corta765

I think your predictions are pretty decent although FA wise your going more name brand then I think we will get. Norwell I don't see them paying that $ amount for nor Bowman whos older plus I've read he wants to stay with OAK and vise versa. Maclin they can get for cheaper with Mike Wallace with speed and I think if they do target a big name player its Star Loutelilie or a LB like Tahir Whitehead or Avery Williamson. Rosen wise I think its either the 3rd 1st, the 2nd rnd pick, or Glenn. No way they give all three and truthfully I'm not sure they would give even 2 of them.

Josh Allen. Dude screams of every red flag scouts have, yet everyone only looks at his physical attributes. Matt Stafford is the only QB recently who has succeeded despite a completion % in college that was sub 60%. He is the only QB of the potential 1st round guys I would feel was a failure by drafting him without him playing a down yet.

Guy was sub 60% completion percentage. Virtually no QB has ever succeeded with that and his footwork is hot garbage. I would be very mad if they draft him

Here are fun five quick questions to answer for this coming season: 1. Who is the player in the draft you want the most? Sam Darnold for me I think he is the safest QB floor wise 2. Who is the free agent you want the Bills to sign the most? Star Lotulelei strengthen that front 7 big time 3. Who do you want as the starting QB? Darnold ^ 4. Who do you want the Bills to play in the home opener? Los Angeles Chargers, I want to annihilate them after last year 5. Does Kyle Williams return? Yes but this will be his final season which I expect him to say upon resigning

Yep. my cousin had similar and beat it at 30. Came back at 31 and despite treatment he passed at 32. Unfortunately it always seems like your on borrowed time when its up in that region. Hopefully he makes it through but certainly not a good sign if it came back once more.

Dylan...Dylan.. Dylan, Dylan, and Dylan because I spit hot fire! No but for real: 1. Darnold- I think Rosen may have a higher ceiling, but Darnold I think is a safer pick with a floor of Flacco pre ACL tear and ceiling around Phillip Rivers. Good leader with all the passing traits you want that just need time to smooth out. 2. Rosen- Ceiling reminds me of a mix of Matt Ryan/Stafford/Rich Gannon late career (OAK). I think he will succeed but he does need the correct situation where I think Darnold can go anywhere and at his floor be decent enough. 3. Mayfield- Has that Steve Young moxie and feel when he is good and also has that Vince Young potential to implode if he is in the wrong hands coaching wise IMO. Doesn't scare me with our coaching staff I think he would do well, but a place like NYC I could see issues given the big lights and constant media. 4. Rudolph- Very much a situational QB in terms of success to me. He has accuracy and size and with a coach thats a little creative I think he could be be a higher end version of Ryan Tannehill. He needs time to sit and develop also and I don't see him having much success if he has to start immediately. 5. Jackson- I see his ceiling somewhere above Tyrod & below Deshaun Watson. He can be incredibly explosive but his accuracy needs work and he is absolutely a project QB to develop him fully. That said his athleticism probably would allow him more success early on the the other four just because some of the plays he can make are sublime, but I think defenses would have him figured out after a season if he doesn't grow.

Good question I go Star because of his familiarity with McD but either one would be great.

Haha bold move finally break the drought and time to close up shop

Guys EJ Gaines isn't two times the player that Vontae Davis is.. or three... or four.. or five.........or six.....or seven.... or eight.... or nine... BUT TEN TIMES THE PLAYER VONTAE IS. Book the freaking super bowl boys on team Gaines!

Goodell choke slamming Jerry Jones

Not entirely true. Milano was removed as a starter with Humber's return which coincided with the 3 game stretch of Jets/Saints/Chargers. After that they reinserted Milano and their run defense went from tire back to average after that. Front 7 has holes I expect them to fill big time but they atleast in my eyes rebounded back to good enough against the run D to not be a liability.

At one point he was pretty good but watch his market this off season. He lacks speed and the ability to break away from defenders two things coaches want big time today. Matthews is hard to judge because he was injured for majority of the year and outside of the Jets/Falcons games I don't remember him much because of that.

IF he and Gronk are gone that Patriots offense will lose some real explosion next year even with Edelman back. Gronk is virtually uncover-able at points, but Lewis could be worse due to his versatility.

100% agree. Ralph was loved by the players and I remember the one drought offseason he spent like 70 mil on Derrick Dockery and Langston Walker to try and upgrade on line. After Donahoe though he became really cheap for front office and I think that experience hurt him. He tried to fix that later on with Buddy Nix and going after Bill Cowher but he was too old and the reputation/instability of the team long term made it a very tough hire. This is why I give Russ Brandon an enormous amount of credit for the work he did to stabilize things so when the team was sold it had a firm base regionally and Marrone wasn't a bad hire at all in retrospect compared to Jaruon or Gailey.

Basically I broke it down like this: Denver- Good D and some weapons on offense but tough division, some cap tightness, and coach isn't very great. Also isn't Cousins the 3rd best QB in this division behind Rivers & Carr? I think he wants somewhere that offers more favorable schedule. Arizona- Defense is good, offense has weapons, stadium is awesome plus indoors, and Wilks looks like a strong coach given the staff he has. But this division is turning into an arms race again and not a single game divisionaly would be necessarily easy compared to playing in AFC or NFC North. Also with Fitzgerald playing for only another year they need more at WR. Jets- More cap space then the Bills but more holes and same situation as BUF being the AFC with Brady, PIT, AFC South etc.. The WR corp is a mess and Anderson's arrest only hurts more. The Jets to me feel more like a perfect spot for Darnold or Rosen to grow with a rebuilding roster not a win now type vet. Cleveland- No one could offer a contract the size CLE could where they could front load the first two years $90 million strong and still have a ton of cap space. The defense has some real talent and should see an uptick this year. If your Cousins despite CLE reputation if they tell you your getting Saquon Barkley, Sammy Watkins, & Randall Cobb for instance to go with Josh Gordon, Duke Johnson, and David Njoku plus that mammoth contract and a division which after PIT is not imposing at all how many other teams really offer a better chance other than maybe MIN & JAX? True definition of darkhorse right here. Jacksonville- JAX seems pretty set with Bortles short term especially after the recent contract extension. If there was one team in the AFC that felt like a perfect fit who could take on for real NE/PIT it would be JAX with Cousins but they don't seem interested enough. Buffalo- We have a chance at Cousins with the draft picks being used to solidify the roster and some of the roster space. But he has to face Brady/BB twice plus you have PIT also waiting and an AFC South that quickly has some real teams with talent, I think he stays away from the AFC because of this. Also with all the moves McBeane has made I just don't see them doing something this aggressive. Minnesota- Best roster of talent by any of the teams looking for a QB and even with GB/Rodgers the division is not imposing. Also NFC is wide open also which is why I picked the Vikings as Cousins landing spot especially with Keenum and Bridgewater most likely leaving.

If Whaley gets a second chance with a head coach he is gets to pick or is very close with I wouldn't be surprised if he is moderately successful to really good. His drafts were good minus 16 which like you said was Ryan, he could find guys in FA for next to nothing that worked well, and he got some real steals trading wise. His two big problems were contracts and coexisting with the coach if the coach played a player that wasn't Whaley's guy. I think those two things are fixable.

2015 is the better example offense started Woods, Watkins, Glenn, Wood, and J. Miller on opening day 5 of 11 all drafted by the Bills. Defense started Dareus, Bradham, P Brown, Gilmore, Darby, McKelvin, and A Williams on opening day 7 of 11 drafted by Bills. Rex in year 1 didn't lose much from the Bills D or O. After that he purged a lot/Whaley's contract extensions hit the team hard. The 2015 Bills were without a doubt the most talented team they've had since 1999 IMO performance just never matched thanks to Rex.

Not surprised by this. I recently commented on a Doug Whaley post that he actually drafted pretty decently until 2016 and that last years roster was buoyed by vets/2017 draft class big time. Here is the list of starting caliber players we drafted (2012 on) that are gone: Sammy Watkins, Robert Woods, Marquise Goodwin, Nigel Bradham, Ross Cockrell, Kiko Alosno (traded for Shady so wash), Ronald Darby, Reggie Ragland, Stephon Gilmore, and if you reach back one year further Marcell Dareus also. Obviously you cannot pay all of them, but we reshuffled the deck for a 3rd head coaches scheme again and lost talent. Now it worked out a lot better I like McD a ton, but Rex is a direct reason why Bradham isn't here and Ragland was drafted which shows how much changing coaches impacts your lineup especially with how much Bradham could be used now. By the way the 2016 draft is case and point what happens when you miss big time on your picks only Adolphus Washington and Shaq Lawson are even left on the roster. So yea the Bills have work to do but the positives are the 2017 draft went incredibly well with White, Dawkins, & Milano as a strong base and they have a lot of picks this year even if they trade for a QB to add more depth.

Agreed and basically the middle three games go as followed: NYJ: Team was overhyped and defense just straight missed tackles. Mix in the offense turns the ball over 3 separate times including once when we would've tied the game at 10-10 and twice inside our own 40 and our D didn't have a chance to make many other mistakes. NOLA: Offense was never on the field, team morale wise looked lost, and NOLA exploited the middle of our D which was transitioning without Darues LAC: Peterman and the entire team quit come the second half minus a select few. Also for some dumb reason it took 3 horrendous games on D for the coaches to realize Milano should've been starting over Humber. BUT to their credit they fixed and played far better after that.

This has been an issue for me for a while. I love football and I understand that things evolve so I am good with the limiting of head hits by defenders. What I hate though is how the rules are soo slanted for offenses now. God forbid you touch a WR remotely past 5 yards, if a QB is grazed anywhere not in his middle its 15 yards, QB's are virtually never called for intentional grounding, etc.. after a while its off putting as a fan. One of the issues the NFL has with the catch rule is if they just did it where the moment its caught its a catch without 3 steps etc.. there would be wayy more fumbles and turnovers which team coaches freaked out about. This is probably the same reason the intentional grounding rule is such crap. Even these two minor adjustments would give the defense a better shot and IMO a closer better played game. I hate in general how the league has went from QB being the primary focus in the game to the only focus. QB mattered a ton in the 70-80-90s BUT you could still win if you had a good RB defense and average QB play. That just doesn't exist anymore. I am not saying I necessarily want the 9-3 Carolina game either weekly, just a little bit more back in the favor of the defense.

This would be the point I remind the OP that Tyrod Taylor himself hit the open market and came BACK to Buffalo for less because suitors didn't think he was worth the money he wanted. Bridge QB's are exactly that and all it takes is one team possibly BUF that puts enough money and term on the table that sells them to come here.

No and honestly I could care less about them really did nothing for me as a fan. I think cheerleaders and other sports that have ice girls etc.. are eventually going to go to the wayside in sports in the next decade. Society is changing pretty quick and a lot of this is seen now as objectifying women by a lot of people not entertainment. Additionally as the NFL tries to expand its viewership and increase all demographics especially female I see them shifting away from that type of piece of entertainment during the game. Like I said it did nothing for me either way as a fan, but that is just kinda how I see things shaping out.

I wouldn't want to go unless I was concerned universally a Top 10 guy where at least I knew I wouldn't fall out of the first round. Although in general I would rather be with family and friends rather then the draft anyway.

I personally think they are more sold on Darnold then Rosen by a little. Rosen is the most pro ready QB in terms of skill and playing in a pro style offense, but Mayfield to me has the safer floor which to me is a QB equal to Joe Flacco pre ACL injury. Rosen I think could have higher upside but I could see him potentially flunking out in the wrong situation, I don't think Mayfield would flunk out.

Um excuse me but on Madden 2004 I directed the Lincoln Hawkeyes (Moved AZ Cards to Lincoln NEB we had sick unis) to 9 consecutive Super Bowls and we won 5. My football knowledge is vastly superior then virtually anyone on this board with the exception of maybe Dunkirk Don