Jump to content

Tougher Roster or build a dome?


Hebert19

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Seriously?? By the time the stadium is built, there realistically might only be 4-5 guys still on the roster.  5 years is an eternity in the NFL.  

 

The one exception to that is QB's and Allen.  He could easily last 10 plus years.  Throwing QB's seem to making a comeback league wide so even after he's gone, could get another similar styled QB.  So a dome isn't such a bad idea IMO.  Actually was thinking a similar thing  yesterday during the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Parking this here as well as other threads. 

 

Josh allen qbr. 

 

2021 

Home rating - 85.8

Away rating - 99.4

 

2020

Home rating - 103

Away rating- 110.5

 

2019

Home rating - 76.9

Away rating - 92.6

 

I'm on dome bandwagon

Edited by Hebert19
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hebert19 said:

Parking this here as well as other threads. 

 

Josh allen qbr. 

 

2021 

Home qbr - 85.8

Away qbr - 99.4

 

2020

Home qbr - 103

Away qbr - 110.5

 

2019

Home qbr - 76.9

Away qbr - 92.6

 

I'm on dome bandwagon

The most predictive stat of team success in the NFL is team passer rating differential. What's the differential in the Bills home games during Allen's time here between the Bills and their opponents? That is truly all that matters. https://www.si.com/more-sports/2011/06/23/most-importantstatpasserratingdifferential 

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hebert19 said:

Parking this here as well as other threads. 

 

Josh allen qbr. 

 

2021 

Home rating - 85.8

Away rating - 99.4

 

2020

Home rating - 103

Away rating- 110.5

 

2019

Home rating - 76.9

Away rating - 92.6

 

I'm on dome bandwagon


If you want to get on the dome wagon,  you don’t compare Josh Allen’s performance in home vs. away games. You compare it in dome vs. non-dome games. 
 

For example, Miami doesn’t have a dome, and Josh routinely obliterates the Dolphins in that city. He also had fairly sublime games in Foxboro, Kansas City, and Tampa Bay. 
 

I’m not saying he wouldn’t play well in the dome…just that the data you cited don’t prove your point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WickedGame said:


If you want to get on the dome wagon,  you don’t compare Josh Allen’s performance in home vs. away games. You compare it in dome vs. non-dome games. 
 

For example, Miami doesn’t have a dome, and Josh routinely obliterates the Dolphins in that city. He also had fairly sublime games in Foxboro, Kansas City, and Tampa Bay. 
 

I’m not saying he wouldn’t play well in the dome…just that the data you cited don’t prove your point. 

Elements vs not.  Last 2 year in particular the home games weather has been *****. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills fans looking for a "tough" team---go watch the UFC.

 

I'll be here watching the Bills play competitively in NFL playoff games with their "soft" team...

 

...that can actually THROW THE F-ING BALL for the first time 30 years....and used that ability to get to the AFC Championship game last year.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nextmanup said:

Bills fans looking for a "tough" team---go watch the UFC.

 

I'll be here watching the Bills play competitively in NFL playoff games with their "soft" team...

 

...that can actually THROW THE F-ING BALL for the first time 30 years....and used that ability to get to the AFC Championship game last year.

 

 

I don't want a tough team.  I want the team to match the stadium.  If we want to throw 40+ times we need a dome.  If we want to be like indy or ravens then the colder and windier the better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2021 at 6:55 AM, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

I was jealous watching Herbert in LA last night in perfect weather conditions drop these dimes all night. 
 

i actually think Josh is great in bad weather— but how many drops did our receivers have yesterday? And the McKenzie fumble….

Nobody is good in bad weather. Especially elite qbs. The only advantage is if we had a mauler OL and D. Henry. I don't want to hear a peep when Josh struggles in the wind etc. Sometimes you get what you ask for.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Hebert19 said:

Parking this here as well as other threads. 

 

Josh allen qbr. 

 

2021 

Home qbr - 85.8

Away qbr - 99.4

 

2020

Home qbr - 103

Away qbr - 110.5

 

2019

Home qbr - 76.9

Away qbr - 92.6

 

I'm on dome bandwagon

Just did the math for 2021: the rating for opposing QBs in Buffalo in 2021 through 8 games is 60.9. The Bills have a massive positive rating differential of over 20 (you have to factor in sack yardage lost into team passer rating, so it'll be a little less than 85.8 for the Bills). Anyway, the differential is over 20. That is huge. With regard to Buffalo weather, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander: opponents have to play in it too. In 2020 and 2021, when Allen's rating became a thing, they will be 15-4 at home including the playoffs assuming they beat the Jets.  

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hebert19 said:

Elements vs not.  Last 2 year in particular the home games weather has been *****. 


I don’t think the evidence bears that out. Recency bias…the memory of the New England game and a less-than-stellar passing game one day ago…are at play here. 
 

In reality, Buffalo weather hasn’t been that brutal in recent years. Not to mention 75% of our home games are typically played before we even get to November. And if I recall, we played some playoff football in January last year without any weather-related problems. 
 

Does it snow in Buffalo? Sure. Is it cold and windy? Sure. But that’s true in Green Bay, KC, New England, and Cincy, too. Those cities have had productive QBs lately, if I recall.

 

Meanwhile, dome teams like the Lions, Saints, Falcons, and Texans are as abysmal as ever. 
 

We can survive the weather. You don’t build a multi-billion dollar stadium just because the current guy looks amazing in a dome, no more than I’d build a million dollar sunroom in my house because my wife looks hot in a bikini. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Nobody is good in bad weather. Especially elite qbs. The only advantage is if we had a mauler OL and D. Henry. I don't want to hear a peep when Josh struggles in the wind etc. Sometimes you get what you ask for.

The Bills' passing game is better in Buffalo weather than our opponents' passing game is. That's what matters.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2021 at 9:26 AM, Hebert19 said:

So this week might be a catalyst to see what we do next as am organization.  

 

We have a soft team...I think everyone agrees there and it showed yesterday. Soft as in undersized, and just not cut out for hard nosed football...so with this roster are we better in a dome?  

 

Good news is we get to see in 3 days.  What if we go out and look like our old selves Thursday and throw it all over the field.  1 game after getting embarrassed and playing sloppy in the elements...

 

So my question is like the chicken or egg debate.  Do we:

 

1.  Continue to build the greatest show on turf roster that is more speed focused than power...and cave on building a dome?

 

2.   Gut the roster and bring in some big bodies that can bully people come December and Jan in the elements of western New York.  

 

I honestly think this needs to be talked about when considering a new stadium.  What is the personality that we want to build and that is the stadium direction.  As of now...our roster is more dome and less western New York.  

how many more unique ways are we going to bring up this topic over and over again about the dome?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing discussed here not elsewhere.

 

Smaller stadium will help since there will be smaller surface area and those who do want to watch from outside can watch from home or bar.

9 minutes ago, WickedGame said:

We can survive the weather. You don’t build a multi-billion dollar stadium just because the current guy looks amazing in a dome, no more than I’d build a million dollar sunroom in my house because my wife looks hot in a bikini. 

 

If you can afford it and your wife looks hot in bikini and sunroom will help keep her looking that way do it.

 

The issue here is afford and nobody advocating dome has offered to pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Nothing discussed here not elsewhere.

 

Smaller stadium will help since there will be smaller surface area and those who do want to watch from outside can watch from home or bar.

 

If you can afford it and your wife looks hot in bikini and sunroom will help keep her looking that way do it.

 

The issue here is afford and nobody advocating dome has offered to pay for it.


Bingo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Governor said:

Where we screwed up was building a tweener roster around Josh. 
 

He would flourish with a bigger team and he’ll likely go to one a few years from now.

 

Very rarely will you see a poster actually use a photo of themself for their avatar photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2021 at 9:26 AM, Hebert19 said:

So this week might be a catalyst to see what we do next as am organization.  

 

We have a soft team...I think everyone agrees there and it showed yesterday. Soft as in undersized, and just not cut out for hard nosed football...so with this roster are we better in a dome?  

 

Good news is we get to see in 3 days.  What if we go out and look like our old selves Thursday and throw it all over the field.  1 game after getting embarrassed and playing sloppy in the elements...

 

So my question is like the chicken or egg debate.  Do we:

 

1.  Continue to build the greatest show on turf roster that is more speed focused than power...and cave on building a dome?

 

2.   Gut the roster and bring in some big bodies that can bully people come December and Jan in the elements of western New York.  

 

I honestly think this needs to be talked about when considering a new stadium.  What is the personality that we want to build and that is the stadium direction.  As of now...our roster is more dome and less western New York.  

Both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A dome in OP seems like the kind of graveyard that is the City of Niagara Falls in a nutshell.  The Turtle?  Wintergarden?  Rainbow Mall?  Why pay for ***** that you don't need?  If the Bills "need" to move to Austin or San Antonio, then let them.  Enough is enough with paying for ***** that doesn't make sense.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...