Jump to content

Matt Araiza signs with Chiefs


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jkeerie said:

Nothing is obvious on this board, Capco.  The opinions by some are so extreme most especially when it comes to the Chiefs vs Bills.


Well, they say a good troll attempt is one that isn't obvious, so I'll take that as a compliment!  😅

Two things to keep in mind, imo.  1) fan is short for fanatic, and fanaticism is basically an irrational, emotionally driven state of mind.  2) most people are fairly dumb anyway lol.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, st pete gogolak said:

There was ZERO chance Bills were doing anything other than cutting him once the allegations were made.  Remember the allegations?  Having non consensual sex with a minor? 

You know what? The Bills did a great job with putting a total lid on ANY info about Kim Pegula…for Six Months…when she disappeared from public view. Nobody in the media even dared ask a question about her.

 

They could have showed some loyalty and done the same thing for Matt A. After all, I always hear/see/read that the Bills organization are one big “family”, right? And that includes Bills fans too. They certainly didn’t treat Matt A. like family. After an initial presser (after the bogus lawsuit was made public), they could have shut down any & all media questions & inquiries by stating at that first presser that they would not be addressing it again. But that would have taken brass balls by Beane & McClappy, and they obviously have no such cajones.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Okay, so you would have used 2 roster spots on 2 Punters for 2 straight seasons? 

 

This wasn't just Bills PR either. It was NFL PR. 

nope, would have just signed him as soon as we could have. There was no reason to have him on a roster. They also could have stood by him and forced the league to deal with it. They certainly have stood by Von…

Edited by Meatloaf63
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

You know what? The Bills did a great job with putting a total lid on ANY info about Kim Pegula…for Six Months…when she disappeared from public view. Nobody in the media even dared ask a question about her.

 

They could have showed some loyalty and done the same thing for Matt A. After all, I always hear/see/read that the Bills organization are one big “family”, right? And that includes Bills fans too. They certainly didn’t treat Matt A. like family. After an initial presser (after the bogus lawsuit was made public), they could have shut down any & all media questions & inquiries by stating at that first presser that they would not be addressing it again. But that would have taken brass balls by Beane & McClappy, and they obviously have no such cajones.

Give me a break.  They made a business decision, plain and simple. I'm not thrilled with everything that McBeane does, but to suggest that those guys lack guts or fortitude . . . is nuts.  

 

The analogy you attempt to draw between this situation and the Kim P. situation is inapt.  The Bills had a measure of control over the Kim P. situation.  Everyone who dealt with her in Florida signed a confidentiality agreement. Local media was politely told that the story was off-limits, and that anyone who tested that edict would find various other things, such as their press pass, off-limits as well.  By contrast, the Bills had no such means to control the Araiza accuser, her attorney, or any aspect of that story other than Araiza's employment status. 

 

Finally, while we're on the subject of "cajones," perhaps if Araiza had such fortitude and, simultaneously, a set of clean hands, he wouldn't have discontinued his defamation action against his accuser.  But he did.  And here we are. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

You know what? The Bills did a great job with putting a total lid on ANY info about Kim Pegula…for Six Months…when she disappeared from public view. Nobody in the media even dared ask a question about her.

 

They could have showed some loyalty and done the same thing for Matt A. After all, I always hear/see/read that the Bills organization are one big “family”, right? And that includes Bills fans too. They certainly didn’t treat Matt A. like family. After an initial presser (after the bogus lawsuit was made public), they could have shut down any & all media questions & inquiries by stating at that first presser that they would not be addressing it again. But that would have taken brass balls by Beane & McClappy, and they obviously have no such cajones.

 

Yeah.... there's a huge difference between the media asking about the health of a woman who has no barring on the field or in public and was barely visible in the first place and trotting an accused r-pist on the field every Sunday.

 

We could have said "we don't want to field questions about this". It wouldn't matter. They would never let it go and we'd be destroyed for avoiding the subject on a daily basis.

 

Let alone the heat from the League Office for making the League look bad. If you don't think Goodell and the league office weren't putting pressure on them to make this go away - i've got a bridge to sell you.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zow2 said:

Bills were in a no win situation, they had to release him. The media mob and fans were out in force at that time.

 

As for Araiza’s comeback.  The Bills care about optics.  The Chiefs care about winning.

The Bills kept Von Miller and cut Matt Araiza, right?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Okay, so you would have used 2 roster spots on 2 Punters for 2 straight seasons? 

 

This wasn't just Bills PR either. It was NFL PR. 

The NFL would have had to step in and done something. You can't convince me otherwise.

 

Further, released him and put him on the practice squad is also an option. 

21 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

You know what? The Bills did a great job with putting a total lid on ANY info about Kim Pegula…for Six Months…when she disappeared from public view. Nobody in the media even dared ask a question about her.

 

They could have showed some loyalty and done the same thing for Matt A. After all, I always hear/see/read that the Bills organization are one big “family”, right? And that includes Bills fans too. They certainly didn’t treat Matt A. like family. After an initial presser (after the bogus lawsuit was made public), they could have shut down any & all media questions & inquiries by stating at that first presser that they would not be addressing it again. But that would have taken brass balls by Beane & McClappy, and they obviously have no such cajones.

There wasn't a total lid. Many many people knew about it but didn't spread it. The media in Buffalo report about half the stories they could.

 

This story was known about within a few weeks. Two massive strokes and loss of some functions. Last I cared to check she can't speak well and has other various motor skills issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, boyst said:

The NFL would have had to step in and done something. You can't convince me otherwise.

 

Further, released him and put him on the practice squad is also an option. 

 

You can't be convinced by the rules that are in place and the fact that it was outwardly stated that they would do nothing? There were two options - keep him on the roster or cut him. It was attested to in the presser. The league wasn't going to make a special exemption for him. Simple as that. I was hoping they would but it was made clear that they wouldn't. I don't know how you aren't "convinced" by fact.

 

As for the Practice Squad idea, that keeps him from being on the field. But that doesn't stop the media from hounding them and the league putting pressure on them for keeping him on the team.

 

You might think "F-ck the media, F-ck the league! F-ck PR!". That's great for you, you rebellious soul. But that's not the reality of how it works with multi billion dollar companies that have to answer to networks, advertisers, and the public.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Yeah.... there's a huge difference between the media asking about the health of a woman who has no barring on the field or in public and was barely visible in the first place and trotting an accused r-pist on the field every Sunday.

 

We could have said "we don't want to field questions about this". It wouldn't matter. They would never let it go and we'd be destroyed for avoiding the subject on a daily basis.

I’m going to bed soon, and not going to go back and forth with you on this, but she was President of the Buffalo Bills, which is waaaaaaayyyyy different than just a “regular” wife of an NFL owner, who is not involved AT ALL in the operations of the club.

 

And like I said, YES, they surely could have stonewalled the questions if they had wanted to, just like they have with Von Miller.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

You know what? The Bills did a great job with putting a total lid on ANY info about Kim Pegula…for Six Months…when she disappeared from public view. Nobody in the media even dared ask a question about her.

 

They could have showed some loyalty and done the same thing for Matt A. After all, I always hear/see/read that the Bills organization are one big “family”, right? And that includes Bills fans too. They certainly didn’t treat Matt A. like family. After an initial presser (after the bogus lawsuit was made public), they could have shut down any & all media questions & inquiries by stating at that first presser that they would not be addressing it again. But that would have taken brass balls by Beane & McClappy, and they obviously have no such cajones.


Not cool to bring the Kim situation into this. She suffered a life changing health event and deserved privacy. Full stop. Matt A was publicly accused of sexual assault. I hope you appreciate the difference. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

I’m going to bed soon, and not going to go back and forth with you on this, but she was President of the Buffalo Bills, which is waaaaaaayyyyy different than just a “regular” wife of an NFL owner, who is not involved AT ALL in the operations of the club.

 

And like I said, YES, they surely could have stonewalled the questions if they had wanted to, just like they have with Von Miller.

 

The comparison is apples and oranges on SO many different levels. How you can't see it is completely insane to me.

 

On that note, I agree, I don't want to go back and forth on this because it's madness that you think it's remotely comparable on any level.

 

2 minutes ago, Saint Doug said:


Not cool to bring the Kim situation into this. She suffered a life changing health event and deserved privacy. Full stop. Matt A was publicly accused of sexual assault. I hope you appreciate the difference. 

 

They don't.

 

They, like so many others today, are so in their feels over Kansas City landing him that they're seeing red, ignoring common sense on multiple different levels, and lashing out with hairbrained ideas as to how this injustice could have been avoided (spoiler alert - it couldn't) - in a completely black and white manner, ignoring the MANY shades of grey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Considering you thought he'd never get signed, I doubt this thread is everything you hoped it would be...

 

Hey...good for him!  Gets him out of his parents house.

 

But you know what this a great thread doc.....come on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt was a once in 5 years kinda punter. The Bills made the best decision they could at the time. Obviously the kid was setup.
The Bills just weren’t going to take the heat of keeping him around. In light of the Von Miller fiasco and how bad the bills special teams where the last year the Bills made very bad decision. 
The Chiefs are just trolling the Bills at this point since other then Josh going punch for punch with Patrick they pretty much own this franchise.

Well played KC well played. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go back and look at the allegations. They were horrific. Azaria and two teammates allegedly gang raped a 17 year old.  There was no way the Bills were keeping him on the roster after that.  It stinks but it was as inevitable as it was unfair.  I’m glad he has cleared his name and glad he’s getting a second chance. I wish the second chance was with the Bills.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, st pete gogolak said:

Go back and look at the allegations. They were horrific. Azaria and two teammates allegedly gang raped a 17 year old.  There was no way the Bills were keeping him on the roster after that.  It stinks but it was as inevitable as it was unfair.  I’m glad he has cleared his name and glad he’s getting a second chance. I wish the second chance was with the Bills.

And many of us recall Beane alluding to details that he withheld from the team about that night, and was released after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...