Jump to content

Legette vs. McConkey


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I've considered this as well. Last year I liked Jalin Hyatt as a potential 1st round pick for us and instead he went in the 3rd. WRs with that sort of frame tend to fall further than draftniks predict.


I think only 5 go in the first but I do believe there will be a 2nd round run on guys. 
 

I have all 6 QBs 

5 WRs

11 OL

4 DL

5 DBs 

1 TE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McConkey only lined up in the slot 25% of his college snaps if my memory serves.  
 

I’m a Dawg fan so I’m partial to Ladd, but I’m taking Mitchell above Ladd, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin or Legette. I love AD’s combo of size and speed.  I also like his ability to make the big play, 11 TDs last year and 5 TDs in 5 CFP games.

Edited by GASabresIUFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SirAndrew said:

I just watched McConkey’s college highlights, and can’t stop seeing a slightly versatile slot receiver. I want to see what others are seeing, but I don’t get it. The college highlights look strikingly similar to a Kincaid, Shakir, Samuel type player. We don’t have a need for that. I appreciate the fact he lined up on the outside, but that’s college. The NFL is a huge step up, and I don’t see a guy with the physicality to play on the outside consistently. Our greatest hope is finding a Metcalf, Lamb, or AJ Brown type player. Someone who can dominate physically, while giving Josh a downfield threat. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I just struggle seeing this in McConkey. He looks like a slot receiver twig figure running down the field. 

I think he can play the Diggs' role. You'd still need to get a big X. I have advocated for McConkey and a trade up from 60 for Legette. Naturally, you're free to draw your own conclusions and advocate for whatever you like. If you think you only need one receiver to add to the WR group (I don't,) then a big trade up for Odunze is probably the best you could do if focused on the kind of boundary receiver you are looking for.

1 minute ago, GASabresIUFan said:

McConkey only lineup in the slot 25% of his college snaps if my memory serves.  
 

I’m a Dawg fan so I’m partial to Ladd, but I’m taking Mitchell above Ladd, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin or Legette. I love AD’s combo of size and speed.  I also like his ability to make the big play, 11 TDs last year and 5 TDs in 5 CFP games.

I know for whatever reason, you don't normally respond to anything I write, but the questions on Mitchell are about his effort, his diabetes, etc. I can't answer how much of that is manageable, real, etc. I do like him.

Edited by Dr. Who
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

know for whatever reason, you don't normally respond to anything I write, but the questions on Mitchell are about his effort, his diabetes, etc. I can't answer how much of that is manageable, real, etc. I do like him.

I’ve got nothing. ;)

Edited by GASabresIUFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GASabresIUFan said:

McConkey only lined up in the slot 25% of his college snaps if my memory serves.  
 

I’m a Dawg fan so I’m partial to Ladd, but I’m taking Mitchell above Ladd, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin or Legette. I love AD’s combo of size and speed.  I also like his ability to make the big play, 11 TDs last year and 5 TDs in 5 CFP games.

Excited Best Friends GIF by Gogglebox Australia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want a guy who can fight through the “sticky” playoff coverage. 
 

We’ve tried the little nimble guys and precision route separators. Seem to disappear every year. 
 

That’s why I’m on Legette. I want to see us try something different. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Who said:

I think he can play the Diggs' role. You'd still need to get a big X. I have advocated for McConkey and a trade up from 60 for Legette. Naturally, you're free to draw your own conclusions and advocate for whatever you like. If you think you only need one receiver to add to the WR group (I don't,) then a big trade up for Odunze is probably the best you could do if focused on the kind of boundary receiver you are looking for.

I know for whatever reason, you don't normally respond to anything I write, but the questions on Mitchell are about his effort, his diabetes, etc. I can't answer how much of that is manageable, real, etc. I do like him.

As a type 1 diabetic it's easy to control these thanks to pumps and continuous glucose monitoring systems. Granted I'm not running routes etc which can impact sugars quicker than normal but one can carb up purposely to help avoid lows. People questioning effort don't watch enough football to realize all guys don't go balls to the walls on every down. My issue with McConkey is he doesn't beat people with pure speed but seem to make moves to avoid getting hit etc which great in the return game but as a receiver I worry as he struggled with injuries in college what's going to happen when the big guys start hitting him. 

Edited by The Jokeman
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you guys convince me that McConkey is this good? He seems to be LOVED by the board, with no negatives by my account. 
 

What makes him such a strong WR in general? If he’s good, he’s good, and of course he’d be a hit for the Bills, even if he isn’t a WR1, which we’d still be looking for if drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RyanC883 said:

 

love the idea of Cowing.  Also like the Fla WR as a 2nd round guy if we get Legette first.  I think Cowing may go earlier than some of the mock draft sims have him going.  I could see late 2nd, early 3rd.  

He’s one of my favorite prospects!! I like Pearsall a lot too.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DaggersEOD said:

I want a guy who can fight through the “sticky” playoff coverage. 
 

We’ve tried the little nimble guys and precision route separators. Seem to disappear every year. 
 

That’s why I’m on Legette. I want to see us try something different. 


THIS x 10000000.  Only exception is Worthy because if he’s in motion that won’t matter

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

This is a tough question for me. I’d love to answer “both.” Legette has the higher ceiling IMO. McConkey certainly has the higher floor. I think McConkey will be better in 2024 because he’s more refined at this point.
 

The answer is that you actually need BOTH of those skill sets still on this team. If forced to choose, I’ll say Legette because what he has is harder to teach. I can find a guy a little later, albeit smaller, but that also separates in Jacob Cowing. I think that it’s easier to find good footwork than it is to find that size/speed combination.


it’s also cheaper/easier to find a lunch pail guy than an elite traits guy in free agency 

 

Also- I swear I meant that as a hard working technician of the game and not as a white guy

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Thrivefourfive said:

Could you guys convince me that McConkey is this good? He seems to be LOVED by the board, with no negatives by my account. 
 

What makes him such a strong WR in general? If he’s good, he’s good, and of course he’d be a hit for the Bills, even if he isn’t a WR1, which we’d still be looking for if drafted. 

He does have negatives. As the Jokeman indicated, McConkey has battled injuries, so concerns about durability are not ridiculous. And he's not a great receiver in traffic, though he runs such savage routes that he normally creates a lot of space. The big 3 at the top of the draft have high floors and high ceilings, though no one is without risk. After that, everyone has something to worry about for sure. In addition, lots of folks in this thread think McConkey is just another slot receiver. We don't need more of those, frankly, but I don't think that's what he is. In the old nomenclature, he's a flanker.

10 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


it’s also cheaper/easier to find a lunch pail guy than an elite traits guy in free agency 

 

Also- I swear I meant that as a hard working technician of the game and not as a white guy

I think McConkey has some elite traits. The gritty slot/lunch pail thing annoys me. I think he's more the Fred Astaire of wide receivers. He's smooth, and at the same time can break a route off with violence.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

I think McConkey has some elite traits. The gritty slot/lunch pail thing annoys me. I think he's more the Fred Astaire of wide receivers. He's smooth, and at the same time can break a route off with violence.

Lance Alworth comes to mind.  I would be very happy with McConkey.  I suspect we'll pass on him if he's still available and then deeply regret that we didn't take him.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


it’s also cheaper/easier to find a lunch pail guy than an elite traits guy in free agency 

 

Also- I swear I meant that as a hard working technician of the game and not as a white guy


He’s white???

 

throwing-papers-im-done.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GASabresIUFan said:

McConkey only lined up in the slot 25% of his college snaps if my memory serves.  
 

I’m a Dawg fan so I’m partial to Ladd, but I’m taking Mitchell above Ladd, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin or Legette. I love AD’s combo of size and speed.  I also like his ability to make the big play, 11 TDs last year and 5 TDs in 5 CFP games.

Mitchell’s yac was horrendous and he’s kind of clumsy looking in his route running and catching. He could be great but he could also be the bust of the group. I stay away 

1 hour ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Lance Alworth comes to mind.  I would be very happy with McConkey.  I suspect we'll pass on him if he's still available and then deeply regret that we didn't take him.

 

 

Yep - we pass on him, kc takes him and he averages 110 catches the next 10 years

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Mitchell’s yac was horrendous and he’s kind of clumsy looking in his route running and catching. He could be great but he could also be the bust of the group. I stay away 

How many times did you see him play in person?  I went to most of his games at UGA and YAC, separation, route running, and effort were never a problem.  How much YAC do you get when you make great catches in the end zone.    This kid might be a little raw, but he'll be a very good NFL player.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GASabresIUFan said:

How many times did you see him play in person?  I went to most of his games at UGA and YAC, separation, route running, and effort were never a problem.  How much YAC do you get when you make great catches in the end zone.    This kid might be a little raw, but he'll be a very good NFL player.  

Eye test (you) vs analytics - what all the analysts are saying……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dr. Who said:

McConkey is absolutely a volume receiver year one. You don't know what you are talking about. Also, I don't think "dissident" means what you think it means.

Autocorrected disappointment. And if you follow the thread you will see I support McConkey over legette. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...