Jump to content

Lorenzo back on a 2 year deal


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

and he still might. But with all this versatility, we can line up alot of folks all over the place. I sure hope we get a good WLB in here.McD needs that skills set in particular. We got big time TE's to cover....

 

This is shaping up to be one slow-ass defense.

$4.5M/year is starter money. Lo plays the SLB, Preston in middle, and Ragland at Will? Doesn't make alot of sense. Maybe we'll add a speedy WLB, but then who rides the pine? probably Preston.

 

I still don't know what D McD is trying to build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is shaping up to be one slow-ass defense.

$4.5M/year is starter money. Lo plays the SLB, Preston in middle, and Ragland at Will? Doesn't make alot of sense. Maybe we'll add a speedy WLB, but then who rides the pine? probably Preston.

 

I still don't know what D McD is trying to build.

Nice first post. I'm wondering where the speed will come from too ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the singing

Though I agree it is unlikely that he will replicate 2016 in a new system or have as many snaps

Still I see him being an depth asset as an OLB, ST, and playing on 3rd downs

Look both Zack and Lorax were brought in as depth

Zack become a starter when Ragland went down

Lorax ended up subbing in for Lawson

However when Lawson came back snaps were taken way from both Hughes and Lorax

Right now our starting LB's in the 4-3 are P Brown, Ragland, and Lorax, and one of Brown/Ragland are kicking outside

I gotta think we're not finished here, that Lorax is the 4th rotational sub

And are still looking at Zack or the draft for a young rotational 1st and 2nd down OLB starter

 

jc

Isn't Mychal Kendricks from the Eagles available for a trade? Would he be a fit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is shaping up to be one slow-ass defense.

$4.5M/year is starter money. Lo plays the SLB, Preston in middle, and Ragland at Will? Doesn't make alot of sense. Maybe we'll add a speedy WLB, but then who rides the pine? probably Preston.

 

I still don't know what D McD is trying to build.

 

......yup....let's go back to Dopey Dickey Jauron's defense, the "heavyweights".....which Tasker eloquently categorized their style of effective play as, "like bugs hitting your windshield".....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

......yup....let's go back to Dopey Dickey Jauron's defense, the "heavyweights".....which Tasker eloquently categorized their style of effective play as, "like bugs hitting your windshield".....

 

Ugh, the Keith Ellison days..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

......yup....let's go back to Dopey Dickey Jauron's defense, the "heavyweights".....which Tasker eloquently categorized their style of effective play as, "like bugs hitting your windshield".....

 

Ugh, the Keith Ellison days..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is shaping up to be one slow-ass defense.

$4.5M/year is starter money. Lo plays the SLB, Preston in middle, and Ragland at Will? Doesn't make alot of sense. Maybe we'll add a speedy WLB, but then who rides the pine? probably Preston.

 

I still don't know what D McD is trying to build.

I don't know his plans for this D, but speed should and will be addressed. I see Zo being used in obvious blitzing downs and certain sub-packages. But I'm not sold that he's automatically our starting Sam,or any other lb'er. I think it's either draft a Wlb,and put P Brown in the middle,with Rags at sam,or roll with Brown at Weak,Rags in the middle,and find a Sam in the draft.Zo comes off the bench in certain situations. Just my take on it anyway.. Edited by BuffAlone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...