Transsurrection in TN, MT, TX, IA: All the documented events that aren't happening.

[Big Blitz]

 

[Big Blitz]

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

33 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

it’s unusual that we out crazy the nanny states… yet here we are. 

[Big Blitz]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

TEXAS: Abbott Signs Law Banning Child Genital Mutilation. 

 

“It sad that there even needs to be a law that bans child genital mutilation (AKA ‘gender affirming care,’ but really “sex-defying cosmetic surgery”), but this is the world we’re living in.”

 

https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=55082

 

 

Just like those right-wing radicals in Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK.

 

 

.

 

[Pokebball]

On 6/5/2023 at 8:01 AM, Westside said:

No, that’s the current administration. But you already knew that.

We're experiencing it! We're living it.

Edited June 6, 2023 by Pokebball

[HomeskillitMoorman]

20 hours ago, Unforgiven said:

Ouch.

 

Walsh is a guy that admonishes anyone who waves a Pride flag or is homosexual at all even in their private lives...yet believes it's totally fine for him to promote and adorn Catholicism no matter how many children they sexually abuse. 

 

Maybe try to find a better source. 

[Boatdrinks]

1 hour ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Walsh is a guy that admonishes anyone who waves a Pride flag or is homosexual at all even in their private lives...yet believes it's totally fine for him to promote and adorn Catholicism no matter how many children they sexually abuse. 

 

Maybe try to find a better source. 

Walsh’s opinion is fine. I’m an atheist, but even I can see that sexual abuse is not a part of Catholic doctrine. It certainly isn’t endorsed in the Bible that I’m aware of. There are creeps around us in all areas of life including the priesthood, education etc etc. Recruiting children does appear to be fully endorsed/ encouraged LBGBT +~whatever doctrine though. As a non religious person, your take on Walsh doesn’t appear to hold water. 

[Tenhigh]

On 5/28/2023 at 10:58 AM, BillStime said:

You should hate less.

 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

9 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Walsh’s opinion is fine. I’m an atheist, but even I can see that sexual abuse is not a part of Catholic doctrine. It certainly isn’t endorsed in the Bible that I’m aware of. There are creeps around us in all areas of life including the priesthood, education etc etc. Recruiting children does appear to be fully endorsed/ encouraged LBGBT +~whatever doctrine though. As a non religious person, your take on Walsh doesn’t appear to hold water. 

 

The Catholic Church literally to this day protects Priests that have molested children and even has some of them on income, literally right now as we speak. 

 

It's not different at all. He's lumping in anyone who has a different take on the Pride flag and wave it, which most people do, because of the corrupt small extremist amount yet he does the same exact thing with Catholicism. 

 

It's 100% hypocrisy. 

[Boatdrinks]

1 minute ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

The Catholic Church literally to this day protects Priests that have molested children and even has some of them on income, literally right now as we speak. 

 

It's not different at all. He's lumping in anyone who has a different take on the Pride flag and wave it, which most people do, because of the corrupt small extremist amount yet he does the same exact thing with Catholicism. 

 

It's 100% hypocrisy. 

Sure it is. One can practice the virtues of the Catholic faith while disapproving of wrongdoing by corrupt individuals within the Catholic Church. Catholic doctrine on its own is not corrupt. Honestly , what is good about a “pride flag” ,what it represents or those who extoll its virtues ? I can’t see it and again , I’m not religious. 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Sure it is. One can practice the virtues of the Catholic faith while disapproving of wrongdoing by corrupt individuals within the Catholic Church. Catholic doctrine on its own is not corrupt. Honestly , what is good about a “pride flag” ,what it represents or those who extoll its virtues ? I can’t see it and again , I’m not religious. 

 

One can also celebrate Pride while disapproving the wrongdoing of corrupt individuals within that circle. It's the same exact thing. 

 

What I put in bold is purely your opinion, nothing else. Catholic doctrine also says it's wrong to simply be homosexual. That's not rooted in any kind of fact and it's led to decades of horrific treatment of people that are gay and even really harmful and disturbing practices like conversion therapy. I can poke just as many holes there as you could in the Pride movement or circle or whatever you want to call it. The whole thing behind the Pride flag was during the many years where homosexuals were treated poorly and unfairly in our country and didn't have the rights to get married or for some, adopt children. For a pretty big percentage of people who are gay, that flag symbolizes the fight and freedom they now have to do those things and how far they have come. 

 

But again, that does not mean anyone who waves a Pride flag or wears a shirt or whatever is pro-sexualizing children, just like I don't believe any Catholic who still goes to the Catholic church is pro-child molestation. You want to lump in everyone on one side and be nuanced on the other, how is that not the very definition of hypocrisy?

[BillStime]

22 hours ago, Unforgiven said:

Ouch.

 

Yeah, Matt Walsh - sick phk - did you buy your plushie yet?

 

Sweet Baby Plushie – Daily Wire Shop

 

 

[Boatdrinks]

16 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

One can also celebrate Pride while disapproving the wrongdoing of corrupt individuals within that circle. It's the same exact thing. 

 

What I put in bold is purely your opinion, nothing else. Catholic doctrine also says it's wrong to simply be homosexual. That's not rooted in any kind of fact and it's led to decades of horrific treatment of people that are gay and even really harmful and disturbing practices like conversion therapy. I can poke just as many holes there as you could in the Pride movement or circle or whatever you want to call it. The whole thing behind the Pride flag was during the many years where homosexuals were treated poorly and unfairly in our country and didn't have the rights to get married or for some, adopt children. For a pretty big percentage of people who are gay, that flag symbolizes the fight and freedom they now have to do those things and how far they have come. 

 

But again, that does not mean anyone who waves a Pride flag or wears a shirt or whatever is pro-sexualizing children, just like I don't believe any Catholic who still goes to the Catholic church is pro-child molestation. You want to lump in everyone on one side and be nuanced on the other, how is that not the very definition of hypocrisy?

Wrong. It’s quite apparentbthat the entire “ pride “LGBwhatever movement is focused upon indoctrinating children at the earliest possible age when they are obviously very impressionable. You can pretend that doesn’t exist and try to extrapolate some other “ meaning “ out of it or try to convince yourself that it’s just being “ accepting” or something like that. Seems harmless enough but it’s clear that is not the case. Indoctrinating children is literally central to the core of the movement. It’s also clear that our grandmothers and grandfathers weren’t going to church to sexualize children. Look, the whole pride thing is born out of growing the group, adding to the cadre, making it seem like an accepted alternative. They try to make opposition seem socially unacceptable and one must go along to be part of the “ good group”. Your comparison is naive if not outright silly. Many a bad idea or movement owes it success to the apathy of conformism. LGBwhatever is one of those. 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

7 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Wrong. It’s quite apparentbthat the entire “ pride “LGBwhatever movement is focused upon indoctrinating children at the earliest possible age when they are obviously very impressionable. You can pretend that doesn’t exist and try to extrapolate some other “ meaning “ out of it or try to convince yourself that it’s just being “ accepting” or something like that. Seems harmless enough but it’s clear that is not the case. Indoctrinating children is literally central to the core of the movement. It’s also clear that our grandmothers and grandfathers weren’t going to church to sexualize children. Look, the whole pride thing is born out of growing the group, adding to the cadre, making it seem like an accepted alternative. They try to make opposition seem socially unacceptable and one must go along to be part of the “ good group”. Your comparison is naive if not outright silly. Many a bad idea or movement owes it success to the apathy of conformism. LGBwhatever is one of those. 

 

Recruiting and indoctrinating people including children isn't central to the core of Catholicism or Christianity????? Are you serious??? They literally tell you it's your JOB in life to do that! That's how it's always been and they don't even deny it the way you are. They even gave it it's own name in proselytizing. It's amazing how much you are willing to turn a blind eye to on that side of the ball. 

 

And I don't agree that's what the entire Pride thing is all about. It was about giving people a group to turn to when people were rejected by their own families or loved ones or even by our countries laws at the time. Am I denying that there is a faction doing some evil things with it? Absolutely not. But it's in exactly the same way that these religious groups and Churches are and the level of corruption is no different. It's literally proven to be no different. 

 

I'm against indoctrination of all of it. You are only against indoctrination when it doesn't fit your political agenda. 

[Pokebball]

8 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Recruiting and indoctrinating people including children isn't central to the core of Catholicism or Christianity????? Are you serious??? They literally tell you it's your JOB in life to do that! That's how it's always been and they don't even deny it the way you are. They even gave it it's own name in proselytizing. It's amazing how much you are willing to turn a blind eye to on that side of the ball. 

 

And I don't agree that's what the entire Pride thing is all about. It was about giving people a group to turn to when people were rejected by their own families or loved ones or even by our countries laws at the time. Am I denying that there is a faction doing some evil things with it? Absolutely not. But it's in exactly the same way that these religious groups and Churches are and the level of corruption is no different. It's literally proven to be no different. 

 

I'm against indoctrination of all of it. You are only against indoctrination when it doesn't fit your political agenda. 

Indoctrination is simply education without the ability for reasoned debate.

[HomeskillitMoorman]

13 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Indoctrination is simply education without the ability for reasoned debate.

 

I mean, that's mostly what religion is

[Boatdrinks]

23 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Recruiting and indoctrinating people including children isn't central to the core of Catholicism or Christianity????? Are you serious??? They literally tell you it's your JOB in life to do that! That's how it's always been and they don't even deny it the way you are. They even gave it it's own name in proselytizing. It's amazing how much you are willing to turn a blind eye to on that side of the ball. 

 

And I don't agree that's what the entire Pride thing is all about. It was about giving people a group to turn to when people were rejected by their own families or loved ones or even by our countries laws at the time. Am I denying that there is a faction doing some evil things with it? Absolutely not. But it's in exactly the same way that these religious groups and Churches are and the level of corruption is no different. It's literally proven to be no different. 

 

I'm against indoctrination of all of it. You are only against indoctrination when it doesn't fit your political agenda. 

So Catholicism or Christianity’s goal is to normalize unnatural or perverse sexual behaviors and introduce these ideas at an early age to children while getting that message out to the masses ? You are one strange individual if you think that. Some may hide their perversion behind the cloth of Christianity , but the overall movement of that faith is not perverse. Now LGBTwhatwver on the other hand , well perversion is the focus of that religion. 

7 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

I mean, that's mostly what religion is

Well, yes. LBGTQwhateveer is in that sense a religion of its own. 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

24 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

So Catholicism or Christianity’s goal is to normalize unnatural or perverse sexual behaviors and introduce these ideas at an early age to children while getting that message out to the masses ? You are one strange individual if you think that. Some may hide their perversion behind the cloth of Christianity , but the overall movement of that faith is not perverse. Now LGBTwhatwver on the other hand , well perversion is the focus of that religion. 

Well, yes. LBGTQwhateveer is in that sense a religion of its own. 

 

Well you're basically outing yourself as a homophobe here. It's your opinion that people that are gay are into "unnatural or perverse sexual behaviors". 

 

But once again, not all people that are gay are trying to indoctrinate children into being gay. Not even most of them. Just like not all religious people are hiding their perversion behind the cloth of Christianity or Catholicism. The origins of Pride was to give people a safe space at times when homosexual people were not treated well or were shunned by family members or their church and to fight for equal rights. That's what most homosexual people celebrate when it comes to Pride. 

 

You are defining one group by a small percentage of their population that are extreme and corrupt and disgusting while not doing the same for the other. The right response would be to do that to neither. And you changed your verbiage there when you realized you were wrong. Those religions are just as much about recruitment, probably even moreso, than the whole Pride thing is. You are literally told that's your job as a Christian or Catholic. I know, I was raised Catholic. 

 

[Pokebball]

53 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

I mean, that's mostly what religion is

Not my experience at all. I too was raised Catholic. I attended twelve years of Catholic schooling. Best education in my City!

 

I never felt any pressure to recruit. In fact I can't think of anyone that I recruited, even informally?

Edited June 6, 2023 by Pokebball

[HomeskillitMoorman]

10 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Not my experience at all. I too was raised Catholic. I attended twelve years of Catholic schooling. Best education in my City!

 

I never felt any pressure to recruit. In fact I can't think of anyone that I recruited, even informally?

Im glad you had a better experience. As I’m sure some had a better experience with LGBTQ+ people that weren’t trying to recruit them in any way. 
 

This is pretty much my point. 

[Boatdrinks]

2 hours ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Well you're basically outing yourself as a homophobe here. It's your opinion that people that are gay are into "unnatural or perverse sexual behaviors". 

 

But once again, not all people that are gay are trying to indoctrinate children into being gay. Not even most of them. Just like not all religious people are hiding their perversion behind the cloth of Christianity or Catholicism. The origins of Pride was to give people a safe space at times when homosexual people were not treated well or were shunned by family members or their church and to fight for equal rights. That's what most homosexual people celebrate when it comes to Pride. 

 

You are defining one group by a small percentage of their population that are extreme and corrupt and disgusting while not doing the same for the other. The right response would be to do that to neither. And you changed your verbiage there when you realized you were wrong. Those religions are just as much about recruitment, probably even moreso, than the whole Pride thing is. You are literally told that's your job as a Christian or Catholic. I know, I was raised Catholic. 

 

Of course religions are about spreading the word. My thoughts were not “ wrong”, rather I’m not a religious person so perhaps incorrect terminology was used. This however isn’t about simple terminology. Homophobe lol, now that’s lefty speak for one who dissents with liberal dogma. Fine, but acknowledge it for what it is : an attempt to redefine what is the natural norm. What behaviors would you say they’re “ into” .I’ve yet to meet anyone who was terrified of a homosexual individual. We are not in times where “ safe spaces” are needed in this country. We are not the Middle East etc. You must not pay much attention to the LGBTwhatever movement or perhaps you’ve missed the drag shows for kids or talk about sex toys with young schoolchildren. Or the corporations that push “ pride” in the USA because it gives them “ cred” but won’t do it in other countries. It’s quite literally the focus of the movement, not just a few. Anyway , is this type of “ pride “ really a great trait of humanity? One that should be celebrated and shouted from the rooftops ? Does it deserve its own month ? I’m going to say no. 

Edited June 6, 2023 by Boatdrinks

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

2 hours ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Well you're basically outing yourself as a homophobe here. It's your opinion that people that are gay are into "unnatural or perverse sexual behaviors". 

 

But once again, not all people that are gay are trying to indoctrinate children into being gay. Not even most of them. Just like not all religious people are hiding their perversion behind the cloth of Christianity or Catholicism. The origins of Pride was to give people a safe space at times when homosexual people were not treated well or were shunned by family members or their church and to fight for equal rights. That's what most homosexual people celebrate when it comes to Pride. 

 

You are defining one group by a small percentage of their population that are extreme and corrupt and disgusting while not doing the same for the other. The right response would be to do that to neither. And you changed your verbiage there when you realized you were wrong. Those religions are just as much about recruitment, probably even moreso, than the whole Pride thing is. You are literally told that's your job as a Christian or Catholic. I know, I was raised Catholic. 

 

it’s not homophobia to point out that the biological design for human procreation is heterosexuality. Any departure from that while certainly accepted in today’s world it’s from an evolutionary standpoint fatalistic. 
 

For all that follow the science stuff we seem to struggle with understanding very basic biological processes. 

[Big Blitz]

Yep.  

[Big Blitz]

 

[JaCrispy]

5 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Yep.  

You see, people can tolerate adult perverts- but when you start to come for their kids, it’s “Game On”…👍

[aristocrat]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Breaking:  Brawl Breaks out outside Glendale, CA School Board as Armenian Parents Take on the Alphabet Mob

by Bob Hoge 

 

A huge fight broke out outside the Glendale School Board meeting in Los Angeles as parents, many of them from the Armenian-American community, came to protest the school’s pride events. Naturally, the left-wing zealots—read “Antifa”—showed up in force, and as you will see, some serious punches were thrown on both sides. A heavy police presence attempted to stop the fighting, violently pulling apart combatants to prevent serious injury.

 

 

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2023/06/06/breaking-massive-brawl-breaks-out-at-glendale-ca-school-board-as-armenian-american-parents-take-on-the-woke-mob-n757376

[HomeskillitMoorman]

16 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Of course religions are about spreading the word. My thoughts were not “ wrong”, rather I’m not a religious person so perhaps incorrect terminology was used. This however isn’t about simple terminology. Homophobe lol, now that’s lefty speak for one who dissents with liberal dogma. Fine, but acknowledge it for what it is : an attempt to redefine what is the natural norm. What behaviors would you say they’re “ into” .I’ve yet to meet anyone who was terrified of a homosexual individual. We are not in times where “ safe spaces” are needed in this country. We are not the Middle East etc. You must not pay much attention to the LGBTwhatever movement or perhaps you’ve missed the drag shows for kids or talk about sex toys with young schoolchildren. Or the corporations that push “ pride” in the USA because it gives them “ cred” but won’t do it in other countries. It’s quite literally the focus of the movement, not just a few. Anyway , is this type of “ pride “ really a great trait of humanity? One that should be celebrated and shouted from the rooftops ? Does it deserve its own month ? I’m going to say no. 

 

I said homophobe because you literally called a homosexual relationship "sexually perverse". What's perverse about 2 consenting same-gender adults having sex?

 

Lets say for a second that someone who is homosexual agreed with you that it's not the "natural norm". Would that change who they personally are naturally attracted to? Would you be able to change your sexual attraction on a dime? For someone who is in that position, what does acknowledging that do?

 

I would agree that we largely are not in times where safe spaces are needed anymore. But we're not that far removed from when they were for people that were gay. And it literally hasn't even been a decade since they finally got the right to marry across the board. The whole thing was created to fight for those rights and give people those safe spaces when they were more needed and what they do now is probably more of a celebration of how far things have come. Although when listening to people like you, I think they probably second-guess how far we as people have actually come. 

 

You're attaching the extremists that target kids to anyone who is gay or on any part of the LGBTQ+ spectrum. I haven't defended any of that and actually agree with people about that being wrong. You called it "sexually perverse" even when it had nothing to do with kids because you think it's intrinsically perverse. 

 

It doesn't matter if I think it should be celebrated or if it deserves its own month. We live in a free country. You're not being forced to attend Pride parades. You're not being forced to be gay or go to gay weddings. You are free to start a grassroots movement if you want to celebrate something you like for a month if you want to, or you don't have to. You are free to sit back and whine about the things you don't like as well, which you are exercising. So really what's the problem?

 

 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

16 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

it’s not homophobia to point out that the biological design for human procreation is heterosexuality. Any departure from that while certainly accepted in today’s world it’s from an evolutionary standpoint fatalistic. 
 

For all that follow the science stuff we seem to struggle with understanding very basic biological processes. 

 

To call it "sexually perverse" is homophobic.

 

When did I argue that the biological design for human procreation isn't heterosexuality? That doesn't mean homosexual relationships are wrong, just like it's not wrong for heterosexual couples to not have kids if they don't want to. Nobody owes it to anyone else to procreate, there is no obligation for anyone to do that. 

 

Also, if someone is gay and they agree that is the biological design...do you think that changes their attraction?

[Boatdrinks]

2 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

I said homophobe because you literally called a homosexual relationship "sexually perverse". What's perverse about 2 consenting same-gender adults having sex?

 

Lets say for a second that someone who is homosexual agreed with you that it's not the "natural norm". Would that change who they personally are naturally attracted to? Would you be able to change your sexual attraction on a dime? For someone who is in that position, what does acknowledging that do?

 

I would agree that we largely are not in times where safe spaces are needed anymore. But we're not that far removed from when they were for people that were gay. And it literally hasn't even been a decade since they finally got the right to marry across the board. The whole thing was created to fight for those rights and give people those safe spaces when they were more needed and what they do now is probably more of a celebration of how far things have come. Although when listening to people like you, I think they probably second-guess how far we as people have actually come. 

 

You're attaching the extremists that target kids to anyone who is gay or on any part of the LGBTQ+ spectrum. I haven't defended any of that and actually agree with people about that being wrong. You called it "sexually perverse" even when it had nothing to do with kids because you think it's intrinsically perverse. 

 

It doesn't matter if I think it should be celebrated or if it deserves its own month. We live in a free country. You're not being forced to attend Pride parades. You're not being forced to be gay or go to gay weddings. You are free to start a grassroots movement if you want to celebrate something you like for a month if you want to, or you don't have to. You are free to sit back and whine about the things you don't like as well, which you are exercising. So really what's the problem?

 

 

There is a natural order to things, and two individuals with the same …“equipment “ going at it is against that order. It certainly is contrary to the expected norm so it fits the definition of perverse. One doesn’t need to be religious or a scientist to figure it out. Now, should it be allowed and perfectly legal ? Sure. This is a free country after all. 
   My issue is the celebration of this as something great. By sports teams, corporations ( though not in middle eastern countries etc so it rings quite hollow and is obviously about $$) etc. If you have a different opinion , even if you are a pro athlete the media will rail against you. Schools now try to introduce this “ pride” to children at an inappropriate age . Many parents find this offensive and an intrusion into their child’s upbringing. Again, the powerful elite don’t care. 
  It’s a free country and all that and parades are fine. Never cared about them either way.  The corporations et all should really stfu imo. At that point they’re making it everyone’s business. But hey, complaining is only acceptable these days if it comes from the far left. 

[Boatdrinks]

9 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

To call it "sexually perverse" is homophobic.

 

When did I argue that the biological design for human procreation isn't heterosexuality? That doesn't mean homosexual relationships are wrong, just like it's not wrong for heterosexual couples to not have kids if they don't want to. Nobody owes it to anyone else to procreate, there is no obligation for anyone to do that. 

 

Also, if someone is gay and they agree that is the biological design...do you think that changes their attraction?

Still “ perverse” by definition. Don’t really care about procreation either as no one is obligated to do this. However , one cannot deny the obvious. 
  Also, what is with the incredibly stupid practice on the left of defining everything as “ phobic” ? We all have things we like and don’t like. Things we approve of and that we do not. Things that we think are gross and kind of disgusting, and things that we don’t. Is one chocophobic if they dislike chocolate? What if you can’t stand Taylor Swift ? What if you dislike Caucasian people like the left does? Caucaphobic ? Obviously this practice/ tactic by the libs and media is moronic yet it continues. 

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Still “ perverse” by definition. Don’t really care about procreation either as no one is obligated to do this. However , one cannot deny the obvious. 
  Also, what is with the incredibly stupid practice on the left of defining everything as “ phobic” ? We all have things we like and don’t like. Things we approve of and that we do not. Things that we think are gross and kind of disgusting, and things that we don’t. Is one chocophobic if they dislike chocolate? What if you can’t stand Taylor Swift ? What if you dislike Caucasian people like the left does? Caucaphobic ? Obviously this practice/ tactic by the libs and media is moronic yet it continues. 

 

When did you decide to be straight?

 

 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

15 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

There is a natural order to things, and two individuals with the same …“equipment “ going at it is against that order. It certainly is contrary to the expected norm so it fits the definition of perverse. One doesn’t need to be religious or a scientist to figure it out. Now, should it be allowed and perfectly legal ? Sure. This is a free country after all. 
   My issue is the celebration of this as something great. By sports teams, corporations ( though not in middle eastern countries etc so it rings quite hollow and is obviously about $$) etc. If you have a different opinion , even if you are a pro athlete the media will rail against you. Schools now try to introduce this “ pride” to children at an inappropriate age . Many parents find this offensive and an intrusion into their child’s upbringing. Again, the powerful elite don’t care. 
  It’s a free country and all that and parades are fine. Never cared about them either way.  The corporations et all should really stfu imo. At that point they’re making it everyone’s business. But hey, complaining is only acceptable these days if it comes from the far left. 

 

I disagree that it's "perverse" by definition. The one I found is "showing a deliberate and obstinate desire to behave in a way that is unreasonable or unacceptable", I don't think that's what two same-gender people having sex is. Maybe you do or you have a different definition of the word, I don't know. But let me ask you again...what if someone who is homosexual actually agrees with you that heterosexuality is the "natural order", but they don't have that attraction, they themselves are simply naturally attracted to the same gender and it didn't happen by choice and they are simply seeking a same-sex adult consensual relationship? What exactly do you want or expect for them to do?

 

From the origins of it, I don't think it was necessarily a celebration of being gay, moreso a celebration that you could be gay and still have the same rights and be treated like anyone else. Have a small, very loud faction of that group made demands for more? Yes, but unfortunately people are lumping in the entire community as that because of them. You can make any "group" look bad if you judge them all by the extremists within it, whether it's religious, political, even sports fanbases, literally anything. 

 

And again, I agree about pushing ideologies onto kids being wrong, I've said that consistently. 

 

To your other thing about "phobic", the difference is if I don't like Taylor Swift, I don't say she's somehow perverse if she's not actually doing something perverse, I just don't like her music. It's different if you say two dudes having sex is gross to you personally. A gay person might feel the exact same way that two opposite gender people going at it in their minds is gross. 

[Big Blitz]

Omg

 

 

[SCBills]

The Armenians in LA, Somalians in Minneapolis, and now this …

 

About to get real awkward for Dems. 
 

Minorities or LGBTQ+ 

 

Libs: Choose your fighter. 
 

 

[B-Man]

 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

8 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

You see, people can tolerate adult perverts- but when you start to come for their kids, it’s “Game On”…👍

 

Unless of course, it's Pastors and Priests coming for their kids...then that side stays silent

[B-Man]

1 minute ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

 

Unless of course, it's Pastors and Priests coming for their kids...then that side stays silent

 

 

"Johnny One-Note" with the same false claim, over and over.

 

EVERYONE has condemned the abuse by priests.

 

 

[HomeskillitMoorman]

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

"Johnny One-Note" with the same false claim, over and over.

 

EVERYONE has condemned the abuse by priests.

 

 

 

But for some reason, not all Christians and Catholics are lumped in with them. As they shouldn't be. But anyone who waves a Pride flag is lumped in with the worst of their group. That's what the context was behind that, if you actually read what people are saying in between your postings of propaganda.