Jump to content

Spitballing on RB target for Bills


MAJBobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, cage said:

 

Hasn't the McKissic $ been consumed by the tsunami of the last couple days?

I think that was just the talking heads speculating.  They must find it difficult accepting the concept that the Bills are now a well managed organisation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Manther said:

My guess and gut feeling is the Bills would have taken Etienne if the Jags didn't jump up and grab him last year.  I think Beane and McD see a game changing RB weapon if it is a special player is worth it.

I don't think they thought of the two RBs as special players. 

10 hours ago, Manther said:

My guess and gut feeling is the Bills would have taken Etienne if the Jags didn't jump up and grab him last year.  I think Beane and McD see a game changing RB weapon if it is a special player is worth it.

I don't think they thought of the two RBs as special players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Magox said:

The Bills new they were losing Beasley and they were trying to replace some of what Beasley did which was produce some volume of catches and picking up firsts on third down.   The McKissic loss was not insignificant and I still think they try to get someone in a similar mold whether it be a RB or slot receiver.

I saw it the same way as you and got laughed at for it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billzgobowlin said:

Stop patching up the RB room with third rounders.  Go get Breece.  I will say I still have a lot of love for Singletary (got his jersey first year) and he can be our Fred Jackson we need a stud to get us that ground game producing!!!

I can’t understand why people wouldn’t want a Jonathan Taylor type RB on this roster?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

I can’t understand why people wouldn’t want a Jonathan Taylor type RB on this roster?

I don't think people don't want it. I personally  don't think he's worth a 1st, probably won't make it to our second and I wouldn't trade up to get him. MAYBE if he's there for our 2nd, I would think about it, but would depend on who else is available at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, qwksilver said:

I'm on board with B Hall but I don't think that the FO will go that route in the draft unless we sign a CB (no to Richard Sherman) and trade back from 25. Just my 2 cents.

 

Are you saying RB is a bigger need than CB? I think we need 2 CBs.

Why 2 corners?  We have Tre, Taron, Dane and Neal.  We rarely, if ever carry more than 5.  Keep guys on the PS and bring them up as needed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Why 2 corners?  We have Tre, Taron, Dane and Neal.  We rarely, if ever carry more than 5.  Keep guys on the PS and bring them up as needed 

I agree with him on the 2 corner need.   Tre isnt a lock to start the season then you also need a guy that can compete with Jackson and whoever loses that battle will be the back up guy outside   

Edited by GolfandBills
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...