Not at the table Karlos Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Didn't see him much in Seattle so he may be Bledsoe slow now but speed was never his game. His vision and determination made him good. I think he can still be productive as a role player/3rd down back for a team like the pats****. I'd rather he retire than consider playing there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Not sure why he wants to keep going. He may get a nod after a RB or two go down before or in the season and can contribute. The league minimum is high enough it would be some decent money for him, but he is entering his sunset. God bless him for what he dod for so many bad Bills teams. We love you Fredex! maybe.......money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000637586/article/fred-jackson-wants-to-continue-career-in-2016?campaign=Twitter_atn He's a 35 year old FA... Think he gets a contract anywhere? OMG just give it up already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 He looked slower to me last year as he played late in the year somewhat when Lynch and the rookie were hurt. It's time to give it up Freddy. I loved you in Buffalo, but the only way i see him playing is a team get decimated with injuries by say week 8 or 9, and he finishes a season for a team as he picked up off the street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 He looked slower to me last year as he played late in the year somewhat when Lynch and the rookie were hurt. It's time to give it up Freddy. I loved you in Buffalo, but the only way i see him playing is a team get decimated with injuries by say week 8 or 9, and he finishes a season for a team as he picked up off the street. As I have said many times he really slowed down 2 seasons ago. Last year in Seattle he really looked like an aged RB. Hang em up Fred and start a new career your a smart fella! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalScotts Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 he's only had one good contract, he didnt get in the league until he was 26. This is bank it time as a back up RB- until all 32 teams say no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloMatt Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I disagree very strongly, so f me I suppose. Nostalgia hires and signings have not worked out well in the past. Let another team take a chance or do like Jared Allen and ride off. Worth the vet minimum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayoffsPlease Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Don't blame him, he was slighted on the front end of his career, no surprise he wants to exploit every last chance in the twilight. I think over looked is a fairer description than "slighted". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 As I have said many times he really slowed down 2 seasons ago. Last year in Seattle he really looked like an aged RB. Hang em up Fred and start a new career your a smart fella!Does M&T Bank still need a spokesperson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 It's wild to think that at 35 your usually done as an NFL player. That has to be tough mentally for a guy like Fredex who plays with a big heart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 23, 2016 Author Share Posted February 23, 2016 Does M&T Bank still need a spokesperson?im no expert on corporate advertising, but as a consumer I feel like if he retired, they could re-launch that ad campaign using him. I feel like the only way it doesn't work is if he's on another team. Most Bills fans love him. Of course he'd have to agree to them using his likeness in a bills uni, but he'd be getting paid. I have to think he'd want to retire as a Bill unless he really has deep resentment for how it all went down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Talent isnt lacking it is his speed that is now. He started losing a step 2 seasons ago. You don't think a running back having a problem running is related to talent to do the job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I wish that he would hang them up but that is up to him. I see Freddie as a good fit in NE (unfortunately). They always value intelligence and he can step in and be a good blocker and option out of the backfield for Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMan Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 He's probably still a better option at RB than Boobie. Bring him back. Agree. It was eff'd up to release him in the first place. I remember thinking a few times last season, "Freddie would have gotten a first on that play." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Dixon is here for ST, and nothing else in case of emergencies. Just like Easley. If Fred could handle playing well at ST, I'm fine with swapping the two. I seriously doubt a 35 yr old RB can play ST. It's too wearing on an older guy's body. Besides the Vet Minimum is high for a 9 year player. Most likely more than Dixon's contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 (edited) Dixon is here for ST, and nothing else in case of emergencies. Just like Easley. If Fred could handle playing well at ST, I'm fine with swapping the two. I seriously doubt a 35 yr old RB can play ST. It's too wearing on an older guy's body. Besides the Vet Minimum is high for a 9 year player. Most likely more than Dixon's contract. It's actually $400k less than Boobie's deal if we signed Fred to a vet minimum. Edited February 23, 2016 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paup 1995MVP Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 The NFL game for a Running Back is speed explosiveness and shiftiness. At this point Fred has none of that. He was a great player and leader in his heyday. That day is long gone. Can we give it a rest and move forward? There are so many good young RB's available every year. And we are doing a great job to finding them. How about giving it up for Mike Gillislee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 (edited) The most important thing we lost last year when Freddie was cut, was leadership. The team had NO leaders among the players. Shockingly, there were NO players-only meetings. To my mind, that was the biggest problem, even more than Wrecks destroying the defense. It wouldn't have been destroyed if some leaders among the players had straightened everyone out. But NO ONE stepped up. I considered suggesting bringing Jackson back just for his leadership abilities. The problem is, leadership in the locker room requires performance on the field. By next year, even more of the Bills will have never played with Jackson, and have no idea what kind of player he was. He would be a seldom-used backup, trying to tell younger, more-effective players how to conduct themselves. They would blow him off, and everyone involved would be miserable. Come back to Buffalo, Freddie. Settle in down the street from Thurman Thomas, and you and he can play catch with your kids in the street. I'd pay money to see that. Edited February 23, 2016 by Utah John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloMatt Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I disagree DoorMatt. Ha. I get it I see what you did there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMan Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 The most important thing we lost last year when Freddie was cut, was leadership. The team had NO leaders among the players. Shockingly, there were NO players-only meetings. To my mind, that was the biggest problem, even more than Wrecks destroying the defense. It wouldn't have been destroyed if some leaders among the players had straightened everyone out. But NO ONE stepped up. I considered suggesting bringing Jackson back just for his leadership abilities. The problem is, leadership in the locker room requires performance on the field. By next year, even more of the Bills will have never played with Jackson, and have no idea what kind of player he was. He would be a seldom-used backup, trying to tell younger, more-effective players how to conduct themselves. They would blow him off, and everyone involved would be miserable. Come back to Buffalo, Freddie. Settle in down the street from Thurman Thomas, and you and he can play catch with your kids in the street. I'd pay money to see that. Awsome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts