Jump to content

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


B-Man

Recommended Posts

JUST THINK OF THE MEDIA AS DEMOCRATIC PARTY OPERATIVES WITH BYLINES AND IT ALL MAKES SENSE

 

 

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out.

Predictably, the vast majority of the people and the outlets that shared this exchange failed to note that the violations being discussed had occurred during the previous administration, while those who did know failed to ask themselves (and others) why the violations didn’t receive similar coverage when they were first exposed. Instead, they jumped straight to the conclusion that the federal government, headed up by President Trump, was deliberately inflicting pain on babies. This isn’t true.

 

It wasn’t true during the Obama administration either. Then, as now, the violations weren’t part of an intentional or evil ploy, but were the product of the system’s being overloaded.

 

Then, as now, the intended care at these facilities was humane, and consistent within the requirement under Flores. In 2014, the Obama administration was dealing with a serious crisis: a large influx of unaccompanied minors that strained the facilities. In 2019, the Trump administration is dealing with a serious crisis: a large influx of unaccompanied minors that strains the facilities.

 

 

The absence of coverage back in 2014 makes perfect sense. After all:

treacher_on_journalism_10-11-17-1.jpg

 

 
Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tiberius said:

The "Enemy of the people" save the children 

 

 

More than 300 children are being relocated from a remote Border Patrol station in Texas following an Associated Press reporthighlighting poor conditions at the facility. The government has moved most children out of the facility, which is near El Paso and was operating over capacity, and now only 30 children remain. The AP’s previous report said children as young as 10- to 15-years-old were taking care of toddlers and that there was inadequate food, water, and sanitation services. U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-TX) said some kids were sent to a different facility in El Paso, but it is unclear where all of them have been moved to. 

If only the facilities had adequate funding for the surge in numbers... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

If only the facilities had adequate funding for the surge in numbers... ?

The administration was arguing in court that children don't need tooth brushes and any basic human necassities, so why would funding matter? 

 

4 days ago - Detained migrant children got no toothbrush, no soap, no sleep. ... don't have a toothbrush, if you don't have soap, if you don't have a blanket, ...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The administration was arguing in court that children don't need tooth brushes and any basic human necassities, so why would funding matter? 

 

4 days ago - Detained migrant children got no toothbrush, no soap, no sleep. ... don't have a toothbrush, if you don't have soap, if you don't have a blanket, ...
 

Huh, its almost like that exact article mentions the lack of funding at one point. Strange. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, B-Man said:

CNN ON IMMIGRATION: Never Seen This Level Of Cooperation From Mexico Before.

 

Hmmmm.

 

 

 

.

 

It's in Mexico's best interest to cooperate. If these families settle down it will take away jobs from the single Mexicans that used to come here to work. The dynamic has changed in that we are getting families from Central America and elsewhere that can't be easily deported. By law we have to at least house them for awhile and we are literally overwhelmed. Mexico is cooperating to save jobs for their own people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Democrats want the campaign issue.....................not any solutions.

 

Starving children or votes

 

 

the 'choice' is easy for liberals

 

 

While the chattering lefty lemmings on our board still want to blame President Trump

 

 

 

.

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Mayfair employees are going to walk out because they sold beds to a non profit providing beds for the children in detention centers..............Beds.  They don't want the kids to have beds!  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bbb said:

So, Mayfair employees are going to walk out because they sold beds to a non profit providing beds for the children in detention centers..............Beds.  They don't want the kids to have beds!  

 

 

 

No, they don't.  They want the centers closed, and the kids released and reunited with their parents.

 

They fail to realize that many of the kids will be reunited with traffickers.  And that even the ones reunited with family have nowhere to go.  And that almost all of them will disappear.

 

But as long as they're being raped and abused out of sight by private individuals, and not being neglected by the understaffed federal government for everyone to see, it's good.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bbb said:

So, Mayfair employees are going to walk out because they sold beds to a non profit providing beds for the children in detention centers..............Beds.  They don't want the kids to have beds!  

 

 

Mayfair, you give me just what I need.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, bbb said:

So, Mayfair employees are going to walk out because they sold beds to a non profit providing beds for the children in detention centers..............Beds.  They don't want the kids to have beds!  

 

 


Ummm yeah. Wayfair has a cult following among the 20 and 30 something crowds.  Should be interesting if those people walking out tomorrow have jobs the next day. The works are protesting that Wayfair sold beds to the facilities. Are they gonna screech if the kids have to sleep on the floor because they protested these kids having beds? 

Here's the hashtag:  https://twitter.com/hashtag/WayfairWalkout 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Media outlets aren’t holding back on publishing this photo of a drowned father and daughter

 

CNN reports:

In the photo, the bodies have come to rest near a river bank where five discarded beer cans and an empty soda bottle sit in the tall reeds. Another beer can floats next to the girl’s body.

Salvadoran officials said the father and daughter drowned on Sunday. Their bodies were found Monday.

Salvadoran Minister of Foreign Affairs Alexandra Hill said the government is working with Mexican authorities to repatriate the remains.

She called on those who plan to migrate to the United States illegally to refrain from doing so.

“Our county is in mourning, again. I beg you, to all the families, parents, don’t risk it,” she said, according to a CNN translation. “Life is worth a lot more.”

 

 

 

 

But if you engage your brain, not your emotions, those to blame are (in no order):

1. Mexico
2. Gangs/traffickers
3. Those refusing to build wall aka funnelling people to LEGAL entry points.
4. Open borders activists
5. Parents risking kids lives

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the U.S every citizen/parent would be charged with endangering the welfare of a child for a myriad of actions associated with a journey from Central America and the death of a child. The Border Patrol and ICE get blamed by the Left for the actual sins of the mothers and fathers of these children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By now you’ve probably seen that heartbreaking photo of Óscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez and his 23-month-old daughter, Valeria from El Salvador who drowned while attempting to cross the Rio Grande river and enter the U.S. to, presumably, apply for asylum.

 

But the New York Times is reporting this morning that relatives say that Martínez and his family was not fleeing violence at home, and therefore it’s likely that their asylum claim would have been denied, which is true in both the Trump and Obama administrations:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Ummm yeah. Wayfair has a cult following among the 20 and 30 something crowds.  Should be interesting if those people walking out tomorrow have jobs the next day. The works are protesting that Wayfair sold beds to the facilities. Are they gonna screech if the kids have to sleep on the floor because they protested these kids having beds? 

Here's the hashtag:  https://twitter.com/hashtag/WayfairWalkout 


What morons wanting kids to sleep on the floor. Was this during  their lunch break?
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they were escaping political persecution with their children? <_<

Clicking over to the La Prensa site (which crashed my browser twice) it said the DHS is the agency that alerted the Mexicans that these fine, upstanding, asylum seeks were on their way:

The Universal indicates in its report that the Department of Homeland Security of the United States was the one that alerted the Federal Police of Mexico of the presence of the three migrants in Costa Rica and Panama.
 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Tibs... have you no shame at all?

 

 

It's already been discussed.

 

It is not a matter of Tibsy's shameless bleating, 

 

but if he would read, the NYT points out that this example of these unfortunate people that the lemmings grabbed onto, is a poor argument.

 

They died on Mexico's southern border, and the family denies thast they were trying to escape any 'oppression'

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

It's already been discussed.

 

It is not a matter of Tibsy's shameless bleating, 

 

but if he would read, the NYT points out that this example of these unfortunate people that the lemmings grabbed onto, is a poor argument.

 

They died on Mexico's southern border, and the family denies thast they were trying to escape any 'oppression'

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

It was the Southern border?  I saw a pic on twitter saying it was the Rio Grande!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a bipartisan $4.5 billion bill to combat the escalating humanitarian crisis on the southern border, moments after rejecting a House version over its restrictions on enforcement efforts -- setting up a race to reconcile the two measures before Congress leaves town.
 

The Senate bill passed 84-8. That vote in the Republican-controlled chamber came minutes after the House version was voted down 55-37.
 

It's unclear what will come next. The Senate vote could put pressure on the Democrat-controlled House to pass its version before Congress breaks for the July 4 recess. Or the two chambers could try and hash out their differences in what is known as a conference committee.
 

</snip>

 

The nos (this is an eclectic mix):
 

Eight senators – Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii; Mike Lee, R-Utah; Ed Markey, D-Mass.; Bob Menendez, D-N.J.; Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; and Ron Wyden, D-Ore. – voted against the legislation.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...