Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

No need, John.

 

Joe can reference Trump lawyer's six-step plan for Kamala to overturn the election. See, with Eastman's memo; there was no need for Trump to incite an insurrection, tell his mob to storm the Capitol and cause all this needless death and injuries. All he had to do was follow the founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence memo and Trump would still be POTUS.

 

What could go wrong?

 

 

 

5svxwu.jpg

 

 

LMAO

 

Yes, it's funny how many times I need to say it.   You want people to stop (allegedly) lying, don't justify/excuse it when your own party does it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump already appealed (SHOCKER)...

 

Trump's position that he may override the express will of the executive branch appears to be premised on the notion that his executive power ‘exists in perpetuity.' But presidents are not kings, and plaintiff is not president.”

 

ouch

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How nice, an ultimatum threatening some  more insurrection. No worries it’s the good kind

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/black-lives-matter-activists-threaten-riots-if-mayor-elect-eric-adams-reinstates-controversial-nypd-anti-crime-units/ar-AAQywKu

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Shocked 1
  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Eric Adams, soon to be named by MSNBC's Joy Reid as the next Black White Supremacist.    

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With long prison sentences being handed out to the rioters its only a matter of time before the House Committee investigating this assault on our democracy hands its evidence of the conspiracy behind the assault over to the DOJ for prosecution of the leaders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump's own CIA Director: 'We Are On the Way to a Right-wing Coup'

 

"Milley was taken aback by the prospect of such an unprecedented action, afraid that he was witnessing the unfolding of a coup. CIA Director Gina Haspel, who also expected to be fired, shared his fear. “We are on the way to a right-wing coup.”

 

https://www.newsweek.com/we-are-way-right-wing-coup-cia-director-privately-warned-1647538

 

road-jan-6-final.webp?w=1280&h=603&f=78c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Is that fear I smell?

 

 

 

Just another piece to the puzzle.

 

Trump's own people... acknowledging exactly what precipitated.

 

Yeah.  The same fear I had the 20 other times I (or others) said "so now they got him?" :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BillStime said:

I never said "Now we got em"

 

That's all you freaks trying to dismiss the mounds of evidence against your keeper.

 

There's no evidence.  Unless/until they can find where Trump told them to enter the Capitol, and there won't be, it's all feelz.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Did I miss something? Is there a video or audio tape of Trump telling those numbskulls to enter the Capitol? If not, to quote Hilary: “What difference does it make?”
 

Was he communicating telepathically?

 

I'm sure Adam Schiff has it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the President of the United States somehow communicated with thousands of people on some sort of a private hotline?  Was someone selling those on Amazon? And the only place the Commission can look for these communications is in the private documents of the Executive Office?  Really?  There is no record of them on the receiving end of the communications? 

Or, could it be that this is nothing more than a fishing expedition trying to dig up dirt on a political opponent?  Wait a minute....isn't that EXACTLY what Trump was accused of doing in the infamous Ukraine phone call?  Or does the impeachable offense only apply when it's a republican?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So the President of the United States somehow communicated with thousands of people on some sort of a private hotline?  Was someone selling those on Amazon? And the only place the Commission can look for these communications is in the private documents of the Executive Office?  Really?  There is no record of them on the receiving end of the communications? 

Or, could it be that this is nothing more than a fishing expedition trying to dig up dirt on a political opponent?  Wait a minute....isn't that EXACTLY what Trump was accused of doing in the infamous Ukraine phone call?  Or does the impeachable offense only apply when it's a republican?


Oh sunshine - what happened at the actual Capitol with Trumps mob was just one small piece of a much larger puzzle associated with 1/6.

 

Put your seatbelt on and enjoy the ride. 
 


 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Oh sunshine - what happened at the actual Capitol with Trumps mob was just one small piece of a much larger puzzle associated with 1/6.

 

Put your seatbelt on and enjoy the ride. 
 


 

 

Okie Dokie sounds like fun. 
By the way, what color are the pills you’re taking? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How revealing that some posters here are continually saying that Ashli Babbitt (who was unarmed) deserved to be murdered.

 

 

and the same people say Kyle Rittenhouse did not have the right to shoot Grosskreutz when he was threatening him with a gun.

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

19 hours ago, Tiberius said:

With long prison sentences being handed out to the rioters its only a matter of time before the House Committee investigating this assault on our democracy hands its evidence of the conspiracy behind the assault over to the DOJ for prosecution of the leaders

This statement is representative of the lefts mindset.  Liberals that advocate for de-fund the police, prison and sentencing reform, SWAT teams dragging their political enemies out of their homes at 3 AM with media present to record the event, and advocate for changes in the criminal justice system for rapists, murders, and other criminals while applauding the militarization of the Capitol area have no issue with long sentences and weaponizing the criminal justice system when it comes to punishing their real or perceived political enemies.  The message the left is sending is you can rape, murder, and commit other crimes against people and property and we will fight for you to get off easy but don't oppose our political program and ideology or we'll bring down the hammer on you.  Obey and comply with our agenda. 

Remember this next time you hear or read about some goofball fringe nut job reciting the scripture about the unfairness of the criminal justice system.

  • Agree 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tiberius said:

With long prison sentences being handed out to the rioters its only a matter of time before the House Committee investigating this assault on our democracy hands its evidence of the conspiracy behind the assault over to the DOJ for prosecution of the leaders

While this is no time in our history for run on sentences, nothing feels more like integrity than a partisan political tribunal setting the table for a partisan criminal investigation. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

This statement is representative of the lefts mindset.  Liberals that advocate for de-fund the police, prison and sentencing reform, SWAT teams dragging their political enemies out of their homes at 3 AM with media present to record the event, and advocate for changes in the criminal justice system for rapists, murders, and other criminals while applauding the militarization of the Capitol area have no issue with long sentences and weaponizing the criminal justice system when it comes to punishing their real or perceived political enemies.  The message the left is sending is you can rape, murder, and commit other crimes against people and property and we will fight for you to get off easy but don't oppose our political program and ideology or we'll bring down the hammer on you.  Obey and comply with our agenda. 

Remember this next time you hear or read about some goofball fringe nut job reciting the scripture about the unfairness of the criminal justice system.

 

Dems being hypocrites?  Say it ain't so!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

While this is no time in our history for run on sentences, nothing feels more like integrity than a partisan political tribunal setting the table for a partisan criminal investigation. 

Inciting a riot is a crime. 

3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

This statement is representative of the lefts mindset.  Liberals that advocate for de-fund the police, prison and sentencing reform, SWAT teams dragging their political enemies out of their homes at 3 AM with media present to record the event, and advocate for changes in the criminal justice system for rapists, murders, and other criminals while applauding the militarization of the Capitol area have no issue with long sentences and weaponizing the criminal justice system when it comes to punishing their real or perceived political enemies.  The message the left is sending is you can rape, murder, and commit other crimes against people and property and we will fight for you to get off easy but don't oppose our political program and ideology or we'll bring down the hammer on you.  Obey and comply with our agenda. 

Remember this next time you hear or read about some goofball fringe nut job reciting the scripture about the unfairness of the criminal justice system.

No, inciting a riot is a crime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Inciting a riot is a crime. 

No, inciting a riot is a crime. 

 

Who incited it?  That's the question.  The protestors were protesting peacefully and patriotically for quite awhile, like Trump asked them to do, until something changed and they decided to break into the Capitol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You're advocating for a(nother) crime against democracy. 

 

You already got your balls slapped around for believing in RUSSIA©, THE MUSICAL sponsored by The Real D, why do you keep letting them humiliate you like this?  

 

Riots are not democracy. You people are just the stuff criminal tyrants love. Go kiss his feat and bow down to your criminal masters. 

 

Democracy will conquer you! You are losing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Who incited it?  That's the question.  The protestors were protesting peacefully and patriotically for quite awhile, like Trump asked them to do, until something changed and they decided to break into the Capitol.  

Trump 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Inciting a riot is a crime. 

No, inciting a riot is a crime. 

Inciting a riot is a crime.

 

Bringing that up doesn't justify or excuse the Democrats weaponizing the mechanisms of government for political purposes.  Specifically to use it for the persecution and punishment of their political enemies with a passion for maximum sentences for mostly petty charges.  Make no mistake.  That is what's driving this 1/6 investigation. 

How else would you explain a political class that has no interest in law and order, advocating instead de-funding police, zero bail arrangements, dismantling the prison system, and other anti-law enforcement initiative and ideas, having such a great obsession for law and order when it comes to this one situation?  A political event gone bad.  Are we expected to believe the members of the committee who embrace holding suspects indefinitely without bail and in confinement on misdemeanor charges would endorse and support no bail and solitary confinement for a similar situation of a suspect accused of criminal trespass at the local WalMart?

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Inciting a riot is a crime.

 

Bringing that up doesn't justify or excuse the Democrats weaponizing the mechanisms of government for political purposes.  Specifically to use it for the persecution and punishment of their political enemies with a passion for maximum sentences for mostly petty charges.  Make no mistake.  That is what's driving this 1/6 investigation. 

How else would you explain a political class that has no interest in law and order, advocating instead de-funding police, zero bail arrangements, dismantling the prison system, and other anti-law enforcement initiative and ideas, having such a great obsession for law and order when it comes to this one situation?  A political event gone bad.  Are we expected to believe the members of the committee who embrace holding suspects indefinitely without bail and in confinement on misdemeanor charges would endorse and support no bail and solitary confinement for a similar situation of a suspect accused of criminal trespass at the local WalMart?

Not weaponizing, it's going after a criminal. That's what government is suppose to do. You people don't deserve to live in this great country. You people are parasites 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...