Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:45 PM, CNY315 said:

Really don't get how someone could watch Clay and think Chandler

yep, nowhere near the same type of player

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:00 PM, GG said:

 

LaCanfora - Master of the obvious.

Early reports also indicate that the Bills will need to spend more than the Dolphins get Clay, and that they will need to score more points than the other team to win games.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:59 PM, Whitewalker Merriman said:

Early reports also indicate that the Bills will need to spend more than the Dolphins get Clay, and that they will need to score more points than the other team to win games.

Where did you read this?? Link???

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:59 PM, Whitewalker Merriman said:

Early reports also indicate that the Bills will need to spend more than the Dolphins get Clay, and that they will need to score more points than the other team to win games.

Not if the other team doesn't score more than us!!!!

Posted (edited)
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:41 PM, Lurker said:

 

I think there's a lot of selective memory around here. Is he a top-tier TE? No, of course not. But he's an effective guy who would be a fine complement to Clay...

i think you might need to re-read my post and then watch the video again. We have 2 high points where his feet might not have left the ground and he fell forward on one tackle... he was productive, and an ok player but didnt capitalize on his size like one would expect. i feel like your video supported my point that hes not a bad player, he just hasnt capitalized on his frame... did you see him winning jump balls, and running over guys? Edited by NoSaint
Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:00 PM, GG said:

 

LaCanfora - Master of the obvious.

 

...and frequently, the flat-out-wrong.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:23 PM, mikemac2001 said:

Ya he seems to miss if he is the first to leak it

 

He clearly has no in-the-know source for Bills' info. He guesses and makes inferences. When he is right, as you point out it is generally something already out there.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 1:55 PM, kdiggz said:

 

 

 

Bills waiting to see Suh's deal in Miami before making Clay offer sheet but I'm told will be heavily frontloaded ($9M or more in 2015)...

So it's a game of chicken now? I'm guessing we're going to have to offer first because clay will have other opportunities and it doesn't seem like suh is visiting anywhere else. I wonder how long each team could go having an agreement in principle but not actually signing the player?

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:29 PM, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

So it's a game of chicken now? I'm guessing we're going to have to offer first because clay will have other opportunities and it doesn't seem like suh is visiting anywhere else. I wonder how long each team could go having an agreement in principle but not actually signing the player?

If I were the Bills I would have Suh in for a nice visit. See what the Fins think about that.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 2:02 PM, Beerball said:

Really doesn't matter since it has 0% to do with this topic.

But, but, but... RI grabbed the guy's facemask! :cry:

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:29 PM, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

So it's a game of chicken now? I'm guessing we're going to have to offer first because clay will have other opportunities and it doesn't seem like suh is visiting anywhere else. I wonder how long each team could go having an agreement in principle but not actually signing the player?

i dont think either side is terribly worried - both know what to expect, more or less, and both know the options. its the difference of maybe one extra barb thrown in, not likely deal making/breaking. if anything i would guess they are taking time trying to find a format that clay likes that would fit their needs to be hard to match.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:35 PM, NoSaint said:

i dont think either side is terribly worried - both know what to expect, more or less, and both know the options. its the difference of maybe one extra barb thrown in, not likely deal making/breaking. if anything i would guess they are taking time trying to find a format that clay likes that would fit their needs to be hard to match.

I think it could help the Bills a lot to know the specific parameters of the Suh deal before signing Clay to the offer sheet. Plus stuff like the Fins bringing in Cameron could affect it. You're probably right that it may not be a deal breaker but it's surely possible. The Kyle extension today means the Bills wanted to add a couple mil more in cash this year.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:03 PM, Kelly the Dog said:

Not if the other team doesn't score more than us!!!!

that's obvious

  On 3/11/2015 at 3:35 PM, Nanker said:

But, but, but... RI grabbed the guy's facemask! :cry:

:lol:

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:40 PM, Kelly the Dog said:

I think it could help the Bills a lot to know the specific parameters of the Suh deal before signing Clay to the offer sheet. Plus stuff like the Fins bringing in Cameron could affect it. You're probably right that it may not be a deal breaker but it's surely possible. The Kyle extension today means the Bills wanted to add a couple mil more in cash this year.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking too because of the reported size of Suh's deal. I don't know if Cameron affect's these because with the tag you'd think miami would keep clay if the could and Cameron is only in play only if they can't.

Posted
  On 3/11/2015 at 3:40 PM, Kelly the Dog said:

I think it could help the Bills a lot to know the specific parameters of the Suh deal before signing Clay to the offer sheet. Plus stuff like the Fins bringing in Cameron could affect it. You're probably right that it may not be a deal breaker but it's surely possible. The Kyle extension today means the Bills wanted to add a couple mil more in cash this year.

This could do it: Six years, $30million $25 guaranteed.

2015 $8million Plus $18million signing bonus.

 

dreaming is fun

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...