The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection

[B-Man]

 

 

.

[BillStime]

Trump WH had an ethics lawyer?

 

And they advised Hutchinson to lie?

 

No way

 

 

[BillStime]

The conclusion: “The central cause of January 6th was one man, Donald Trump”.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

We want corruption exposed wherever it leads…

 

Now who said that? 
 

@JaCrispy - that was you!  

 

Aren’t you a bit surprised by this:

 

And this?

 

What were they trying to hide?

Edited December 24, 2022 by BillStime

[JaCrispy]

12 hours ago, BillStime said:

We corruption exposed wherever it leads…

 

Now who said that? 
 

@JaCrispy - that was you!  

 

Aren’t you a bit surprised by this:

 

And this?

 

What were they trying to hide?

Now, I’m no attorney, so I don’t know if those are crimes or not, unless I’m missing something?

 

Im not sure if someone telling someone else not to worry about a reporter, is a thing…

 

And unless certain individuals are legally forbidden from contacting other certain individuals, I’m not sure what the issue is…

 

As far as people wanting to hide things, in political warfare, every politician is trying to hide something…Sometimes it’s legal, sometimes it’s not…But it will always look shady…👍

Edited December 24, 2022 by JaCrispy

[BillStime]

11 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

So, what’s the crime here? Am I missing something?

C’mon man - there are numerous things wrong with this - obstruction and lying under oath is against the law.

 

 

[Orlando Tim]

33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

C’mon man - there are numerous things wrong with this - obstruction and lying under oath is against the law.

 

 

I do appreciate your going all in with the  woman who stated she lied originally and then her correction is all hearsay. Especially when "lunging for the steering wheel" is basically impossible in the Beast. But you do you, and Merry Christmas or whichever holiday you like this time of year.

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, Orlando Tim said:

I do appreciate your going all in with the  woman who stated she lied originally and then her correction is all hearsay. Especially when "lunging for the steering wheel" is basically impossible in the Beast. But you do you, and Merry Christmas or whichever holiday you like this time of year.

Merry Christmas Buffalo Tim

[JaCrispy]

55 minutes ago, BillStime said:

C’mon man - there are numerous things wrong with this - obstruction and lying under oath is against the law.

 

 

Whoever is breaking the law should be prosecuted, period…agreed?

[BillStime]

4 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Whoever is breaking the law should be prosecuted, period…agreed?

Of course 

[Aesop]

What about 5/29? 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

Now, I’m no attorney, so I don’t know if those are crimes or not, unless I’m missing something?

 

Im not sure if someone telling someone else not to worry about a reporter, is a thing…

 

And unless certain individuals are legally forbidden from contacting other certain individuals, I’m not sure what the issue is…

 

As far as people wanting to hide things, in political warfare, every politician is trying to hide something…Sometimes it’s legal, sometimes it’s not…But it will always look shady…👍

 

Now factor in that the US Government has designated your employer as public enemy #1, and telegraphed there is nothing they will not do to take that person down.  They will spend years investigating anyone in his circle, leak details of the investigation to the media to shade the story, execute armed raids, threaten anyone in the circle or their families, offer deals in exchange for cooperation, and when one avenue closes, they simply pursue another.  Consider that the IRS has reviewed, questioned and accepted 50+ years of tax returns and still the narrative is he’s guilty of tax crimes, and that politicians on both sides of the aisle push that narrative.  Consider no collusion, no wrongdoing and political persecution, and the fact that it didn’t matter that nothing was found. 
 

In the end, it’s a forgone conclusion that they will get Trump one way or another. They’ll find something, or find enough to convince a friendly jury.  They’ll break him financially.  They’ll break him emotionally. Maybe his health will be destroyed because of the stress, up to and including his death. 
 

The fact is, it will never end.  The only outside shot is he acquiesces, agrees to not disclose what might be harmful to national interests or embarrassing to DOJ etc, and rides into the sunset.  
 

When you look at the big picture, why would anyone not say whatever the government wanted them to say?  

[All_Pro_Bills]

24 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

Now factor in that the US Government has designated your employer as public enemy #1, and telegraphed there is nothing they will not do to take that person down.  They will spend years investigating anyone in his circle, leak details of the investigation to the media to shade the story, execute armed raids, threaten anyone in the circle or their families, offer deals in exchange for cooperation, and when one avenue closes, they simply pursue another.  Consider that the IRS has reviewed, questioned and accepted 50+ years of tax returns and still the narrative is he’s guilty of tax crimes, and that politicians on both sides of the aisle push that narrative.  Consider no collusion, no wrongdoing and political persecution, and the fact that it didn’t matter that nothing was found. 
 

In the end, it’s a forgone conclusion that they will get Trump one way or another. They’ll find something, or find enough to convince a friendly jury.  They’ll break him financially.  They’ll break him emotionally. Maybe his health will be destroyed because of the stress, up to and including his death. 
 

The fact is, it will never end.  The only outside shot is he acquiesces, agrees to not disclose what might be harmful to national interests or embarrassing to DOJ etc, and rides into the sunset.  
 

When you look at the big picture, why would anyone not say whatever the government wanted them to say?  

In short, an abuse of power where they investigate a targeted person, attempt to build a case, take "evidence" and assemble it in search of a crime rather than the traditional law enforcement practices and procedures of investigating a crime, gathering and analyzing evidence, looking for suspects and motive, and identifying the perpetrator. 

Edited December 24, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills

[Westside]

All of this is ok to bstime and tibs and chigoose. They see nothing wrong with harassing and terrorizing their political opponents. 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

16 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

In short, an abuse of power where they investigate a targeted person, attempt to build a case, take "evidence" and assemble it in search of a crime rather than the traditional law enforcement practices and procedures of investigating a crime, gathering and analyzing evidence, looking for suspects and motive, and identifying the perpetrator. 

How dare you, sir!  
 

But yes, that is a shorter version. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[BillStime]

🎯

 

 

[njbuff]

22 hours ago, Westside said:

All of this is ok to bstime and tibs and chigoose. They see nothing wrong with harassing and terrorizing their political opponents. 

Are you expecting something nice and/or intelligent from a bunch of half wits???

[Westside]

1 hour ago, njbuff said:

Are you expecting something nice and/or intelligent from a bunch of half wits???

No, just hope they stop being hypocrites.

[njbuff]

4 hours ago, Westside said:

No, just hope they stop being hypocrites.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Tiberius]

For those of you that care about our republic and Constitution: 

 

 

[Doc]

LOL!  That landed with as much of a thud as Trump's taxes.

[Tommy Callahan]

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

For those of you that care about our republic and Constitution: 

 

 

Epic seeing the left talk democracy and the republic while sharing war mongering Bill Kristols dreams of the state attacking the opposition to the establishment.

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

23 hours ago, Westside said:

No, just hope they stop being hypocrites.

 

You might as well hope that the sun rise in the west tomorrow. 

[BillStime]

 

[Tommy Callahan]

LOL, and now its Raw story.

 

if its not some shady PAC, it's a site that's never even attempted journalism.

 

but explains a lot.

 

 

[BillStime]

9 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LOL, and now its Raw story.

 

if its not some shady PAC, it's a site that's never even attempted journalism.

 

but explains a lot.

 

 

 

Oh c'mon - you would have loved if it had come from Breitbart or REDSTATE, right?

 

Idiot tries so hard. 

 

 

[Tommy Callahan]

31 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Oh c'mon - you would have loved if it had come from Breitbart or REDSTATE, right?

 

Idiot tries so hard. 

 

 

yes you are trying really hard.

 

they all the same silly.  

[BillStime]

Audio

 

 

[Westside]

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Audio

 

 

Nobody gives a damn. Now let’s do hunters laptop and see how much the “big guy” made?

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, Westside said:

Nobody gives a damn. Now let’s do hunters laptop and see how much the “big guy” made?

Nobody cares but here you are… lolz 

 

And yet - Hunters laptop has been dangling in front of voters for 2 plus years and the voters have not once but twice said:

 

Who the F cares?

 

And btw - why do you care so much about Hunters laptop yet conveniently look the other way when it comes to all of the corruption associated with the Trump administration? The amount of money the Trump org over charged the US government and taxpayers? Ivanka’s Chinese trademarks? The Saudis $2 BILLION donation to Jared’s PE firm? How much of that went to the big fat guy? 
 

Keep crying about Hunters laptop - it’s cute.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

Someone smell guilt?

 

 

 

[Orlando Tim]

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

[Doc]

58 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

 

They don't care.  And neither does anyone else about J6 anymore.  Just they don't care about the Summer of 2020.

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

So you don't care Trump tried to violently steal the election, correct? 

[Orlando Tim]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you don't care Trump tried to violently steal the election, correct? 

Violently? Ok nice job of lying to avoid the question. 

[Tiberius]

40 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Violently? Ok nice job of lying to avoid the question. 

Oh, Jan 6 wasn't violent? 

 

Ok 😩

[ChiGoose]

2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

13 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 

So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal?  
 

Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political?  Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery?  More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful? 

[BillStime]

29 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 

Who had the most to benefit if they were successful? 

[ChiGoose]

23 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal?  
 

Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political?  Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery?  More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful? 

Obviously there are going to be politics involved, it’s Congress. The question was whether is was purely political, which I do not believe is true. 
 

We only have reporting on Cheney keeping the focus on Trump, so I can only speculate as to why Bennie Thompson would accept her demands. Maybe it was to keep the committee working together and prevent fracturing. I dunno. I haven’t read the full report yet but I heard it doesn’t mention Ginni Thomas at all. I’d imagine that was at Cheney’s insistence as well.

 

In the end, people will likely just believe what they want to believe anyway.