Stadium Construction Discussion (No PSL/Seat selection posts)

[eball]

23 minutes ago, Einstein said:

Hold on....

In the last 500 posts of this thread - that is going back 6 months - I have posted a total of 14 times in this thread.

But you? You have posted 17 times in that same period. You have posted more than me in this thread in the past 6 months!

If you think I am 'crusading', then you must be leading an entire holy war.

 

Lets look at the tone and intent of these posts.  Some of us are excited and posting updates...some are doing otherwise.  I'd bet at least half of my posts are calling you out for your negativity.

 

[Einstein]

19 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Lets look at the tone and intent of these posts.  Some of us are excited and posting updates...some are doing otherwise.  I'd bet at least half of my posts are calling you out for your negativity.

 

So you’re crusading against me… and my 14 total posts in this thread in the last six months.

 

Got it ✅

[Draconator]

47 minutes ago, Einstein said:

Hold on....

In the last 500 posts of this thread - that is going back 6 months - I have posted a total of 14 times in this thread.

But you? You have posted 17 times in that same period. You have posted more than me in this thread in the past 6 months!

If you think I am 'crusading', then you must be leading an entire holy war.

It's the body of your work that is working against you. 

[eball]

4 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

So you’re crusading against me… and my 14 total posts in this thread in the last six months.

 

Got it ✅

 

No, you clearly don't.  But nice deflection.

 

[Einstein]

37 minutes ago, Mr Info said:

It appears his ( @eball) point is not the volume of posts but the perspective and gist of your posts in this thread.

 

Oh i’m aware.

 

Post 100 times about how great the stadium is = not a problem.

Post 14 times (in a 6 month span) about how you don’t like aspects of the stadium = crusading!!!

 

The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

 

Last time I checked, the thread title isn’t “post great things about the stadium”. It’s stadium discussion. The good, the bad, the ugly, the interesting, the not interesting - everything stadium discussion. 

 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Einstein

[Process]

On 6/3/2025 at 11:00 PM, Einstein said:

 

There is absolutely no way you can look at the two stadiums and say with a straight face that there is not a large difference.

 

One looks like it was built in 2010 and the other looks like it was built in 2025.

 

 

 

Then there is the Browns new stadium - which is the ugliest stadium I think i’ve ever seen. But it does at least look like it is being built this decade. 

 

Boy is it hideous though.

 

I looked at the two pictures several times and am having an extremely hard time identifying any significant difference between the two, besides the glass roof. Please explain to me how the Titans stadium is more modern looking than the Bills? Or is this just another disguised dome debate?

 

I am not a fan of the new Bills stadium because I think they should have built a dome. But for an open air it's perfectly fine. 

[eball]

2 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

Oh i’m aware.

 

Post 100 times about how great the stadium is = not a problem.

Post 14 times (in a 6 month span) about how you don’t like aspects of the stadium = crusading!!!

 

The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

 

Last time I checked, the thread title isn’t “post great things about the stadium”. It’s stadium discussion. The good, the bad, the ugly, the interesting, the not interesting - everything stadium discussion. 

 

 

 

Your crusade is consistent and persistent.  At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome and how the Bills are “obviously” cheaping out on everything, doing nothing new, and taking everyone for a ride.  Last month you made the brilliant observation that the Bills aren’t installing cushioned seats in an outdoor venue, assuming that fans will be unhappy — and then included pictures of seats in domed stadiums to back up your argument!  That’s classic.  Now it’s that the design is apparently old and there’s no way technology has improved.

 

Keep doing your thing, man…

 

[WotAGuy]

8 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Your crusade is consistent and persistent.  At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome and how the Bills are “obviously” cheaping out on everything, doing nothing new, and taking everyone for a ride.  Last month you made the brilliant observation that the Bills aren’t installing cushioned seats in an outdoor venue, assuming that fans will be unhappy — and then included pictures of seats in domed stadiums to back up your argument!  That’s classic.  Now it’s that the design is apparently old and there’s no way technology has improved.

 

Keep doing your thing, man…

 

Same old song in the PSL thread. Always harping on the negative. Relentless. 

[Einstein]

56 minutes ago, eball said:

 At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome

 

Now I know you’re confusing me with someone else. I am not and have never been a domer. Most I have ever said is that I like Minnesotas stadium (which is a dome).

 

In fact, the last time I mentioned the word “dome” in a post was 7 months ago when I said the only reason I’m surprised they didn’t decide on a dome is because of the liability of slick steps.

 

Before that, it was a 16 MONTHS ago that I last mentioned anything about a dome and it was to joke around with the domers. 

 

So… 1 post in 7 MONTHS is “at least twice a month” to you?

 

Or maybe it was 2 posts in 16 MONTHS that put it over the top for you?

 

And this was all preceded by the doozy that I “crusade” in this thread - of course that was before the truth came out that i’ve only had 14 of the past 500 posts in this thread.

What are you going to completely fabricate and lie about next!?