Rigotz

Great post. Now, if you're officially quitting the process, I suppose this means goodbye. So goodbye.

This really is a dumb comment. We’re only 5th “oldest” because we have 3 very old players on the team. The majority of the starters are first or second year pros. They even mentioned during the game that we have more first or second year starters than any other team in the NFL.

As much as I love seeing his passion, I don't like seeing players do this. Nobody likes it when guys leave Buffalo and hate on the city/team.

Can we please shut this thread down? It's going to get bad, fast. This is a bad idea for lots of reasons and we don't have to make it a 15 page flame war.

Little known fact, Nick O'Leary is actually Jack Nicklaus's grandson and he doesn't play with gloves.

There was also the annoying Alabama fan on here who said Foster is going to be legit ... but he has said that about every Alabama player ever, so not worth a shout out.

We're building a young team around a young QB. How about just using the picks on WR so they can grow together instead of trading for vets?

Nobody has ever done this before ... DEFINITELY not Kordell Stewart 20 years ago when he lined up at QB, RB, and WR and was called "Slash" instead of "Jack Back."

The thesis of the article is that you can infer "top priorities" based on this data and that appears to be incorrect. You actually made my point for me. Just looking at who we (overtly) scouted out of the top 10 available players doesn't give any indication of how we value the middle and late round players. It also tries to correlate number of scouting visits to interest in a player. This would be a great article if they left the thesis out that there's some correlation between who we looked at in the top 10 and what our "top priorities" are.

I appreciate the effort on this, but there's zero chance it's correct. We're scouting O-Line and WR. Beane is not an idiot. He realizes how bad our Offense is and has mentioned it in press conferences.

Laziest response of the year goes to....

Kind of surprising to see 32% of people still saying it's a bad trade. What would the benefit be of having McCarron right now?

After week 10, we know 3 new things: - Raiders pick will likely be top 3, which makes the 5th rounder more valuable. - Matt Barkley might be a decent backup / interim starter. - Nate Peterman is not a decent backup / interim starter. Curious where you all fall on this one now.

It's pretty easy. - being surrounded by people that love the same thing as you. - dedicating an entire day to the football experience. - drinking outside and hanging with your friends. - supporting a team when they're bad so you can wear it as a badge of honor when they're good. You should be able to have a good time at the game no matter how bad the actual team is. I always do.

NO! FIRE EVERYONE! I'M CRANKY AND NEED INSTANT SATISFACTION.

We got a very high third round pick in exchange for Tyrod. That was a great deal for us. He will never be a great QB. You need a great QB to win consistently in the NFL. Nothing else, including this thread, matters.

IF Josh Allen starts, I'm rooting for a win and we should all be doing the same. He needs as many wins and as much locker room confidence as possible.

How do you start a thread about something a person said ... and not mention what they said?

This is the problem. There's a huge contingent of dumb fans that want to run every single coach and GM out of town in year 2. We made the playoffs in year 1 and that still wasn't enough for these f*ing people. A rebuild takes time. If you want to build lasting success you can't do the same year-to-year garbage that these fans seem to want for some reason.

How about #18? He's OK at Special Teams, but the fact that we ever throw him the ball is a travesty.

...Kyle Williams?

Buddy .... let me slow this down for you. I'm referring to the value of a third round pick in that same draft. I couldn't use the Darby pick because it was used to trade up for Edmunds.

Is this a joke? Why are people liking this post? - You actually want CASE KEENUM to be the future of our franchise? He signed a 2 year deal with a better franchise to be a starter. We would need to offer at least 3 years. - You would rather have TYROD TAYLOR than Harrison Phillips? Seriously? You disliked that trade? - You want COLIN KAEPERNICK .... a player that would completely BLOW UP our locker room and potentially franchise? ...do you guys have zero concept of how to build for the future?