*Approved* Information only and Spotify fallout

[Big Blitz]

Who does the approving?  The State?:

 

 

 

Spotify is claiming that their new "content advisory" label is for Covid discussion only.  Fearing the spread of misinformation!

 

You think this stops at just Spotify and Podcasts specific to covid discussion only? *Misinformation* like "just flatten the curve" or "get vaccinated get your life back."

 

Excuse me a second...

 

 

 

This isn't just about Joe Rogan leaving the plantation.  This isn't just about Covid.  

 

This is no longer just about canceling someone because they used a racial slur. 

 

This is going to get much worse.....they want to cancel all OPINION in opposition to their insanity.  Usually when you're "right," or have the more appealing position the people gravitate to you.  We tend to not like misery.  But no one agrees with them.  Because they're miserable and support miserable things.  So censorship or threats is the new response via corporate cooperation.  Just like the Nazis!  

 

Joe Rogan interviewed someone who up until May of 2020 was one of the most respected professionals in his field of medicine on the planet.  As he told Rogan, if he isn't qualified to speak, no one is.

 

 

 

By the way.....per their own new standards of such concern about misinformation, CNN, The New York Times, the WaPo, MSNBC, Brian Williams, and our daily White House Press conferences, all fit the criteria of needing a "content advisory." 

 

These idiots don't get to dictate fact from opinion and silence anyone that they consider dangerous.  This road is unprecedented in this country.

 

The real danger is 70 million Americans would read Elvira here and nod in agreement.  

 

 

 

Edited February 2, 2022 by Big Blitz

[Orlando Tim]

It is amazing how much misinformation has become true while so much government information has become false. 

[Chef Jim]

From Rogan:

 

“Eight months ago, if you said if you get vaccinated you can still catch COVID and you can still spread COVID — you will be removed from social media … Now, that’s accepted as fact,” he said.“

[Big Blitz]

Lockdowns only reduced COVID-19 mortality by .2%, study finds: 'Lockdowns should be rejected out of hand'

 

The Johns Hopkins University study also found that shelter-in-place orders reduced COVID-19 mortality by 2.9%

 

"While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted," the researchers wrote. "In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument."

 

The researchers – Johns Hopkins University economics professor Steve Hanke, Lund University economics professor Lars Jonung, and special advisor at Copenhagen's Center for Political Studies Jonas Herby – analyzed the effects of lockdown measures such as school shutdowns, business closures, and mask mandates on COVID-19 deaths.

 

"We find little to no evidence that mandated lockdowns in Europe and the United States had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality rates," the researchers wrote. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/lockdowns-reduced-covid-19-mortality-by-2-study-finds-lockdowns-should-be-rejected-out-of-hand

 

 

 

 

 

Remember when these crisis actors with full support of the MSM that didn't attach any "content advisories" to their stories told us we were getting people killed by going outside or protesting the loss of our livelihoods:

 

This was April 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

Remember how these idiots still to this day tell you "well there really was no lockdown."  What they probably meant was "well we didn't have tanks in streets."

 

 

Full endorsement:

 

Health care workers took a stand against protesters opposing the coronavirus lockdown in Colorado

 

Health care workers in Colorado clashed with protesters who demonstrated on Sunday to demand an end to the state’s stay-at-home order.

 

Dramatic video of the Denver protest went viral when a nurse in full scrubs was captured standing in front of a woman protesting from her truck.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/health-care-workers-took-stand-against-protestors-opposing-coronavirus-lockdown-n1187711

 

 

That's a top 10 moment in Covid history btw

 

 

[Big Blitz]

 

 

[Big Blitz]

Psaki Urges Spotify To Take More Action Against Joe Rogan

 

“Well, last July, I, you probably know, but the Surgeon General (the executive branch; nominated tool of Xiden) also took the unprecedented step to issue an advisory on the risk of misinformation in public health, which is a very significant step,” Psaki said. “And amid that, he talked about the role social media platforms have, so our hope is that all major tech platforms, and all major news sources for that matter, be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19. That certainly includes Spotify.”

 

“So this disclaimer, it’s a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation and disinformation will also uplifting, accurate information,” she continued, later adding: “But ultimately, you know, our view is it’s a, it’s a, it’s a good step. It’s a positive step, but there’s more that can be done.”

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/psaki-urges-spotify-to-take-more-action-against-joe-rogan

 

 

 

 

 

If that wasn't clear, the State really really wants the private sector to do its bidding.  

 

Like good Nazis.  

 

Won't stop with Rogan or anything else they deem "misinformation."

[Irv]

Did Demented Biden ever take a history class?   Maybe he did and is too far demented to remember?  What a mess!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings

 

 

 

  

Edited February 2, 2022 by Irv

[Tiberius]

They hate those that tell the truth. They hate those that attack lies. 

 

 

It's the right wing! 

[Big Blitz]

Do they not understand the irony and stupidity of bashing a podcast host for having guests that are not of the correct opinion or not qualified........then propping up the opinion of an unqualified actor and his seal of approval to the host's response....

 

 

 

 

Dwayne Johnson divides fans with response to Joe Rogan video amid Covid ‘misinformation’ drama

 

‘Great stuff here, brother,’ actor wrote

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/dwayne-johnson-joe-rogan-instagram-spotify-b2005685.html

 

 

 

Welcome to peak stupid.  We keep reaching new heights.   

[TSOL]

Lines are being drawn 

[Big Blitz]

 

[Big Blitz]

No word on if the State approves this.

 

I see no content advisory on the Tweet.  No warning or fact check. 

 

 

 

 

And how far these lunatics have fallen.  If everyone in charge (just need about half) thinks like this KT guy - he's telling you masks for life.  Which only conspiracy tin foil hat nuts told you would happen in April 2020

 

 

[716er]

We'll be masked forever, screamed one idiot to another.

[Big Blitz]

We will definitely be going from this to maskless real soon:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How much influence the Chinese have over these people indeed.....

 

 

 

Edited February 3, 2022 by Big Blitz

[Big Blitz]

Omg.  

 

No content advisory ANYWHERE on this Yahoo piece.  

 

 

[Big Blitz]

They want Instagram to ban Evangeline Lilly (was in Ant-Man but she will always be Kate)

 

 

 

Marvel Stars Simu Liu, David Dastmalchian Lament ‘Irresponsible’ COVID ‘Opinions’ After Evangeline Lilly Defies Mandates

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/CZPQ4hlLFCl/?utm_medium=copy_link

 

“I believe nobody should ever be forced to inject their body with anything, against their will,” she wrote in her post. “This is not the way. This is not safe. This is not healthy. This is not love. I understand the world is in fear, but I don’t believe that answering fear with force will fix our problems.”

 

“I was pro choice before COVID and I am still pro choice today,” she added.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No Simu it felt like a cold (9 months ago the "science" told you you wouldn't get if vaccinated) because you have a BMI less then 20 and you're 32.

 

Freaking worthless humans.  China got you guys by the ****s

[TtownBillsFan]

11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Do they not understand the irony and stupidity of bashing a podcast host for having guests that are not of the correct opinion or not qualified........then propping up the opinion of an unqualified actor and his seal of approval to the host's response....

 

 

 

 

Dwayne Johnson divides fans with response to Joe Rogan video amid Covid ‘misinformation’ drama

 

‘Great stuff here, brother,’ actor wrote

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/dwayne-johnson-joe-rogan-instagram-spotify-b2005685.html

 

 

 

Welcome to peak stupid.  We keep reaching new heights.   

Hadn't seen it prior,  bud glad that "The Rock " is on the side 9f freedom of speech and thought!

[aristocrat]

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

On 2/1/2022 at 7:45 PM, Buffalo Timmy said:

It is amazing how much misinformation has become true while so much government information has become false. 

The prize for the best insight in the fewest words.

 

Lately, Joe Roagan's podcast has been the source of a lot of anxiety over the spread of COVID misinformation.  But Rogan isn't spreading misinformation.  He's just providing a forum for guests to provide their opinions and conclusions on his podcast utiizing a lengthy 3 hour format.  Example, being Dr. Robert Malone.  The creator/discoverer of mRNA technology.  I'd say an unquestioned credentialed and experienced expert in the field.  He basically said that mRNA vaccines produce spike proteins that can cause damage and harm to functions of the human body like proper functioning of the heart and the immune system.  And these risks have not been properly disclosed to the public.  And from a medical ethics perspective saying that all medical procedures and treatments have some level of risk, risk requires disclosure to the patient, and risk requires patient consent.  And that none of that is happening.  Is he right or wrong?  I don't know.  But I'm listening. 

 

But other people are not listening.  They're calling for Rogan to be censored or labeled as a spreader of misinformation.  But look at the people making these claims.  Jen Psaki, Harry and Meghan, entertainers like Neil Young, and on and on.  But they have absolutely no qualifications to make that judgment.  Not a one of them are experts or experienced virologists, or mRNA and Gene Therapy researchers, or medical doctors, or proficient at molecular biology or some other discipline.  If they're getting input from "experts" then identify your experts by name.

 

They have no qualifications to make determinations about what is true or false.  "Nothing is more dangerous than ignorance in action." They idiots. But idiots that make a lot of noise.   In fact the truth is Rogan has expressed a willingness to anyone that disputes what Dr. Malone might say to counter his views point by point on his podcast.  Maybe Harry and Meghan can share their insights about COVID misinformation by accepting an invite to the show and debate Malone on the merits and risks of mRNA vaccines since they seem to know everything.  I'd love to hear that show!  

 

What I have not seen is uncensored and candid input from actual COVID experts disputing views like Malone's.  People that might disagree with what some of Rogan's guests are saying and have the intellectual capacity and the expertise to make a coherent counter argument based on facts and science.  We need to hear from them directly.  Not through some institutional wall of secrecy.  I doubt platforms that censor posters and users like Facebook, Google, Twitter, or Spotify have any such experts in their employ assessing conflicting views and making legitimate assessments.  They just protect the official sources of bullsheet and as those narratives change adjust to it (just like Buffalo Timmy pointed out). I'm optimistic that ultimately the truth will win out.  If it didn't we'd all still be forced to believe the Earth is flat like Neil Young does.   

 

 

Edited February 3, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

9 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We will definitely be going from this to maskless real soon:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How much influence the Chinese have over these people indeed.....

 

 

 

Royal’s have a long history of cancelling the opposition in a very public setting.

 

When you factor in the turbulence that the young prince has seen in his life over the past few years—he’s in the family, he’s out of the family, he’s in England, he’s out of England, the Queen mum loves him, the Queen mum is angry with him—-Rogan better be damn happy they aren’t across the pond.  
 

If Harry didn’t proclaim “Off with his head!”, Meghan surely might. 

[LeviF]

How many times does this point need to be made: THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE OR WHAT IS FALSE.

 

The entire point is to manage information from the top-down. Where "experts" and "science" are defined by the government and their credentialist lackeys.

[Tiberius]

5 minutes ago, LeviF said:

How many times does this point need to be made: THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE OR WHAT IS FALSE.

 

The entire point is to manage information from the top-down. Where "experts" and "science" are defined by the government and their credentialist lackeys.

No, they just don't want people spewing lies on their platform. Seems pretty clear cut 

[LeviF]

Just now, Tiberius said:

No, they just don't want people spewing lies on their platform. Seems pretty clear cut 

 

That's not the "they" I was talking about. But you knew that.

 

If, as the reports suggest, the White House is leaning on Spotify to come down harder on Rogan, this is de facto state action and brings up first amendment issues. Same with Facebook, other big tech, etc. You can't plausibly suggest that these "private companies" would do this on their own when JRE is on, what, episode 1700? And received a $100M contract two years ago. 

 

Dr. Fauci has an open invitation, as does anyone else who wishes to platform the approved information regarding COVID, to go on JRE. Sanjay Gupta took up the invitation. They had a very pleasant conversation.

[Tiberius]

9 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

That's not the "they" I was talking about. But you knew that.

 

If, as the reports suggest, the White House is leaning on Spotify to come down harder on Rogan, this is de facto state action and brings up first amendment issues. Same with Facebook, other big tech, etc. You can't plausibly suggest that these "private companies" would do this on their own when JRE is on, what, episode 1700? And received a $100M contract two years ago. 

 

Dr. Fauci has an open invitation, as does anyone else who wishes to platform the approved information regarding COVID, to go on JRE. Sanjay Gupta took up the invitation. They had a very pleasant conversation.

WH can "lean" on anyone, like Conservatives do all the time. Conservatives  make a living attacking the media. But Biden "does" it, and the world is ending? 

[LeviF]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

WH can "lean" on anyone, like Conservatives do all the time. Conservatives  make a living attacking the media. But Biden "does" it, and the world is ending? 

 

Do you think there is a difference between publicly stating you think certain media conglomerates are against you and privately communicating with shot-callers at media companies regarding your preferences on their allowable content?

[Tiberius]

8 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

Do you think there is a difference between publicly stating you think certain media conglomerates are against you and privately communicating with shot-callers at media companies regarding your preferences on their allowable content?

The government is always communicating with media outlets. Are you against the FCC? Do you think media outlets can just say anything? 

[LeviF]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The government is always communicating with media outlets. Are you against the FCC? Do you think media outlets can just say anything? 

 

What does the FCC have jurisdiction over? 

[Orlando Tim]

38 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, they just don't want people spewing lies on their platform. Seems pretty clear cut 

So did ivermectin win a Nobel prize for use on humans against a virus? Anyone who repeated that was simply a horse dewormer is the liar. I ask a real question- they started a study to see how well it worked in July 2021 but still have not released results, why? Even inconclusive results would be useful.

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, LeviF said:

 

What does the FCC have jurisdiction over? 

So what happen to Rogan? Nothing? Just added a information link? 

[LeviF]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So what happen to Rogan? Nothing? Just added a information link? 

 

According to reports, that hasn't satisfied the White House. Which is what I was talking about to start with.

[Chef Jim]

On 2/2/2022 at 7:17 AM, Tiberius said:

They hate those that tell the truth. They hate those that attack lies. 

 

 

It's the right wing! 

And they REALLY hate those that oppose liberty.  
 

🙄

13 hours ago, 716er said:

We'll be masked forever, screamed one idiot to another.

 Correct 

 

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/02/02/oregon-health-authority-extends-masking-rule-in-schools/?outputType=amp

 

Who’s the idiot now?

50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, they just don't want people spewing lies on their platform. Seems pretty clear cut 

Are you for or against critical thinking? 

 

Methinks you have no idea what a lie really is. 
 

 

Edited February 3, 2022 by Chef Jim

[Tiberius]

11 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

According to reports, that hasn't satisfied the White House. Which is what I was talking about to start with.

Good old reports! 

[LeviF]

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Good old reports! 

 

lol a byproduct of a free press.

[B-Man]

 

Our Media Overlords Are Not Happy

 

 

FTA:

 

Something else Stelter and his ilk won’t mention is that in preferring to listen to people like Joe Rogan over blowhards like Don Lemon, it’s not so much the case that they necessarily “trust” Rogan. What they are hungry for are different points of view, which they don’t get much of at places like CNN and MSNBC.

 

As it turns out, people like listening to a variety of voices so they can form their own opinions rather than being spoon-fed opinions from people like Brian Stelter who are supposed to be objective reporters but at the end of the day come off like American versions of Baghdad Bob.

 

That more people are turning away from traditional sources of “news” is absolutely a good thing in this toxic climate where so-called “journalists” who have been entrusted with holding the government accountable turn out more often than not to be mouthpieces for that same government, to the exclusion of alternative points of view. As my colleague streiff observed in a recent piece:

 

It shows that critical thinking is alive and well in America. It shows that, as a nation, we aren’t willing to believe what the media power structure tells us without question. The day when more people believe Brian Stelter than any other random person on social media will be the day from which we can start the countdown to our national collapse.

 

‘Nuff said.

 

 

 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2022/02/03/our-media-overlords-are-not-happy-n516416

 

 

[Big Blitz]

Award-winning Spotify science podcast drops regular show to focus on countering misinformation spread by Joe Rogan and others on Spotify (because there isn't enough out there that actually does counter him which makes this not about "misinformation.")

 

The makers of an award-winning science podcast on Spotify say they're dropping their regular show amid the Joe Rogan COVID-19 misinformation row.

 

Wendy Zukerman and Blythe Terrell, respectively producer and editor of "Science Vs," say they'll now only make shows "intended to counteract misinformation being spread on Spotify."

 

Scientists, health professionals, and musicians including Neil Young and Joni Mitchell criticised Spotify after Rogan hosted a guest on his podcast who broadcast misinformation about COVID-19 measures. Rogan released a video on Sunday apologising to Spotify for the backlash it received as a result of his show.

 

In a letter sent to Spotify CEO Daniel Ek, published Monday, Terrell and Zukerman say Rogan's show left listeners with a "skewed and inaccurate" view of COVID-19 vaccines, adding: "Spotify has done little to address this."

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/award-winning-spotify-science-podcast-115551533.html

 

 

 

Excuse me, morons.  Spotify's job is to make money.  

 

It's the "public health" officials job and your doctor to advise you on vaccines.  

 

And despite Spotify's reluctance to play the role of doctors and scientist, most every corporate entity on the planet and government (Even President DeSantis in Florida) has advised on getting a vaccine - some (unlike President DeSantis) have tried to force you to get or you're fired.   

 

 

You would think after 2 plus years of this scourge against humanity, that the biggest thing to convince people to get the vaccine, would be mass death.  That everyone should personally know by now someone who died and are convinced this is definitely a threat.

 

No.  Instead, they've consumed all the data (not the news) and determined its not.

 

Most importantly, all these entities telling you to get it, from the beginning, have been lying (except President DeSantis).  They are proven liars and tyrants.  They deserve zero compliance now into year 3 of 15 days and once vaccinated no more masks - which is what they told the first experiments in the first 6 months of the roll out, vaccination would do.   

Edited February 3, 2022 by Big Blitz

[Big Blitz]

Omg.......this definitely needs a content advisory warning holy cow the lies - starting with the first f...ing sentence in the headline:

 

 

 

COVID boosters are the secret to getting back to normal. Why are Americans so resistant to them?

 

On Tuesday, Denmark lifted all of its remaining coronavirus restrictions — a moment that millions of Americans have been longing for, especially as the Omicron wave that began in December appears to be subsiding.

 

Denmark is an enticing vision of what could be. So is the U.K., where coronavirus safety measures were dispensed with in mid-January. But neither the president nor his top public health officials have been eager to signal an end to the emergency phase of the pandemic by lifting any remaining federal restrictions or softening safety recommendations (such as in-school masking). - weird I didn't think they could do that - and cool they admit they're "hard."  

 

The reason is simple, the challenge intractable: The fast-moving Omicron variant is still causing more than 2,500 U.S. deaths a day — (it is?  Or are these totals from weeks ago?)  and not nearly enough vulnerable Americans have received their booster shots to prevent the next serious variant from taking a similarly tragic toll.

 

So far, despite an endless supply of shots and months of easy access, barely a quarter of the U.S. population (27 percent) have received a booster — less than half the Danish (61 percent) or British (55 percent) rate.

 

Even among Americans who’ve already received their initial vaccine doses and are eligible for another, nearly 50 percent have yet to get a booster, which offers much greater protection against serious or critical COVID-19 illness than what continues to count for full vaccination (two doses of the mRNA vaccines manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, or a single Johnson & Johnson shot).

 

The result is practically unique to America, where vaccination rates are solid but booster rates are low: “A pandemic of the unboosted,” as Dr. Peter Hotez, an infectious-disease expert at Baylor College of Medicine, recently told the Financial Times.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/covid-boosters-are-the-secret-to-getting-back-to-normal-why-are-americans-so-resistant-to-them-213829920.html

 

 

 

Pandemic of the unboosted now!  

 

 

[Chef Jim]

7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So what happen to Rogan? Nothing? Just added a information link? 

 

Sigh......

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-rogan-experience-podcast-episodes-removed-spotify-2021-4

[Motorin']

6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Sigh......

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-rogan-experience-podcast-episodes-removed-spotify-2021-4

 

Spotify's not the arbiter of what Rogan can and cannot say. But they do seem to think they have the right to decide who gets to use their service based on what they believe. 

 

That's why I think the Court was wrong in it's ruling that a business can decide to deny services (like cake) based on beliefs.

 

Down the slippery slope we go. 

 

Next slip down, denial of service based on political party. 

 

[Buffarukus]

1 hour ago, Motorin' said:

 

Spotify's not the arbiter of what Rogan can and cannot say. But they do seem to think they have the right to decide who gets to use their service based on what they believe. 

 

That's why I think the Court was wrong in it's ruling that a business can decide to deny services (like cake) based on beliefs.

 

Down the slippery slope we go. 

 

Next slip down, denial of service based on political party. 

 

 

if the cake ordered was asked to be in the shape of a swaztica and the owners were jewish. should they have to bake it? honest answer? 

 

if joe rogans service is talking about subjects you disagree with do you have to listen to it?

 

there is a difference between forcing someone to PROVIDE a service and someone being forced to USE it...or in this case, not use it even if they want to.

 

i don't think spotify wants to remove anything. they are in self preservation mode trying to not give the paranhas anything to latch on to. i wish we weren't in a world view where simple conversation was deemed dangerous. the fact people have a issue he is talking to EXPERTS is pretty scary. after being wrong about so much for so long they still stand on a soapbox as the arbitrator of truth all with state backing. the fact the organizations he is directly competing with are at the for front of the attack. that should be a big red flag of which side they are on and their true intentions.

 

but these are two different issues. you cant create a slope with a example, just when you disagree with it and then talk about how slippery its gotten later on. refusal of service happens all the time for various reasons. you just don't mantle it because it was not shouted through a megaphone for a few months. i can name 100s you would agree with as its been happening long before a baker refused a cake. if you want a acctual example lets talk about refusal of service based on medical history that goes directly against actual LAW, not personal belief. HIPPA is a thing of the past and many love it and advocate it daily..even against children.

Edited February 4, 2022 by Buffarukus

[All_Pro_Bills]

18 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Award-winning Spotify science podcast drops regular show to focus on countering misinformation spread by Joe Rogan and others on Spotify (because there isn't enough out there that actually does counter him which makes this not about "misinformation.")

 

The makers of an award-winning science podcast on Spotify say they're dropping their regular show amid the Joe Rogan COVID-19 misinformation row.

 

Wendy Zukerman and Blythe Terrell, respectively producer and editor of "Science Vs," say they'll now only make shows "intended to counteract misinformation being spread on Spotify."

 

Scientists, health professionals, and musicians including Neil Young and Joni Mitchell criticised Spotify after Rogan hosted a guest on his podcast who broadcast misinformation about COVID-19 measures. Rogan released a video on Sunday apologising to Spotify for the backlash it received as a result of his show.

 

In a letter sent to Spotify CEO Daniel Ek, published Monday, Terrell and Zukerman say Rogan's show left listeners with a "skewed and inaccurate" view of COVID-19 vaccines, adding: "Spotify has done little to address this."

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/award-winning-spotify-science-podcast-115551533.html

 

 

 

Excuse me, morons.  Spotify's job is to make money.  

 

It's the "public health" officials job and your doctor to advise you on vaccines.  

 

And despite Spotify's reluctance to play the role of doctors and scientist, most every corporate entity on the planet and government (Even President DeSantis in Florida) has advised on getting a vaccine - some (unlike President DeSantis) have tried to force you to get or you're fired.   

 

 

You would think after 2 plus years of this scourge against humanity, that the biggest thing to convince people to get the vaccine, would be mass death.  That everyone should personally know by now someone who died and are convinced this is definitely a threat.

 

No.  Instead, they've consumed all the data (not the news) and determined its not.

 

Most importantly, all these entities telling you to get it, from the beginning, have been lying (except President DeSantis).  They are proven liars and tyrants.  They deserve zero compliance now into year 3 of 15 days and once vaccinated no more masks - which is what they told the first experiments in the first 6 months of the roll out, vaccination would do.   

If these folks that think Rogan's guests are spreading COVID misinformation then just get everyone together in a no hold barred debate of the specific topic where they and their experts come to the table and debate Rogan's expert guests and we get down to it all on the up and up and get all the facts straight on the topic without any interference from any censors or uninformed know-it-alls.  How simple is that?  Because right now it just looks to me like they're trying to protect the official narratives from scrutiny.  Thunderdome time.  Two narratives enter, one narrative leaves. 

Like Dr,. Malone suggests that vaccine induced creation of spike proteins have the potential to cause irreparable harm to functions and organs of the human body.  Don't tell me that's misinformation.  Prove to me he's wrong.  If they're right as the claim to be by urging censorship then it should be easy to prove.

 

My view: The bottom line is censorship advocates that claim to be looking out for the interests of the listen or viewer or the public by demanding conflicting views be silenced and stopped from spreading misinformation their real motive is to protect the messenger and the official narrative from criticism and scrutiny of the misinformation they're spreading.   

 

Edited February 4, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills