Dr. Who

We won by 18 in their house this year. Yes, they are playing much better and Tre White is missing. Last time, we didn't have Milano and we are also playing better. The oline is surprisingly effective in the latest iteration and Singletary is providing a genuine rushing game. Bills can legitimately win the game. They are not in the position of hoping to steal a victory. As usual, you are only interested in marshalling evidence to paint bleak or desperate pictures. What a terrific human being you must be to devote so much time and energy to bringing everyone down. (And you're wrong.)

I'm not sure you're ever going to see it then.

Obviously bigger in the sense that a victory over Rat Face and Co. would mean a home AFC championship game. (But you know this.)

I'd really hate to see how you treat your enemies . . .

Correct. Anyone who thinks the Bills' chances of victory are below 30% are trolling or not very bright.

Lived in Atlanta for over forty years, but recently moved. Have not heard any serious discussion of a name change. And if the Blackhawks ever cave and get rid of the best sweater in hockey, shame on them.

Have a look at the Chiefs' board (but don't get too close, you'll catch something disagreeable.)

Yes, I wasn't actually too interested in a close examination of the game. I was reacting to a claim in a prior post and trying to make a broader point. I do remember some of those instances and I certainly made my usual ineffective protest to the telly which is yet to respond once to my indignation. On the whole, relative to what the Bills usually experience, it wasn't as egregious as it can get. When you have a dominant win, few care. In the one score games, folks remember. I expect the remaining contests will likely be close. Neutral site, metaphysically perfect officiating, I think the Bills win most games. Historical reality, alas, is always messy. Win by two scores to insulate yourself from zebra malpractice.

Plausible and if second scenario, I am livid. Inadvertent whistle suddenly becomes a new way to take away a good play, etc.

Probably not, but the Raiders' db clearly stopped short. NFL is sticklers for rules when they want to be. According to rule, should have replayed the down.

In a game where we were historically dominant, so nothing they could do even if they were so inclined. I don't trust the zebras in an even match up, but can't do anything about it. If we avoid turnovers, I think we win.

This happens in all areas of life. And then we vote on things and call it truth.

Execrable savages. Arrogant and dim, plus filthy and low brow. Plus, their qb is a rat face. They need to lose for the good of civilization . . . 😜

I think that gal was Dianna Russini.

Happy Birthday, fella.

Global warming.

You done raised 'em right.

If Bills WRs can catch the ball -- the extreme cold makes this difficult obviously -- it won't be close.

Fair enough. I am actually a natural melancholic as well, though for some odd reason it doesn't affect my take on the Bills.

The minute I saw your avatar as the most recent post in this thread I thought 1) haven't seen that fella much, almost forgot about him and 2) I bet it's a negative juju spew. Well done. The circle jerk of media pundits is not a surprise. ESPN was annointing Mac Jones the new Brady and acting as giddy as a new bride when the Pats* were briefly at the top of the division. The hell with them and the hell with the negative karma. We are better than the Pats*. Time to lower the boom.

This is fine . . . so long as the wall doesn't start talking.

He also posts as Filthy Beast.

I don't think she's very good either, but that's going a bit far don't you think?

Thanks. I'm not on Twitter and did not read it correctly as posted I guess.