Jump to content

The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency


Nanker

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

This is exactly why people rush to defend Roy Moore.  When you have a media willing to make ties between Charles Manson and the Republican President, you invite the rejection of other criticisms as meritless.

 

More...............

 

Quote

 

bv-ycBFs_bigger.jpg NYT OpinionVerified account @nytopinion 15h15 hours ago

Charles Manson wasn't the inevitable outgrowth of the Sixties. If anything, he was a harbinger of today's far right.

 

 

 

:doh:If the Left keeps up this kind of delusion, Trump will be President for life.............

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

Ivanka 2024

Tiffany 2032

 

The Donald Jr.  2040

 

nah, the pendulum swings one way for 2 terms and them back again.

 

Papa Bush was a 3rd Reagan term out of gratitude, can't see that happening after Gore and Hill couldn't work it out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

More...............

 

 

 

:doh:If the Left keeps up this kind of delusion, Trump will be President for life.............

 

So, according to the NY Times everyone who disagrees with leftist orthodoxy is far right, and the far right is Charlie Manson.

 

I'm sure this will really resonate in flyover country, where President Trump won the popular vote in 30 of the 50 states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

So, according to the NY Times everyone who disagrees with leftist orthodoxy is far right, and the far right is Charlie Manson.

 

I'm sure this will really resonate in flyover country, where President Trump won the popular vote in 30 of the 50 states.

 

Add it to the pile with: 

 

If you question the Russian narrative, you love Putin. 

If you question the USIC's reputation and record, you hate America. 

 

Divide, divide, divide. That's how they keep us busy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Taro T said:

Not sure which is funnier: Sasse's take or the pinheads responding to his tweet thinking he was referring to Manson rather than the NYT w/ Chappelle's take on James' quote.

Or the cries of racism because a conservatives white male used a Chappelle quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could be his best tweet yet:

 

 

 
Quote

 

 

Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named “Man (Person) of the Year,” like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot.

I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, I see Ivanka and Chelsea have teamed up to correctly call the media out for exposing Obama's cigarette toting offspring.

 

Now a few pics of Obama himself lighting up a dart would have been awesome.

 

 

As cool as The Cobra smoking in the Pirates dugout.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, row_33 said:

—————/

 

papa Bush is the longest living Prez, but that’s not remotely as hard to believe as the concept of the years Hoover and Truman died after their admins

 

 

Carter already has the longest Post-Presidency and is just a few months younger than Bush the Elder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, /dev/null said:

Carter already has the longest Post-Presidency and is just a few months younger than Bush the Elder.

 

every year Hoover and Truman lived after their admin is like a dog year

 

Hoover died after JFK and Truman lived into the 1970s.

 

 

meds and better nutrition and living standards make it easy for an ex-POTUS to live to be 100 now.

 

back in the 70s and 80s everyone over 50 was burnt out and arthritic and white-haired, things have changed drastically

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

every year Hoover and Truman lived after their admin is like a dog year

 

Hoover died after JFK and Truman lived into the 1970s.

 

 

meds and better nutrition and living standards make it easy for an ex-POTUS to live to be 100 now.

 

back in the 70s and 80s everyone over 50 was burnt out and arthritic and white-haired, things have changed drastically

And no smoking! FDR, Ike and LBJ were smokers and it killed them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And no smoking! FDR, Ike and LBJ were smokers and it killed them

So, Malia is gonna die too?  And barrack?  Yes, that's good!  Anything to stop the socialists!

 

Can't wait until they die of lung cancer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And no smoking! FDR, Ike and LBJ were smokers and it killed them

 

Tibs thinks FDR would still be around if he didn't smoke.

 

How many paint chips have you eaten every day of your sad existence?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

Tibs thinks FDR would still be around if he didn't smoke.

 

How many paint chips have you eaten every day of your sad existence?

 

Wow, you are a real POS. Sorry you are so miserable 

9 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

So, Malia is gonna die too?  And barrack?  Yes, that's good!  Anything to stop the socialists!

 

Can't wait until they die of lung cancer!

That won't help you any. You will still be you. How sad 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Wow, you are a real POS. Sorry you are so miserable 

That won't help you any. You will still be you. How sad 

How about this.  You do you. I'll do me. And we will both be satisfied.

 

If we do this, I recommend oil of olay with a little bit of Vaseline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservative Tries to Prove the Washington Post Is Fake News, Proves Opposite by Mistake
by Jonathan Chait

 

Original Article

 

Good for the WAPO for finally getting journalism right................

 

The only thing that I am laughing at ...................is the completely dishonest liberal spin that this somehow disproves all the past undercover videos that show actual crimes.

 

pretty weak effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:
Conservative Tries to Prove the Washington Post Is Fake News, Proves Opposite by Mistake
by Jonathan Chait

 

Original Article

 

Good for the WAPO for finally getting journalism right................

 

The only thing that I am laughing at ...................is the completely dishonest liberal spin that this somehow disproves all the past undercover videos that show actual crimes.

 

pretty weak effort.

That's right! Washington Post is amazing journalism. They didn't fall for this effort by anti-democracy group Project Veritas to undermine the free press. 

 

Make no mistake, this was an attempt by a Koch brothers  backed and funded organization to undermine one of the foundations of our free society. Pretty lame effort but what would you expect from these clowns who are trying to help a child molester get into our Senate. It stinks of desperation. These people are playing with fire on many levels to try and push Trump's man in Alabama. It's not enough that they have networks and online scandal sheets spewing a constant flow of lies and distortions, they see that most Americans are not buying the right wing sludge they are pushing so they needed to dig deeper and dirtier. The child molester might not win, so they go the extra mile for him. 

 

Rot in hell! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

laughing_man.jpg.....LOL.thats what I get for praising the media two replies above

 

 

 

Just how much hot garbage has WaPo turned into? THIS MUCH

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/11/28/dumbest-sht-ever-just-how-much-hot-garbage-has-wapo-turned-into-this-much/?utm_campaign=twitchywidget

 

 

Who knew a fact checker’s bias would play a part in whether or not a fact is correct?

 

Because that seems to be EXACTLY what the Washington Post did with Mike Pence.
 

Quote

 


We were tempted to say that Pence earns four Pinocchios, but the numbers are technically correct.

Yet they are so devoid of meaning that Pence and the people that applauded his statement should be ashamed.

 

 

Reminder- THESE ARE PROFESSIONAL "FACT CHECKERS"

 

 

Devoid of meaning. But if it was factual and correct wouldn’t that be the opposite of ‘devoid of meaning’? Hey, we’re just asking because clearly, we’re not professional fact checkers.

 

Three Pinocchios for being truthful.

 

And WaPo wonders why we call them fake news.

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn Liberal media. They are probably going to say that Trump's bigoted anti-Muslim tweet is a bigoted act. When will they stop portraying Trump as a bigot?? 

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/29/trump-retweet-muslim-violence-videos-jayda-fransen-267888

 

In one video, labeled by Fransen as “Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches,” a young man beats up another young man, who is using crutches, punching him until he falls to the ground and then kicking him several times. There is no obvious indication, aside from Fransen’s accompanying text, that the assailant is Muslim.

The second of Fransen’s video’s retweeted by Trump features a bearded man shattering a statue of the Virgin Mary. In the third, a group of men, including one carrying a black flag, attack another group, beating them as they fall from a higher ledge.

“It is wrong for the president to have done this,” a spokesman for May said, saying Britain First uses "hate-filled narratives to peddle lies and stoke tensions."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, B-Man said:

DESPERATE FOR CHEAP SHOTS, Newsweek charges Ivanka Trump with plagiarizing “one of her own speeches” in India. You can’t plagiarize yourself.

 

 

this sort of crazed press attack is why people have tuned out even substantive criticisms.

 

 

You want more Roy Moore? This is how you get more Roy Moore.

71P

Oh ya, its the media's fault we are getting Roy Moore as a senator! You are a total idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, B-Man said:

DESPERATE FOR CHEAP SHOTS, Newsweek charges Ivanka Trump with plagiarizing “one of her own speeches” in India. You can’t plagiarize yourself.

 

 

this sort of crazed press attack is why people have tuned out even substantive criticisms.

 

 

You want more Roy Moore? This is how you get more Roy Moore.

71P

You mean she punched above her weight? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Tillerson's gone.

 

Sort of.  According to the NYT, Trump has a "developed a plan" to oust Tillerson in the "next several weeks."

 

Because you can't just report the guy's going to get fired.  You have to report that Trump is scheming to fire him, weeks before he's fired, and undercut everybody.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/30/us/politics/state-department-tillerson-pompeo-trump.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone left the admin of a POTUS, I guess that's the first time it ever happened.

 

 

Americans and its media would have a field day with a federal government run as a Parliament, that would increase the rumours and nonsense by 1,000,000-fold the first day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...