Combating imaginary racism with actual racism??

[Tiberius]

Quote

 

Colorado District Judge Natalie Chase has resigned after she admitted using a racial slur in front of court employees, voiced her opinion on racial issues from the bench and asked employees to do personal tasks for her during work hours.

The Colorado Supreme Court issued an order Friday in which it publicly censured Chase and accepted her resignation. According to the order, it stemmed from accounts from multiple court employees, cited in the order, given as part of an investigation by the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline.

 

The arrogance of racism. 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/us/colorado-judge-resigns-trnd/index.html

[T master]

38 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The arrogance of racism. 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/us/colorado-judge-resigns-trnd/index.html

 

I've done some of the same things with a couple of my black friends and asked why it's okay for a black person to use the N word but not white people they told me it was a term of some kind of endearment which I guess but it still makes no sense from a common sense stand point .

 

I think a lot is in the delivery ! I know i grew up listening and repeating the great Richard Prior my brother & i said it because he made us think in some way it was okay to say those type of things because it was freaking hilarious but i know if i repeated some of the things he said on his album titled for starters "That N**ers Crazy" album in front of a person of color it wouldn't be looked at the same .

 

Even if i used "ah" instead of "er" at the end i'm thinking it would be frowned upon (so i just don't use it period) and it would be thought to be used as a racist slur instead of what Mr. Prior showed me as a young person a piece of his comedy . Oh and Dave Chappell too just saying ! 

 

The only way i/we can understand is to ask questions which i think in some way might have been what this judge was trying to do but she should have done it on her own free time instead of being in her robe & on the clock for sure . 

 

Given todays sensitivity that surrounds life in general a lot more of these kind of things will probably happen when there may not have been any racially degrading type of intent meant in the conversation just a wanting to learn aspect but people today need to be very careful of the woke police listening because it can be very easily misconstrued as something other than the true content of the conversation .

 

 

[Tiberius]

4 minutes ago, T master said:

 

I've done some of the same things with a couple of my black friends and asked why it's okay for a black person to use the N word but not white people they told me it was a term of some kind of endearment which I guess but it still makes no sense from a common sense stand point .

 

I think a lot is in the delivery ! I know i grew up listening and repeating the great Richard Prior my brother & i said it because he made us think in some way it was okay to say those type of things because it was freaking hilarious but i know if i repeated some of the things he said on his album titled for starters "That N**ers Crazy" album in front of a person of color it wouldn't be looked at the same .

 

Even if i used "ah" instead of "er" at the end i'm thinking it would be frowned upon (so i just don't use it period) and it would be thought to be used as a racist slur instead of what Mr. Prior showed me as a young person a piece of his comedy . Oh and Dave Chappell too just saying ! 

 

The only way i/we can understand is to ask questions which i think in some way might have been what this judge was trying to do but she should have done it on her own free time instead of being in her robe & on the clock for sure . 

 

Given todays sensitivity that surrounds life in general a lot more of these kind of things will probably happen when there may not have been any racially degrading type of intent meant in the conversation just a wanting to learn aspect but people today need to be very careful of the woke police listening because it can be very easily misconstrued as something other than the true content of the conversation .

 

 

You don't think this is appropriate for a judge to be saying these things, correct? 

[T master]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

You don't think this is appropriate for a judge to be saying these things, correct? 

 

As i said in my post definitely not while she's in her robe & or on the clock but if on her own time she is trying to learn & understand some things i have no problem with it !!

 

Because she is IMHO trying to better understand something that most see as white people not being able to from that perspective . If you don't know you ask , as they say "there are no stupid questions just stupid answers" ... 

[Tiberius]

Just now, T master said:

 

As i said in my post definitely not while she's in her robe & or on the clock but if on her own time she is trying to learn & understand some things i have no problem with it !!

 

Because she is IMHO trying to better understand something that most see as white people not being able to from that perspective . If you don't know you ask , as they say "there are no stupid questions just stupid answers" ... 

If she corrected someone trying to explain BLM with a "All Lives Matter" comment, I would not trust her at all. That's just an attempt to ignore the issue and even make it look bad, IMO 

 

[T master]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

If she corrected someone trying to explain BLM with a "All Lives Matter" comment, I would not trust her at all. That's just an attempt to ignore the issue and even make it look bad, IMO 

 

 

Maybe if she corrected some one and tried to make her opinion over theirs then i could see it being not real smart ? And Do not all lives matter ? Just asking

 

We are all created in the image of god so i would think we all matter especially to him and those who love us no matter our skin color . We all need to get along and unite against any kind of racism going either way .

[Tiberius]

2 hours ago, T master said:

 

Maybe if she corrected some one and tried to make her opinion over theirs then i could see it being not real smart ? And Do not all lives matter ? Just asking

 

We are all created in the image of god so i would think we all matter especially to him and those who love us no matter our skin color . We all need to get along and unite against any kind of racism going either way .

Yes, but when some people obviously think that Black lives do not matter, you are fighting to say they are wrong, and thus, Black Lives Matter. To throw "ALM" as a reply, is to basically deny the main point 

[Chef Jim]

7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

The arrogance of racism. 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/us/colorado-judge-resigns-trnd/index.html

 

Let's do a little exercise.  

 

What is her political affiliation?  I know judges are supposed to be impartial but I googled her and didn't see Democrat/Libera/Republican/Conservative anywhere.  I wonder if that makes her liberal? 

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, but when some people obviously think that Black lives do not matter, you are fighting to say they are wrong, and thus, Black Lives Matter. To throw "ALM" as a reply, is to basically deny the main point 

 

What is the main point of saying Black Lives Matter?  

[T master]

20 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, but when some people obviously think that Black lives do not matter, you are fighting to say they are wrong, and thus, Black Lives Matter. To throw "ALM" as a reply, is to basically deny the main point 

 

There are those ignorant people walking around unfortunately and their rights are the same as you & I which some times is very hard to swallow !! 

 

But by using BLM it automatically involves 1 & only 1 race which could be taken by some to be racist in it self then there are those that say only some BLM because of publicity purposes . Why not have the heading  ABLM ? 

 

https://www.carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/opinions/letters_to_editor/article_ac4de5a0-c1ea-11ea-8a4b-8f0af5982cba.html

 

ALM means there is no racist content or racism in the statement or 1 race put before another because All Lives (Do) Matter in fact !!

 

And no one race or person is considered higher or better than another to God we are all created in his image and his son died to forgive us all of our sins not just 1 particular race or ethnicity we are all covered under his blood  🙌 !! 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

SEGREGATION NOW,

SEGREGATION TOMORROW,

SEGREGATION FOREVER! 

 

‘Student success’ conference at Michigan State to segregate participants by skin color.

 https://www.thecollegefix.com/student-success-conference-at-michigan-state-to-segregate-participants-by-skin-color/

[Tiberius]

On 4/19/2021 at 10:52 AM, B-Man said:

Wow, B-man dismissing racism as not a problem, imagine that. 

 

 

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Wow, B-man dismissing racism as not a problem, imagine that. 

 

 

 

Wow, Tiberius misunderstanding a second grade level political cartoon.............imagine that.

 

 

[Tiberius]

3 hours ago, T master said:

 

There are those ignorant people walking around unfortunately and their rights are the same as you & I which some times is very hard to swallow !! 

 

But by using BLM it automatically involves 1 & only 1 race which could be taken by some to be racist in it self then there are those that say only some BLM because of publicity purposes . Why not have the heading  ABLM ? 

 

https://www.carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/opinions/letters_to_editor/article_ac4de5a0-c1ea-11ea-8a4b-8f0af5982cba.html

 

ALM means there is no racist content or racism in the statement or 1 race put before another because All Lives (Do) Matter in fact !!

 

And no one race or person is considered higher or better than another to God we are all created in his image and his son died to forgive us all of our sins not just 1 particular race or ethnicity we are all covered under his blood  🙌 !! 

 

 

Obviously many people don’t think black lives matter. Tons of right wingers are upset that Chauvin is even being held accountable....for not thinking a black persons life mattered. 

 

Yes, racism is a big problem in our country 

Just now, B-Man said:

 

Wow, Tiberius misunderstanding a second grade level political cartoon.............imagine that.

 

 

First off, thanks for admitt8ng the junk you post is second grade level garbage, secondly I understand it and you. 

 

Still angry that Chauvin got punished for something you saw as not a crime? 

[B-Man]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

First off, thanks for admitt8ng the junk you post is second grade level garbage, secondly I understand it and you. 

 

Still angry that Chauvin got punished for something you saw as not a crime? 

 

It is a a simplistic cartoon, you missed it's point for all to see..................

 

and you have demonstrated ad nauseam that you have no clue to understanding others

 

You are just thrilled that someone responded to you.............your only goal in life.

 

😄

[Tiberius]

24 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

It is a a simplistic cartoon, you missed it's point for all to see..................

 

and you have demonstrated ad nauseam that you have no clue to understanding others

 

You are just thrilled that someone responded to you.............your only goal in life.

 

😄

Everything you post is simplistic and stupid. 

 

Again, are you still angry that Chauvin is guilty of murder? 

[All_Pro_Bills]

5 hours ago, T master said:

 

There are those ignorant people walking around unfortunately and their rights are the same as you & I which some times is very hard to swallow !! 

 

But by using BLM it automatically involves 1 & only 1 race which could be taken by some to be racist in it self then there are those that say only some BLM because of publicity purposes . Why not have the heading  ABLM ? 

 

https://www.carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/opinions/letters_to_editor/article_ac4de5a0-c1ea-11ea-8a4b-8f0af5982cba.html

 

ALM means there is no racist content or racism in the statement or 1 race put before another because All Lives (Do) Matter in fact !!

 

And no one race or person is considered higher or better than another to God we are all created in his image and his son died to forgive us all of our sins not just 1 particular race or ethnicity we are all covered under his blood  🙌 !! 

 

 

For me its a little simplistic when I hear people saying black lives matter or all lives matter.  Because its a general statement that needs some qualification.  

 

My personal perspective is I believe black and all lives matter of people like school teachers, nurses, people of all races that treat others in a civil manner, people that respect the rights of others, all law abiding and honest citizens, people that are constructive and not destructive, and people of all races and demographics that have virtue and integrity. 

 

But I don't care much about the lives of people like murderers, rapists, sexual predators and other undesirables that cause harm to other people no matter what color they are. 

 

So to me ALM and BLM but I've got some people I'd exclude from that belief.  If somebody takes exception to my exceptions that okay but that's how I feel.         

Edited April 21, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills

[Chef Jim]

5 hours ago, T master said:

 

There are those ignorant people walking around unfortunately and their rights are the same as you & I which some times is very hard to swallow !! 

 

But by using BLM it automatically involves 1 & only 1 race which could be taken by some to be racist in it self then there are those that say only some BLM because of publicity purposes . Why not have the heading  ABLM ? 

 

https://www.carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/opinions/letters_to_editor/article_ac4de5a0-c1ea-11ea-8a4b-8f0af5982cba.html

 

ALM means there is no racist content or racism in the statement or 1 race put before another because All Lives (Do) Matter in fact !!

 

And no one race or person is considered higher or better than another to God we are all created in his image and his son died to forgive us all of our sins not just 1 particular race or ethnicity we are all covered under his blood  🙌 !! 

 

 

 

Black Lives Matter was never meant to be that they matter any more than any other lives matter.  The original intention of Blacks Lives Matter was this.  Black lives matter.  Stop treating them as if they don't.  Why they don't message it this way is beyond me. 

[B-Man]

 

 

LeBron James’ ‘you’re next’ tweet about officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant got deleted (but here it is).

 

 

 

UPDATE: Impressive ratio for LeBron, before his tweet was deleted:

 

[Unforgiven]

23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

LeBron James’ ‘you’re next’ tweet about officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant got deleted (but here it is).

 

 

 

UPDATE: Impressive ratio for LeBron, before his tweet was deleted:

 

   Not one person would blink or notice this if this girl was white.

Wouldn't be a story outside of local.

media and lefties stoking the flames of hatred, they need the 

excuse to riot.

 

[Billznut]

Shocker Lebron being a moron, spouting off before educating himself on the facts. 

[Chef Jim]

 

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

LeBron James’ ‘you’re next’ tweet about officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant got deleted (but here it is).

 

 

 

UPDATE: Impressive ratio for LeBron, before his tweet was deleted:

 

 

Did he have to shoot her?  I don't know but for God's sake the cops are there but you continue to kick someone (I know she didn't kick that girl the guy did) and brandish a knife?  WTF is wrong with people with that much hate?

Edited April 22, 2021 by Chef Jim

[Orlando Tim]

7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Wow, B-man dismissing racism as not a problem, imagine that. 

 

 

Wow tibs blaming all the world's problems on white people. You must be a terrible person to believe such a thing.

[BillStime]

Why is this acceptable?

 

 

[B-Man]

22 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why is this acceptable?

 

 

Because it is not the truth.

 

It is written in such a slanted manner you have to lay down to read it.

 

Protecting citizens who are trapped in cars by rioters/protesters, shielding them from punishment or lawsuits,

 

is presented as an open season on pedestrians.

 

It would be funny if it wasn't more BillZtime trash.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

26 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Because it is not the truth.

 

It is written in such a slanted manner you have to lay down to read it.

 

Protecting citizens who are trapped in cars by rioters/protesters, shielding them from punishment or lawsuits,

 

is presented as an open season on pedestrians.

 

It would be funny if it wasn't more BillZtime trash.

 

 

 

Not true? Oh ok Bonnie.

 

HB 1674

 

“A motor vehicle operator who unintentionally causes injury or death to an individual shall not be criminally or civilly liable for the injury or death, if […] the injury or death of the individual occurred while the motor vehicle operator was fleeing from a riot […] under a reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor vehicle operator from serious injury or death.”

 

Iowa

 

Eliminating liability for drivers who hit protesters: The bill would grant civil immunity to drivers of vehicles who injure someone who is blocking traffic while engaging in disorderly conduct or participating in a protest, demonstration, riot or unlawful assembly without a permit. The driver must be exercising "due care" at the time and not engaging in "reckless or willful misconduct." 

[Big Blitz]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

Why is this acceptable?

 

 

 

 

Because anyone that gets within 6 feet of you and your car has put grandma at risk.  

[Big Blitz]

This is correct.  I've been saying they want this country run like China since the Great Peaceful Protest Revolutions of Summer 2020.

 

Indefinite Covid gets us there.  This is all just a distraction. 

 

 

 

 

 

Big facts.

Edited April 22, 2021 by Big Blitz

[B-Man]

18 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Not true? Oh ok Bonnie.

 

HB 1674

“A motor vehicle operator who unintentionally causes injury or death to an individual shall not be criminally or civilly liable for the injury or death, if […] the injury or death of the individual occurred while the motor vehicle operator was fleeing from a riot […] under a reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor vehicle operator from serious injury or death.”

 

Iowa

Eliminating liability for drivers who hit protesters: The bill would grant civil immunity to drivers of vehicles who injure someone who is blocking traffic while engaging in disorderly conduct or participating in a protest, demonstration, riot or unlawful assembly without a permit. The driver must be exercising "due care" at the time and not engaging in "reckless or willful misconduct." 

 

 

Thanks BillZy

 

EXACTLY what I said

 

46 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Protecting citizens who are trapped in cars by rioters/protesters, shielding them from punishment or lawsuits,

 

is presented as an open season on pedestrians.

 

It would be funny if it wasn't more BillZtime trash.

 

 

Edited April 22, 2021 by B-Man

[BillStime]

13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Thanks BillZy

 

EXACTLY what I said

 

 

 

Protestors are going to get killed and you’re going to cheer/defend the driver.

 

You have a horrific track record here Bonnie.

 

Be best

[Royale with Cheese]

Pretty stupid tweet "King" James.  I guess that girl who was about to get stabbed and probably murdered....her life didn't matter.  Only the life of the black girl shot by the white cop.

 

What if the cop didn't shoot Ma'Khia and she ended up killing the other girl?  What would you have tweeted then Le'Bron?

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Pretty stupid tweet "King" James.  I guess that girl who was about to get stabbed and probably murdered....her life didn't matter.  Only the life of the black girl shot by the white cop.

 

What if the cop didn't shoot Ma'Khia and she ended up killing the other girl?  What would you have tweeted then Le'Bron?

 

He wouldn't have commented and the the story would be buried on the back-page and the media wouldn't make a big deal about it. 

 

Here's where all this is headed and why its headed that way.  Local law enforcement is one of the last institutions or organizations the liberal left does not control.  So they whip up the hysteria level via their media comrades and other voices at every opportunity.  This is leading to calls for "reform".  And the reform they're looking for is to enact "Federal" oversight and control over local police departments.  Once done they will complete their FUBAR exercise of driving our country into 3rd world nation economic and social classification and then hand out surplus Mao cultural revolution outfits purchased from China at a discount since they no longer use them.     

[Royale with Cheese]

9 hours ago, BillStime said:

Protestors are going to get killed and you’re going to cheer/defend the driver.

 

You have a horrific track record here Bonnie.

 

Be best

 

But at the same time, drivers had to protect themselves as well.

 

A friend of mine was driving a car last summer and was at a stop light.  Next thing she knows, a cinder block was thrown at her windshield.  

Then these protesters were trying to open her car door but it was locked....she sped off.  She didn't hit anyone but if the scene had gotten worse, I think she has every right to forcefully drive to her safety.

[Royale with Cheese]

 

WTF

[BillStime]

40 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

But at the same time, drivers had to protect themselves as well.

 

A friend of mine was driving a car last summer and was at a stop light.  Next thing she knows, a cinder block was thrown at her windshield.  

Then these protesters were trying to open her car door but it was locked....she sped off.  She didn't hit anyone but if the scene had gotten worse, I think she has every right to forcefully drive to her safety.

 

Cute story bro. 

 

One word:

 

CHARLOTTESVILLE

 

 

[Royale with Cheese]

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Cute story bro. 

 

One word:

 

CHARLOTTESVILLE

 

 

Yes, that driver deserves the hardest punishment.

 

But are you saying since Charlottesville happened, even if a driver is in immediate danger, they can’t drive off?

 

If I’m in my truck and I have protesters breaking my windows and trying to get inside, I’m driving off.  That’s just common sense.

Edited April 22, 2021 by Royale with Cheese

[SoCal Deek]

10 hours ago, BillStime said:

Not true? Oh ok Bonnie.

 

HB 1674

 

“A motor vehicle operator who unintentionally causes injury or death to an individual shall not be criminally or civilly liable for the injury or death, if […] the injury or death of the individual occurred while the motor vehicle operator was fleeing from a riot […] under a reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor vehicle operator from serious injury or death.”

 

Iowa

 

Eliminating liability for drivers who hit protesters: The bill would grant civil immunity to drivers of vehicles who injure someone who is blocking traffic while engaging in disorderly conduct or participating in a protest, demonstration, riot or unlawful assembly without a permit. The driver must be exercising "due care" at the time and not engaging in "reckless or willful misconduct." 

I honestly can’t believe you would post THESE two laws in support of your ridiculous theory. If you’d slow down and read it’s clear that the authors of these laws purposely inserted specific language to refute your ridiculous position. Geez man....read the dang words! 

[Royale with Cheese]

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I honestly can’t believe you would post THESE two laws in support of your ridiculous theory. If you’d slow down and read it’s clear that the authors of these laws purposely inserted specific language to refute your ridiculous position. Geez man....read the dang words! 

 

[BillStime]

12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I honestly can’t believe you would post THESE two laws in support of your ridiculous theory. If you’d slow down and read it’s clear that the authors of these laws purposely inserted specific language to refute your ridiculous position. Geez man....read the dang words! 

 

Nut jobs aren't going to read the bill - they're going to read the headlines - and think they can run over anyone they want.

 

These laws are pathetic and dangerous.

 

But of course, we have the right wing nut jobs finding a way to justify these new laws when there are NO DOUBT laws on the books that protect these situations... but these laws are nothing more to suppress opposition voices.

 

Sick phks.

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

Nut jobs aren't going to read the bill - they're going to read the headlines - and think they can run over anyone they want.

 

These laws are pathetic and dangerous.

 

But of course, we have the right wing nut jobs finding a way to justify these new laws when there are NO DOUBT laws on the books that protect these situations... but these laws are nothing more to suppress opposition voices.

 

Sick phks.

You’ve lost your mind. You’re reading way more into this than there actually is. You can’t honestly set your hair on fire about everything every day...or can you? 

[wnyguy]

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Nut jobs aren't going to read the bill - they're going to read the headlines - and think they can run over anyone they want.

 

These laws are pathetic and dangerous.

 

But of course, we have the right wing nut jobs finding a way to justify these new laws when there are NO DOUBT laws on the books that protect these situations... but these laws are nothing more to suppress opposition voices.

 

Sick phks.

You should probably read the actual article that you link before you link it and ask yourself "Does this article support my crazy liberal viewpoint?"  If it does not it's probably not a good idea to post the link and prove how much of a misguided moron you are.

 

Be Best