Jump to content

DNA test. I’m going to do it


mead107

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mead107 said:

My sister had it done.  Lot of English and Scandinavian 

 

I want  to get it done.  

 

Have you had it done? 

 

I thought we may have talked about this before. 

 

 

Ummm. Unless you are adopted...

 

Do you expect different results?

 

 

All 4 of my grandparents came from Sicily and my wife is Scottish born.  

 

No mysteries here.  

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ancestry 

 

8 minutes ago, CowgirlsFan said:

Not yet.

 

Which system are you using?

 

38 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Ummm. Unless you are adopted...

 

Do you expect different results?

 

 

All 4 of my grandparents came from Sicily and my wife is Scottish born.  

 

No mysteries here.  

Could be the milk man was my dad 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, mead107 said:

My sister had it done.  Lot of English and Scandinavian 

 

I want  to get it done.  

 

Have you had it done? 

 

I thought we may have talked about this before. 

 

 

 

Good luck.  They're not easy...don't just cram the night before, start studying now.  Hope you pass.

 

(On a more serious note: the commercial versions are notoriously unreliable.  Don't take it too seriously.)

53 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

All 4 of my grandparents came from Sicily and my wife is Scottish born.  

 

No mysteries here.  

 

Yeah, because in the history of the world races and cultures never intermixed on the biggest island located smack-dab in the middle of the Mediterranean.  :lol:

 

You're probably got Berber and Iranian ancestors and don't even know it.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Good luck.  They're not easy...don't just cram the night before, start studying now.  Hope you pass.

 

(On a more serious note: the commercial versions are notoriously unreliable.  Don't take it too seriously.)

Who did you use? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, not interested in voluntarily entering my DNA into massive database

 

There's a few gaps in my "ancestry".  Mom wasn't close to her side of the family, but I know the basics.  Not much is known about my Dad's mother's part of the family.  But I don't really care

 

Kinda reminds me of a cousin that tries to get me to join some group of descendants of Mayflower survivors.  But meh, I wasn't on the boat so I don't care

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon in Pasadena said:

Just FYI:

https://gizmodo.com/what-dna-testing-companies-terrifying-privacy-policies-1819158337

 

 

Plenty more articles on this out there.  I was thinking about doing it, but now I'm pretty sure I will not unless it can be done somehow with a blind escrow or something.

 

 

I was told that the best way to get tested is to have a friend with very different background (very hard to be related) to submit for you.  One friend had it done that way and was surprised with results for it appears that some of the returned data appeared to be influenced by submitter not donor so it is possible that all of the results are not "genetic" but research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Limeaid said:

 

 

I was told that the best way to get tested is to have a friend with very different background (very hard to be related) to submit for you.  One friend had it done that way and was surprised with results for it appears that some of the returned data appeared to be influenced by submitter not donor so it is possible that all of the results are not "genetic" but research.

Well, that would be disappointing. But not too surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

 

I was told that the best way to get tested is to have a friend with very different background (very hard to be related) to submit for you.  One friend had it done that way and was surprised with results for it appears that some of the returned data appeared to be influenced by submitter not donor so it is possible that all of the results are not "genetic" but research.

 

That would make an interesting research project.

 

Get a white guy from the north east, a black guy from the south, an Hispanic from Texas, a Puerto Rican, and a white guy from California.  Mix up the samples and see if the results line up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon in Pasadena said:

Well, that would be disappointing. But not too surprising.

In this case the submitter was black and the donor was Korean but test stated ancestry from several places in sub saharan Africa and Central/South America.  There were several other ancestry bits but NONE from East Asia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my cousins daughter did this and got a hit they traced back to a baby given up for adoption in 1968.......... Ended up as my sisters no one knew about. I didn't believe it. Googled the guys picture. Holy Cow like looking in a mirror. Still haven't got in touch with the guy. I should. Haven't sees sis in 12 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mead107 said:

My sister had it done.  Lot of English and Scandinavian 

 

I want  to get it done.  

 

Have you had it done? 

 

I thought we may have talked about this before. 

 

 

 

I used ancestry.

 

On my mother’s side her father was born in Germany, and her mother Croatian.

 

My fathers side both Grandparents were Polish

 

My dna results came back like 42% Scandinavian. 38% East European/ Slavic

12% Irish 8% Italian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mead107 said:

Who did you use? 

 

I didn't.  Are you kidding?  I wouldn't do that.  That's how they caught the Golden State Killer.  

 

Not that I'm the Golden State Killer.  Too young for that.

 

Or any other killer.  Like the Long Island Serial Killer, or West Mesa Bone Collector.  Not them either.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

I didn't.  Are you kidding?  I wouldn't do that.  That's how they caught the Golden State Killer.  

 

Not that I'm the Golden State Killer.  Too young for that.

 

Or any other killer.  Like the Long Island Serial Killer, or West Mesa Bone Collector.  Not them either.

 

I think I just caught the Zodiac himself ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

Arthur Lee Allen.  He's been dead a while.  

 

He is compelling and I know people say the letters spell his name out but his DNA is not on the letters that they received 

 

though it could be a 2 man team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

He is compelling and I know people say the letters spell his name out but his DNA is not on the letters that they received 

 

though it could be a 2 man team

 

He fits the psychological profile best.  And those are rarely wrong...you can change just about anything else you might do, but you can't change your psychology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

He fits the psychological profile best.  And those are rarely wrong...you can change just about anything else you might do, but you can't change your psychology.

 

Definitely and I’ve read the books by Robert Graysmith and he has compelling arguments 

 

but none of the DNA matches and it does seem like he might of had some help to mask the DNA profile 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo716 said:

 

Definitely and I’ve read the books by Robert Graysmith and he has compelling arguments 

 

but none of the DNA matches and it does seem like he might of had some help to mask the DNA profile 

 

Masking DNA is non-trivial...but you're also talking about DNA samples from the early 70s, at the latest, when DNA profiling was in its infancy.  I'll trust the psych profiling before I'll trust the DNA in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Masking DNA is non-trivial...but you're also talking about DNA samples from the early 70s, at the latest, when DNA profiling was in its infancy.  I'll trust the psych profiling before I'll trust the DNA in this case.

 

While that is true Kathleen Johns was abducted by zodiac and he wrote about it. She drove in a car for 90 minutes with him and absolutely got a great look at him ...

 

she did not pick out Allen in a photo lineup

 

she definitely would have identified Allen if that was the man who tried abducting her. She saw his face for 90 minutes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I didn't.  Are you kidding?  I wouldn't do that.  That's how they caught the Golden State Killer.  

 

Not that I'm the Golden State Killer.  Too young for that.

 

Or any other killer.  Like the Long Island Serial Killer, or West Mesa Bone Collector.  Not them either.

 

I am sure you are a Library Killer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I didn't.  Are you kidding?  I wouldn't do that.  That's how they caught the Golden State Killer.  

 

Not that I'm the Golden State Killer.  Too young for that.

 

Or any other killer.  Like the Long Island Serial Killer, or West Mesa Bone Collector.  Not them either.

 

But you might be both.  What better cover for a serial killer than to move across country and kill a bunch of people in a completely new way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I didn't.  Are you kidding?  I wouldn't do that.  That's how they caught the Golden State Killer.  

 

Not that I'm the Golden State Killer.  Too young for that.

 

Or any other killer.  Like the Long Island Serial Killer, or West Mesa Bone Collector.  Not them either.

They already got his sister's DNA.  All they have to do now is wait outside mead's garbage can and collect a partially eaten Stromboli and a wine bottle he drank directly from!

?

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

My Dad did this a few years ago.  We used to think we were Polish....found out I'm 1/4 Jewish.

 

 

How'd they determine your religious affiliation by testing your DNA???

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Limeaid said:

 

I am sure you are a Library Killer.

I was thinking 'cereal killer'.

4 minutes ago, The Poojer said:

 

 

How'd they determine your religious affiliation by testing your DNA???

Matzoh?  Eat enough, and it works its way into the DNA.

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Poojer said:

 

 

How'd they determine your religious affiliation by testing your DNA???

 

Genealogy[edit]

The modern genealogical DNA test of ethnicity is certainly a non-religious definition of 'who is a Jew?' as increasing numbers of persons discover their biological and cultural origins outside the traditional religious setting.[74] The top two Jewish haplogroups for the priestly families, Haplogroup J-M267 and Haplogroup E-M215 (Y-DNA) have genetic origins in the vast Arabian Peninsula, Egypt, the Horn of Africa, and the Levant, which indicates a more complex cultural genesis and potential identity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...