Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trumpers posting about polls? LOL, you clowns said polls can't be trusted? You guys are just dung

 

Non response to what the poll says...............expected.

 

 

 

 

The Justice Department won’t have January 6 evidence ready until 2022.

by Julie Kelly

 

 

During a status hearing Friday afternoon for Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, an Army reservist arrested on January 15 for his involvement in the January 6 protest in Washington, D.C., an assistant U.S. attorney admitted the government will not meet its discovery obligations for all Capitol defendants until early 2022.

 

Kathyrn Fifield, the lead attorney representing the Justice Department, informed Judge Trevor McFadden that the “incalculable” volume of video collected by the government related to the Capitol breach investigation will prevent defendants and their lawyers from accessing the full body of evidence against them for several more months. “No system exists to wrap its arms around [all this evidence],” Fifield told McFadden. This includes at least 14,000 hours of surveillance video plus thousands of hours of body-worn camera footage from law enforcement.

 

Fifield resisted setting a 2021 trial date for Hale; McFadden and Jonathan Crisp, Hale’s court-appointed attorney, told the government last month that unless a plea arrangement was agreed upon, a trial would be set for later this year because Hale already has been incarcerated for more than six months. “If we do set a trial date, the government cannot meet discovery obligations until early 2022. That’s a conservative estimate,” Fifield said.

 

More at the link: https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/30/unprecedented-unreasonable-unconstitutional-and-wrong/

 

 

 

 

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Non response to what the poll says...............expected.

 

 

 

 

The Justice Department won’t have January 6 evidence ready until 2022.

by Julie Kelly

 

 

During a status hearing Friday afternoon for Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, an Army reservist arrested on January 15 for his involvement in the January 6 protest in Washington, D.C., an assistant U.S. attorney admitted the government will not meet its discovery obligations for all Capitol defendants until early 2022.

 

Kathyrn Fifield, the lead attorney representing the Justice Department, informed Judge Trevor McFadden that the “incalculable” volume of video collected by the government related to the Capitol breach investigation will prevent defendants and their lawyers from accessing the full body of evidence against them for several more months. “No system exists to wrap its arms around [all this evidence],” Fifield told McFadden. This includes at least 14,000 hours of surveillance video plus thousands of hours of body-worn camera footage from law enforcement.

 

Fifield resisted setting a 2021 trial date for Hale; McFadden and Jonathan Crisp, Hale’s court-appointed attorney, told the government last month that unless a plea arrangement was agreed upon, a trial would be set for later this year because Hale already has been incarcerated for more than six months. “If we do set a trial date, the government cannot meet discovery obligations until early 2022. That’s a conservative estimate,” Fifield said.

 

More at the link: https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/30/unprecedented-unreasonable-unconstitutional-and-wrong/

 

 

 

 

So polls are good now?

And sorry, this isn't about polls, its an investigation into a riot to overturn an election. The committee members are doing patriotic work to uncover the work of anti-democratic, violent extremists and to make sure next time around we are better prepared to crush it

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Non response to what the poll says...............expected.

 

 

 

 

The Justice Department won’t have January 6 evidence ready until 2022.

by Julie Kelly

 

 

During a status hearing Friday afternoon for Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, an Army reservist arrested on January 15 for his involvement in the January 6 protest in Washington, D.C., an assistant U.S. attorney admitted the government will not meet its discovery obligations for all Capitol defendants until early 2022.

 

Kathyrn Fifield, the lead attorney representing the Justice Department, informed Judge Trevor McFadden that the “incalculable” volume of video collected by the government related to the Capitol breach investigation will prevent defendants and their lawyers from accessing the full body of evidence against them for several more months. “No system exists to wrap its arms around [all this evidence],” Fifield told McFadden. This includes at least 14,000 hours of surveillance video plus thousands of hours of body-worn camera footage from law enforcement.

 

Fifield resisted setting a 2021 trial date for Hale; McFadden and Jonathan Crisp, Hale’s court-appointed attorney, told the government last month that unless a plea arrangement was agreed upon, a trial would be set for later this year because Hale already has been incarcerated for more than six months. “If we do set a trial date, the government cannot meet discovery obligations until early 2022. That’s a conservative estimate,” Fifield said.

 

More at the link: https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/30/unprecedented-unreasonable-unconstitutional-and-wrong/


By that time no one will care.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So polls are good now?

And sorry, this isn't about polls, its an investigation into a riot to overturn an election. The committee members are doing patriotic work to uncover the work of anti-democratic, violent extremists and to make sure next time around we are better prepared to crush it

You’re crushing it alright Tibs! We need you on that wall….we want you on that wall. Man your post! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doc said:


By that time no one will care.  

     It seems like no one outside of select social media websites care. I am right in the middle of the *****

in a strong blue state...Regular people including democrats are working, vacationing, trying to live their 

lives. No one in the real world gives a f%^ck about politics anymore. People are fed up with it all.

     I'm also convinced that many of the people who voted for biden did it out of fear and resignation, desperate

to  get a semblance of normality back into their lives after democrats, media and the far left had unleashed

utter devastating terrorism and chaos on this nation since hillary ***** on lost.

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

     It seems like no one outside of select social media websites care. I am right in the middle of the *****

in a strong blue state...Regular people including democrats are working, vacationing, trying to live their 

lives. No one in the real world gives a f%^ck about politics anymore. People are fed up with it all.

     I'm also convinced that many of the people who voted for biden did it out of fear and resignation, desperate

to  get a semblance of normality back into their lives after democrats, media and the far left had unleashed

utter devastating terrorism and chaos on this nation since hillary ***** on lost.

Shut up you idiot

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

WHY PELOSI WON’T TOLERATE DISSENT ON HER ‘INSURRECTION’ COMMITTEE.

by Jonathan Tobin

 

https://www.newsweek.com/why-pelosi-wont-tolerate-dissent-her-insurrection-committee-opinion-1613936

 

Perhaps some naive souls believed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision to convene a special committee to investigate the January 6 Capitol riot would afford the country some closure on the traumatic events of that day.

 

It appears that Pelosi has other motives. She and her party have latched onto the disgraceful events of January 6 not merely as a talking point to deploy against former president Donald Trump but as a club with which to beat all Republicans who express concern about election security. Six months after Trump's second impeachment, and following the Senate's failure to approve a 9-11 type commission, Pelosi's dogged insistence on re-litigating the riot was sure to invite debate about a host of issues—including some that don't fit neatly into the Democrats' preferred narrative about an "insurrection."

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Dare I Say That January 6 Was Not an Insurrection?

By Dov Fischer

 

 

The D.C. Capitol Police proved to be incompetent — something we knew already — and failed to set up sufficient barriers. Consequently, a bunch of angry people in the front lines charged the police barricades and got through, and the throng mindlessly followed them. That is what throngs do. They do it at movies, at restaurants, at soccer games, and at heavy metal concerts.

 

They burst into the Capitol because that’s where the throng flowed. For 99 percent of those inside, it was pure curiosity. It was like the people who almost tore down the White House when celebrants thronged to fete the newly elected Andrew Jackson.

 

Remember the guy sitting on Nancy Pelosi’s chair? Do you think he came like John Brown in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, to seize military weapons and incite a national insurrection? Of course not. Be real. The guy was having the time of his life.

 

The people in Washington calling it an insurrection are doing so to justify their own attempt to illegally seize power.

 

 

https://spectator.org/dare-i-say-january-6-was-not-an-insurrection/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

The people in Washington calling it an insurrection are doing so to justify their own attempt to illegally seize power.

 

 

https://spectator.org/dare-i-say-january-6-was-not-an-insurrection/

 

 


Seriously - wtf are you smoking?

 

Illegally seize power? Can you project harder?

 

“just say that the election was corrupt + leave the rest to me and the R Congressmen”

 - Donald J Trump

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2021 at 6:45 PM, 716er said:

 

 

On 7/29/2021 at 7:43 PM, Wacka said:

What dodging?

It took the journalist 11 seconds to ask the question.  
 

Jordan answered “yeah” at 12 seconds and “Yes I spoke with him on January 6” by the 16 second mark.  
 

He was then asked a follow up question, which he answered.  So, the clip is 1 minute and 14 seconds long, both questions asked were answered.  
 

6er, it’s your post.  Where was the dodge?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BillStime said:


You wish they didn’t 

Wrong….your never ending wet dream wishes that they did. You’re a sick person and for unknown reasons Trump has ruined your life. Time to seek counseling. I’m VERY worried about you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Wrong….your never ending wet dream wishes that they did. You’re a sick person and for unknown reasons Trump has ruined your life. Time to seek counseling. I’m VERY worried about you. 

 

Oh...........................................................................ok precious

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


Seriously - wtf are you smoking?

 

Illegally seize power? Can you project harder?

 

“just say that the election was corrupt + leave the rest to me and the R Congressmen”

 - Donald J Trump

 

 

False.

 

NY times. What a surprise. 

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/08/02/nyt-lies-about-trump-again-with-claim-he-pushed-doj-to-declare-election-corrupt/

 

 

On Friday, The New York Times claimed it had obtained the handwritten notes from a post-election meeting between then-President Donald Trump and acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue. Those notes, according to the Times, reveal that when Donoghue “warned that the department had no power to change the outcome of the election,” Trump “replied that he did not expect that.” “‘Just say that the election was corrupt + leave he rest to me’ and to congressional allies,” the Times reported Donoghue’s handwritten notes as stating.

However, a review of the notes from that December 27, 2020 meeting, provided by the Biden administration to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform and posted on the latter’s webpage, expose the Times as once again a purveyor of fake news.

While the Times claimed the above exchange occurred during a phone call in which Trump “pressed” Rosen and Donoghue “on voter fraud claims that the department had disproved,” the “just say that the election was corrupt” comment came in an entirely different portion of the discussion, the handwritten notes establish.

 

Read the article and see the evidence, liar.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Oh...........................................................................ok precious

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

 

 

And there it is again! Have you ever noticed that YOU’RE THE ONE who posts all the pictures of Trump? It’s going be OK…but seriously, time to seek therapy. Unless this man crush of yours is what it’s really all about….precious. 😘

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

False.

 

NY times. What a surprise. 

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/08/02/nyt-lies-about-trump-again-with-claim-he-pushed-doj-to-declare-election-corrupt/

 

 

On Friday, The New York Times claimed it had obtained the handwritten notes from a post-election meeting between then-President Donald Trump and acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue. Those notes, according to the Times, reveal that when Donoghue “warned that the department had no power to change the outcome of the election,” Trump “replied that he did not expect that.” “‘Just say that the election was corrupt + leave he rest to me’ and to congressional allies,” the Times reported Donoghue’s handwritten notes as stating.

However, a review of the notes from that December 27, 2020 meeting, provided by the Biden administration to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform and posted on the latter’s webpage, expose the Times as once again a purveyor of fake news.

While the Times claimed the above exchange occurred during a phone call in which Trump “pressed” Rosen and Donoghue “on voter fraud claims that the department had disproved,” the “just say that the election was corrupt” comment came in an entirely different portion of the discussion, the handwritten notes establish.

 

Read the article and see the evidence, liar.

 

When the NYTimes retracts the claim I'll buy what you're selling from a 25 year old law clerk.

 

LMAO

 

image.thumb.jpeg.6c202f27508c1a1a3fbd962e07fa96a1.jpeg

 

 

 

PS: Good thing we have the select committee up and running - we can subpoena Trump,  Rosen and Donoghue and get to the bottom of this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

When the NYTimes retracts the claim I'll buy what you're selling from a 25 year old law clerk.

 

LMAO

 

image.thumb.jpeg.6c202f27508c1a1a3fbd962e07fa96a1.jpeg

 

 

At least this meme didn’t  feature your secret man crush. You’re making progress. Now….let’s see you go a full day. YOU CAN DO IT!!!

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Dare I Say That January 6 Was Not an Insurrection?

By Dov Fischer

 

 

The D.C. Capitol Police proved to be incompetent — something we knew already — and failed to set up sufficient barriers. Consequently, a bunch of angry people in the front lines charged the police barricades and got through, and the throng mindlessly followed them. That is what throngs do. They do it at movies, at restaurants, at soccer games, and at heavy metal concerts.

 

They burst into the Capitol because that’s where the throng flowed. For 99 percent of those inside, it was pure curiosity. It was like the people who almost tore down the White House when celebrants thronged to fete the newly elected Andrew Jackson.

 

Remember the guy sitting on Nancy Pelosi’s chair? Do you think he came like John Brown in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, to seize military weapons and incite a national insurrection? Of course not. Be real. The guy was having the time of his life.

 

The people in Washington calling it an insurrection are doing so to justify their own attempt to illegally seize power.

 

 

https://spectator.org/dare-i-say-january-6-was-not-an-insurrection/

 

 

 

In other words, mob mentality.   We saw it on January 6th and last summer.

 

Quote

Mob mentality, herd mentality, pack mentality, groupthink, or crowd psychology — the concept has many names. These all boil down to the same idea: Individuals are influenced by a larger group. Regardless of whether that group includes people in your class, your neighborhood, or an entire nation, you may experience mob mentality.

 

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/what-is-a-mob-mentality

 

Of course its still wrong to do things even if part of a mob.  As we learned in grade school, "everyone else was doing it" is not a valid excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Wrong….your never ending wet dream wishes that they did. You’re a sick person and for unknown reasons Trump has ruined your life. Time to seek counseling. I’m VERY worried about you. 

I’m not, he can crawl back under the rock he came from for all I care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...