Jump to content

Game Ball: Shawn Hochuli


BringBackFergy

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

The Eagles made enough TERRIBLE plays to lose the game. When the commentators and guest officiating expert point out how bad it is during the broadcast, you really can't keep burying your head in the sand. The NFL has a problem. It's apparent in so many games every week. The refs need to change their approach to the game and the league needs to be more transparent with their process. If the USFL/XFL can do it, then the NFL should be able to do it. As a consumer, we should demand it.

I still don’t understand how in the playoffs they have the eye in the sky official to help call off bad flags or throw a flag in certain situations. In the playoffs it has worked really well IMO. The worst flag is a phantom flag or a blatant no-call. Feel like you don’t really see that in the playoffs. 
 

why they don’t use it in the regular season is beyond me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Old Coot said:

Shawn Hochuli's explanation of why the horse collar wasn't called: Note: I'm only a messenger. I don't endorse the view expressed.

 

"We felt that the force from the front of the collar and what pulled him down was not from the back," referee Shawn Hochuli told a pool reporter after the game. "So, that’s pretty much it. We felt he was pulled down from the front of the jersey and collar."

 

Except that is actually irrelevant.  You cannot grab the inside of the jersey period, as stated in the NFL Rulebook below:

 

image.thumb.png.5aa95470cfab2bbaf02f5fb97719cb05.png

 

Effectively Hochuli made up his OWN VERSION of the rule instead of using the one the NFL has.

Edited by Big Turk
  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, VaMilBill said:

I still don’t understand how in the playoffs they have the eye in the sky official to help call off bad flags or throw a flag in certain situations. In the playoffs it has worked really well IMO. The worst flag is a phantom flag or a blatant no-call. Feel like you don’t really see that in the playoffs. 
 

why they don’t use it in the regular season is beyond me

Oh they do, only for illegal man downfield calls though.  Like in the Bills Patriots game

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

Except that is actually irrelevant.  You cannot grab the inside of the jersey period, as stated in the NFL Rulebook below:

 

image.thumb.png.5aa95470cfab2bbaf02f5fb97719cb05.png

The quote says the horse collar rule does not apply to a QB in the pocket. So it's legal to horse collar the QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think at this point If the horrendous officiating continues the NFL is going to be forced to allow reviews after questionable plays even if it extends games way too long.

 

I'm not blaming yesterdays loss on that but it was blatantly one sided and despite that Josh Allen still led this team to what should have been another huge win in recent years if not for the clown on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Old Coot said:

The quote says the horse collar rule does not apply to a QB in the pocket. So it's legal to horse collar the QB?

 

That is correct, it does not apply in the pocket. Allen was not in the pocket, he was near the sideline meaning the normal horsecollar rules apply

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

That is correct, it does not apply in the pocket. Allen was not in the pocket, he was near the sideline meaning the normal horsecollar rules apply

Which is also why it was so hilariously inept to call the grounding penalty 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zag20 said:

Which is also why it was so hilariously inept to call the grounding penalty 

 

They could have called the grounding since the ball didn't reach the LOS but Gabe Davis was literally 2-3 feet from where the ball landed which should have nullified that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what was also fun about how the officiating played out in this game? It's how it changed as the game went on, so 1st half just blatant bias for the Eagles they're getting away with everything and the Bills are getting murdered with calls.

 

2nd half comes along and it seems like word came along from upstairs that this ***** was getting out of hand, way too noticeable better cut it out your getting called out on social media and even on the broadcast. So what's Hochuli to do call a balanced game on the Eagles....***** that can't stomach doing that, so whats he do?

 

2nd half how about no penalties at all.

 

On the surface seems fair for both teams, but what do you think happens in that situation?

 

A. The Eagles keep abusing the refs leniency, while the Bills having no reason to trust that they won't be penalized into oblivion absolutely don't.

or

B. Both teams take advantage of the situation equally.

 

Everybody got their final answer? Alright well if you picked A. or B. I'm sorry your wrong it was C.

 

C. It's all a ***** trap. Even if the Bills did take advantage of the situation it just would put Hochuli in the perfect position to start calling penalties on obvious things that nobody would really be able to complain about the calls.

 

At the end of the game I think since the Bills didn't trust him which was actually probably the best call and since we were managed to be in a position to win all the way into OT, and maybe another call got made about ridiculous things not being called so he finally had to call a few on the Eagles poor him. 😢

 

Or at least that's what it all ***** felt like.

Edited by Warcodered
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 penalties against the Bills in the first half, and most were ticky tack(Conor, Rasul, etc).

1 penalty against the hometown Eagles in the first half

 

That has nothing to do with the Bills.  If any NFL game the penalties are 10-1 in favor, I can tell you without knowing anything about that game that the refs suck and have an agenda

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billsfan1972 said:

Has the phantom holding call been brought up?  It was offsetting penalties as Kincaid was held on thurd down and somehow the Bills were too called for a hold that did not happen.  Replay down, inc and a punt.  Bills were moving the ball thay pissession 

Was that the one where McGovern or Morse had the DT shoot in, the DT fell forward to the ground and Morse/McGovern basically watched him fall to the ground. Tony Romo said something like “ehhhh, not sure that was much of a hold”

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

Was that the one where McGovern or Morse had the DT shoot in, the DT fell forward to the ground and Morse/McGovern basically watched him fall to the ground. Tony Romo said something like “ehhhh, not sure that was much of a hold”

Watched im a bar, a very quick replay and may have been.  Ot was a joke call regardless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game is too fast for the officials to call it accurately.  I assumed that's why they now have the "eye in the sky", to buzz down and get them to huddle up and correct calls.  But stuff like interference, or non interference or holding can't be corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Warcodered said:

You know what was also fun about how the officiating played out in this game? It's how it changed as the game went on, so 1st half just blatant bias for the Eagles they're getting away with everything and the Bills are getting murdered with calls.

 

2nd half comes along and it seems like word came along from upstairs that this ***** was getting out of hand, way too noticeable better cut it out your getting called out on social media and even on the broadcast. So what's Hochuli to do call a balanced game on the Eagles....***** that can't stomach doing that, so whats he do?

 

2nd half how about no penalties at all.

 

On the surface seems fair for both teams, but what do you think happens in that situation?

 

A. The Eagles keep abusing the refs leniency, while the Bills having no reason to trust that they won't be penalized into oblivion absolutely don't.

or

B. Both teams take advantage of the situation equally.

 

Everybody got their final answer? Alright well if you picked A. or B. I'm sorry your wrong it was C.

 

C. It's all a ***** trap. Even if the Bills did take advantage of the situation it just would put Hochuli in the perfect position to start calling penalties on obvious things that nobody would really be able to complain about the calls.

 

At the end of the game I think since the Bills didn't trust him which was actually probably the best call and since we were managed to be in a position to win all the way into OT, and maybe another call got made about ridiculous things not being called so he finally had to call a few on the Eagles poor him. 😢

 

Or at least that's what it all ***** felt like.

This was 100% the blueprint during the Cheaters 'dynasty'.  Incredible one-sided game-altering calls in their favor in 1st half to get them ahead - then whistles swallowed in 2nd half allowing them to keep lead in boring fashion.   Unless they were down last drive, then add phantom PI call to gift them score to win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...