Mikie2times Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Some of the better leaders I have worked with have told me, you being an expert or great is not a sign that you’re doing your job well. How we perform when you aren’t there and how well you duplicate yourself with employees is. I think this logic clearly extends to coaches. To me it’s easier to validate who the very best are based on the number of future leaders and coaches they have been able to develop.  Plenty of critical McD threads out there. I was hoping to focus this conversation on if anybody thinks McD will develop a coaching tree or has the capability of doing so, and if yes or no, how much does that matter in evaluating his success?  Hypothetically, who would that tree consist of? I don’t consider Dabs, Frazier, or Brady as part of that tree. Does anybody here feel that is the case or could be in time? Maybe some influence? From my view this relevant as far as a different angle to evaluate his performance vs the standard stuff we hear on the board. Quote
Freddie's Dead Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good one. 1 2 Quote
Mikie2times Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good one. I sort of feel that way, but I would really like to hear from some of his supporters. I have said before, I still think talent is a bigger barrier to success right now than coaching. But if the notion that one of all time winningest HC’s will never develop a future HC is laughable, how damning is that? It feels pretty damning from leadership perspective. Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Some of the better leaders I have worked with have told me, you being an expert or great is not a sign that you’re doing your job well. How we perform when you aren’t there and how well you duplicate yourself with employees is. I think this logic clearly extends to coaches. To me it’s easier to validate who the very best are based on the number of future leaders and coaches they have been able to develop.  Plenty of critical McD threads out there. I was hoping to focus this conversation on if anybody thinks McD will develop a coaching tree or has the capability of doing so, and if yes or no, how much does that matter in evaluating his success?  Hypothetically, who would that tree consist of? I don’t consider Dabs, Frazier, or Brady as part of that tree. Does anybody here feel that is the case or could be in time? Maybe some influence? From my view this relevant as far as a different angle to evaluate his performance vs the standard stuff we hear on the board. curious why you wouldn’t consider Dabs or Brady as part of his tree? 1 2 Quote
Lost Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago People who have coaching trees are innovators of the game.  McD is a good leader but he hasn't changed the game in any meaningful way that others will follow.  1 4 Quote
SydneyBillsFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Maybe a coaching indoor pot plant that hasn't been watered for a week. 2 Quote
NewEra Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said: curious why you wouldn’t consider Dabs or Brady as part of his tree? Brady hasn’t been a HC.  Daboll is the only branch Quote
Maynard Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 21 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said: curious why you wouldn’t consider Dabs or Brady as part of his tree? I’d say McD doesn’t know O from his own fart. Not sure that counts. Plus Dabs might get fired and Brady looking like a used prophylactic wrapper at the moment. Edited 4 hours ago by Maynard Quote
Bills!Win! Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Coaching trees would be  Holmgren Reid Belichick  who else? Edited 4 hours ago by Bills!Win! Quote
wppete Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) There is no way. He is not a great coach. Just got lucky to have hit a homerun in getting a unicorn 🦄 for a QB and a very bad division after Brady left. Dont see him being a head coach much longer in Buffalo.  20 minutes ago, NewEra said: Brady hasn’t been a HC.  Daboll is the only branch I think Daboll falls under the Belichick tree.  Edited 4 hours ago by wppete 1 Quote
Big Turk Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, wppete said: There is no way. He is not a great coach. Just got lucky to have hit a homerun in getting a unicorn 🦄 for a QB and a very bad division after Brady left. Dont see him being a head coach much longer in Buffalo.  I think Daboll falls under the Belichick tree.   You mean the teams he has sucked as the OC with? Quote
hondo in seattle Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 51 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Some of the better leaders I have worked with have told me, you being an expert or great is not a sign that you’re doing your job well. How we perform when you aren’t there and how well you duplicate yourself with employees is. I think this logic clearly extends to coaches. To me it’s easier to validate who the very best are based on the number of future leaders and coaches they have been able to develop.  Plenty of critical McD threads out there. I was hoping to focus this conversation on if anybody thinks McD will develop a coaching tree or has the capability of doing so, and if yes or no, how much does that matter in evaluating his success?  Hypothetically, who would that tree consist of? I don’t consider Dabs, Frazier, or Brady as part of that tree. Does anybody here feel that is the case or could be in time? Maybe some influence? From my view this relevant as far as a different angle to evaluate his performance vs the standard stuff we hear on the board.  With his winning record, if McD gets fired by Pegula, someone else will hire him as a HC. He'll be a HC coach long enough in this league to see some of his subordinates become head coaches. In that sense, he'll have a tree.  But I think the idea of a "tree" means a bit more than that. To me a coaching tree means a coach who mentored and influenced his subordinates who later on exhibited that influence when they were head coaches. Bill Walsh comes to mind.   I think the coaches under McD might be influenced by his "process" and culture. But his tree will lack any distinctive, original X and O tactical stuff. To me, that's not a true tree. McD is just another branch in the Reid tree.  1 Quote
ngbills Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Brady to Penn St. McDaniels to Buffalo. Super Bowl win. Quote
90sBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bills!Win! said: Coaching trees would be  Holmgren Reid Belichick  who else? You forgot the granddaddy of them all…Walsh. Quote
UConn James Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bills!Win! said: Coaching trees would be  Holmgren Reid Belichick  who else? One could argue for McVay, and tho it is early, it has had some measure of success. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.