aristocrat Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 On 1/19/2024 at 1:30 PM, Tiberius said: They just want to complain and let the situation be as it is Did the dems try and work with trump at all? Why would you expect him to work with them? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 He telling them to oppose a bill that help secure the border. He doesn't care about the border. He just wants something to scare MAGA voters with. A solution is the last thing he wants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: He telling them to oppose a bill that help secure the border. He doesn't care about the border. He just wants something to scare MAGA voters with. A solution is the last thing he wants But you want open borders right? Any time trump proposed border solutions you called him a nazi during his term. Now you’re surprised he says don’t compromise? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: But you want open borders right? Any time trump proposed border solutions you called him a nazi during his term. Now you’re surprised he says don’t compromise? Lol Tibs is twisting his words like a pretzel. He was against the wall before he was for it? Or for the before he was against it? I don’t think he even knows what the hell he’s talking about! 😂😂😂 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Just now, Westside said: Tibs is twisting his words like a pretzel. He was against the wall before he was for it? Or for the before he was against it? I don’t think he even knows what the hell he’s talking about! 😂😂😂 he never says what he means according to him. how does one twist meaningless words? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 26 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: he never says what he means according to him. how does one twist meaningless words? Are you off your meds? You’re not making any sense. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Just now, Westside said: Are you off your meds? You’re not making any sense. not to someone with an IQ less than 80. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 You tell them Little Marco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 On 1/19/2024 at 7:01 AM, LeviF said: Lots of border measures that the regime will simply ignore, like all of the other ones. Homeland Security has the mandate to secure the border, they don't do it because the Sec is a traitor and the current orders are to stand down. Simple as. So we’re going to ignore the fact that Biden has reached across the aisle and offered a compromise Got it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 34 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: So we’re going to ignore the fact that Biden has reached across the aisle and offered a compromise Got it Not a "compromise". A bill that does little to nothing to address the problem, and spends money that we don't have. Enforce the immigration laws on the books ! . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 There is absolutely NO reason enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books needs a compromise, much less to be tied to aid for Ukraine. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Just now, Doc said: There is absolutely NO reason enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books needs a compromise, much less to be tied to aid for Ukraine. good English... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Not a "compromise". A bill that does little to nothing to address the problem, and spends money that we don't have. Enforce the immigration laws on the books ! . I get so tired of hearing this spending money that we don’t have Republican spending whenever they are in charge goes up, not down on the ledgers of this country. Look it up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 15 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: good English... Thanks. It was. Edited January 23 by Doc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 14 hours ago, B-Man said: I get tired of posters picking out one single point of a response, and ignoring the main one Thats kind of their MO. it's a sad state of affairs when the FED can't even do its core role of protecting the borders. All the Supreme court ruling stated is that it's the FEDS job, not the States. and the left thinks that's a win. if anything, it just shows the feds are either incompetent or support illegal immigration. And if they support the open borders, they should be held negligent for any and all crime/violence that's a result of it. Will Texas resist the feds? It was all the rage when the orange dude was in office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 17 hours ago, BillStime said: You tell them Little Marco Right from the horses mouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Only a MSM parrot would think that the fed protecting the border has anything to do with military funding to Ukraine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Only a MSM parrot would think that the fed protecting the border has anything to do with military funding to Ukraine. it's called the political process of compromise...you wouldn't know Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 its called war mongers will over the safety of the people. you also got stocks in it. or just parroting the DNC talking points like usual? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 15 hours ago, B-Man said: Not a "compromise". A bill that does little to nothing to address the problem, and spends money that we don't have. Enforce the immigration laws on the books ! . You have no idea what's in the bill. Neither do I. But Senate Dems and Repubs are now behind it, so yes, it is a compromise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Here's a summary of what we know about the Senate compromise. Note the comment from Sen Lankford (R-OK), not exactly a bleeding heart: The proposal crafted by the Senate would toughen the asylum process with a goal of cutting the number of migrants who come to the southern border to make an asylum claim. Negotiators have worked on some policies intended to aid immigrants. The plan could include a pathway to citizenship for Afghans who came during the U.S. withdrawal from their country, along with work permits for migrants who enter the asylum system, according to two people familiar with the talks who were granted anonymity to discuss the private negotiations. But the package will mostly leave out broad immigration changes, like protections for immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally as children, that have been foundational in previous Senate bills. "It will be by far the most conservative border security bill in four decades," said Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, the lead GOP negotiator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 39 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: it's called the political process of compromise...you wouldn't know Yes, "compromising" America's security is what the left has been doing... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 27 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Here's a summary of what we know about the Senate compromise. Note the comment from Sen Lankford (R-OK), not exactly a bleeding heart: The proposal crafted by the Senate would toughen the asylum process with a goal of cutting the number of migrants who come to the southern border to make an asylum claim. Negotiators have worked on some policies intended to aid immigrants. The plan could include a pathway to citizenship for Afghans who came during the U.S. withdrawal from their country, along with work permits for migrants who enter the asylum system, according to two people familiar with the talks who were granted anonymity to discuss the private negotiations. But the package will mostly leave out broad immigration changes, like protections for immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally as children, that have been foundational in previous Senate bills. "It will be by far the most conservative border security bill in four decades," said Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, the lead GOP negotiator. It's gonna be 5k pages and that's what we know. It's always in the details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 40 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: It's gonna be 5k pages and that's what we know. It's always in the details True. So let's take some time to read it, propose amendments, etc. But Trump is urging House Republicans to vote "no" unless it is an immigration restrictionist's wet dream. And in divided government, you'll never get that. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 3 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: Insert Jackson quote here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Reminder: On 1/19/2024 at 10:18 AM, B-Man said: Never once considered that President Trump and many others oppose the (so-called) border security deal because it is a sorry bit of legislation that won't really fix anything, did you Tibs ? Nope. You just thought felt that this was an opportunity to attack. Well, as usual, you were wrong. . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 You're an idiot (trademark). I'm taking it from DC Tom cuz he's no longer with us. Thankfully... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You're an idiot (trademark). I'm taking it from DC Tom cuz he's no longer with us. Thankfully... For you. @DC Tom would eviscerate you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 12 hours ago, Doc said: For you. @DC Tom would eviscerate you. FYI: DC Tom is still posting over on the adult board (under a different name) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 35 minutes ago, B-Man said: FYI: DC Tom is still posting over on the adult board (under a different name) You mean the other website? Or the football board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 47 minutes ago, B-Man said: Other site. He still comes here, if you tag him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Doc said: He still comes here, if you tag him say his name in a mirror three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Other site. good riddance. talk about deflection! He would move a topic towards food if anyone made a point he couldn't refute. Chef Jim would keep it going. typical MAGA deflection tactic for the intellectually disabled. btw, Lenny seems to be MIA. can't say I miss him. Edited January 24 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: good riddance. talk about deflection! He would move a topic towards food if anyone made a point he couldn't refute. Chef Jim would keep it going. typical MAGA deflection tactic for the intellectually disabled. btw, Lenny seems to be MIA. can't say I miss him. Huh? I don't think you know who @DC Tom is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 18 hours ago, Doc said: For you. @DC Tom would eviscerate you. On it... 21 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You're an idiot (trademark). I'm taking it from DC Tom cuz he's no longer with us. Thankfully... You're an idiot. 1 hour ago, Doc said: Huh? I don't think you know who @DC Tom is. And on it... 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: good riddance. talk about deflection! He would move a topic towards food if anyone made a point he couldn't refute. Chef Jim would keep it going. typical MAGA deflection tactic for the intellectually disabled. btw, Lenny seems to be MIA. can't say I miss him. You really are an idiot. Edited January 24 by DC Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: On it... You're an idiot. oh, great! Can you decipher my username when you were active here? Please don't start stalling with recipes in conjunction with the other cons when you start losing a debate. other than that, en guarde! Edited January 24 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 This will backfire on the cult - it always does - lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetermansRedemption Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) Does anyone actually believe it’s the Democrats who want border security? Their actions of fighting Republican proposals AND tying the border to aid in Ukraine speaks contrary to a “fix the border” message. Couldn’t they simply decide to have a separate border deal and put some hard line proposals out there? Republicans would pass it immediately and then the problem is solved. Democrats could even take the credit and that would be a great political move considering how highly immigration ranks on voters minds. They could take the spear right out of the republican party’s hands. Edited January 25 by PetermansRedemption Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts