All Activity

It is really hard to stay at the top of your conference for 6+ years (10 for K.C.). There are going to be ups and downs, and dips, even within that stretch, or between two such stretches maybe. It is inevitable due to salary cap, contracts, players aging out, drafting late, other teams getting better, other teams being younger, healthier, hungrier, etc. Yes, there are teams on the rise, but it is foolish to think that the Mahomes, Allen, and Jackson era is over when they are only 28-, 29-, and 30-years old. Most good QBs are productive into their late 30s. There have been 18 NFL QBs to play into their early 40s. These guys all have 10-12 more productive years ahead of them. The talent of the team around them may fluctuate, but they will all still be deep in the hunt most years. And then the next question is can Denver, New England, and Chicago maintain that success for multiple years (as they have to pay their QBs, start drafting later, get FAs poached, have tougher schedules, etc.). As to the QBs themselves, obviously, the young guys will need to prove it in the post-season too (which we have yet to see), but I thought that I would look at the overall stats in comparison, just out of curiosity. Here are the QB stats for each QB's first 25 starts in the league (Williams only has 25 starts thus far, so I used that as the base number for all--even though Nix and Maye have 29 and 28 starts, respectively, to this point). FIRST 25 STARTS IN THE NFL Player Total Yards Total TDs INTs Mahomes 8,260 71 14 Jackson 6,761 57 9 Nix 6,179 51 17 Maye 6,134 40 11 Williams 6,127 34 10 Allen 6,068 45 21 Caveat for Josh...he was the most raw of those QBs coming into the league and by far came to the worst team (least amount of talent around him). K.C, Baltimore, and Denver were all pretty solid teams when they drafted their QBs. And I venture to say that Chicago and New England both had more talent last year than the 2018 salary-capped purged Bills. But, yeah, statistically the three young QBs have started well. But, let's see if they can continue to grow and produce as circumstances change around them (over a few seasons), before we put them at the same level or ahead of the big three (or four, if you include Burrow).

I hope Sauce is not seriously injured. That's the risk teams take when they go all in on one player to try and sustain success.

And that's why you shouldn't trade 2 first round picks for a CB

Most estimates of his speed that I've seen suggest that he runs the 40 in the low to mid 4.4s. He is generally seen as more quick than fast. In the low 4.4s, you can still beat a lot of CBs. The bigger issue is that most see him as a slot receiver. That would still leave Buffalo with the dilemma on who lines up outside.

He looked very gimpy leaving to the Locker room.

That looked really bad

Sauce looks to have a non-contact leg injury.

Sauce Achilles?

If Bucs lose today that division is going to get interesting

I don't see any way he doesn't win MVP this year

Sometimes I go and walk the street Behind the green sheet of glass A million miles below their feet A million miles, a million miles I'll be with you, girl Like being low Hey-hey-hey, like being stoned

Stafford, his 28th TD pass since his last interception. New NFL record.

Yeah, if that offense gets going they are going to be a really tough out

I was able to purchase a NFL Sunday ticket for the rest of the regular season including tax $63.00. Its a great bargain for anyone who needs or might want it.

Well this game isn’t starting very well for Indianapolis.

The odd thing is that the system is so stale, that guys from years ago can step right in. And its also odd we can't teach new guys, but much of the league seems to have the defense completely figured out.

Interested to see how Stroud plays today.

Not a good start for the Colts on O. 3 and out Also, I am impressed every time I see how ripped DeMeco Ryans is

Houston’s Defense is so nasty, my goodness. If Stroud can elevate that Offense at all, they’re a wagon. Big if though.

Five straight three and outs for Indi going back to last week

The Democrats’ Latest Faux Scandal By John Hinderaker Here are my thoughts on the controversy: 1) The story is based on anonymous “sources,” i.e., deep state leakers. Unless and until someone steps forward, identifies himself, tells us what he knows and how he knows it, and takes responsibility for his statements, I assume everything in the story is probably a lie. 2) Given the lack of regard for the “law of armed conflict” that is consistently shown by our enemies, my reaction is: boo hoo. 3) Is there really a “law of armed conflict” that says you can only shoot at a target once? And if someone escapes an initial bombing, or burst of fire, or whatever, he is home free and can’t again be targeted? I’d like to see that law. I haven’t seen any news source cite to it. 4) If such a rule exists and applies in the present context, it is stupid. If it applies, and one were determined to follow it, it would incentivize a massive first strike that would eliminate any chance of survivors. And would also increase the risk of collateral, unintended damage. Meanwhile, it appears that the Trump administration may be intent on bringing about regime change in Venezuela. If armed conflict develops, the fate of the narco-traffickers will soon be forgotten. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/the-democrats-latest-faux-scandal.php

I'm going Colts. Want Houston to rack up some L's

Colts have to have the quietest fans when their team is on offense. You'd think the stands were empty

Colts, no question, for me.

Octobox!