Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

 

Heavily Hyped Primetime Jan 6 Committee Hearing Lands with a Thud

 

There were no such revealing details of any import that I could see, and their attempt to show that Trump was “at the center” of some coordinated multistep effort was weak at best. Trump is not above criticism, and many don’t like his actions and words after the 2020 election, but no one yet has found definitive evidence that Trump said anything even close to, ”storm the capitol, folks!”

 

What the Committee did prove is that

A) it was a violent event,

B) security was utterly lacking,

and C) that the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were there.

 

All very interesting—and all stuff we already knew from the second Donald Trump impeachment trial.

 

{snip}

 

 

I’m guessing much of the audience had already turned to a different channel by the time the committee started showing the video, which was about 48 minutes into the hearing.

 

The video is compelling, and as I said there’s plenty of violence and some people who should go to jail, and many have. Although the committee said some of the footage was “never-before-seen by the public,” there didn’t seem to be any that was particularly different than what we’ve already seen, and certainly none that shone new light on the situation. The only thing that jumped out to me was that it seemed the volume level of the background noise of yelling protesters seemed to have been jacked up to 11 for maximum effect. Riots are bad. Got it.

 

 

The committee continued with more evidence—evidence that mostly showed that a riot is a scary place to be. Nowhere was there a smoking gun, a new “blockbuster” piece of evidence, or a stunning new narrative.

 

The hearing was a disaster for Democrats, and it’s hard to see a huge audience that wants to watch seven more hearings. Those hearings won’t even be primetime, and won’t get the same wall-to-wall network coverage. They’ll probably be little noticed by anyone except Adam Schiff groupies.

 

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/06/10/heavily-hyped-primetime-jan-6-committee-hearing-lands-with-a-thud-n576889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

It is interesting how loudly nobody cares.  🤔

 

 

Sorry.

 

No adult falls for that first grade "observation"

 

The Left puts on a prime time propaganda show at taxpayers expense,

 

we are naturally going to point out it's nonsense.

 

 


 

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Sorry.

 

No adult falls for that first grade "observation"

 

The Left puts on a prime time propaganda show at taxpayers expense,

 

we are naturally going to point out it's nonsense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I mean why would we have an investigation of a violent incident at our capital in which people died? 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

I mean why would we have an investigation of a violent incident at our capital in which people died? 🙄

 

Good point.  I wonder why we didn't hear about any of these people last night?  They were the only ones who died during the "insurrection" after all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friendly reminder that the left doesn’t actually think attacking government buildings and threatening the safety of public officials is a bad thing. They’re just embarrassed and jealous that the right were able to what they failed miserably at.

Edited by gobills404
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that the left doesn’t actually think attacking government buildings and threatening the safety of public officials is a bad thing. They’re just embarrassed and jealous that the right were able to what they failed miserably at.

images-16.jpg.3a8b5926f4d977a9ea7eb32599645f12.jpg

  • Sad 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So it’s your position that violently storming the Capitol or White House is acceptable as long as your motivation is politically correct? Okie Dokie

The apple is virtuous and the orange (man) is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So it’s your position that violently storming the Capitol or White House is acceptable as long as your motivation is politically correct? Okie Dokie

Stop. It's stupid a stupid comparison 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that the left doesn’t actually think attacking government buildings and threatening the safety of public officials is a bad thing. They’re just embarrassed and jealous that the right were able to what they failed miserably at.



Friendly reminder: Andy Ngo is a notorious grifter and lying alt-right troll.


https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/andy-ngo-right-wing-troll-antifa-877914/

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-02-08/andy-ngo-new-book-still-pretends-antifa-real-enemy

https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/


 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Stop. It's stupid a stupid comparison 

 

Elaborate.  I've been on board with a complete investigation by law enforcement officials on the event of 1/6, including charging the perpetrators who assaulted law enforcement, breached the Capitol, destroyed property and the like.  I acknowledge thinking that law enforcement might be a bit heavy handed against those guilty of low level activity, but on the whole, I supported the investigation just as you did.

 

Now, when confronted with videos of insurrectionists and revolutionaries attempting to storm the White House, burn it to the ground and lynch all the occupants, you seem completely comfortable with those actions. 

 

@Jauronimo has been active here of late talking about the difference between jaywalking in Des Moines and attempting the stop the peaceful transfer of power, and while I disagree that people are generally comparing 1/6 to stealing sneakers, I do agree a message must be sent.  I can't imagine a more destructive assault on our way of life than that shown in those videos.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Elaborate.  I've been on board with a complete investigation by law enforcement officials on the event of 1/6, including charging the perpetrators who assaulted law enforcement, breached the Capitol, destroyed property and the like.  I acknowledge thinking that law enforcement might be a bit heavy handed against those guilty of low level activity, but on the whole, I supported the investigation just as you did.

 

Now, when confronted with videos of insurrectionists and revolutionaries attempting to storm the White House, burn it to the ground and lynch all the occupants, you seem completely comfortable with those actions. 

 

@Jauronimo has been active here of late talking about the difference between jaywalking in Des Moines and attempting the stop the peaceful transfer of power, and while I disagree that people are generally comparing 1/6 to stealing sneakers, I do agree a message must be sent.  I can't imagine a more destructive assault on our way of life than that shown in those videos.

 

 

You mean the peaceful protest Trump walked out into? 

 

Do I really need to say anything more? 

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Of course it is:

 

Angry Americans attacking federal buildings.

 

No similarities whatsoever. 
 

 

Dumb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logic said:

Friendly reminder that smearing the messenger when you can’t disprove the message is the laziest tactic in book.

46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

images-16.jpg.3a8b5926f4d977a9ea7eb32599645f12.jpg

“It’s ok when we do it”

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that smearing the messenger when you can’t disprove the message is the laziest tactic in book.

 

 

But Rolling Stone and Salon told him so ...........😂

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that smearing the messenger when you can’t disprove the message is the laziest tactic in book.

“It’s ok when we do it”

No, it's very different. Maybe you just can't understand how they are different. You were told something, it made you feel good, so you embrace the silly argument. Simple 

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

But Rolling Stone and Salon told him so ...........😂

 

 

Is Salon.com still a thing???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that smearing the messenger when you can’t disprove the message is the laziest tactic in book.

 

 

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

But Rolling Stone and Salon told him so ...........😂

 



"Smearing the messenger" is necessary when "the messenger" is a notorious liar who has been proven to selectively edit his clips and distort reality to fit his propaganda narratives.

Not that either of you clicked any of the links, but if you had, you would've seen that Andy Ngo pals around with the Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys.  Andy Ngo's Proud Boys buddies, as I'm sure you know, were recently charged with Seditious Conspiracy. 

Please let me know what leftists who are "just as bad" as the J6 domestic terrorists are currently facing chargers as serious as those being faced by the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and their ilk.

Please also feel free to post pictures and videos of leftist protestors erecting gallows outside government buildings and chanting "hang Mike Pence" or hunting the Speaker of the House through the halls of congress. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Logic said:

 



"Smearing the messenger" is necessary when "the messenger" is a notorious liar who has been proven to selectively edit his clips and distort reality to fit his propaganda narratives.

Not that either of you clicked any of the links, but if you had, you would've seen that Andy Ngo pals around with the Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys.  Andy Ngo's Proud Boys buddies, as I'm sure you know, were recently charged with Seditious Conspiracy. 

Please let me know what leftists who are "just as bad" as the J6 domestic terrorists are currently facing chargers as serious as those being faced by the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and their ilk.

Please also feel free to post pictures and videos of leftist protestors erecting gallows outside government buildings and chanting "hang Mike Pence" or hunting the Speaker of the House through the halls of congress. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/06/08/politics/man-arrested-near-brett-kavanaugh-home/index.html
 

You were saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, gobills404 said:



Yep. One lone lunatic being arrested is definitely the same as the leadership of an entire right wing, white supremacist, domestic terrorist group being charged with seditious conspiracy. Totally equivalent.

We can play this game all day:

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-08/right-wing-plot-kidnap-michigan-whitmer

Besides, I'm not posting the guy who wanted to kill Kavanaugh's good buddy's Tweets and presenting them as honest, good faith presentations of reality, the way that you're posting Proud Boy buddy Andy Ngo's Tweets.

Ngo is a grifter and a liar. Always has been. 

 

Edited by Logic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You mean the peaceful protest Trump walked out into? 

 

Do I really need to say anything more? 

Dumb 

It’s fascinating when people don’t see how their own bias contributes to these problems.    Someone always thinks their revolutionaries seeking to destroy/maim/kill are in the right, Tibs. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It’s fascinating when people don’t see how their own bias contributes to these problems.    Someone always thinks their revolutionaries seeking to destroy/maim/kill are in the right, Tibs. 
 

It's just a ridiculous comparison 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gobills404 said:

Friendly reminder that the left doesn’t actually think attacking government buildings and threatening the safety of public officials is a bad thing. They’re just embarrassed and jealous that the right were able to what they failed miserably at.

 

Yeah but that's different (not really, but that's all lefties can say).

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah but that's different (not really, but that's all lefties can say).

 

Same exact scenario happens tonight at the White House and the left is raging.  And I'd be right there with them because law and order must be maintained no matter what type of moron currently occupies the White House.

 

But again that's not a hard call to make when you actually have principles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It’s fascinating when people don’t see how their own bias contributes to these problems.    Someone always thinks their revolutionaries seeking to destroy/maim/kill are in the right, Tibs. 
 

Irony ☝🏻️

5 hours ago, gobills404 said:
Friendly reminder that the left doesn’t actually think attacking government buildings and threatening the safety of public officials is a bad thing. They’re just embarrassed and jealous that the right were able to what they failed miserably at.

This post seems self-righteous and weirdly prideful over something so despicable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Logic said:

Yep. One lone lunatic being arrested is definitely the same as the leadership of an entire right wing, white supremacist, domestic terrorist group being charged with seditious conspiracy. Totally equivalent.

Lol if you actually believe that then I realize I’m wasting my time trying to present you with any facts. Welcome to the ignore list.

Edited by gobills404
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, B-Man said:

Ratings are in!

 

😂

 

 

 

I watched the hockey game.  I just assumed it was a rerun of the impeachment trials.  It did have about 20 million plus viewers across all the networks which is pretty piss poor all things considered.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

I watched the hockey game.  I just assumed it was a rerun of the impeachment trials.  It did have about 20 million plus viewers across all the networks which is pretty piss poor all things considered.

 

 

I watched “Goodfellas”. I figured if I was watching reruns, I might as well watch one where the acting is good.  
 

On that note, one of my favorite movie scenes of all time.  Hypocrisy and the human condition all wrapped up in about a minute:

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

SHOW TRIAL RATINGS ARE IN

 

TV Rating Guide’s Rebecca Bunch posts the ratings for the January 6 Committee’s show trial hearing this past Thursday evening. The headline declares the ratings “decent.”

 

Well, that is disappointing if accurate. If you take your television viewing from the broadcast networks, however, your only choice was to turn the thing off.

 

The networks graciously handed their prime time slots over to the committee’s motley crew in unison, Soviet style.

 

Providing a link to the ratings, the Washington Free Beacon adds a poignant twist. Reporter Collin Anderson homes in on CBS (which lagged the field) and finds that CBS’s broadcast of the hearing could not keep up with the rerun of “Young Sheldon” [?] that aired in the same time slot last week.

 

 

:lol:

 

http://www.thetvratingsguide.com/2022/06/thursday-tv-ratings-6922-january-6th.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...