Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

Judge to Capitol riot defendant: 'Patriotism is loyalty to country, loyalty to the Constitution'

 

A federal judge rejected the argument that US Capitol rioters held in jail are being prosecuted for their political views and disavowed attempts to downplay the magnitude of the deadly insurrection during a sentencing on Wednesday.

 

"You called yourself and everyone else patriots, but that's not patriotism," Judge Amy Berman Jackson said of defendant Karl Dresch. "Patriotism is loyalty to country, loyalty to the Constitution, not loyalty to a head of state. That is the tyranny we rejected on July 4."

 

Jackson, known for her sharp criticism of the Trump administration's moves, called Dresch an "enthusiastic participant" in the effort "to subvert democracy, to stop the will of the people and replace it with the will of the mob."

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/04/politics/amy-berman-jackson-capitol-riot-defendant-patriotism/index.html

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

INSURRECTION! 

 

 

 

 

 


Republicans: laws matter enforce them!!!!

Republicans: Wait not against us!!!

 

I’m copying and pasting your post to show how single minded the sheeple Republicans are:

 

As D.C. Murder Rate Soars,

 

(this is a whataboutism. It’s a classic R strategy. Literally the DC murder rates are meaningless here. It’s a hey! What about this thing that doesn’t matter to the issue I’m talking about!!)

 

FBI Arrests Jan. 6 Protester Who Spent 17 Minutes in the Capitol, Mostly Snapping Selfies.

 

Did he break the law? Yes or no? Yes he did. He’s also a Republican so he’s an idiot and documented himself breaking the law.

 

Dont want to be in jail? Don’t break the law.

 

Ill also chime in because I’m assuming your next post will be about rioters from BML. Who cares. This dude broke the law. This is the guy we’re discussing since you. And only you brought him up.

 

I really hope you aren’t blue lives matter if you’re supporting people breaking the law like this. If you are you should probably take the flag off your truck and / or jeep.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Republicans: laws matter enforce them!!!!

Republicans: Wait not against us!!!

 

I’m copying and pasting your post to show how single minded the sheeple Republicans are:

 

As D.C. Murder Rate Soars,

 

(this is a whataboutism. It’s a classic R strategy. Literally the DC murder rates are meaningless here. It’s a hey! What about this thing that doesn’t matter to the issue I’m talking about!!)

 

FBI Arrests Jan. 6 Protester Who Spent 17 Minutes in the Capitol, Mostly Snapping Selfies.

 

Did he break the law? Yes or no? Yes he did. He’s also a Republican so he’s an idiot and documented himself breaking the law.

 

Dont want to be in jail? Don’t break the law.

 

Ill also chime in because I’m assuming your next post will be about rioters from BML. Who cares. This dude broke the law. This is the guy we’re discussing since you. And only you brought him up.

 

I really hope you aren’t blue lives matter if you’re supporting people breaking the law like this. If you are you should probably take the flag off your truck and / or jeep.

 

What law did the protestor in B-Man's post break? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

What law did the protestor in B-Man's post break? 

You can look at what he was charged with. He left it really wide open on who it was. But looking at arrests and when B Man posted his spam, it’s probably Glenn Allen Brooks. Good write up:

 

Charges

Entering and remaining and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted bulding; disorderly conduct and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol buildling.

What happened

A member of a church prayer group reported Brooks to the FBI, after Brooks shared photos of himself inside the Capitol and boasted of his participation. The FBI matched a surveillance photo of Brooks arriving at his home to surveillance footage from inside the Capitol. He wore a red jacket and a knit cap with the word "Trump" on the front.
 

are those not laws? I doubt you’re an attorney, but to give you a little hint on how the justice system works, it’s super hard to charge someone with something that’s not a

law.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:

You can look at what he was charged with. He left it really wide open on who it was. But looking at arrests and when B Man posted his spam, it’s probably Glenn Allen Brooks. Good write up:

 

Charges

Entering and remaining and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted bulding; disorderly conduct and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol buildling.

What happened

A member of a church prayer group reported Brooks to the FBI, after Brooks shared photos of himself inside the Capitol and boasted of his participation. The FBI matched a surveillance photo of Brooks arriving at his home to surveillance footage from inside the Capitol. He wore a red jacket and a knit cap with the word "Trump" on the front.
 

are those not laws? I doubt you’re an attorney, but to give you a little hint on how the justice system works, it’s super hard to charge someone with something that’s not a

law.

 

 

 

Assume much?  It's not very becoming. 

 

You've gone to an awful lot of trouble responding to spam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Assume much?  It's not very becoming. 

 

You've gone to an awful lot of trouble responding to spam.  


Your question: what laws did he break.

 

Response: 

Charges

Entering and remaining and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted bulding; disorderly conduct and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.

 

Still sticking up for a guy that broke the laws?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Your question: what laws did he break.

 

Response: 

Charges

Entering and remaining and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted bulding; disorderly conduct and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.

 

Still sticking up for a guy that broke the laws?

 

No Gabby.  We have no idea who B-Man's post was referring to do we?  Hence my "assume much?" comment.  

 

Even if we did until he's convicted he is assumed innocent.  That still applies here correct?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

No Gabby.  We have no idea who B-Man's post was referring to do we?  Hence my "assume much?" comment.  

 

Even if we did until he's convicted he is assumed innocent.  That still applies here correct?? 


It was the only indictment the day he posted.

 

Your question: What law did the protestor in B-Man's post break? 

 

I replied. 
 

Let’s dump the assumptions then.

 

Here is all the indictments from 1/6 so far:

 

https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/

 

Which laws are you on with them breaking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Four officers who responded to U.S. Capitol attack have died by suicide

 

Aug 2 (Reuters) - The District of Columbia's police department on Monday said two more police officers who responded to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol have died by suicide, bringing to four the number of known suicides by officers who guarded the building that day.

 

A Capitol Police officer who had been attacked by protesters died the following day. More than 100 police officers were injured.

 

During emotional testimony last week, four police officers told a House of Representatives special committee that they were beaten, threatened, taunted with racial insults, and thought they might die as they struggled to defend the Capitol against the mob.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/officer-who-responded-us-capitol-attack-is-third-die-by-suicide-2021-08-02/


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


It was the only indictment the day he posted.

 

Your question: What law did the protestor in B-Man's post break? 

 

I replied. 
 

Let’s dump the assumptions then.

 

Here is all the indictments from 1/6 so far:

 

https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/

 

Which laws are you on with them breaking!

 

Which one is him?   No need to respond. You don't know.  Think and not assume before you type next time ok. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

INSURRECTION! 

 

As D.C. Murder Rate Soars, FBI Arrests Jan. 6 Protester Who Spent 17 Minutes in the Capitol, Mostly Snapping Selfies.

 

 

 


B-Man.  

@Chef Jim is trying to cook a risotto without rice and is tired of assumptions. Can you tell us which insurrectionist you were referring to so we can figure out which laws he is okay with people breaking? Thanks!

Edited by Backintheday544
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said:


B-Man.  

@Chef Jim is trying to cook a risotto without rice and is tired of assumptions. Can you tell us which insurrectionist you were referring to so we can figure out which laws he is okay with people breaking? Thanks!


A risotto? What’s a risotto?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Wow you must be a chef at McDonalds:

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risotto

 

Do yourself a favor and find a good risotto.

 

Also again deflecting. Do you approve of the laws these people broke?


Dude it’s risotto and not A risotto. I make the best risotto you have likely every eat. So thanks for the wiki page. 🙄
 

Deflecting?  I can’t answer your question.  I’d have to care enough about it to look at all the laws they’ve been charged with breaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Dude it’s risotto and not A risotto. I make the best risotto you have likely every eat. So thanks for the wiki page. 🙄
 

Deflecting?  I can’t answer your question.  I’d have to care enough about it to look at all the laws they’ve been charged with breaking. 


I wrote a thing about how dumb your risotto argument is but deleted it because you’re deflecting . It’s cool that you cook chicken nuggets and don’t know better cooking. I decided to skip that because you’re using a dumb ass right deflection technique.

 

You asked a question, what law did they break.

 

You’ve been presented with many, many people who have been arrested and indicted for breaking the law and with what laws they have broke.

 

You have been pro-support cops. Yet you’re cool with these many many people breaking laws. You haven’t reconciled a very basic question yet.

 

 

Edited by Backintheday544
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Huh. Noice the letter missing at the end of protestor in my post?   
 

Check. 


Ahhh I get it. It’s totally cool. You’re illogically trying to use semantics. 
 

Here let me try to do the same. 
“Noice” my last post, like WTF is that dude I’ll ignore anything you’ve said and just say Noice.

 

You’re moving the goalposts and know you are. @B-Man posted about a law breaker (and really man let us know which one you meant!). 
 

You were obvious curious I which laws he broke. You showed an obvious disregard to math tonight and how hard first grade math is. 

 

You made me obviously question your chef credentials as well.

 

I think it’s best for all that you admit you’re an idiot, it does not matter which insurrectionist bman posted about, there has been reasonable cause to indict the people indicted.

 

On a personal note I get it’s hard for you to reconcile this. You want to be yea pro-cop George Floyd deserved it and all that. But then say what cops shot Babbit!!! They’re terrible but not terrible!

 

Noice dude! Noice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:

 

Did he break the law? Yes or no? Yes he did. He’s also a Republican so he’s an idiot and documented himself breaking the law.


All I did was call you out in this nonsense.  Hell I didn’t even hit the Republican part.  
 

B-Mans post did not even specify who he was talking about. So I was, in my own way, catching you talking out your butt. 
 

Check and mate. 
 

That was easy.  Three moves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Good Lord, I forget to add the link to one story and we get a page and a half of ................................Whatever that was.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jack-dunphy/2021/08/03/as-d-c-murder-rate-soars-fbi-arrests-jan-6-protester-who-spent-17-minutes-in-the-capitol-mostly-snapping-selfies-n1466724

 

Back , it was indeed Glen Allen Brooks, but I think that you are missing the point here.

 

You discuss both things separately, when it is an analogy.

 

( An analogy is comparable to metaphor and simile in that it shows how two different things are similar, but it's a bit more complex. )

 

 

I make no excuses for people who violate the law, but one must question the rationale for expending any of the FBI’s finite resources on arrests such as this.

 

Yes, there were serious crimes committed by some people who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, including assaults on police officers. Brooks is not charged with any such crime. By all means, no effort should be spared in identifying and apprehending those responsible for such acts, but the FBI’s apparent zeal to round up every last person who entered the Capitol that day, regardless of how innocuously they may have behaved while inside, gives the appearance of unfairness. This is especially so when compared to the lack of similar fervor to prosecute those responsible for last year’s nightly attacks on the federal courthouse in Portland, Ore., during which officers were injured and the building repeatedly set ablaze.

 

There have been 114 homicides in Washington, D.C., this year, a 5 percent increase over the same period last year, and based on the Metropolitan Police Department’s past performance, we may assume more than 30 percent of them will go unsolved. 

 

Perhaps the FBI’s time and effort would be of better use in trying to improve these statistics.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Good Lord, I forget to add the link to one story and we get a page and a half of ................................Whatever that was.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jack-dunphy/2021/08/03/as-d-c-murder-rate-soars-fbi-arrests-jan-6-protester-who-spent-17-minutes-in-the-capitol-mostly-snapping-selfies-n1466724

 

Back , it was indeed Glen Allen Brooks, but I think that you are missing the point here.

 

You discuss both things separately, when it is an analogy.

 

( An analogy is comparable to metaphor and simile in that it shows how two different things are similar, but it's a bit more complex. )

 

 

I make no excuses for people who violate the law, but one must question the rationale for expending any of the FBI’s finite resources on arrests such as this.

 

Yes, there were serious crimes committed by some people who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, including assaults on police officers. Brooks is not charged with any such crime. By all means, no effort should be spared in identifying and apprehending those responsible for such acts, but the FBI’s apparent zeal to round up every last person who entered the Capitol that day, regardless of how innocuously they may have behaved while inside, gives the appearance of unfairness. This is especially so when compared to the lack of similar fervor to prosecute those responsible for last year’s nightly attacks on the federal courthouse in Portland, Ore., during which officers were injured and the building repeatedly set ablaze.

 

There have been 114 homicides in Washington, D.C., this year, a 5 percent increase over the same period last year, and based on the Metropolitan Police Department’s past performance, we may assume more than 30 percent of them will go unsolved. 

 

Perhaps the FBI’s time and effort would be of better use in trying to improve these statistics.

 

 

 


You set em up I knock em down. 😂

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ALF said:

Four officers who responded to U.S. Capitol attack have died by suicide

 

Aug 2 (Reuters) - The District of Columbia's police department on Monday said two more police officers who responded to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol have died by suicide, bringing to four the number of known suicides by officers who guarded the building that day.

 

A Capitol Police officer who had been attacked by protesters died the following day. More than 100 police officers were injured.

 

During emotional testimony last week, four police officers told a House of Representatives special committee that they were beaten, threatened, taunted with racial insults, and thought they might die as they struggled to defend the Capitol against the mob.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/officer-who-responded-us-capitol-attack-is-third-die-by-suicide-2021-08-02/


 


The deadly insurrection was so deeply troubling a MPD officer who was deployed to guard an empty capital and enforce kerfew took his life 6 mo later. Shameful how these politicians spin personal tragedies into more political collateral. 

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15771981/meet-capitol-officer-kyle-defreytag-capitol-riot/

Quote

DeFreytag was deployed to protect the Capitol after police cleared the building of rioters and helped enforce a curfew, the department said.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Officers are committing suicide? Forgive me for not understanding what’s being alleged here but is the point that these officers were traumatized by the event or is it that they felt guilty for sympathizing with or assisting in it? Honest question.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Officers are committing suicide? Forgive me for not understanding what’s being alleged here but is the point that these officers were traumatized by the event or is it that they felt guilty for sympathizing with or assisting in it? Honest question.


I’m with you, the political manipulation of the narrative is so thick it’s hard to know reality.  Also interesting 3 of 4 were DC MPD not capital police. Pelosi is going to use every one she can as a political device. 
 

and if dealing with a mob is that traumatizing, there must be fallout from last summers riots that impacted tens of thousands of police. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Officers are committing suicide? Forgive me for not understanding what’s being alleged here but is the point that these officers were traumatized by the event or is it that they felt guilty for sympathizing with or assisting in it? Honest question.

 

The implication is that the event made them commit suicide, therefore they were killed by the protestors.  Just trying to trump-up the events of the day to make it look like an insurrection and not a bunch of idiots breaking into Capitol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

The implication is that the event made them commit suicide, therefore they were killed by the protestors.  Just trying to trump-up the events of the day to make it look like an insurrection and not a bunch of idiots breaking into Capitol.

 

5io68s.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What did Doody too Warm say about the Russian hoax, Pelosi’s comments on the illegitimate election results when Trump won, and Liz Warren’s concerns about election security in 2019?   
 

We need context man. 

 

That's different. :rolleyes:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What did Doody too Warm say about the Russian hoax, Pelosi’s comments on the illegitimate election results when Trump won, and Liz Warren’s concerns about election security in 2019?   
 

We need context man. 


Why didn’t the GQP investigate those concerns?

 

Context? Your boy pissed all over the United States constitution - his oath of office - to throw out the votes of 81,000,000 people.

 

Trump is a crook and you are an anti American idiot going to bat for him traitor.

 

Get out of here with your bs

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:


It was the only indictment the day he posted.

 

Your question: What law did the protestor in B-Man's post break? 

 

I replied. 
 

Let’s dump the assumptions then.

 

Here is all the indictments from 1/6 so far:

 

https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/

 

Which laws are you on with them breaking!


interesting that a number of account detail police open doors, taking selfie’s with the rioters. Wonder if any of these suicides are connected to the feds finding officers participating or at least not fighting back in the body can footage. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...