Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

 

 

Lather,

 

Rinse,

 

Repeat.

 

 

They just won't let go of their false narrative.

 

Democrats are making loud noises about January 6th again, claiming that coming revelations will “blow the roof” off the House of Representatives.

 

Jamie Raskin, who serves on the January 6th Committee, recently claimed while speaking at Georgetown University that he and his colleagues will present “evidence” that Donald Trump coordinated with white nationalist and fascist groups “in order to support the coup.”

 

 

This comes via NBC News, which reported on Raskin’s comments. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-revelations-will-blow-roof-house-rep-jamie-raskin-says-rcna25542

 

 

 

This is such nonsense, and we’ve heard it all before. Why should anyone believe this time is different?

 

There have been numerous leaks by the January 6th committee up to this point. All of them have been massive duds that don’t begin to prove the committee’s assertions. The idea that they’d have the discipline to hold back stunning, game-changing revelations until the open hearings is farcical.

 

There’s no entity in Washington that is that buttoned-up, much less when speaking of Congress. If there was anything that actually added up to a criminal offense, we’d have heard about it by now.

 

And sure enough, if we keep reading NBC News’ write-up what we’ll find is that Raskin is planning to rehash the same failed talking points the Democrats have been pushing for over a year. Namely, that it was somehow a “coup” or illegal for Trump to speak to various surrogates about whether it was possible for Mike Pence to object to the electors.

 

😆

 

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/04/22/top-democrat-january-6th-investigation-revelations-blow-the-roof-off-the-house-n554400

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

CNN has been telling you truth.

 

Everyone believes it.

 

:lol:


👆🤡

 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Worry porn, among its many self-deceiving tricks, telescopes time in order to ignore its healing effect.

 

Thus a New York Times editorial last week revealingly insisted (and pleaded), “Jan. 6 is not in the past. It is every day.”

 

One staple of the genre, promoted also by Never Trump Republicans like Bill Kristol, is a studied emphasis on those Republican state legislators currently eager to be seen enacting “reforms” to voting rules and election mechanisms to appease their Trumpist constituents.

 

This supposedly isn’t a case of politicians doing what they always do, chasing short-term popularity. It’s a scheme to overturn the 2024 election. Except this would require these same ambitious up-and-comers, in three years’ time when the fever of many Republican voters will have subsided, to go against not only the majority in their state who presumptively voted for the Democrat, but against many Republicans who would also oppose overturning the vote.

 

This is not really how ambitious politicians behave and points to perhaps the biggest Jan. 6 worry-porn fallacy—the assumption that a few hundred of the worst Capitol Hill rioters are representative of 75 million Trump voters.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-big-lie-narrative-will-fail-mainstream-media-jan-6-journalism-2020-election-capitol-riot-protest-trump-11641574341

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Worry porn, among its many self-deceiving tricks, telescopes time in order to ignore its healing effect.

 

Thus a New York Times editorial last week revealingly insisted (and pleaded), “Jan. 6 is not in the past. It is every day.”

 

One staple of the genre, promoted also by Never Trump Republicans like Bill Kristol, is a studied emphasis on those Republican state legislators currently eager to be seen enacting “reforms” to voting rules and election mechanisms to appease their Trumpist constituents.

 

This supposedly isn’t a case of politicians doing what they always do, chasing short-term popularity. It’s a scheme to overturn the 2024 election. Except this would require these same ambitious up-and-comers, in three years’ time when the fever of many Republican voters will have subsided, to go against not only the majority in their state who presumptively voted for the Democrat, but against many Republicans who would also oppose overturning the vote.

 

This is not really how ambitious politicians behave and points to perhaps the biggest Jan. 6 worry-porn fallacy—the assumption that a few hundred of the worst Capitol Hill rioters are representative of 75 million Trump voters.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-big-lie-narrative-will-fail-mainstream-media-jan-6-journalism-2020-election-capitol-riot-protest-trump-11641574341

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Why did Bowser only authorize ~300 guardsmen that day as 1,000+ sat idle at armory?

"they" did the same thing the day JFK was assassinated

 

The committee already said Pelosi’s comms/documents are off limits. There’s no indication committee interviewed Bowser. Or Chris Wray. Or DC DHS head.

Of course not, these people don't work for the American people.. or truth and justice.

 

It isn't hard to figure out who the true #1 enemy of America is.

Edited by Albwan
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2022 at 1:57 PM, BillStime said:


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

What is it like to be the only guy still clinging to the Steele Dossier? 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

What is it like to be the only guy still clinging to the Steele Dossier? 


What’s it like to be so ignorant that the Steele dossier has anything to do with Trump having over 140+ meetings w Russians?

 

Manafort sharing campaign data with Russians?

 

And Roger Stone coordinating Wikileaks drops?

 

What would Trump do without your ignorance?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


What’s it like to be so ignorant that the Steele dossier has anything to do with Trump having over 140+ meetings w Russians?

 

Manafort sharing campaign data with Russians?

 

And Roger Stone coordinating Wikileaks drops?

 

What would Trump do without your ignorance?

Manafort was fired for his malfeasance- of which I am sure you are aware. And Roger Stone dealt with Julian Assange who last I checked was not related to Russia. Once again you are either lying or pathetically ignorant

Edited by Buffalo Timmy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Manafort was fired for his malfeasance- of which I am sure you are aware. And Roger Stone dealt with Julian Assange who last I checked was not related to Russia. Once again you are either lying or pathetically ignorant

 

LMAO - why do I bother with you?  Every accusation is a confession - lmao. 

 

How did Julian Assange get the DNC data? WHO HACKED DNC?

 

smfh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

LMAO - why do I bother with you?  Every accusation is a confession - lmao. 

 

How did Julian Assange get the DNC data? WHO HACKED DNC?

 

smfh

 

Are you insinuating that only one group hacked the server in Hillary's closet? But I am glad you gave up on the rest of your lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2022 at 8:06 PM, Buffalo Timmy said:

Bless your heart, logic is not your friend.

 

 

 

 

The other day, after rolling out the Trump collusion rant over and over and over and over and over, I asked about Mueller and the outcome of his  collusion report.  
 

BillSy’s reply was that we’ve not seen the “unredacted” report…presuming that the “there was no collusion” report delivered by Mueller to the world wasn’t the real real real report, I guess. 
 

 

One needs a secret decoder ring to follow him at times. 
 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The other day, after rolling out the Trump collusion rant over and over and over and over and over, I asked about Mueller and the outcome of his  collusion report.  

BillSy’s reply was that we’ve not seen the “unredacted” report…presuming that the “there was no collusion” report delivered by Mueller to the world wasn’t the real real real report, I guess. 
 

 

One needs a secret decoder ring to follow him at times. 
 

 

 

Even that is part of his delusion.

 

We haven't seen the unredacted report, but the Democrat leaders in Congress did.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2022 at 10:28 AM, SoCal Deek said:

Please tell us who the brave ones are. Is it you? Are you the brave one? 

Brave sir BillStime bravely ran away, and bravely hid in his mother's basement, bravely calling people cowards who didn't bravely follow the same brave Twitter feeds that he bravely did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The other day, after rolling out the Trump collusion rant over and over and over and over and over, I asked about Mueller and the outcome of his  collusion report.  
 

BillSy’s reply was that we’ve not seen the “unredacted” report…presuming that the “there was no collusion” report delivered by Mueller to the world wasn’t the real real real report, I guess. 
 

 

One needs a secret decoder ring to follow him at times. 
 

 

Be sure to drink your Ovaltine.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Heartbreak on Capitol Hill as Democrats Come to a Realization About Jan. 6 Committee

 

b81791f9-8087-4ffa-97b6-38b3b3ae1bc8-450

 

 

Over the last couple of weeks, we’ve seen various claims made by the rabidly partisan Jan. 6th Committee being carefully leaked to the press and book writers/reporters from the New York Times, who in turn are going into overdrive in giving the stories their best spins in hopes of distracting people from the self-destruction currently taking place within the Democratic party.

 

We saw it in early April with the “Trump phone call gap that wasn’t,” and just last week with yet another infamous “bombshell” report, this time in their insinuations about how House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was allegedly so ashamed of what happened on January 6th, 2021 that he told Rep. Liz Cheney on a House Republican leadership call four days later that then-President Donald Trump should resign in disgrace.

 

Both McCarthy and Trump responded accordingly by strongly pushing back and refuting the more supposedly explosive claims and in the process nuked the “rift” narrative the media was trying to spin.

 

But as we draw closer to the 2022 midterm elections, Democrats are coming to some sobering (for them) conclusions about the January 6th Committee and, fittingly enough, on how the leaks that are coming out of it are impacting voter perceptions, especially at a time when voters are “distracted by inflation, Ukraine and the lingering coronavirus pandemic”:

 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2022/04/27/heartbreak-on-capitol-hill-as-democrats-come-to-a-realization-about-jan-6-committee-n556886

 

giphy.gif

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people realize it was a riot that went too far, was essentially planned (and not by who they are portraying) and allowed to happen, and which lasted a few hours and then ended on its own.  But it's all the Dems have at this point, given the shitshow Joey has made the country.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...