Chef Jim Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Who cares if they are idiots if they spending money? You ok man? God you're dense. I was calling them idiots and nothing more. You can read right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 God you're dense. I was calling them idiots and nothing more. You can read right? ya right. Dishonest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 ya right. Dishonest No you're dense. Honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 http://thehill.com/regulation/329720-study-trump-has-eliminated-86b-in-regs President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group. The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). This includes the Education Department’s school accountability standards, the Environmental Protection Agency’s waters of the United States rule and the so-called “blacklisting” rule for government contractors. These are just a few examples mentioned in the report. Since taking office, Trump and Congress have repealed 13 rules with the CRA. The CRA allows lawmakers to overturn recent rules they disapprove of with a simple majority in Congress, and send the action to the president for his signature. “Just as there are fiscal costs for new significant rules, there can be savings from repealing old rules through comprehensive regulatory reform,” said Sam Batkins, director of regulatory policy at the AAF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 http://thehill.com/regulation/329720-study-trump-has-eliminated-86b-in-regs President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group. The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). This includes the Education Department’s school accountability standards, the Environmental Protection Agency’s waters of the United States rule and the so-called “blacklisting” rule for government contractors. These are just a few examples mentioned in the report. Since taking office, Trump and Congress have repealed 13 rules with the CRA. The CRA allows lawmakers to overturn recent rules they disapprove of with a simple majority in Congress, and send the action to the president for his signature. “Just as there are fiscal costs for new significant rules, there can be savings from repealing old rules through comprehensive regulatory reform,” said Sam Batkins, director of regulatory policy at the AAF. Fake news Trump probably spends more on weekend vacations than that anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Wonder who amongst us is less confident now than before the election. I'm currently less confident in the stock market. Trump needs to enact a major economic policy change or the bubble will burst. Fiddling with regulations and tweeting about companies ain't going to cut it. Nero needs to get off the golf course and use his early good will to get something passed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 I'm currently less confident in the stock market. Trump needs to enact a major economic policy change or the bubble will burst. Fiddling with regulations and tweeting about companies ain't going to cut it. Nero needs to get off the golf course and use his early good will to get something passed. Every 5 or so years the market players take their cut of the profits made by the rise, causing it all to fall accordingly. Nothing wrong with this, they are fully entitled. And every time the media screams its a total surprise and the world is coming to an end. A few times I've mentioned this to senior citizens and they put everything into $$$ just before the market "collapsed" due to the players taking their cut of profits. One saved $400,000 from this. Nothing new really, but the media will turn it into the Apocalypse when it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Fake news Trump probably spends more on weekend vacations than that anyway This was a very ignorant response------------------even for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 This was a very ignorant response------------------even for you. Typical he would use bitter envy to make a comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Every 5 or so years the market players take their cut of the profits made by the rise, causing it all to fall accordingly. Nothing wrong with this, they are fully entitled. And every time the media screams its a total surprise and the world is coming to an end. A few times I've mentioned this to senior citizens and they put everything into $$$ just before the market "collapsed" due to the players taking their cut of profits. One saved $400,000 from this. Nothing new really, but the media will turn it into the Apocalypse when it happens. yes. My point is prices were filled with optimism from his election, and now they need some substance to keep going. Barring that, its profit taking time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Nobody Works in One in Five U.S. Families by Ali Meyer Original Article No family member was employed in 16,069,000 U.S. families in 2016, or 19.6 percent of families, according to newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of families with nobody employed increased by roughly 19,000 from 2015 to 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Nobody Works in One in Five U.S. Families by Ali Meyer Original Article No family member was employed in 16,069,000 U.S. families in 2016, or 19.6 percent of families, according to newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of families with nobody employed increased by roughly 19,000 from 2015 to 2016 "The fact that 20 percent of families don’t have anyone working demonstrates that the labor market still has weaknesses," Ortiz said. "But the problem isn’t the number of available jobs." Yet the immigrants keep coming and finding work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorbait Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 "The number of families with no workers has remained relatively steady since 1995, when the bureau began compiling the data." "There are currently 5.7 million job openings, millions of which pay roughly $50,000 or more per year," he said. "Policymakers need to address the skills gap that is preventing these unemployed families from seizing these available good jobs." I wish they would do a follow-up study and figure out how these families are getting by. Are they in between jobs? Living off of benefits? Running illegitimate businesses out of their house? Living off of family inheritance and trusts? Are they already retired? Dealing drugs? So many factors here to consider. Still, one-in-five was a surprise to me. Something needs to be done to get them working and paying taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Nobody Works in One in Five U.S. Families by Ali Meyer Original Article No family member was employed in 16,069,000 U.S. families in 2016, or 19.6 percent of families, according to newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of families with nobody employed increased by roughly 19,000 from 2015 to 2016 I actually am surprised it's not more considering the percentage is close to what it was in 1995 (19.6% to 18.9%). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 It would be good to know what % is due to retiring. The baby boomers retiring has a significant impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 22, 2017 Author Share Posted April 22, 2017 yes. My point is prices were filled with optimism from his election, and now they need some substance to keep going. Barring that, its profit taking time. Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 It would be good to know what % is due to retiring. The baby boomers retiring has a significant impact. And what % of those retiring are offset by the % entering the workforce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 22, 2017 Author Share Posted April 22, 2017 And what % of those retiring are offset by the % entering the workforce Unfortunately, right now the demographics are upside down, coupled with zero prospect for immigration reform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 And what % of those retiring are offset by the % entering the workforceas I posted in the past my generation has a significant impact on the stats. Part, not all, of the decline in the employment/pop ratio is due to this, as is the data I responded to--the demographic retiring is bigger than the current demo entering the workforce. As An aside, as GG noted about the crackdown on immigrants, it's surprising we haven't seen greater improvement in wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 Nobody Works in One in Five U.S. Families by Ali Meyer Original Article No family member was employed in 16,069,000 U.S. families in 2016, or 19.6 percent of families, according to newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of families with nobody employed increased by roughly 19,000 from 2015 to 2016 So what is Trump doing about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 (edited) How Trump’s First Three Months Point the Way to Three Percent Growth. by Roger Kimball FTA: It is with this in mind, I believe, that the oft-quoted idea that Trump’s detractors take him literally, but not seriously, while his defenders take him seriously, not literally must be understood. As we approach Trump’s hundredth day in office—the clock just turned on 91 days as I write this—it is worth stepping back and posing on Trump’s behalf the question Mayor Ed Koch made famous: “How’m I doing?” It would be difficult, I suspect, for readers who get their news primarily from outlets as the New York Times, the Washington Post, MSNBC, or CNN to have any sense of Trump’s stupendous accomplishments these past three months. For some of us, it can almost go without saying, the fact that Hillary Clinton is not president, that her political career, in fact, is over is by itself an accomplishment of history-making proportions. “Precautions are always blamed,” Benjamin Jowett once observed, “because when successful they are deemed to have been unnecessary.” Pundits now have the luxury of speculating what a Clinton presidency would have been like. I can tell them. American would have evolved even further toward its status as a one-party state ruled by an elite, progressive oligarchy. The war that Obama inaugurated on religious freedom, on the First and Second Amendments, on enforcing America’s immigration laws, on our energy independence and status as the world’s premier military and economic power—all would have been prosecuted vigorously by a President Clinton. The ideological weaponization of government’s administrative alphabet soup—the IRS, the EPA, the DOJ, etc.—would have continued apace as conservative groups were targeted and discriminated against for the tort of dissenting from the progressive orthodoxy on any contentious issue. Thus it is that the fact that Donald Trump, not Hillary Clinton, is president is already, just by itself, an accomplishment of the first water. And it’s not just a matter of what Hillary Clinton would have done. At issue was also who she was: a Clinton. I leave to one side the breathtaking corruption that she conspired with through her connections with the Clinton Foundation and its various pay-to-play schemes. I leave to one side also her callous and mendacious incompetence in handling the terrorist attacks on our consulate at Benghazi, her scandalous and routine mishandling of classified material and deployment of a home-brew email server. Leave that to one side and think just of the precedent she would have set had she become president: no, I am not talking about her anatomical status as female, but rather her dynastic status as a Clinton. Had she won, the presidency of the United States for the last twenty years would have shuffled between three families. That alone would have set an ominous precedent and upsetting that counts as a large bullet dodged. But what else has Trump wrought in his 91 days as president? To listen to the legacy media, the answer is: not much. Many near-top-tier jobs have gone unfilled. The much ballyhooed repeal of Obamacare failed on its first go around. Tax cuts haven’t happened. The progressive Jared Kushner-Ivanka wing of Trump’s advisors seems to have gained ascendancy (at least according to the Sanhedrin of the MSM) over the Stave-Bannon populist wing. In short, it’s a shambles all around. That, anyway, is the gospel according to the progressive megaphones. The message is far different on the ground. Quite apart from the permanent rustication of Hillary Clinton, Trump has moved with blinding speed to start fulfilling many of his major campaign promises. Immigration. Illegal border crossings are down by more than 90 percent. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is once again enforcing the nation’s immigration laws. Deportations are down because there are fewer illegal penetrations of US borders. In other words, Trump’s policy is shaping up to be a major success. Sanctuary cities, i.e., cities where federal immigration laws are essentially suspended. Trump promised to end them. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is working overtime to make that happen. Earlier today, he wrote at least eight jurisdictions warning them that they may be failing to comply with immigration laws and that they were therefore in jeopardy of losing federal grants. Some cities, notably in California and New York, have blustered that they will continue to resist abiding by the law, but I predict they will change their tune once the spigot of federal funds is turned off. Energy. The Keystone and Dakota access pipelines. Need I say more? Yes? How about “coal”: that should settle the question. Foreign affairs. Under Obama, you had the unenforced red lines of a pink politician. Under Trump, you have 59 Tomahawk missiles directed at a Syrian air force base that carried out a Sarin gas attack, followed a few days later by the destruction of an ISIS tunnel complex in Afghanistan with one 21,000-pound super bomb. You also have successful face-to-face diplomatic meetings with President Xi Jinping of China, Prime Minister Theresa May, and even Chancellor Angela Merkel. Earlier today, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel publicly told Secretary of Defense James Mattis that he welcomes the “strategic change of American leadership and American policy.” The Russians are stamping their feet but Trump continues his course. Meanwhile, the Chinese seem to have been enlisted to help with the problem of the Kim Jong-Un, the cartoon-like dictator of North Korea. In Seoul a couple of days ago, Vice President Pence echoed Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s warning that America’s “strategic patience” with North Korea’s minatory antics was at an end. Trump underscored that partly by parading a lot of military hardware in and around the Korean peninsula, partly by tweeting that “North Korea is looking for trouble. If China decides to help, that would be great. If not, we will solve the problem without them!” The Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch. Also, Neil Gorsuch. And may I add, Neil Gorsuch? Thanks to the Federalist Society for preparing that list of twenty-odd names from which Trump plucked his first Supreme Court nominee. Trump will likely have to avail himself of at least two more justices and who knows how many federal judges “very much in the mold of Justice Scalia.” Regulation. First there’s the two for one rule: want a new regulation? Get rid of two others first. And then there is the spate of executive orders aimed and reducing onerous and inefficient regulation. It’s early days yet, but so far it seems to be working. Two big question marks hover over the issues of health care and tax cuts. Despite the many confident prognostications from the punditocracy, I think it is impossible to say when or what is going to happen on either issue. We’re ninety days into a new administration now. Come back at day 360. There is also the large issue of economic growth. The stock market, which is up about 2,500 points since Donald Trump was elected, clearly is bullish on his policies. Will that enthusiasm be translated into 3 percent or better growth? If so, the pathetic pink-hatted females can jump up and down all they like, the Black Lives Matter protesters can continue their policy of violent racial redress, disappointed commentators, who had pinned their hopes for advancement on a Clinton presidency, can continue to sulk and reassure one another that Donald Trump is “not their president.” It won’t matter. If Donald Trump reaches and sustains that magic number of 3 percent growth for the major part of his first term, he can count upon a second term as well. I fully expect him to maintain plenty of enemies, just as William Dean Howells advised, but they’ll be off caterwauling in the wilderness, as irrelevant to the process then as they were to the election last fall. Edited April 23, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 11 Ways Trump Has Rolled Back Government Regulations In His First 100 Days The Daily Signal ^ | 04/23/2017 | Rachel del Guidice As President Donald Trump reaches his 100th day in the White House on April 29, he will have worked with Congress to rescind more regulations using the Congressional Review Act than any other president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Wow, 100 days already? So what day is the impeachment vote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Wow, 100 days already? So what day is the impeachment vote? It might be awhile. The Libs are still trying to get Clinton elected by blaming Putin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 It might be awhile. The Libs are still trying to get Clinton elected by blaming Putin. There are Lefties out there who think it's only fair that Hiliary become President and that 25th Amendment thingy is irrelevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 There are Lefties out there who think it's only fair that Hiliary become President and that 25th Amendment thingy is irrelevant You're a lot more obsessed with Clinton than any left wing posters here. Even Gator doesn't talk about her any more and he's a Stepford-Dem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Wow, 100 days already? So what day is the impeachment vote? After the iron-clad reports from 233 intelligence agencies proving Putin really runs the USA. This wasn't even laughable it was so pitiful. You're a lot more obsessed with Clinton than any left wing posters here. Even Gator doesn't talk about her any more and he's a Stepford-Dem. Is Hill going to run and get the nod for 2020? You're a lot more obsessed with Clinton than any left wing posters here. Even Gator doesn't talk about her any more and he's a Stepford-Dem. Is Hill going to run and get the nod for 2020? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 After the iron-clad reports from 233 intelligence agencies proving Putin really runs the USA. This wasn't even laughable it was so pitiful. Is Hill going to run and get the nod for 2020? Is Hill going to run and get the nod for 2020? No matter how many times you ask you will not get a coherent answer from John Adams Benjamin Franklin, soon to be James Madison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 No matter how many times you ask you will not get a coherent answer from John Adams Benjamin Franklin, soon to be James Madison. I thought the same thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Didn't think it would accept a duplicate response.... shrug.... I'm interested in hearing if those who supported Hillary are gung-ho for a run by her in 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Didn't think it would accept a duplicate response.... shrug.... I'm interested in hearing if those who supported Hillary are gung-ho for a run by her in 2020. I'm not. I think she lost because she had been around too long. 1992: Bush had been around too long Clinton was the new guy 2000: Gore had been around too long, lost to a new guy --Bush the younger was new 2008: McCain had been around too long and lost to a new guy 2016: Hillary was old news and Trump was something new Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 All Top 10 US States for 2017 Economic Outlook are Right-to-Work States, while All Bottom 10 Are Forced Union http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446963/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-friendly-states-growing … Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 All Top 10 US States for 2017 Economic Outlook are Right-to-Work States, while All Bottom 10 Are Forced Union http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446963/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-friendly-states-growing … Those are not rankings of actual economic growth, rather growth policies viewed as favorable by the ranking group. Here's a list of the fastest and the slowest ranked by GDP growth for 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Those are not rankings of actual economic growth, rather growth policies viewed as favorable by the ranking group. Nobody said they were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Nobody said they were.Nosey. It's all about impressions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 All Top 10 US States for 2017 Economic Outlook are Right-to-Work States, while All Bottom 10 Are Forced Union http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446963/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-friendly-states-growing … More right wing propaganda http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/dec/19/jerry-brown/are-jobs-california-growing-hell-lot-faster-texas/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 Lots to like about the tax proposal. Reduce and collapse rates, eliminate deductions, drop corporate tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Lots to like about the tax proposal. Reduce and collapse rates, eliminate deductions, drop corporate tax. I'm curious to hear details about the one time rate for the repatriation of corporate earnings stockpiled internationally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Lots to like about the tax proposal. Reduce and collapse rates, eliminate deductions, drop corporate tax. I'd prefer something more revenue-neutral, but there's quite a few good ideas in it. Naturally, though, I'm only hearing it's a fiscal disaster, as the news will only run sound bytes from Democrats who haven't even read the damn thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 I'm curious to hear details about the one time rate for the repatriation of corporate earnings stockpiled internationally. Heard it's a one time 10% hit, so that should bring in $200bn. I'd prefer something more revenue-neutral, but there's quite a few good ideas in it. Naturally, though, I'm only hearing it's a fiscal disaster, as the news will only run sound bytes from Democrats who haven't even read the damn thing. Revenue neutrality is a myth. This tax plan should add a point of growth to GDP, so that is where you make up the difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts