago, eball said:

I dunno, of course there's so much to be revealed, but my "Spidey Sense" tells me this is a setup.  Jilted ex upset that Shady has been trying to get her out of his house for months.  Legal process initiated.  Is it a coincidence that a hearing was scheduled yesterday and this stuff happens?  Lawyer representing ex is an attention seeker -- she trademarked "pitbull in a skirt" -- yet doesn't even spell McCoy's name correctly in her "statement" released to news sources.  Lots of vague information presented as "fact."

 

Shady's kid's mom has come out and said the kid has never been abused.  So there's one lie.  I think we also now know (or are pretty sure) the assailant wasn't Shady himself.  So we're beyond the "heat of the moment" scenario frequently associated with domestic violence.  There are a few keys to this "case" in my opinion:

 

1 - What's on the security cameras?

2 - Is there any evidence that ties Shady to some sort of direct request for a "hit" on the ex?

3 - What would Shady's motivation be for calling out such an order?  The eviction case was going to be heard and he would have won.

 

Look, if Shady ordered someone to break in and beat/rob this chick then he deserves whatever the legal system doles out.  But this is as fishy as hell.

 

We'll all find out soon enough.

 

And why go through the legal process at all if he was just going to order a hit? He'd also have to be next level stupid to order it on the night she returns from London. It seems odd.

 

It could also be the case that knowing she was away Shady asked someone to stop by the house and pick up these items... didn't order him to beat the crap out of this women... and this guy took it upon himself to do it when he realized they were home.

 

But as you say, we shall find out soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw, not for nothing, but the dead cap money if Shady goes is $5.25 million, and I believe we get $3.45 million in cap relief, if I'm reading Spotrac correctly.

 

Edit: and we would obviously and easily hit the $50 million mark in dead cap money this year.

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The minute I followed this "instagram model" on the gram it was almost comical to me how fake this chick was. She wanted to be famous so bad. Everything about her was fake, from her voice to her body to her intentions. 

 

I would let this play out. Too many things are falling directly in line.  Her just getting back from Europe. Court date where she knows she ain't winning. To these instagram posts tagging news outlets. To them demanding only the items that lesean gave her. I smell a rat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, MURPHD6 said:

Dear Internet detective keyboard warrior. Merriam webster sucks. HARD. Its a silly American Dictionary, with no etymological context. No one who knows anything about etymology (look that word up too) or semantics gives a crap about what it says. Its used by grade school kids, so I think your quoting a definition meant for 4th graders. Try looking the word up in the Oxford, the 4th (legal) definition might surprise you. Then stop telling people to do research. Because your research is at the level of an elementary school student who just learned how to google, but doesn't have the attention span to read beyond a few sentences.

 

Oh, you mean this definition?

 

"(of an argument or statement) seeming reasonable or[/b] probable."

 

...highlighted the key word for you there.  Or.  My proper use of the word was the former, you're still claiming the latter.  So...thank you for outright proving the use of the word correct.  Again, do your homework next time.  Check, and mate.

Edited by The Red King
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Her posting all over Insta the type of jewellery she has or out talking about it at "da club" means someone who doesn't know her personally could ask for specific items, no?

 

Could it also not be probable that this intruder went there, knowing she wasn't home because it was all over social, looking for these things and was surprised to find her there?

 

And why go through the legal process at all if he was just going to order a hit? He'd also have to be next level stupid to order it on the night she returns from London. It seems odd.

 

It could also be the case that knowing she was away Shady asked someone to stop by the house and pick up these items... didn't order him to beat the crap out of this women... and this guy took it upon himself to do it when he realized they were home.

 

But as you say, we shall find out soon enough.

The part that I find odd is apparently the police were called within 30 minutes of her arriving home from London, and the attack. If I am reading her lawyers allegations correctly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JaxBills said:

The part that I find odd is apparently the police were called within 30 minutes of her arriving home from London, and the attack. If I am reading her lawyers allegations correctly.

 

A lot will depend on if they find this person who did the beating. 

 

We also don't know who else she has in her life, are we so sure it couldn't be another male who had this done? Because a friend "outed" Shady in a post, where she lied about the child abuse(Mother of son has said as much), doesn't amount to much evidence against Shady, unless they know this person is associated with Shady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When reading the press release from her attorney, my only question is why at 3am if she's sleeping she's wearing expensive bracelets? That doesn't make a lot of sense, most women remove most if not all jewelry before they go to bed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...