Jump to content

Michael Irvin Removed from NFL Network Superbowl LVll Coverage


T&C

Recommended Posts

It's just a he-said, she-said case now. I can see both sides. One of them is lying.

 

Rich and powerful people like Irvin think they can get away with anything, though. Add alcohol and you have a walking, talking,  potential lawsuit around every corner.

Edited by MJS
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Many times accused will find witnesses "who saw nothing". 

People have been murdered and with people in room and some people will have seen nothing.

It all depends on your point of view and how much you were paying attention to that particular thing at that particular time.

 

image.thumb.png.f401f4ed5873bded523b0e9c27a8422e.png

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2023 at 5:06 PM, Mr. WEO said:

If their employee came to them and reported this, is Marriot supposed to ignore her claims about Irvin's alleged comments/behavior while she was on the job?

 

What is the basis of his suit?

 

No.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chongli said:

 

Florio already starting to tiptoe backwards...

 

 "Reasonable minds may differ as to whether the characterization does or doesn’t mesh with Marriott’s version.

That’s a potential problem for Irvin, frankly. He’s accused of making lewd comments to the employee. He has admitted that he had been drinking. If the employee has told a consistent, unimpeachable story to Marriott management and NFL representative(s) who investigated the situation, it could be difficult to prove that her explanation fails to match the video."

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Florio already starting to tiptoe backwards...

 

 "Reasonable minds may differ as to whether the characterization does or doesn’t mesh with Marriott’s version.

That’s a potential problem for Irvin, frankly. He’s accused of making lewd comments to the employee. He has admitted that he had been drinking. If the employee has told a consistent, unimpeachable story to Marriott management and NFL representative(s) who investigated the situation, it could be difficult to prove that her explanation fails to match the video."

 

 

Why wouldn't he change his opinion when new info comes to light? It's what reasonable people do.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Why wouldn't he change his opinion when new info comes to light? It's what reasonable people do.

 

 

 

The video was inevitably going to put shade on his shoot from the hip original opinion.  It was an unforced error. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why he's not suing the NFL or the network that pulled him off the game?

 

Makes no sense to sue the hotel when they were simply reporting an incident an on the job employee made and that the NFL asked the hotel to do beforehand.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“I don’t really recall that conversation, to tell you the truth,” Irvin told the Dallas Morning News. “We were out drinking. It was just a friendly conversation. ‘What’s up?’ I don’t even know. … I am totally perplexed. That’s honestly all that happened.”

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2023/02/10/michael-irvin-sues-accuser-marriott-after-super-bowl-week-incident/11229565002/

he admits he had been drinking and cant remmber what was said.

 

his defense now is after having seen the video is that the accuser did not act like i said something bad

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, papazoid said:

“I don’t really recall that conversation, to tell you the truth,” Irvin told the Dallas Morning News. “We were out drinking. It was just a friendly conversation. ‘What’s up?’ I don’t even know. … I am totally perplexed. That’s honestly all that happened.”

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2023/02/10/michael-irvin-sues-accuser-marriott-after-super-bowl-week-incident/11229565002/

he admits he had been drinking and cant remmber what was said.

 

his defense now is after having seen the video is that the accuser did not act like i said something bad

who to believe here.

 

person

 

or

 

renowned cocaine and kitty fiend Michael Irvin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, papazoid said:

“I don’t really recall that conversation, to tell you the truth,” Irvin told the Dallas Morning News. “We were out drinking. It was just a friendly conversation. ‘What’s up?’ I don’t even know. … I am totally perplexed. That’s honestly all that happened.”

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2023/02/10/michael-irvin-sues-accuser-marriott-after-super-bowl-week-incident/11229565002/

he admits he had been drinking and cant remmber what was said.

 

his defense now is after having seen the video is that the accuser did not act like i said something bad


he doesn’t know, he doesn’t recall….yet he states “honestly, that’s all that happened”.  
 

lol dumbass.  He needs a gag order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irvin s clearly drunk af.  He keeps pushing his hips forward to her, its not over the top, but noticeable. She steps back, seems noticeably offput but an elbow touch.  Weird thing to react to unless hes acting like a pig.

 

Just have a hard time believing all that is coincidence, especially with his reputation.

 

Not to mention, she had nothing to gain here, HE filed suit, not her.  Pretty logical something happened and she went to a boss to ask to not be put in the situation again. Very reasonable request by a nobody trying to do her job.  Then he tosses around lynching comments, and sues them?  Hope she countersues, this threw a wrench in her life because he couldnt handle a little heat

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just watched the video, and I think this whole thing gets thrown out on both sides.  Even if Irvin said what the woman claims, I don’t see how it’s going to be proven.  And yeah, repulsive if he said what she claims, but her body language appeared at ease to me, versus trying to walk away and get back to work.  If anything, her boss/coworker appeared annoyed when she got back, so it’s possible she altered the version of events even a little, to cover her own butt.  And then realized she had to carry on with that story, for the sake of her job.  
 

Again though, I don’t see how the video and her word will implicate him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...