Jump to content

Marquez Valdes-Scantling meeting with the Bills (UPDATE: Signed)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, NoSaint said:


or I keep saying - heaven forbid Samuel rolls an ankle in a preseason game and misses September? Week 1 could get real thin real fast if Coleman is even slightly a project and either Shakir or Samuel miss any early reps 

Yup. We could be seeing a lot of 2 TE sets if that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Bills Bud said:

What a joke. Bringing in a bunch of jalopies when we just needed one Ferrari


Beane already maxed out the company credit card paying for the last few Ferraris, so jalopies are about all he can afford right now.

Please check back next offseason. In the meantime, the Bills will ride the jalopies as far as they'll go before breaking down (the Divisional round, if recent history holds).

Edited by Logic
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BigAl2526 said:

Well, if the Bills want to bring him in to compete, there are worse WRs on the roster now that they can drop.  Just don't spend too much money to sign him.


They only have $2m left to spend at the moment …so it won’t be much even pushing some out with dummy years ..

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, appoo said:

 

Game recognizes game in this case. Can't believe that nimrod in NY couldn't make use of him

 

I wonder why he couldn't make use of him and before you say this is one play it's a pattern he does it alot

 

 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Logic said:

He's better than Quintez Cephus, KJ Hamler, Mack Hollins, and probably Chase Claypool. His career production relative to theirs makes this indisputable. 

He also provides a downfield threat that the Bills currently lack. Given what it will likely cost to sign him, I'd be fine with this. It would materially improve and diversify the Bills' WR corps. Not as much as we'd all like, of course, but the salary cap is the salary cap.


The stats don’t support that.  Chase Claypool had back to back 850+ yard seasons to start his career with a broken down Big Ben as the 3rd WR before his attitude got him traded to purgatory in Chicago and then at end of bench in Miami last year.  
 

MSV has never reached 700 yards in 6 years playing with prime Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes, including last year when the chiefs were desperate at WR and he only put up 315 yards.  
 

Even Mack Hollins has the same career high of 690 yards in a season as MVS does, except Hollins did it as the 3rd WR and playing with Carr instead of MVP Rodgers.  
 

Hollins has the better attitude of all 3.  And he is a much better blocker, and better ST player too.  Chase has the most raw ability and talent, but he’s got to his head right after JuJu poisoned him young.  
 

MVS just sucks at everything.  His only hope of beating out Chase is that Chase hasn’t learned his lesson and doesn’t get his head right on what is likely his last chance before hitting CFL.  I doubt he would beat out Hollins either as Hollins does more.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


The stats don’t support that.  Chase Claypool had back to back 850+ yard seasons to start his career with a broken down Big Ben as the 3rd WR before his attitude got him traded to purgatory in Chicago and then at end of bench in Miami last year.....

 

I know it makes no logical sense whatsoever but I am extremely intrigued by Chase Claypool during this particular chapter of his career.

  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:



 

MVS just sucks at everything.  His only hope of beating out Chase is that Chase hasn’t learned his lesson and doesn’t get his head right on what is likely his last chance before hitting CFL.  I doubt he would beat out Hollins either as Hollins does more.  

He’s very good at getting behind the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vertical threat nobody else brings.  Do it.

2 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Catching the damn ball is all that matters. Who cares how far downfield he gets if he's only going to drop it.    

 

Hard pass

You want to keep those safeties back though even if he is a decoy of sorts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He also has made big plays in the playoffs. 

He makes a random catch here and there. 

 

24 catches for 406 yards and scored 4 touchdowns in 11 games in the playoffs in his career.

 

Last season he had 21 catches for 315 yards 1 TD during the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:

He makes a random catch here and there. 

 

24 catches for 406 yards and scored 4 touchdowns in 11 games in the playoffs in his career.

 

Last season he had 21 catches for 315 yards 1 TD during the season

So? He’s experienced depth. People here wanted OBJ and DJ Chark as our experienced depth. Completely unrealistic. 
 

People are talking about this guy like he’s not an upgrade over Trent Sherfield.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Hollis, Claypool and MVS are three of the least efficient WRs I’ve ever seen.  All three of them under one offense would be like a squad full of Robert Royals.

 

 

He is what Kolby Listenbee could have been if not for the sports hernia's.

 

Adding him would leave them one Keon Coleman hammy strain away from meaningful games with elite ball-dropper MVS on one side and DK Decaf Shorter on the other side.   What could go wrong?

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

So? He’s experienced depth. People here wanted OBJ and DJ Chark as our experienced depth. Completely unrealistic. 
 

People are talking about this guy like he’s not an upgrade over Trent Sherfield.

 

MVS ran a 4.37 40 and while he's going to be 30 he's only played 6 seasons (not a lot of wear and tear so to speak), he's been durable and won two Super Bowls while being a somewhat productive player. The Bills are getting as about as good a low risk "experienced" depth option as they can get at this stage.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...