TakeYouToTasker Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch? No she's old. It's a davenport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 but she had a distinguished 'career' as a journalist.......Chelsea Clinton Leaving Her Fake Job at NBC -- NYMag I'm mean ummm, as a lecturer................Chelsea Clinton's Second Fake Job: Saving the World I mean.........running the 'family' Foundation..........Chelsea Clinton gets a new job | TheHill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 but she had a distinguished 'career' as a journalist.......Chelsea Clinton Leaving Her Fake Job at NBC -- NYMag I'm mean ummm, as a lecturer................Chelsea Clinton's Second Fake Job: Saving the World I mean.........running the 'family' Foundation..........Chelsea Clinton gets a new job | TheHill Based on the experience of the current POTUS she's right on track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch? No she's old. It's a davenport. I thought it was an old pair of Web Hubble's U-trow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. At least with royalty the leadership is known ahead of time. With this crap we all have to sit through the faux process where the electorate gets a say. There are 300 million people in this country. Why on Earth is there even a story about a 35 year old prepping for a future run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I'm going to write her in during the primaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I'm going to write her in during the primaries. I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote. That is the only reason I was sad to see Bush leave office. No more Bush twin stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Beavis- "hehhuhuh you have braces" "I have braces too" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 i've always wanted to punch her in the face and i barely know anything about her to even have an opinion. this thought has always bothered me. she just looks like someone who needs a punch in the face. what is wrong with me? either way, it's sad because quite clearly in 25-30 years one of the Obama girls will be running for something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 At least with royalty the leadership is known ahead of time. With this crap we all have to sit through the faux process where the electorate gets a say. There are 300 million people in this country. Why on Earth is there even a story about a 35 year old prepping for a future run? Just as you said, royalty is known ahead of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 i've always wanted to punch her in the face and i barely know anything about her to even have an opinion. this thought has always bothered me. she just looks like someone who needs a punch in the face. what is wrong with me? either way, it's sad because quite clearly in 25-30 years one of the Obama girls will be running for something. We will need the equivalent of the Manhattan Project in psychological research and I don't know if we have enough people with the courage and iron stomachs to find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Just as you said, royalty is known ahead of time. Royalty also usually invokes the divine right of kings. Hillary's not claiming a divine right...just a manifest destiny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 We will need the equivalent of the Manhattan Project in psychological research and I don't know if we have enough people with the courage and iron stomachs to find out. i don't know if it is appropriate that i laugh at that or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Royalty also usually invokes the divine right of kings. Hillary's not claiming a divine right...just a manifest destiny. Sexist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 i don't know if it is appropriate that i laugh at that or not. First question to answer once we get the project set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote. My vote is for Barbara the younger That is the only reason I was sad to see Bush leave office. No more Bush twin stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. Royalty? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Royalty? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing. What makes it a Republican thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 What makes it a Republican thing? It's not. Learn how to read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Royalty? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing. Yes and to the credit of the Republican Electorate, Jeb Bush will be rejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yes and to the credit of the Republican Electorate, Jeb Bush will be rejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 It's not. Learn how to read What?? Then what did you mean by this? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 What?? Then what did you mean by this? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing. So you don't know the difference between the Republican party and republican form of government. Look it up. You are ignorant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 29, 2016 Author Share Posted January 29, 2016 So you don't know the difference between the Republican party and republican form of government. Look it up. You are ignorant Given your posting history, demonstrating a lack or proper grammar and spelling, and your often stated "lack of caring about it" it is absolutely unreasonable for you take a stand that readers should have know you meant "republican" rather than "Republican". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 So you don't know the difference between the Republican party and republican form of government. Look it up. You are ignorant So because you don't know how to write a coherent thought that makes me ignorant. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Few things would be funnier than watching the party that screams "white privilege" push people out of the way so they can vote for Chelsea Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Few things would be funnier than watching the party that screams "white privilege" push people out of the way so they can vote for Chelsea Clinton. Yeah but it's not white privilege because she's like the son of a, nevermind. Your a raysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Yeah but it's not white privilege because she's like the son of a, nevermind. Your a raysis It wouldn't be because she's not a man. She's a minority, a woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Remember: Bill Clinton was touted as the first black President. Given that, Chelsea can make claims on her people, if needed, when she runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Sorry to bump an old thread, but we have good news. Variety Magazine will be giving a lifetime achievement award to Rear Admiral Chelsea Clinton* *title courtesy of DC Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Sorry to bump an old thread, but we have good news. Variety Magazine will be giving a lifetime achievement award to Rear Admiral Chelsea Clinton* *title courtesy of DC Tom. The !@#$? Why? She's had neither a lifetime, nor any achievements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 The !@#$? Why? She's had neither a lifetime, nor any achievements. So you mean to say that she's perfectly qualified to get this Nobel Prize, er, ah, "lifetime achievement award" from the Leftist press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 "Stop trying to make Chelsea happen" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 The !@#$? Why? She's had neither a lifetime, nor any achievements. She has a vagina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 She has a vagina Link? No. Wait. Nevermind. I'll take your word for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 22, 2017 Author Share Posted March 22, 2017 Link? No. Wait. Nevermind. I'll take your word for it. Poojer would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 She's Webb Hubbel's kid, not Slick's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts