Jump to content

Report: Whaley's job is safe


boater

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Whaley is one of the things that is right with this organization. Never could understand the misguided negative perception. The guy's job is to bring in talented players. He can't control the way they play or the way the coaches coach.

Oh it's very easy to understand. People need someone to vent their frustations on, whether they are part of the problem or not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WGR alluded to this story http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000609519/article/which-nfl-gms-are-on-the-hot-seat

 

With:

 

If the report is true. Many fans heads will explode. (not mine though)

 

I certainly hope so. Very little of what happened this year should be put on Whaley unless we are going to pin the epic collapse of the defense on him like he should have seen it coming even though nobody would have predicted it.

 

He has drafted very well, added very good pieces both thru FA and the waiver wire, and he can only do but so much and then it's on the players and coaches.

Edited by matter2003
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whaley is one of the things that is right with this organization. Never could understand the misguided negative perception. The guy's job is to bring in talented players. He can't control the way they play or the way the coaches coach.

Exactly my point...he can only do so much...drafts, FA classes and waiver wire additions have all been very good for the most part with Whaley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only conjecture if we don't like the news. Good news is always true. This is probably true though.

 

Now you know how it works.

 

It's conjecture when it's nonsensical **** thrown against the wall with no basis in fact. Now you'll know it next time you see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is really hard to assess Whaley's performance the last two years and his role in the front office in terms of decision making prior to that time. Even if you give him all of the credit for recent drafting and player acquisitions, i am not sure why there is such strong support for him on this board. We continue to miss the playoffs and I do not think there is a lot to be optimistic about for next year given our cap situation and need to, at a minimum, retool on defense.

 

I am trying to be objective here, but I think the best argument that can be made for Whaley is that a GM should have at least three years to turn things around. Maybe the better argument is that after 16 years without making the playoffs and new ownership, a housecleaning is in order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is really hard to assess Whaley's performance the last two years and his role in the front office in terms of decision making prior to that time. Even if you give him all of the credit for recent drafting and player acquisitions, i am not sure why there is such strong support for him on this board. We continue to miss the playoffs and I do not think there is a lot to be optimistic about for next year given our cap situation and need to, at a minimum, retool on defense.

 

I am trying to be objective here, but I think the best argument that can be made for Whaley is that a GM should have at least three years to turn things around. Maybe the better argument is that after 16 years without making the playoffs and new ownership, a housecleaning is in order.

The argument for Whaley changes every season. Watch him no longer get credit or blame for Brown, Bradham, Mario or Rex even though they were all reasons to keep him 6 months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is really hard to assess Whaley's performance the last two years and his role in the front office in terms of decision making prior to that time. Even if you give him all of the credit for recent drafting and player acquisitions, i am not sure why there is such strong support for him on this board. We continue to miss the playoffs and I do not think there is a lot to be optimistic about for next year given our cap situation and need to, at a minimum, retool on defense.

 

I am trying to be objective here, but I think the best argument that can be made for Whaley is that a GM should have at least three years to turn things around. Maybe the better argument is that after 16 years without making the playoffs and new ownership, a housecleaning is in order.

i don't think the Pegulas should be Drought Dwellers and I don't think they are. Whaley has not been the GM for 16 years. They haven't been the owners for 16 years. They've been here 1 year. They need to look at the here and now and not what came before, and decide if it has the foundation to build upon in a positive direction. A "czar" type would help with that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...