Jump to content

Trump's cult is mentally disturbed and must be stopped


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

He didn’t say he was right or good. He said he was smart. There’s a HUGE difference. Sheeesh

they just pick apart every word Trump says and use it out of context constantly.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doc said:


According to morans here, once you praise someone it's how you feel forever.  Be consistent, please.

 

People can change their mind. Trump has twice complimented Putin on his invasion. 

 

This isn't basketball where you tell the other guy, "nice shot," out of respect FFS. Take a look at the Churchill video. You seem to need a refresher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, John Adams said:

People can change their mind. Trump has twice complimented Putin on his invasion. 

 

This isn't basketball where you tell the other guy, "nice shot," out of respect FFS. Take a look at the Churchill video. You seem to need a refresher. 

 

At CPAC Trump called the invasion of Ukraine "appalling, an outrage and an atrocity."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beach said:

he called the move of declaring a portion of the Ukraine as independent genius

 

That was the beginning of the invasion, it wasn't his territory, it is Ukranian land. Then Trump doubled down on that after the barbaric onslaught began 

 

He's a traitor 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

He praised Putin as genius for invading another country. 

 

Hilarious to watch the DR shills turn themselves into pretzels defending Trump.

 

Why is it SO HARD for the cult to just acknowledge that Trump was subservient to Putin?  

 

66xeh7.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That was the beginning of the invasion, it wasn't his territory, it is Ukranian land. Then Trump doubled down on that after the barbaric onslaught began 

 

He's a traitor 

haha, Trump didnt say whose land it was.  He said what Putin declared it.  He didnt say he was right.  Every time i hear about these terrible things Trump has said i think "wow, thats terrible." then i go listen to the quote for myself and see how the media and you media puppets have twisted it.  

Congrats these sleezy moves are making myself and my gf (both left leaning) vote completely red for the past 2 years.  I dont want to vote Republican for the rest of my life, but i will until this madness stops.  We arent alone.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Hilarious to watch the DR shills turn themselves into pretzels defending Trump.

 

Why is it SO HARD for the cult to just acknowledge that Trump was subservient to Putin?  

 

66xeh7.jpg

 

 


This is 100% why I absolutely LOVE Donald Trump!  😂😂😂

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2022 at 1:01 PM, John Adams said:

 

I again contrast the approaches above. 

 

Perhaps praising a dictator who just started a war...praising him for starting the war...creates as you say, more than a hub-bub. 

 

 

Now do Trudeau's glowing admiration of China

 

 

 

These people (his American and European counterparts love them to) pose a greater threat to the West and freedom right now then Putin - who is most definitely a problem but adults like Trump held in check.  

 

We didn't vote to kill our energy independence and a government that would bring Russia and China closer together. 

 

But apparently 81 million people upset about Trump's tweets did.  

 

 

Carry on.  

 

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Hilarious to watch the DR shills turn themselves into pretzels defending Trump.

 

Why is it SO HARD for the cult to just acknowledge that Trump was subservient to Putin?  

 

66xeh7.jpg

 

 

So it’s your position that the enemy can’t be smart? And you believe this why? Is that what CNN tells you to think? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Now do Trudeau's glowing administration of China

 

 

 

These people (his American and European counterparts love them to) pose a greater threat to the West and freedom right now then Putin - who is most definitely a problem but adults like Trump held in check.  

 

We didn't vote to kill our energy independence and a government that would bring Russia and China closer together. 

 

But apparently 81 million people upset about Trump's tweets did.  

 

 

Carry on.  

 


Ok sure. Trudeau is an idiot and an embarrassment. 
 

I didn’t find that hard. But you can’t say a bad word about daddy. 

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

So it’s your position that the enemy can’t be smart? And you believe this why? Is that what CNN tells you to think? 


Not speaking for dipsh— Billstime, my position is that you don’t compliment a dictator on starting a war. 

Edited by John Adams
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, John Adams said:



Not speaking for dipsh— Billstime, my position is that you don’t compliment a dictator on starting a war. 

Trump has been trying to wake up the establishment for years.  They however  seem to prefer being asleep at the switch. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Trump has been trying to wake up the establishment for years.  They however  seem to prefer being asleep at the switch. 

 

The alternative was war with a nuclear power. 

 

A ***** choice. 

 

If you think the US should be independent from OPEC, Russia, and China, I can agree with the former two but good luck on the later. It doesn't even begin to be realistic. The world is complicated. Germany certainly would have done better to keep their nuclear reactors up but that wouldn't have kept them from sucking on Russia's petroleum tit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Her argument might have been a little stronger if she included more searing examples of praise for Putin, like the time Trump called him a “master tactician.” Wait, sorry. That was actually how The New York Times itself described the Russian president in mid-February. And also in October 2020.

 

But Tamkin could have mentioned the time Tucker Carlson said in a monologue that there was a legitimate argument as to “whether Mr. Putin’s grievances had bases in fact, whether the United States and its allies were too cavalier in expanding NATO, [and] whether Russia was justified in believing that its security was compromised.” My bad. That was also the Times on Feb. 23.

 

J.D. Vance definitely did say, though, that Putin was “the most influential human being on the planet,” and also described him as “brilliant.” Never mind, that was David Brooks, one of the Times’ marquee columnists.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

Her argument might have been a little stronger if she included more searing examples of praise for Putin, like the time Trump called him a “master tactician.” Wait, sorry. That was actually how The New York Times itself described the Russian president in mid-February. And also in October 2020.

 

But Tamkin could have mentioned the time Tucker Carlson said in a monologue that there was a legitimate argument as to “whether Mr. Putin’s grievances had bases in fact, whether the United States and its allies were too cavalier in expanding NATO, [and] whether Russia was justified in believing that its security was compromised.” My bad. That was also the Times on Feb. 23.

 

J.D. Vance definitely did say, though, that Putin was “the most influential human being on the planet,” and also described him as “brilliant.” Never mind, that was David Brooks, one of the Times’ marquee columnists.

 

 

 

Cool. Were those quotes from an ex president as Putin attacked cities?

 

Churchill complimented Hitler once. In 1935.

Edited by John Adams
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

When you're hanging out with the Clintons on Epstein's rape island, you are the establishment.  


Why go to all the way to the USVI when you can just go to Mar-a-Lago?

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886o2ptw49rqih26aiics

 

Idiots w absolutely zero foresight. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BillStime said:


DR working over time to save Putin’s reputation… useless idiots 

It was an interesting article with a lot of direct quotes that points out some pretty clear bias.   Did you read it?  Putin is a POS, but he isn't an idiot,  it's ok to admit that.

Edited by Tenhigh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John Adams said:

 

Cool. Were those quotes from an ex president as Putin attacked cities?

 

Churchill complimented Hitler once. In 1935.

 

So comments praising Putin from "the paper of record" as Putin saber rattles and aligns his troops on the Ukraine border is "cool."

 

An ex-President saying the exact same things days or weeks later is unconscionable. 

 

Got it.

 

There's living in someone's head rent free, there is paying someone to live in your head and then there's whatever the narcissistic,  blow hard orange man is doing in your head. It's friggin messy what he's doing in there and always hilarious to watch.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

So comments praising Putin from "the paper of record" as Putin saber rattles and aligns his troops on the Ukraine border is "cool."

 

No. They one quote from Feb. 23 is terrible. 

 

But they are also not ex-Presidents. See the difference? 

 

Can you link me to where you're critical of Tokyo Rose Tucker? I missed that. 

 

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

An ex-President saying the exact same things days or weeks later is unconscionable. 

 

Do you think an ex-President and some columnist are the same? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

No. They one quote from Feb. 23 is terrible. 

 

But they are also not ex-Presidents. See the difference? 

 

Can you link me to where you're critical of Tokyo Rose Tucker? I missed that. 

 

 

Do you think an ex-President and some columnist are the same? 

 

 

i understand that you are trying to frame the argument so that it makes sense.  It may make perfect sense to those suffering from TDS, but for the the rest of us honest folks it doesn't.  

 

Do you think media coverage and access by ex-presidents and other world leaders are the same in 1940 and 2022?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Do you think media coverage and access by ex-presidents and other world leaders are the same in 1940 and 2022?

 

 

No.

 

I found this quote from Kennedy about Khrushchev kind of alarming though. Right in the middle of the Cuban Missile crisis, Kennedy said,  "This is genius. How smart is that? And he’s going to go in and be a peacekeeper, that’s the strongest peace force."

 

Got that wrong, sorry. That was Lincoln talking about Jefferson Davis after Chancellorsville. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

 

Trump knew nothing of Ukraine, but got impeached for withholding aid for a short period of time.

 

I wonder if John Bolton ever saw a country on a map that he didn't want to bomb.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...